Seahawks Depth Chart: Offense
by John Morgan on Sep 13, 2008 8:40 AM PDT
in Everything You Need To Know
54 comments
Offense/Defense
End |
Tackle |
Guard |
Guard |
Tackle |
End |
|||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Sammie |
Billy
|
Jones Sean Locklear |
Wahle |
Spencer |
Willis Locklear |
Putzier Will Heller |
Back |
||
 |
 |
 |
Weaver |
Hasselbeck Seneca Wallace Charlie Frye |
Jones Ducket Maurice Morris |
0 recs |
54 comments
Email
Print
Comments
If this looks funky to anyone...
by John Morgan on Mar 20, 2008 1:30 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
The Depth Chart looks just fine, John
by JL White on Mar 20, 2008 11:34 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh...
by John Morgan on Mar 20, 2008 1:38 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Can you make one with the coaches too?
Why? Because the Seahawks rock my socks.
by Chickadee on Sep 1, 2008 12:40 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's a good idea.
I’ll see what I can do.
by John Morgan on Sep 1, 2008 12:51 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Man alive, we're thin
by The Ancient Mariner on Mar 20, 2008 2:06 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Well...
by John Morgan on Mar 20, 2008 2:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh and I'm refusing to acknowledge Porkchop...
by John Morgan on Mar 20, 2008 2:10 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The longer I look at this
I think listing Obomanu is the slot is a little misleading. If the line up 2 wide Engram will be the flanker, but if they go 3 wide Engram will be in the slot and Obomanu would go out wide, right? Or am I missing something?
by Nate Dogg on Mar 20, 2008 2:18 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
It's pretty interchangeable
by John Morgan on Mar 20, 2008 2:23 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Passing game
by jeager on Mar 20, 2008 2:32 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Branch
by nwse on Mar 20, 2008 4:30 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Matt Hasselbeck
by Gray on Mar 20, 2008 6:09 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
RG:B Albert, TE: M Bennett, WR: E Bennett
Hass has done well with rag-tags like Urban, Robinson, Bannister, Warrick, Stevens; he'll be fine with this group.
by puerto on Mar 20, 2008 8:12 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
This is an old post that's been updated.
And will be updated continually throughout the season.
by John Morgan on Sep 1, 2008 10:05 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Mansfield Wrotto
by Kinger12 on Mar 20, 2008 8:45 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Hard to say until
by Shrug on Mar 20, 2008 11:01 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think Wrotto will spend another season...
by John Morgan on Mar 21, 2008 8:57 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Look at all them honkeys...
by TIF on Mar 20, 2008 8:45 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Ouch
Yeah, I'm not liking the idea of Burleson at split. It seems like an awfully big risk entering the season with a 36 year old who's just waiting to get injured and 3 completely unproven guys to complement him at WR, especially when we aren't really sure how the running game is going to work out either.
by notor on Mar 21, 2008 12:31 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Burly
by UW Alex on Mar 21, 2008 12:46 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Wrotto? Practice Squad?
I am pretty sure Wrotto was on the active roster all of last year which makes him ineligible for the practice squad. Am I wrong about this?
by SA77 on Jul 5, 2008 11:27 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
No, you are correct.
From the NFL Collective Bargaining Agreement
Section 4. Eligibility:
(a) The practice squad shall consist of the following players, provided that they have not served more than two previous seasons on a Practice Squad: (i) players who do not have an Accrued Season of NFL experience; and (ii) free agent players who were on the Active List for fewer than nine regular season games during their only Accrued Season(s). An otherwise eligible player may be a practice squad player for a third season only if the Club by which he is employed that season has at least 53 players on its Active/Inactive List during the entire period of his employment.
That was a mistake on my part.
by John Morgan on Jul 6, 2008 2:38 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
There is a difference
between being on the 53 and being active on the 45. Wrotto, I believe was only active on the 45 against Atlanta. Thus, Wrotto only has one of nine “45” active games; thus, Wrotto has PS eligibility. Sando has the breakdown on ESPN.
