Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Raiders' GM Begins The Purge

The Tape: Third Quarter, Placing Brian Russell in the Crosshairs

Something came up this morning that ate the ass end off my time for today, so I'm going to have to push the fourth quarter and overtime posts back to tomorrow. Today we'll handle the third quarter and cover the DVOA when it arrives. The third quarter didn't have a ton of interesting plays or play calls. The most noteworthy decisions were John Marshall deciding to crank up the blitzes (that's good) and Mike Holmgren shelving the run with a big lead and an ailing quarterback (that's bad). The most noticeable Hawks' plays were Babineaux once again blowing coverage, allowing Kellen Winslow to convert a third and 8 on a drive that led to a game-changing touchdown for the Browns. And one vexing PI call against Brian Russell, which got me thinking...

Think when he decides to play bad: I was not very high on the Brian Russell signing. At the time I didn't even think he'd make the starting squad. Through training camp and into the preseason it became clear that Russell would be the starter and Michael Boulware's days as a Hawk were over. I was still pretty iffy on Russell - in part because of a natural distrust of players whose "leadership" is touted well above any particular skill or accomplishment. But the defense was playing well, the deep pass wasn't the bugaboo it had been for so many years and it's just plain hard to evaluate the play of a free safety.

Eight games into the season, it's time we start asking ourselves "what is Brian Russell doing?"

I back through the entire season's play-by-play (provided by CBS) and recorded every play Russell was listed beside. That encompassed an interception, 3 pass defenses and 38 tackles. For each I recorded the total yardage recorded on the play. The interception and 3 pass defenses each earned 0s. I also recorded if the play was successful or not. First let's establish a baseline. Pro Football Prospectus records very similar stats for all defenders, my 2006 copy was most handy so I grabbed a couple players from it: A Pro Bowler and a Castaway.

Brian Dawkins:

Target: 14% (6th out of 75)

Pass Stop: 53% (33)

Pass Yards: 7.4 (28)

Rush Stop: 46% (24)

Rush Yards: 7.2 (41)

Michael Boulware:

Target: 10% (29)

Pass Stop:  51% (39)

Pass Yards: 9.2 (51)

Run Stop: 33% (47)

Run Yards: 8.4 (51)

Boulware had a decent season, it was 2005 and everything was right in the world of the Seahawks. I provided his data instead of someone who performed worse, because Boulware is the player Russell replaced. It's important to look at these stats together. For instance, if a player's target number is high, he may simply be making up for the failings of others, something important to consider when looking at his Stop Rates and Average Yardage rankings. If his Stop Rate is good, but his average yardage bad, that might indicate his team was able to force their opponent into long yardage situations. Remember, allowing a 17 yard completion on 3 and 20 is a success. And if a player's stop rate is middling or poor, but their total yards allowed rate is poor or worse, it might be a good indication that that player is not only allowing a lot of successful plays, but big yardage plays. That's Boulware. Of course when a player is bad in all categories...

Brian Russell:

Target: 9.6% (estimated)

Pass Stop: 18%

Pass Yards: 13.4

Run Stop: 29%

Run Yards: 11.7

That's staggering. Russell must be one of, if not the worst safety in football in all four ratings. When we gripe about opponents converting long third downs, the poor use of zones, and uninspired blitz packages, we might be missing the forest for the tree. A full 21% of Russell's tackles are 20+ yards downfield. Russell is consistently playing so soft, so conservatively, that he's accomplishing little more than preventing the homerun. None of this should be terribly surprising. Russell is a journeyman FS who's been let go by some iffy pass defenses. With two other viable free safeties on roster, it's time Russell's job security is a least questioned.

Comment 18 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

interesting stuff
"With two other viable free safeties on roster"

I assume you are talking about Babs and Mike Green?

I wasn't impressed with Babs as a safety last season, so I'm not sure that change would make a huge difference.

I would however like to see Green get a better opportunity.  I thought he made a couple of nice plays on Sunday.  I don't think Green is good or anything, but he could be an improvement.

I don't know.  I'm so/so on Russell, I don't think he's that great, but do we really have better options?

