Field Gulls: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Backing the Pack for NC State Fans!


Seahawks Anonymous - Tears

Britney-spears-crying_medium

via www.crimerant.com

0 recs | Comment 31 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Yeah I'm getting drunk among other things tonight.

Fuck this ish.

Yesterday's Pants
A blog-thingy about the Mariners and stuff.

by BrettJMiller on Nov 16, 2008 7:24 PM PST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

There we go :)

I feel good now.

Yesterday's Pants
A blog-thingy about the Mariners and stuff.

by BrettJMiller on Nov 16, 2008 9:27 PM PST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

We should have....

Traded our entire roster and all of our draft picks for the entire Giants team. That would have turned our season around in a hurry.

If life gives you lemons, keep the receipt

by Bramlet A. on Nov 16, 2008 11:10 PM PST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Hmmm

That might be worth it…

If life gives you lemons, keep the receipt

by Bramlet A. on Nov 17, 2008 6:42 AM PST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Meant to reply to SeaTown...

If life gives you lemons, keep the receipt

by Bramlet A. on Nov 17, 2008 6:43 AM PST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I'm so tired of watching this team underperform.

As much as I love the Walrus, I am really excited to see some new blood in here next year. New players, new coaches, new staff. It’s going to be a fun offseason.

Also, here’s hoping 37 doesn’t magically have a great game against us next weekend.

Dick Dastardly and Muttley with sick laughter

by Wayward Llama on Nov 17, 2008 7:37 AM PST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I think that's what a lot of us feel these days.

Mike Holmgren has done a lot for the franchise and for that I know I’m thankful. However, it will be refreshing to see some new (perhaps more creative people) calling plays next season.

by BrianL on Nov 17, 2008 1:13 PM PST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The "Seahawks Anonymous" Thread

Has exponentially decreased in terms of involvement the past few weeks, which I’m guessing is due to people losing hope and not even bothering to check Field Gulls anymore.

by SeaTownBlueDevil on Nov 17, 2008 2:15 PM PST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

FG hits isn't down much

I think there’s little to bitch about. All but the diehards saw this season was over weeks ago, so the disappointment just isn’t there.

by John Morgan on Nov 17, 2008 2:18 PM PST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

We're Seattle fans, I take pride in my sports teams sucking on me.

But seriously, I’d rather have a bunch of great guys who don’t win a superbowl than a bunch of losers win a superbowl. I love Peterson, Kerney, Trufant, Engram, Weaver, and Carlson, and I’m glad that I like our team.
I often wonder if I would trade the Mariners for the Yankees, and I might have a few years ago when they had ARod, Damon, Matsui, Randy and Wang, but other than that, no way, never.

by LantermanC on Nov 17, 2008 2:41 PM PST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I would trade all the players I love for a winner in a heartbeat.

Loving losers and holding onto them because their good guys is why we never win. Not that our players are losers. But as much as I hate the Patriots, I think I would switch rosters with them if it got Seattle a Super Bowl victory. Winning is all that matters in pro sports.

Yesterday's Pants
A blog-thingy about the Mariners and stuff.

by BrettJMiller on Nov 17, 2008 4:27 PM PST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I know you put 'pro sports' there, but I'm going to disagree again.

I’d rather have the Phoenix Suns or the Mavs a few years back rather than the Spurs. Neither the Mavs nor the Suns won, but they both play more entertaining basketball. Plus they can both say that they were robbed of the chance to win (Dwyane Wade shooting 50 fts a game and Amare being suspended), whereas in the Spurs case, I feel like they play defense with a ‘do as much as we can get away with’ attitude, which I hate (Bruce Bowen exemplifies this).
Another example, while not pro sports is college cross country. I’d much rather root for a college team that recruited a bunch of 10 minute two milers that ran a bunch of mileage and by their senior years were making a run at a conference or regional title, not because they have a bunch of talented guys, but because they trained their butts off for 3-4 years. Too many times you just see the top schools (and this is with every sport, like USC football), get the top one or two runners every year, and a lot of these guys are cocky freshman who just get by on their talent.
Maybe it’s just the stupid stubborn sports fan in me, but I’d much rather root for the underdog. Plus, I’d imagine when Seattle does finally win a championship in my lifetime (Huskies football shared title not counting and same for the Storm, sorry), it’ll be that much sweeter than if we had won 10 championships in the last 10 years.

by LantermanC on Nov 18, 2008 9:46 AM PST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

WHAT?! How do the Storm not count?

