Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Explaining Jeremy Lin's Early, Surprising Success

2007 Season Review: Deion Branch

When I ran the 2006 season reviews, the emphasis was on what the player had accomplished that season. I started this season as the lead blogger for Field Gulls rather than as a mid-season replacement, so have had ample chance to comment on each and every player's performance throughout the season. Therefore, this year's season reviews will concentrate on what the player can do next season. It might be odd, then, that we would start the season with someone that might not contribute at all next season, but that might be more up in the air than you think.

Let's first talk about how Deion Branch was acquired, and a certain pervasive thinking that Branch's recent injury is proof that his was a bad signing. In week 2 of the 2006 season, Tim Ruskell and the Seattle Seahawks traded their first round pick for Deion Branch. Branch was the 12th most valuable receiver in football in 2005, a relatively known commodity, whose skill set matched Mike Holmgren's preferred offense, and who's character and commitment matched Ruskell's preferred roster construction. A big part of the impetus to move Branch was Darrell Jackson, his mounting injuries, and the fact that Ruskell clearly had no desire to retain him, much less extend his contract. At the time of the trade, if one player between Jackson and Branch could be forecast to miss the 2008 season due to injury, it would Jackson. Branch was then signed to a 6 year, 39 million $ contract. The contract is somewhat backloaded, with 13 million guaranteed. Because the team traded a first round pick and then subsequently signed Branch to a relatively large contract, many have transmuted the two moves into one package of moves daunting in their enormity. That is, now that Branch is injured. But, if viewed from the standpoint of when the trade was made, it makes perfect sense. Seattle had an oft-injured #1 receiver on his way out, and no clear backup within the organization. It was one-year removed from the Super Bowl and considered itself a contender with a potentially shrinking window. It ran an offense that could be intimidating for young receivers - a position with more than a few first-round flameouts. The team had cap room to spare, and Ruskell devised a contract that burnt unused cap for the 2006 season, and left a relatively unburdensome cap number for its remainder. The move allowed Seattle to move Darrel Jackson for a 4th round selection, that then allowed them to draft a potential defensive end of the future, or a potential starting guard of the future, depending on which player between Baraka Atkins and Mansfield Wrotto you think Seattle valued more.

Still, whatever the initial motivation for the contract, Branch is indubitably a bust now. He's recorded two disappointing seasons and may now miss the entirety of 2008. Seattle somehow replaced D-Jack with someone even more injury riddled. The ACL injury is especially worrisome for Branch, because agility is Branch's premiere quality as a receiver. Branch is neither large nor capable of fighting for the jump ball, and the day he can no longer make precise cuts, or explode for run after the catch, is the day that he's no longer a viable NFL receiver. If Branch suffered more than a simple torn ACL, suffered further ligament or even cartilage damage, it's probable that his career is over or near over.

And that opens my speculation about Branch not just as a Seahawk, but as an NFL player. Information is, naturally, scarce about the nature and extent of Branch's injury. Without that, everything else is guesswork, but, because Branch's injury was caused by cutting, rather than a severe blow to the side of his knee, it is very likely that he suffered a "clean tear" and did not suffer damage to his MCL or surrounding cartilage. If that's the case, and it likely is, then what matters most for Deion Branch is his ability to regain his sense of his knee. His proprioception, or sense of one's own body in space. After 6 months an ACL transplant is fully healed, but an athlete can take much longer to be able to regain his ability to use the repaired body part properly. Here are some benchmarks to look for that will give us some indication as to how Branch is healing: At 6 weeks the bone has attached to the graft, Branch should be able to walk on his own at this point. Therefore, 6 weeks after Branch has surgery, he should be able to start physical therapy. Any delay is a very bad sign. At 12 weeks "the patient can typically begin a more aggressive regimine of exercises involving stress on the knee, and increasing resistance." At 4 months Branch should be able to run. Assuming he undergoes the treatment in the next few weeks, that should allow for him to participate in training camp. That should be the first conclusive report we get about just how well Branch is doing. Don't worry about reports as to Branch's straight line speed or receiving, all that matters is his ability to cut and run routes.

Deion Branch has a murky and by no means positive outlook for the 2008 season. Any way he contributes would be positive. But though Tim Ruskell has certainly not had the same success signing offensive talent as he's had signing defensive talent, Branch is not a good example of where he's gone wrong (Chris Spencer is a far more appropriate). Still, like the Steve Hutchinson debacle before, a small mistake has blown up in Ruskell's face, and become a lightning rod for criticism. Branch may yet recover, may enjoy a triumphant return not unlike Joey Galloway, but for now, he's little more than sunk cost and a wasted draft pick.