Josh Brown is better than you. The Rest of the team is worse.

by MFAN on Nov 6, 2007 2:18 PM PST reply actions  

I'm not sure. Maybe not.
The former Mr. Irrelevant Mike Green was once a very good player, but he's been bitten by injuries and is nearing 31. I actually wasn't referring to Babs, but C.J. Wallace, who was good in the preseason but whose skills in coverage are pretty much unknown (by me that is). I was a proponent of giving Josh Wilson some looks at free safety, it certainly seems to fit his skill set better than cornerback. The question I guess is, what's worse than possibly worst in the league?

by John Morgan on Nov 6, 2007 2:26 PM PST up reply actions  

good point
I guess I didn't realize Russell was THAT bad.  I knew he wasn't great (or even good), I just thought he was the typical generic safety.

I didn't even think about Wallace.  I always liked him a UW, but he seems like an all or nothing player.  He might make some real nice plays, but I could also see him struggling going for picks and big hits instead of playing it safe.

One idea I think could work: Move Grant back to FS, and put Wallace at his natural SS position.  I think Wallace could be a real asset against the run and Grant can do his thing at Free Safety.

Josh Brown is better than you. The Rest of the team is worse.

by MFAN on Nov 6, 2007 2:32 PM PST up reply actions  

Agreed.
You get a two for one bonus there, too. Grant plays his natural position and Russell is removed from the starting lineup. Or, if you want to be particularly inspired, run a Safety rotation. Put Russell against deep passing teams, or teams that are in a game situation where they need to pass deep. Put Wallace in for blitzes, obvious running downs - the like. I don't see any reason a team couldn't platoon almost every defensive position. Why stop on the line? I've long advocated that Hill be subbed during passing downs (though his ability as a pass defender has improved). Look what a rotation has down for our defensive line. The Hawks don't have a single marquee defensive lineman, but an overall very good defensive line.

by John Morgan on Nov 6, 2007 2:38 PM PST up reply actions  

Purple Dishwasher Something Something
John, you put the 'anal' in 'analysis'. Props.

Having said that, I'll take the safety that doesn't give up the deep pass. Boulware made me cry like a schoolgirl too many times.

by Bloof on Nov 6, 2007 2:26 PM PST reply actions  

I saw this more in the Cleveland game
and it was probably to try to cover Winslow but we were running Green, Russel and Grant out there all at the same time. Was Grant playing OLB at that point?

Also I don't see why Russell is always the blitzing safety

V. 1.0, mutherf***er, know what I'm sayin'?

by Scruffy Lefty on Nov 6, 2007 2:31 PM PST reply actions  

I don't know if your numbers can really be
definitive by using the play by play. But you should look back at your game charts and really focus on Brian and what he is doing.
V. 1.0, mutherf***er, know what I'm sayin'?

by Scruffy Lefty on Nov 6, 2007 2:33 PM PST reply actions  

Here's the thing...
Even on the charts, he's almost invisible. He doesn't blow a lot of coverages, he doesn't record a lot of good covers. He rarely even appears on screen until it's too late. That's what you see in the play-by-play. If I could see the entire field on every play, I would guess I would see Russell playing very deep on many plays. I understand that as a safety his first priority is to prevent long gains, but though he may be removing many homerun, TD scoring plays, he's not preventing first downs. Simply, he's bending too much - way too much.

by John Morgan on Nov 6, 2007 2:42 PM PST up reply actions  

Wouldn't that suggest this is a
Jim Mora problem more than a Brian Russell problem?

by sammy on Nov 6, 2007 2:50 PM PST up reply actions  

Could be a Marshall problem also
I'm not sure who actually aligns the defense when it come to games . Wether the coordinator does it or each coach is in charge of his unit.

Anyone have this info I would like to know who to point the blame at.

V. 1.0, mutherf***er, know what I'm sayin'?

by Scruffy Lefty on Nov 6, 2007 2:57 PM PST up reply actions  

Now that I think of it
the only time I see him on TV is when he is failing to get to the QB on a blitz
V. 1.0, mutherf***er, know what I'm sayin'?

by Scruffy Lefty on Nov 6, 2007 2:54 PM PST up reply actions  

I really like the platoon idea
I think having Russell play in the obvious long-passing downs is a good idea.

One play that comes to mind was the Chargers game last season where Boulware blew the coverage and the Chargers scored the TD to win the game.  That is the type of play where having Russell could really help.

I don't really trust Wallace or Wilson on deep coverage, and I could see them getting burned (Wallace more than Wilson).