Excluding the Hawks, M’s, Former Sonics, Huskies, and Seattle Sounders FC, the Storm are arguably one of the top ten sports teams in Seattle.

by SeaTownBlueDevil on Nov 18, 2008 10:35 AM PST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I don't follow them, so any accomplishments they have don't give me any joy...

Can’t tell if your post is sarcastic… Not a sexist comment for me though, since a Huskies XC victory would give me a ton of joy since I’ve been following them all season, and watched their first race in person.

by LantermanC on Nov 18, 2008 11:12 AM PST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It was def sarcasm. Not sexist, though...

…women’s basketball is easily the most boring “professional” sport. Which is exactly the reason why there’s no WNBA Live games:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3FGI7R0u3TQ

by SeaTownBlueDevil on Nov 18, 2008 11:47 AM PST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Oh, no, I meant my remark wasn't supposed to be sexist, not yours.

I would enjoy watching the WNBA if I could. I’ve actually watched several WNBA games, but just can’t seem to get interested.

by LantermanC on Nov 18, 2008 12:52 PM PST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Was that a reply to my comment?

Because I couldn’t agree more. I was being sarcastic up above.

by SeaTownBlueDevil on Nov 18, 2008 1:32 PM PST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The WNBA touts "fundamentals" as a reason to watch

but there are countless high school and college women’s basketball teams that play the game with more authority and discipline.

by BrianL on Nov 18, 2008 1:41 PM PST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

True

And its not even sexist to say that women’s basketball doesn’t matter, its just realistic and unfortunately, politically incorrect to say in public I guess. Sports are first and foremost an entertainment business, and personally, I’m entertained by watching people do something consistently top-notch in a gaming environment I most certainly cannot do. I can’t throw a 50 yard spiral with a 300lbs behemoth chasing me. I can’t dunk. I CAN make (and miss) layups and 3 pointers.

However, following my above logic, I am heavily entertained by women’s abilities to menstruate. This is something I cannot do. Yet.

by SeaTownBlueDevil on Nov 18, 2008 2:29 PM PST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Def not the same for me

With the exception of 1 or 2 favorite players here (Lofa, maybe Truf), I’d jettison every one of the good guys if it got us a team full of bad-boy winners. I don’t care if we had a team full of T.O.‘s, Mosses, Plaxico’s, even Pacman’s, who bitched about everything in sight. If they win me a Super Bowl, it’d be completely worth it for me. But that might just be my personality…I can’t stand rooting for the underdog, I love rooting for the favorite – unless the favorite is some team from Boston (Pats, Sox, Celtics).

by SeaTownBlueDevil on Nov 18, 2008 12:21 AM PST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I agree

I agree with that one. Maybe it’s spending time on the East Coast and being faced with swarms of Red Sox, Yankees fans all the time (I don’t mind Patriots fans, and I don’t see how the Pats could be considered ‘bad boys’ just because they’re favorites, they play hard and humble). But I would never switch the M’s for the Yankees out of sheer fear that it would turn Seattle sports fans into a bunch of jackass assholes. I love my sports, but these are games we’re talking about and they’re games played by other people. Teams like the Yankees seem to ruin the people who root for them. If that happened in Seattle I’d be very disheartened.

by Snuffleupagus on Nov 18, 2008 7:37 AM PST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Pats aren't really bad-boys, but they're certainly not humble

Remember last year, when they were up 35-0 on the Dolphins in the second quarter and decided to go for it on Fourth Down? And there was Spygate, but whether that was a jerk-off thing to do is debatable.

by SeaTownBlueDevil on Nov 18, 2008 7:51 AM PST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

yeah

humble isn’t the right word. I guess I just mean they are team oriented. They don’t have ‘me, me, me’ guys like TO. but yeah, last year they were really running up the score.

by Snuffleupagus on Nov 18, 2008 8:04 AM PST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Are we talking about players or coaches?

