Field Gulls: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: SB Nation NFL Power Rankings for Week 11

Season Retro: Lofa Tatupu

A badass in his prime.

Lofa Tatupu

Stats

Highlights

Lowlights

Outlook

Stats*

Penetrations: 31

Tips: 4

Broken Tackles: 17

Blown Coverage: 3

Good Coverage: 5

Blown Assignments: 1

*Includes all games minus Week 10, Divisional Round and the second half of Week 3 and the first half of week 1.

Highlights

9/9/07

Lofa Tatupu looks stronger than I've ever seen him. On Sunday he was stripping blockers with ease.

9/16/07

Lofa Tatupu made a game changing interception on the Cardinals first drive of the half. You might have noticed that, but did you notice...The Hawks are in a base defensive package. Ken Whisenhunt's power rushing attack kept Seattle in a base package for most of the contest. Both of the corners are deep, Deon Grant is deep and Brian Russell is shallow--I'm about ready to say that these two are used interchangeably. It's first and ten, the Cards are on their seventh play, driving, nearing midfield. The call is a play action, at first all three linebackers stay shallow spying the backfield. Matt Leinart is staring a hole into Larry Fitzgerald, Tatupu reads the play-fake and turns back sprinting into position. No sooner does he turn back to the line of scrimmage than the ball arrives, the young Pro Bowler catches then sprints 18 yards back across the fifty. Just an awesome and truly improbable play. Tatupu reads Leinart expertly and makes a catch many receivers would drop. Fitzgerald was otherwise nearly uncovered, if Tatupu had merely defensed the play it would have been impressive, but the reflexes it takes to catch a ball unseen is astounding.

11/18/07

Here's your play of the day. A slick little blitz package the Hawks ran twice. I had called for Marshall to rush fewer defenders on blitzes and use underneath zones, specifically with the Hawks athletic defensive ends, and he did just that. Here's his best, with Kerney at left defensive end working in zone coverage. The key is Peterson's ability to edge rush, and the resulting hole created for Tatupu to bring pressure. Kerney is in perfect position to defend the flat when Grossman attempts to roll right.

12/2/07

First play of the game, Lofa Tatupu interception, how'd it go down? Here's what I saw: The Eagles are four wide with a tight end; AJ Feeley in the shotgun. The Seahawks are in a base package w/ the linebackers spread wide. The Eagles have their two best wide receivers, Kevin Curtis and Reggie Brown, in the slots. They're covered by Julian Peterson and Leroy Hill, respectively. Tatupu is assigned L.J. Smith, so that the Hawks' three linebackers are each in man coverage against, arguably, the Eagles' three best receivers. At the snap Smith runs a loose post route, is thrown a bit off route by Tatupu and then sort of dogs it in the gap between Tats and Deon Grant. Curtis is thrown completely off his route by Peterson. I'm not so sure about Brown and Hill, but Brown looks open after the camera pans to center in on the Tatupu interception. Take that for what it's worth. The rest is obvious, Tats snags the pick and sets up the first Hawks' score.

Since we're on the subject, let's skip to Tatupu's second pick. Daryl Johnston called it a mirror image, but it really wasn't. Not that I'm picking on Johnston, he's just being colorful. It's 3rd and 6, the Hawks are in a 4-2 Nickel package and the Eagles a 3 WR, TE, single back formation. The Eagles send the slot receiver in motion, Jordan Babineaux adjusts by moving in and up against the line, Hill by moving out right. So different formation, different down and distance, and as I'll elaborate, a different group of role players for Tats' second star turn. At the snap, Brandon Mebane punishes the left guard, showing some college form with his manic handfighting, and forcing Todd Herremans back steadily towards Feeley. Westbrook jumps in for an assist and gets chucked for the effort. Tatupu briefly shadows Smith before Babs picks up Smith entering Babs' zone. This allows Tats to break back into a middle zone, intercept the pass intended for the slot receiver and then be off for a 49 yard return into Philly's redzone. That's'alotta zones!! So, Mebane pressures, Babs again shows good zone awareness, and Tatupu makes the best of an underneath zone. Pretty slick and surprisingly no frills.

Play of the game, courtesy of, who else?, Lofa Tatupu. Not a pick, but a tackle. First play, third Eagles drive of the third quarter. The Eagles run a wide receiver screen to Curtis, with Todd Herremans pull blocking. Tats starts shaded a little right of center. After the snap, Tats reads the play and charges left, but is met by Herremans. How does Tatupu react to the attempted block by the 6'6", 321 pound guard? By dropping a shoulder into him and laying him out. Flat. Then shoots the gap and stops the screen before it gets off the floor.