This next game might be a good one to give Wallace some time at strong safety against a niners team that is probably try and "gore" us to death.

Josh Brown is better than you. The Rest of the team is worse.

by MFAN on Nov 6, 2007 2:57 PM PST reply actions  

Jimmimoose and I have been bitching about
Russell since week 1 I think. It seems like he's either playing WAAAAY too deep, or flat out missing his coverage.
I reject your reality and substitute my own!

by Phil Hatzenbuehler on Nov 6, 2007 3:05 PM PST reply actions  

Move over SA
FG has a new whipping boy
V. 1.0, mutherf***er, know what I'm sayin'?

by Scruffy Lefty on Nov 6, 2007 3:11 PM PST reply actions  

Hip hip Hooray!!!
I was really looking forward to a new guppy.

I really liked Russel until now.  I did notice that we are giving up a lot of wide... WIDE open catches down field.

I would be interested to see some of the numbers on Jennings.  Specifically his numbers when he is playing zone on 3rd down.  Seems to me that he is targeted a lot but it may just be they are avoiding Tru and not targeting Jennings.  

To me it's hard to pick on Russel for being a guy that makes tackles down field.....isn't that his job?

Let's not run anymore.... EVER!

by The Manchild on Nov 6, 2007 4:09 PM PST reply actions  

Okay, upon request.
Here's what I have charted for Russell.

Penetrations: 3
Tips: 1
Good Coverages: 1
Blown Coverages: 2
Broken Tackles: 3

"Where is he?"
"Very Good Containment."
"Russell needs to figure out how to cover."

Something to consider: Marshall, Mora, may have him playing too deep, but if he still has NFL caliber speed, he should be able to break on some plays and still get involved. Russell's only consistent contribution is cleanup tackles and preventing touchdowns. That's not without value, just not much value.

by John Morgan on Nov 6, 2007 4:17 PM PST reply actions  

Lamentations
It makes me sad that the 'Hawks' mediocrity is wasting Walter Jones' waning years of productivity, and probably the end of Beck's best years.  But what frustrates me more is what the failure of the defense to prevent the third-and-long completions is doing to our stud LBs.  I really enjoy watching each of those guys play, but the defense overall is made relatively pedestrian because of scheme or lack of safety talent or something.  I just don't get it.  I guess if it were easy to put together a winning NFL team, though, guys like me would do it.

by jeager on Nov 6, 2007 4:59 PM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SEA!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Avatar_small
The Official Field Gulls OT Thread - In Which We Gush About Our Favorite TV Shows

Recent FanPosts

Photo_on_2011-10-14_at_23
Jim Harbaugh Vs. Pete Carroll
Small
Nation Wide Mock Draft
Small
Could Dre Kirkpatrick be the key to our 2012 draft?
Einstein_www-txt2pic-com_small
Seahawks QB Situation: Not a Defense for Tarvaris Jackson
Small
Team Needs - The National Perception of Seattle
Small
2012 Mock Draft, Version 1.0
Walshrun_small
Super Bowl XLVI Reaction: New England Patriots
Small
My Friend has a Friend who works for Nike...
208114_505637750968_23709013_30160241_9483_n_small
GM John Schneider On The Ideal QB
Bodypaint_small
Delocated ad

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editor/Lead Writer

284430_601240951600_44900771_32958650_2317286_n_small Danny Kelly

Staff Writers/Editors

Screen_shot_2011-01-05_at_9 Scruffy Lefty

Small BrianL

Avatar_small Benne

Olympiabeer_small Tyler Jorgensen

Hatersgonnahate_small Thomas Beekers

Profilepic_small DJ C-Raig

897267_o_small Kenneth Arthur

Halloween_mobster_small Jacson Bevens

Photo__1__small Charlie Todaro

Staff Writers

Small Joshua Kasparek

Mail Matt Erickson

Davis_small Davis Hsu

Profile2_small Rob Staton

208114_505637750968_23709013_30160241_9483_n_small Scott Enyeart

Elephant_pink_clothes_small Chris Sully

Seattle_seahawk_white_1600_reasonably_small_small Derek Stephens

Osprey1_small Ben Harbaugh

Easleystreet2_small ChadDavis45

Bu_fb_2_small Daniel Hill