When it comes to the players (which is I thought what we were talking about, would we trade the Seahawk players for bad boy stars), I don’t think you can really give the Patriots too much crap. I mean, the Patriots organization can be total jerk offs (see: both of SeaTown’s examples), but it is the coaches not the players.

I’m certainly no huge Patriot fan, but from what I’ve seen of their players and locker room, they seem to be pretty straight up, hard working guys, regardless of what Darth Belicheck does to improve his chances of winning over and over again.

In terms of this thread in general, I think we are missing some big points. As the Cowboys have sort of proved this season, merely bringing in a bunch of talent doesn’t mean you get a Super Bowl. If we just cut all our “good guy” players and replaced them with obnoxious superstars, we wouldn’t simply win a championship. Championship teams are built around a core of good players (which i think we have the makings of) and then good chemistry and coaching.

Also, I think it is a little outrageous to say that

Loving losers and holding onto them because their good guys is why we never win.

Considering we made it to the Super Bowl a few seasons ago, and have won a playoff game in each of the past three seasons (something very few teams can boast). When it comes down to it, we have been one of the most consistantly good teams in the NFC for the past 4-5 years. So, frankly, I am tired of hearing Seahawks fans dump on us and saying we aren’t any good and we are always like this. It may be true of the Mariners, but the Seahawks are still a good team. This year sucked. They played terribly, they coached terribly, but this is an abberation. While we certainly need to improve next season, I don’t think we need to be revisionists, and totally recast the past five years, which have been great.

by Dedalusson on Nov 18, 2008 8:31 AM PST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Good point about the Pats coaching

I never argued that they were bad-boys anyway, just that I dislike them. Also, I certainly don’t agree with the “Loving losers and holding onto them” theory about why we never win, but I don’t think any one was arguing that a team with a bunch of selfish superstars like the Cowboys means a necessary win. I think BrettJMiller was just saying that IF a team of selfish superstars would win us a Super Bowl, he would take that in a heartbeat, as would I. Having a team you can be proud of off-the-field is much less important than a team you can be proud of on-the-field.

by SeaTownBlueDevil on Nov 18, 2008 10:31 AM PST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

What about players that you weren't really proud of on the field either?

Like a bunch of Rodney Harrisons or Roy Williams (can’t think of too many dirty players).

by LantermanC on Nov 18, 2008 11:13 AM PST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

If they make the team win, then I don't really care if they're dirty.

A win is a win. For me, the only exception here is when you win and you didn’t deserve it, i.e. gifted by the referees or something. But again, this is all just my opinion, and I’m sure most of FG’s readers have more integrity than I do.

by SeaTownBlueDevil on Nov 18, 2008 11:51 AM PST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Where the writing's bad and the discussion banal.
Start posting about the Seahawks »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Lolcat_small
FG - Training Camp Meet up/Awesome dudes excited to meet other dudes with same interests.
Nielson_small
The Turnaround Season: A Fictional Look Into the 2009 Seattle Seahawks
Steve2006_small
THE WAY WE WERE: Comparing the 2009 Seahawks to the 2005 NFC Champions

Recent FanPosts

Imagen_015_small
Misfit is famous!
Small
Trade for Thigpen
Xhand_small
Housh: A Psychic or Loudmouth?
Michaelscott_small
Impact of Coverage LBs On A Defense?
Small
TE Cameron Morrah signed, 4 years, $1.79 Million
Small
Burleson to train at Athletes' Performance in Arizona
Small
FB Owen Schmitt enters camp as the starter

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Managers

Image_114_small Shrug

Jj_flag_detail1_small John Morgan

Editors

Lolcat_small Scruffy Lefty

Authors

Vp081-c_small Christian

Small BrianL

Small abender20

Small Doug Farrar

Official Partner of Yahoo! Sports