How the Tampa 2 Solves Mike Holmgren's Traditional West Coast Offense
The problem with an offensive philosophy older than or as old as most NFL players is that the league has had a long time to develop counter-strategies. If the earliest roots of the West Coast Offense date back 40 years to Bill Walsh serving under Paul Brown, its counter could bear children or gran-chillen in Missoura. And predictably, Kiffin and Dungy's Tampa 2 hales from the heart of Gerry Ford's rambling preamble to Jimmy Carter's stagflation: 1975. The Steel Curtain Era of the NFL, dominated by Bud Carson's warriors and simple defensive schemes geared towards sheer physical dominance. When Kiffin and Dungy did their modern reinterpretation of Carson's Curtain, the essence was retained: Simplicity and execution.
A lot like Mike Holmgren's West Coast.
In this rivalry, Dungy and Kiffin rule the day...s. Over 11 contests, in seven separate seasons, adjusted for both Holmgren's strength of offense and Dungy's strength of defense, Holmgren's offenses have scored only 86% of expected points. Since a week one walloping in Dungy's first game as a head coach, Holmgren has never scored more than 23 points. Here's why.
The Walsh offense is built to spread the field horizontally. An emphasis on drags, slants, speed outs, curls, running back flares or flats and other routes that run across but not down the field.
The benefit is two fold. It creates high percentage receptions that propels an offense methodically towards the end zone and it drives safeties and linebackers wide, opening rush lanes. In Holmgren's west coast, the run is the payoff play.
If a quarterback's completion percentage dips, run after the catch is limited or a defense's linebackers and safeties retain gap responsibility, the offense is greatly weakened.
That's how the Tampa 2 wins in four steps.
First, receivers are jammed coming off the line. The disrupted timing causes routes to develop too slowly or not together and lowers completion percentage.
Second, the emphasis on short zones and tackling minimize yards after the catch.
Third, the emphasis on short zones increases the chance of a cornerback pick 6
And fourth, a simplified gap control scheme keeps linebackers true to their assignment and away from vacating gaps and allowing big rushing gains.
The strategy takes its toll, and Holmgren's offense looks slow, inexplosive and demoralized.
0 recs |
7 comments
Comments
Go go John Carlson!
This game has the potential to be a big break out game for Calson, and if he can do what we all think he can do he could just win the Hawks the game. TE’s in the seam can really exploit the Tampa 2. It’s too bad Hasselbeck is out because it was something I remember him and Stevens doing really well in 2005.
by Nate Dogg on Oct 17, 2008 4:36 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Hopefully a breakout game for Senenca and the rest of the offense also
by collyb on Oct 17, 2008 4:56 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hopefully a breakout game for the entire freaking team.
If life gives you lemons, keep the receipt
by Bramlet A. on Oct 18, 2008 12:14 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
John you got mail.
You may gain some yards on the ground, but eventually Lofa will end up biting you in the ass.
by Scruffy Lefty on Oct 17, 2008 5:49 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
And my computer is down again.... ugh
You may gain some yards on the ground, but eventually Lofa will end up biting you in the ass.
by Scruffy Lefty on Oct 18, 2008 1:56 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
So John I got about half way through until it my comp crapped out again
so we’ll give it a shot on the next one.
You may gain some yards on the ground, but eventually Lofa will end up biting you in the ass.
by Scruffy Lefty on Oct 18, 2008 1:57 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Cool.
Sucks about the computer.
I’ll get you something Tuesday night.
by John Morgan on Oct 18, 2008 2:12 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 






















