Field Gulls Podcast: Game Planning the Giants
Thanks to crushedoptimist for submitting a question and giving me an idea of what to talk about for the rest of the podcast. I'll open the next AQA thread on Monday. Whatever happens tomorrow, I'm hyped. Let's decrown their ass.
0 recs |
17 comments
Comments
You're welcome!
Only problem is that I can’t access the podcast, either at 1 pm or now.
Shoot. I’ll keep trying.
"Hey, guess what? Nobody cares who would win in a crazy fantasy fist-fight between Anne Frank and Lizzie Borden." The Monarch
by crushedoptimist on Oct 4, 2008 2:13 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Nope. I'm reinstalling Quicktime on my computer to see if that was the issue.
"Hey, guess what? Nobody cares who would win in a crazy fantasy fist-fight between Anne Frank and Lizzie Borden." The Monarch
by crushedoptimist on Oct 4, 2008 7:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nope. Nothing. But I bet your answer was awesome!
Is there a weblink to the recorded version as well?
"Hey, guess what? Nobody cares who would win in a crazy fantasy fist-fight between Anne Frank and Lizzie Borden." The Monarch
by crushedoptimist on Oct 4, 2008 8:27 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm unable to see it as well
but I’m at work, so that might have something to do wih it.
by Nate Dogg on Oct 4, 2008 8:45 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'll try another player next week.
Here’s a link to the episode.
by John Morgan on Oct 4, 2008 9:28 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I used the link and got my fix.
Thanks for the assist. I will be interested to see if the Hawks follow your particular game plan.
"Hey, guess what? Nobody cares who would win in a crazy fantasy fist-fight between Anne Frank and Lizzie Borden." The Monarch
by crushedoptimist on Oct 4, 2008 10:02 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
You so did not take my heart out of my throat
I’m just a bundle of nerves today, I need a drink.
Excellent work though. I’m excited to see the upcoming changes.
by Nate Dogg on Oct 4, 2008 10:09 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Thanks
For the great Podcast. I always love your analysis and I look forward to your breakdown of the tape.
by gobo on Oct 5, 2008 1:50 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Looking forward to the new and improved...
tape study coming from you.
"Those who fear disorder more than injustice inevitably produce more of both." -- Rev. William Coffin
by dcrockett17 on Oct 5, 2008 7:17 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Scouts Inc. rated the Giants as having a better
QB, RB, WR, OL, DL, DB, Special Teams, and Coach than us, while we have better LB. Accurate assessment or Superbowl Hype?
by LantermanC on Oct 5, 2008 8:32 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I would take all of our positions over all of theirs...
Beck>Eli
Jones/Duckett/Weaver/Schmitt>Jacobs/Ward/Bradshaw
Branch/Engram/McMullen/Carlson>Toomer/Moss/Smith/Boss
O-Line about even? Depends on our health.
D-Line, I really love our D-Line, and theirs is a bit beat up, no?
LB, ours are among, if not THE best in the league.
DB, I think we have a great group of DBs except for BRussell
I’ll admit our ST except for Mare is kind of crap…
As for coaching… I’m not sure, all I know is that Coughlin was really close to being fired for 2 years and then he lucked out in the palyoffs.
by LantermanC on Oct 5, 2008 8:43 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jacobs Bradshaw and Ward are better
than our rushing attack.
by redwolf75 on Oct 5, 2008 3:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would take their RBs.
I’ve read too much from Scouts that is way off base to take much stock in their opinions. It’s a good idea, but the executing is awful.
by John Morgan on Oct 5, 2008 3:58 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 














