The Tape: Packers @ Seahawks: Carjacked and the Slumbering Butcher Knives
With all the grousing about Seattle's small players, it is one of their largest that's hurt this defense the most: Lawrence Jackson. Jackson started strong against the Bills, excellent in support and looking like a natural playing situational defensive tackle. When he tallied two sacks against the 49ers, I initially thought "Oh sweet, the kid's picking it up a notch." But those sacks were almost incidental; Jackson was the first man to the quarterback as the pocket collapsed from all three sides. In fact, Jackson has been a ghost. Providing little pressure and rarely holding the point. His continued starting bespeaks to my point that Seattle is developing a team for tomorrow, because there's little doubt that Darryl Tapp is the better defensive end today. Tapp's sack output was concentrated in a single dominant showing against the Rams, but he was consistently disruptive. His speed off the edge limited opposing quarterback's time in the pocket and covered for some of Seattle's inadequacies in the secondary.
From here on out, we'll center tape study on players that impact Seattle's future. Calling out Brian Russell's awfulness is a bit superfluous. If you can't see he's terrible you're not watching, and if he's still on the roster in 2009, I'm boycotting.
Here's how Jackson and Tapp compared yesterday through the first quarter. Tracking line rotations can be a chore, but these two make it a little easier. Tapp starts from a three point, Jackson from a four.
Jackson played eight of the first nine Green Bay downs. For all the talk about spelling Patrick Kerney, the rotation seems isolated to Jackson and Tapp. Two things stand out. The Packers never assigned a tight end to his side, and Jackson never gave them a reason to. Here's the brief list of results.
- Washed out.
- Misses run.
- Good contain.
- Pressure.
- Blocked out.
- Absorbed.
- Nothing.
- Faked out of play.
Then Tapp subbed in.
- Spin inside move, tripped in pile.
- Tight end assigned left, Green Bay false start.
- Tight end assigned left, edge rush.
- Tight end assigned left and right, penetration Tapp.
- Nothing.
Peterson subbed in, then Seattle went to a 3-3 and that was the end of the quarter. The problem is that Jackson has no pass rush moves. He has decent burst off the snap, isn't easily overmatched, but does almost nothing to get free of the blocker. He also overthinks plays, fading off the blocker when a good hard move into the line would be better. I won't fault a guy for making hustle tackles downfield, but if the option is jam the pile/rush the passer or fade off the blocker/find the ball carrier, I'll take the former.
0 recs |
9 comments
Comments
Let's not bury Jackson just yet
I think it’s going to take a bit for him to adjust to the NFL after being at USC for so many seasons. There, was just plain better than everybody else, and so were his teammates. He didn’t need to employ a lot of moves; he could just out-talent the offensive linemen he went against (for the most part). He needs some time to learn a couple edge rushing moves and to develop the anchor ability against the run.
That being said, Tapp should have been playing the majority of the snaps from the opening of the season. Relying on rookies is never a good idea in the NFL, and bites teams in the ass more than it rewards them.
by thecassino on Oct 13, 2008 2:23 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Here's what irritates me ...
In the concept of working towards the future, Jackson is 23, Tapp is 24.
Tapp has been effective in his role ever since he got here. If the ’Hawks are in the business of talent development, Jackson should be taking some reps from Kerney, not Tapp.
by Jo-Jo on Oct 13, 2008 3:27 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Jackson has better potential.
I agree though, it makes a lot of sense to spell Kerney. Listening to Holmgren, it’s as if he doesn’t see how unlikely contention already is. I understand optimism, and I understand this is his last season, but if Seattle loses to Tampa Bay, which is very likely, they’ll be 1-5. I do hope that some young players start getting worked in soon.
by John Morgan on Oct 13, 2008 4:01 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Russell
I can’t see Russell’s awfulness because 95% of his play is off camera in the TV broadcasts.
by VBJohnson on Oct 13, 2008 8:52 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
You'd see more of him if he wasn't late in coverage on every deep pass play.
by BrianL on Oct 13, 2008 9:09 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hard to be in the game and still look good for interviews afterwords
So I don’t blame him for keeping away from the action….it can be a dangerous sport.
by collyb on Oct 13, 2008 11:46 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
How can you tell
…if he is late or if he is just coming off his man and following the ball, helping out someone else?
by VBJohnson on Oct 14, 2008 12:25 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 
















