Field Gulls: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:





2007 Season Review: Deion Branch

When I ran the 2006 season reviews, the emphasis was on what the player had accomplished that season. I started this season as the lead blogger for Field Gulls rather than as a mid-season replacement, so have had ample chance to comment on each and every player's performance throughout the season. Therefore, this year's season reviews will concentrate on what the player can do next season. It might be odd, then, that we would start the season with someone that might not contribute at all next season, but that might be more up in the air than you think.

Let's first talk about how Deion Branch was acquired, and a certain pervasive thinking that Branch's recent injury is proof that his was a bad signing. In week 2 of the 2006 season, Tim Ruskell and the Seattle Seahawks traded their first round pick for Deion Branch. Branch was the 12th most valuable receiver in football in 2005, a relatively known commodity, whose skill set matched Mike Holmgren's preferred offense, and who's character and commitment matched Ruskell's preferred roster construction. A big part of the impetus to move Branch was Darrell Jackson, his mounting injuries, and the fact that Ruskell clearly had no desire to retain him, much less extend his contract. At the time of the trade, if one player between Jackson and Branch could be forecast to miss the 2008 season due to injury, it would Jackson. Branch was then signed to a 6 year, 39 million $ contract. The contract is somewhat backloaded, with 13 million guaranteed. Because the team traded a first round pick and then subsequently signed Branch to a relatively large contract, many have transmuted the two moves into one package of moves daunting in their enormity. That is, now that Branch is injured. But, if viewed from the standpoint of when the trade was made, it makes perfect sense. Seattle had an oft-injured #1 receiver on his way out, and no clear backup within the organization. It was one-year removed from the Super Bowl and considered itself a contender with a potentially shrinking window. It ran an offense that could be intimidating for young receivers - a position with more than a few first-round flameouts. The team had cap room to spare, and Ruskell devised a contract that burnt unused cap for the 2006 season, and left a relatively unburdensome cap number for its remainder. The move allowed Seattle to move Darrel Jackson for a 4th round selection, that then allowed them to draft a potential defensive end of the future, or a potential starting guard of the future, depending on which player between Baraka Atkins and Mansfield Wrotto you think Seattle valued more.

Still, whatever the initial motivation for the contract, Branch is indubitably a bust now. He's recorded two disappointing seasons and may now miss the entirety of 2008. Seattle somehow replaced D-Jack with someone even more injury riddled. The ACL injury is especially worrisome for Branch, because agility is Branch's premiere quality as a receiver. Branch is neither large nor capable of fighting for the jump ball, and the day he can no longer make precise cuts, or explode for run after the catch, is the day that he's no longer a viable NFL receiver. If Branch suffered more than a simple torn ACL, suffered further ligament or even cartilage damage, it's probable that his career is over or near over.

And that opens my speculation about Branch not just as a Seahawk, but as an NFL player. Information is, naturally, scarce about the nature and extent of Branch's injury. Without that, everything else is guesswork, but, because Branch's injury was caused by cutting, rather than a severe blow to the side of his knee, it is very likely that he suffered a "clean tear" and did not suffer damage to his MCL or surrounding cartilage. If that's the case, and it likely is, then what matters most for Deion Branch is his ability to regain his sense of his knee. His proprioception, or sense of one's own body in space. After 6 months an ACL transplant is fully healed, but an athlete can take much longer to be able to regain his ability to use the repaired body part properly. Here are some benchmarks to look for that will give us some indication as to how Branch is healing: At 6 weeks the bone has attached to the graft, Branch should be able to walk on his own at this point. Therefore, 6 weeks after Branch has surgery, he should be able to start physical therapy. Any delay is a very bad sign. At 12 weeks "the patient can typically begin a more aggressive regimine of exercises involving stress on the knee, and increasing resistance." At 4 months Branch should be able to run. Assuming he undergoes the treatment in the next few weeks, that should allow for him to participate in training camp. That should be the first conclusive report we get about just how well Branch is doing. Don't worry about reports as to Branch's straight line speed or receiving, all that matters is his ability to cut and run routes.

Deion Branch has a murky and by no means positive outlook for the 2008 season. Any way he contributes would be positive. But though Tim Ruskell has certainly not had the same success signing offensive talent as he's had signing defensive talent, Branch is not a good example of where he's gone wrong (Chris Spencer is a far more appropriate). Still, like the Steve Hutchinson debacle before, a small mistake has blown up in Ruskell's face, and become a lightning rod for criticism. Branch may yet recover, may enjoy a triumphant return not unlike Joey Galloway, but for now, he's little more than sunk cost and a wasted draft pick.

