Seahawks Depth Chart: Offense
Offense/Defense
End |
Tackle |
Guard |
Guard |
Tackle |
End |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Sammie |
Billy
|
Jones Sean Locklear |
Wahle |
Spencer |
Willis Locklear |
Putzier Will Heller |
Back |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Weaver |
Hasselbeck Seneca Wallace Charlie Frye |
Jones Ducket Maurice Morris |
54 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
If this looks funky to anyone...
The Depth Chart looks just fine, John
by JL White on Mar 20, 2008 11:34 PM PDT up reply actions
Oh...
Man alive, we're thin
by The Ancient Mariner on Mar 20, 2008 2:06 PM PDT reply actions
Well...
The longer I look at this
I think listing Obomanu is the slot is a little misleading. If the line up 2 wide Engram will be the flanker, but if they go 3 wide Engram will be in the slot and Obomanu would go out wide, right? Or am I missing something?
It's pretty interchangeable
Passing game
Matt Hasselbeck
by Gray on Mar 20, 2008 6:09 PM PDT reply actions
RG:B Albert, TE: M Bennett, WR: E Bennett
Hass has done well with rag-tags like Urban, Robinson, Bannister, Warrick, Stevens; he'll be fine with this group.
Mansfield Wrotto
I think Wrotto will spend another season...
Look at all them honkeys...
by TIF @ Field Gulls on Mar 20, 2008 8:45 PM PDT reply actions
Ouch
Yeah, I'm not liking the idea of Burleson at split. It seems like an awfully big risk entering the season with a 36 year old who's just waiting to get injured and 3 completely unproven guys to complement him at WR, especially when we aren't really sure how the running game is going to work out either.
by notor @ Field Gulls on Mar 21, 2008 12:31 AM PDT reply actions
Burly
Wrotto? Practice Squad?
I am pretty sure Wrotto was on the active roster all of last year which makes him ineligible for the practice squad. Am I wrong about this?
No, you are correct.
From the NFL Collective Bargaining Agreement
Section 4. Eligibility:
(a) The practice squad shall consist of the following players, provided that they have not served more than two previous seasons on a Practice Squad: (i) players who do not have an Accrued Season of NFL experience; and (ii) free agent players who were on the Active List for fewer than nine regular season games during their only Accrued Season(s). An otherwise eligible player may be a practice squad player for a third season only if the Club by which he is employed that season has at least 53 players on its Active/Inactive List during the entire period of his employment.
That was a mistake on my part.
I believe
wrotto was inactive for the whole season, barring the final game. Wrotto would need nines games on the active list to not be a potential PS member. Good luck getting him through waivers.
It is what it is...
There is a difference
between being on the 53 and being active on the 45. Wrotto, I believe was only active on the 45 against Atlanta. Thus, Wrotto only has one of nine “45” active games; thus, Wrotto has PS eligibility. Sando has the breakdown on ESPN.
Atkins does not have eligibility (I think).
It is what it is...
Wrotto will surprise
I believe Wrotto was part of the 53, but never active
- Wrotto may get to secnd team this year.
I was thinking
the same thing. I love his demeanor, his build, his intelligence. My God, if the man can stay healthy, he looks like… Terrel Owens.
It is what it is...
And he looks meaner live
He looked like a grizzled linebacker doing an interview on the sidelines in the last preseason game.
Man..
Logan Payne in the slot. What a mess.
The very existence of flame-throwers proves that some time, somewhere, someone said to themselves, You know, I want to set those people over there on fire, but I'm just not close enough to get the job done.
-George Carlin
Yeah...
I kind of have this feeling that when we go to 3 WR we move Burly to the slot and Kent out wide. Getting Burly on the move against some poor linebacker or nickel corner sounds like YAC heaven.
One also wonders if Carlson will be put in the slot, too…
Rookie Photos
Is it just an accident that the two starting rookies (Payne and Carlson) both have their photos taken further away?
It makes them look like a couple of kids from the JV squad lining up on fan appreciation day or something.
I tried to take every photo from the same source, but ESPN doesn't have a photo of Payne.
And I don’t know why John Carlson is backed away from the camera.
is Payne starting over Kent?
I’m sure both we’ll see time, but it seemed liked Kent was getting more action with the starters in the pre-season.
you know I am in love with Kent
lets hope that either one is worthy
Why? Because the Seahawks rock my socks.
I think Payne is a better fit in the slot.
And that he will play the Bobby Engram role, something Kent isn’t really designed for. I think Kent will see time in 4 wide sets and playing split end when Burleson moves to the slot.
Kent will take on the role that we had Hackett in. Running long routes that will be five step drops.
Hackett hardly ever went across the middle. Payne is Engram without the ability to punt return early on in his career.
John, when I see Payne I see a Brandon Stokley. Am I wrong in this?
XBOX live gamertag: BANE509...I would die tonight for my beliefs.
Carlson looks an awful lot like
Josh Hartnett and Payne kind of looks like a young Brian Russell. Just saying.
That's better than Willis and an injured Simms
who couldn’t use his entire upper body to block.

by 




































