Injury Seasons: Why?
by Birdfeeder on Nov 4, 2008 11:22 AM PST
9 comments
There is an interesting article on Pro Football Weekly:
http://www.profootballweekly.com/PFW/The+Way+We+Hear+It/WWHI/2008/wwhi110308.htm
I am sick of seasons filled with injury being the downfall of this franchise.
Do the Seahawks experience a greater number of "talent killing" injuries than the rest of the league?
If so, why? Poor conditioning, perhaps?
And then, why do we still suffer? Is there no depth?
Is there any statistical analysis out there that compares injury impact on season success? Any info would be greatly appreciated.
A place to bury strangers.
0 recs |
9 comments
Email
Print
Comments
At first I was like wtf
Then I realized your graph is wrong.
If life gives you lemons, keep the receipt
by Bramlet A. on Nov 5, 2008 12:23 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Shoulda asked this differently
Of course injury has an impact on the season, BUT, how do we rate vs. other teams in the category of critical injuries per season?
Example: we lose 7 starters for a total of say, 65 games in a season, vs some other team losing 9 starters for 80 games.
by Birdfeeder on Nov 6, 2008 1:18 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
According to FO
Seattle has a three year rank of 29.4 games lost per season, 10th. This year is an exception.
by John Morgan on Nov 6, 2008 9:44 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Certain photos copyright © 2010 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
