State of the Blog
I know those four words rarely mean anything good, but that's not the case today. Actually, I just wanted to solicit readers' opinions about what they like, what they don't like and what they'd like to see on Field Gulls. I'm especially interested in hearing from individuals who have never posted before. I know some bloggers are very autocratic, and given the origins of blogging that's understandable, but I'm not that way. I'm interested in everyone's opinions.
On a slightly separate note, I think I've figured out a manageable schedule for posts. I've decided for the sake of readability and my own time constraints I'm placing a soft cap of 800 words on my posts. That also gives me extra time to edit my posts, something I never do enough. It's a soft cap, so if something absolutely demands a longer post...
I would like to get back to doing Podcasts. To anyone who listened to my preseason Podcasts, what did you think?
Also I don't want this to turn into a kvetch fest. I don't mind complaints, but try and not rag on me or anyone else--I promise you I know my shortcomings better than most.
0 recs |
18
comments
Comments
Hey John I really dig this blog and your analysis
by Harrison on Sep 19, 2007 10:40 AM PDT 0 recs
I am really liking the blog
by Man From Nantucket on Sep 19, 2007 10:50 AM PDT 0 recs
I visit this site at least 4 times a week.
Now, don't take this to mean I'd like a more technical format. If this were all x's and o's it'd be informitive but bo-ring. Keep up the combo of technical analysis and colorful commentary.
I didn't get to catch the podcasts, so no feedback on that for you.
by Saluboy on Sep 19, 2007 12:41 PM PDT 0 recs
I don't comment often,
I liked the podcasts in the preseason- my only advice would be to mix in a few more jokes here and there to keep yourself and the listeners engaged.
Again, keep it up, I dig it!
by Cornflakes on Sep 19, 2007 1:17 PM PDT 0 recs
Add videos to the podcast!!! :)
by Scruffy Lefty on Sep 19, 2007 1:55 PM PDT 0 recs
John Morgan
by Eegah on Sep 19, 2007 1:59 PM PDT 0 recs
Great job
by dartjeff on Sep 19, 2007 2:49 PM PDT 0 recs
Something every football blog needs...
by Bloof on Sep 19, 2007 3:21 PM PDT 0 recs
Things sittin' pretty
Things I particularly like in the blog:
- The breakdowns (by half or quarter) following a game, noticing specific plays and their import.
- Your seeming unique ability to blend recognition of individual matchups vs. team play (meaning that while you can tell us a lot about Levi Brown facing Kearney, you put that into a larger context).
- The Video Previews. Easily one of the bigger laughs in my week.
Perhaps a comprehensive database where we can all post our weekly picks, keep track of our overall records, etc etc? One of the more enjoyable aspects of the football season, there are just the right number of games for ability in "pickin' 'em" to show, but not too many to pick every game.
Also, I don't know if you have anything along these lines, but with as much as you know about offensive philosophy construction, perhaps you'd care to show us a diagrammed play or two that you design specifically for the Hawks?
Overall, we're very lucky to have you. It's a pleasure reading your stuff, I'm here more than once a day, usually.
ps, I'll be posting more this season than last, as I think you can maybe guess.
by jimmimoose on Sep 19, 2007 3:24 PM PDT 0 recs
Lurker
by pope on Sep 19, 2007 3:47 PM PDT 0 recs
Great Blog
I don't really see anything you need to improve on here. All of your analysis is pretty spot on. Although, maybe using graphics or videos along with your recaps would help strengthen your points, although I suppose that might bring up copyright issues. Aside from that, I don't see many areas you could improve upon as this is already a great site. Keep up the good work.
by thebiz on Sep 19, 2007 6:42 PM PDT 0 recs
chiming in
In other words, I've really enjoyed everything I've seen on the site; the matchups are particularly useful in teaching me new things about football, more so even than FO. The recaps are also awesome, especially since I live in Boston and only get to see a Hawks game about twice a year.
So, keep up the good work, any new content would be goodness for me, but don't get burned out, my dissertation needs you!
by helpless optimist on Sep 20, 2007 7:10 AM PDT 0 recs
My non-cents
I have learned more about football here than I did being an avid fan my whole life. I go to games now and educate everyone on all the match-ups and defensive sets and act like I thought it all up. I love it. You could charge a fee for this site. I appreciate the effort and time you put in. You should be proud.
Having said that. If I read "bench Alexander" in favor of Momo one more time I might have to vomit. It actually takes the joy out of the site for me to agree with your analysis on so many levels and then read that time and time again. I'm not a Shaun lover but to say Momo is a better option is criminal.
Again, GREAT SITE!!!! best I've seen.
I suggest this line "Shaun's run is coming to a close.... draft a RB in 'O8"
by The Manchild on Sep 20, 2007 2:44 PM PDT 0 recs
I respect that.
I guess my bigger point is that the "workhorse" or "feature" back are a relic of the past. Smart teams split carries both because it extends the life of a rusher and because it gives opponents different looks. So if I said "Bench Alexander" which I know I did, I didn't mean he shouldn't get the most of the carries or any carries, just not all of them. Assuming thirty touches, I would like to see something like this: Alexander 14, Morris 8, Weaver 5, Pearman 3. Alexander gets all the looks in the red zone. Morris gets more work between the twenties. Weaver and Pearman get looks in third down and obvious passing situations.
by John Morgan on
Sep 20, 2007 6:38 PM PDT
up
0 recs
While this is the way it should be
by Christian on
Sep 21, 2007 10:09 AM PDT
up
0 recs