0 recs | Comment 9 comments

Story-email Email | Print |

Comments

Display:

It's painful that we lost that 1 rd.pick --
it could've been spent on upgrading our O-Line.

by redwolf75 on Jan 17, 2008 3:08 PM PST   0 recs

I still don't have a problem with the Deal
It just sucks that he has been hurt both years
V. 1.0, mutherf***er, know what I'm sayin'?

by Scruffy Lefty on Jan 17, 2008 6:00 PM PST   0 recs

Agreed.
I still think it was a smart deal. The fact that he's been so oft-injured is why I have my head in my hands now.

by SpokaneSHAWK on Jan 18, 2008 8:03 AM PST to parent up   0 recs

ditto
Josh Brown is better than you. The Rest of the team is worse.

by MFAN on Jan 18, 2008 10:43 AM PST to parent up   0 recs

2008
So what does this mean for 2008? Can the Seahawks manage a Super Bowl run with Engram, Hackett, Burleson, and... Obomanu? If not, what changes do you think need to be made? When I look at age as the determining factor, I'm optimistic for Hackett and Burleson -- not so much for Engram.

by Runnin on Jan 18, 2008 12:48 AM PST   0 recs

Hindsight
I think John's analysis is correct: Branch deal was a decent to good one when made, but a turd now.  While folks say it's unfair to judge personnel decisions in hindsight, that's the only way we can do it, time being linear and all.  

I'm not so sure that Chris Spencer is such a problem.  I think he may yet end up being a Pro Bowl center.  As John has noted, he improved quite a bit over this past season.  Certainly, however, anything less than Pro Bowl would be a disappointment after using a first round pick at that position.

by jeager on Jan 18, 2008 7:08 AM PST   0 recs

Spencer is supposed to have Surgery
On his shoulder and thumb. So I'm curious if the injuries were really a factor during the season or not.
V. 1.0, mutherf***er, know what I'm sayin'?

by Scruffy Lefty on Jan 18, 2008 7:54 AM PST to parent up   0 recs

What exactly
would be the "small mistake" Ruskell made?  I don't see any mistakes, just the inevitable risk that comes with doing anything at all--or, for that matter, with doing nothing.

As for Spencer, I'm with jeager:  the way Spencer finished out the year, I'm optimistic that his problems were related to past injuries, and that he can be a force in the middle of the line going forward (as long as he can stay reasonably healthy, anyway).

by The Ancient Mariner on Jan 18, 2008 12:59 PM PST   0 recs

Even if things broke right, it was still too...
much in total resources to spend on a 27 y/o wr w/ only one year experience as a #1. Late first round and early second round picks are your best bang for buck picks in the entire draft. So instead of signing a younger player at a more premium position for a few million, he signed an older player at a relatively fungible position for 39 million. I can understand his thinking, but I think it was a mistake, albeit small.

I maintain that drafting Spencer, a center, with your first round pick was a pretty big mistake. Centers, quality, Pro Bowl centers can be attained throughout the draft or in free agency. Center, more than any other line position, is about smarts: line calls, picking up free blitzers, knowing how to combo block etc. Spencer only played center one season in college, and, predictably, has struggled w/ the details. To justify a first round selection, Spencer would almost have to be a Pro Bowler. Spencer didn't look like a Pro Bowler coming out of college, and as-is, is about a below average center. That, again, is just not a good use of resources.

by John Morgan on Jan 18, 2008 1:49 PM PST to parent up   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

M_image
High Point/Low Point Of 2007 Seahawks Season?
Image_114_small
OT: She is a woman possessed!
Small
Turns out Mack Strong is a gentleman
Small
Holmgren's last season - Interesting article
Small
Jonathan Ogden to retire.
Small
We are losing to Swoop
Small
Cedric Benson kicked to the curb...
Small
Strahan Retires Officially
Photo_95_small
Which WR is going to step up?
Small
Boys extend Owens

Post New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Managers

Image_114_small Shrug

Jj_flag_detail1_small John Morgan

News Fetch

Mutedposthorn_small Stencil

Graphics Editor

0000039510_20070504111310_small Scruffy Lefty

ad

Site Meter