Atkins does not have eligibility (I think).
It is what it is...
by kidder95 on Sep 1, 2008 10:08 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Atkins does not.
He was active for 12 games last season.
by John Morgan on Sep 1, 2008 10:10 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wrotto will surprise
I believe Wrotto was part of the 53, but never active
- Wrotto may get to secnd team this year.
by kidder95 on Jul 5, 2008 8:32 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Is it me...
or does Courtney Taylor look like a mean bastard?
by John Morgan on Sep 1, 2008 10:13 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I was thinking
the same thing. I love his demeanor, his build, his intelligence. My God, if the man can stay healthy, he looks like… Terrel Owens.
It is what it is...
by kidder95 on Sep 1, 2008 10:16 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
But is his body as fragile as his face is mean?
by Nate Dogg on Sep 1, 2008 11:43 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
And he looks meaner live
He looked like a grizzled linebacker doing an interview on the sidelines in the last preseason game.
by Nate Dogg on Sep 1, 2008 11:44 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Man..
Logan Payne in the slot. What a mess.
The very existence of flame-throwers proves that some time, somewhere, someone said to themselves, You know, I want to set those people over there on fire, but I'm just not close enough to get the job done.
-George Carlin
by Wayward Llama on Sep 1, 2008 12:08 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I did a double-take when I saw that.
by Misfit74 on Sep 2, 2008 11:18 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah...
I kind of have this feeling that when we go to 3 WR we move Burly to the slot and Kent out wide. Getting Burly on the move against some poor linebacker or nickel corner sounds like YAC heaven.
One also wonders if Carlson will be put in the slot, too…
by djafrot on Sep 1, 2008 12:20 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Rookie Photos
Is it just an accident that the two starting rookies (Payne and Carlson) both have their photos taken further away?
It makes them look like a couple of kids from the JV squad lining up on fan appreciation day or something.
by brokejumper on Sep 1, 2008 2:08 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I tried to take every photo from the same source, but ESPN doesn't have a photo of Payne.
And I don’t know why John Carlson is backed away from the camera.
by John Morgan on Sep 1, 2008 3:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
is Payne starting over Kent?
I’m sure both we’ll see time, but it seemed liked Kent was getting more action with the starters in the pre-season.
by MFAN on Sep 1, 2008 3:45 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
you know I am in love with Kent
lets hope that either one is worthy
Why? Because the Seahawks rock my socks.
by Chickadee on Sep 1, 2008 4:13 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think Payne is a better fit in the slot.
And that he will play the Bobby Engram role, something Kent isn’t really designed for. I think Kent will see time in 4 wide sets and playing split end when Burleson moves to the slot.
by John Morgan on Sep 1, 2008 4:34 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
thanks for the clarification. I was wondering about that, too.
by Misfit74 on Sep 2, 2008 11:20 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kent will take on the role that we had Hackett in. Running long routes that will be five step drops.
Hackett hardly ever went across the middle. Payne is Engram without the ability to punt return early on in his career.
John, when I see Payne I see a Brandon Stokley. Am I wrong in this?
XBOX live gamertag: BANE509...I would die tonight for my beliefs.
by Christian on Sep 13, 2008 10:35 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Carlson looks an awful lot like
Josh Hartnett and Payne kind of looks like a young Brian Russell. Just saying.
by Aesop on Sep 2, 2008 4:30 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Our o-line has willis and porkchop =(
by aerozeppelin on Sep 13, 2008 9:08 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
That's better than Willis and an injured Simms
who couldn’t use his entire upper body to block.
by BrianL on Sep 13, 2008 11:19 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I didn't see much of Willis in the Buffalo game
which is usually a good thing for a right tackle.
by Nate Dogg on Sep 13, 2008 4:22 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Does Bumpus change anything for the reciever depth?
Payne as the splint end seems….. worrisome.
by Nate Dogg on Sep 13, 2008 4:22 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
Related FanPosts on Field Gulls
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Certain photos copyright © 2010 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