Comment 9 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

It's painful that we lost that 1 rd.pick --
it could've been spent on upgrading our O-Line.

by redwolf75 on Jan 17, 2008 3:08 PM PST reply actions  

I still don't have a problem with the Deal
It just sucks that he has been hurt both years
V. 1.0, mutherf***er, know what I'm sayin'?

by Scruffy Lefty on Jan 17, 2008 6:00 PM PST reply actions  

Agreed.
I still think it was a smart deal. The fact that he's been so oft-injured is why I have my head in my hands now.

by SpokaneSHAWK on Jan 18, 2008 8:03 AM PST up reply actions  

ditto
Josh Brown is better than you. The Rest of the team is worse.

by MFAN on Jan 18, 2008 10:43 AM PST up reply actions  

2008
So what does this mean for 2008? Can the Seahawks manage a Super Bowl run with Engram, Hackett, Burleson, and... Obomanu? If not, what changes do you think need to be made? When I look at age as the determining factor, I'm optimistic for Hackett and Burleson -- not so much for Engram.

by Runnin on Jan 18, 2008 12:48 AM PST reply actions  

Hindsight
I think John's analysis is correct: Branch deal was a decent to good one when made, but a turd now.  While folks say it's unfair to judge personnel decisions in hindsight, that's the only way we can do it, time being linear and all.  

I'm not so sure that Chris Spencer is such a problem.  I think he may yet end up being a Pro Bowl center.  As John has noted, he improved quite a bit over this past season.  Certainly, however, anything less than Pro Bowl would be a disappointment after using a first round pick at that position.

by jeager on Jan 18, 2008 7:08 AM PST reply actions  

Spencer is supposed to have Surgery
On his shoulder and thumb. So I'm curious if the injuries were really a factor during the season or not.
V. 1.0, mutherf***er, know what I'm sayin'?

by Scruffy Lefty on Jan 18, 2008 7:54 AM PST up reply actions  

What exactly
would be the "small mistake" Ruskell made?  I don't see any mistakes, just the inevitable risk that comes with doing anything at all--or, for that matter, with doing nothing.

As for Spencer, I'm with jeager:  the way Spencer finished out the year, I'm optimistic that his problems were related to past injuries, and that he can be a force in the middle of the line going forward (as long as he can stay reasonably healthy, anyway).

by The Ancient Mariner on Jan 18, 2008 12:59 PM PST reply actions  

Even if things broke right, it was still too...
much in total resources to spend on a 27 y/o wr w/ only one year experience as a #1. Late first round and early second round picks are your best bang for buck picks in the entire draft. So instead of signing a younger player at a more premium position for a few million, he signed an older player at a relatively fungible position for 39 million. I can understand his thinking, but I think it was a mistake, albeit small.

I maintain that drafting Spencer, a center, with your first round pick was a pretty big mistake. Centers, quality, Pro Bowl centers can be attained throughout the draft or in free agency. Center, more than any other line position, is about smarts: line calls, picking up free blitzers, knowing how to combo block etc. Spencer only played center one season in college, and, predictably, has struggled w/ the details. To justify a first round selection, Spencer would almost have to be a Pro Bowler. Spencer didn't look like a Pro Bowler coming out of college, and as-is, is about a below average center. That, again, is just not a good use of resources.

by John Morgan on Jan 18, 2008 1:49 PM PST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SEA!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Avatar_small
The Official Field Gulls OT Thread - In Which We Gush About Our Favorite TV Shows

Recent FanPosts

Photo_on_2011-10-14_at_23
Jim Harbaugh Vs. Pete Carroll
Small
Nation Wide Mock Draft
Small
Could Dre Kirkpatrick be the key to our 2012 draft?
Einstein_www-txt2pic-com_small
Seahawks QB Situation: Not a Defense for Tarvaris Jackson
Small
Team Needs - The National Perception of Seattle
Small
2012 Mock Draft, Version 1.0
Walshrun_small
Super Bowl XLVI Reaction: New England Patriots
Small
My Friend has a Friend who works for Nike...
208114_505637750968_23709013_30160241_9483_n_small
GM John Schneider On The Ideal QB
Bodypaint_small
Delocated ad

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editor/Lead Writer

284430_601240951600_44900771_32958650_2317286_n_small Danny Kelly

Staff Writers/Editors

Screen_shot_2011-01-05_at_9 Scruffy Lefty

Small BrianL

Avatar_small Benne

Olympiabeer_small Tyler Jorgensen

Hatersgonnahate_small Thomas Beekers

Profilepic_small DJ C-Raig

897267_o_small Kenneth Arthur

Halloween_mobster_small Jacson Bevens

Photo__1__small Charlie Todaro

Staff Writers

Small Joshua Kasparek

Mail Matt Erickson

Davis_small Davis Hsu

Profile2_small Rob Staton

208114_505637750968_23709013_30160241_9483_n_small Scott Enyeart

Elephant_pink_clothes_small Chris Sully

Seattle_seahawk_white_1600_reasonably_small_small Derek Stephens

Osprey1_small Ben Harbaugh

Easleystreet2_small ChadDavis45

Bu_fb_2_small Daniel Hill