We're lucky to have this guy.

Lowlights

10/7/07

Tatupu has gotten much better navigating blockers, but he still misses some tackles and the way Seattle is designed defensively, when Tatupu misses all hell breaks loose. That's what happened on the fifth play of the Steelers scoring drive when Najeh Davenport went off for 45 yards. As soon as Tatupu misses about 7 yards past the line of scrimmage, Davenport cuts back towards the left sideline and Hawks tumbled like a California mudslide. Nate Washington got away with an iffy block in the back, the kind of call you want when it benefits your team but not so flagrant that you can justifiably be outraged. Washington's contact was largely incidental, despite Joe Buck crediting him with a "great block".

11/4/07

A long third down conversion keyed by a blown coverage by Babineaux allows the Browns to drive into the fourth quarter, down 8, but with first and ten from the Hawks' 24. Following a dropped pass by Winslow and a stuffed Jamal Lewis run, the Browns are facing their 6th 3rd and long of the contest. Clevenland spreads `em wide, splits out 4, counting Winslow, with an offset back right. Seattle responds with a 4-2 nickel. Russell impotently blitzes the edge, but Tru plays man to perfection, breaks on the Braylon Edwards quick slant and ankle tackles him short of the first, forcing the Browns into 4th and 2. 4th, 2, Browns break huddle empty backfield, 5 wide. Seattle is again in a 4-2 Nickel, with Tatupu and Kevin Bentley spread outside the ends. At the snap, Hawks rush 4, Craig Terrill spins through his man, pressures Anderson. Bentely and Babs double Vicious to the left. Tatupu stutter steps, attempts to jam Winslow, fails, loses a step, blows coverage and watches as Winslow reels in a quick-out for 13 and 1st and goal from the Seattle 2. Tatupu looks back at Bentley, taps his chest and then raises his hands as if to say "What the Hell just happened?"

12/16/07

If only Tatupu could wrap up, he'd be that much more fearsome. The guy allows a lot of broken tackles. A lot.

Outlook

The now and future face of the franchise, Tatupu doesn't always wrap well and isn't a plus on blitzes. That's about as critical as you can be of Tatupu. He's a ++ run stopper, a + coverage backer, is fabulously aware and the unquestioned leader of Seattle's D. The day Tim Ruskell "reached" for Tats, he reinvented the Seahawks. In 2007, Tatupu showed growth shedding blockers. What had once been a weakness became a strength as Tats quietly became of one the better middle linebackers in football at fighting through garbage and shedding lead blockers. That skill might portend an improvement in his pass rush, too. Lofa Tatupu is an excellent player, a rare leader and true Blue. A Seahawk for life.

0 recs  |  Comment 16 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

John do you have a wing span measurement
for Lofa and maybe compare that to a LB that doesn't miss tackles
Coach Owens = Scruffy's spell check

by Scruffy Lefty on Mar 21, 2008 3:48 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

No more Tats
please....it's just lame.

Just because Tatupu worked out well doesn't mean that Ruskell didn't reach for him.  I know that sounds entirely retarded, but bear with me. Taking someone in the 3rd that would have been there in the 5th is a reach.   Now, whether Lofa would have been around for the Seahawks to grab even a round later I don't know.  I felt the same way about Boulware (who is a better example since he busted), it's great that your grade him out as a first round talent, but that doesn't mean you need to take him there.

But that really neither here nor there.  Yay Seahawks!  How does this change their current cap situation and next years cap?  I'm going out on a limb and saying that Ruskell probably loaded it up in a way to give them some extra flexibility with Tru and the boy's that come up next year.

by Nate Dogg on Mar 21, 2008 4:28 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Wait, really?
Puhols was drafted in the 13th, jerry rice in the 7th, tom brady in the 6th...

Face it, we got lucky to find tatupu in the 2nd.  Living in hindsight is a terrible thing to do.

by dlinsley on Mar 21, 2008 6:38 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

And I was drunk when I wrote all that
but what i'm trying to say is that the draft is equivalent to the pull out method... it's all luck.  Front offices find crazy steals (such as the names i talked about earlier) almost randomly.  Believe me, Lofa is a BARGAIN for 6yrs/40 mill.  AFAIK, he's making 6 mill a year over the next 8... That is rediculous for a future HOFer.

And BTW, how can ANY seattle sports fan rip on Timmy Ruskell.  This man has created a perennial contender out of a bottom of the barrel franchise.  I have never understood the criticisms... Honestly, this is the BEST GM SEATTLE HAS EVER HAD.  He drafts well, finds great free agents, and has instilled a team first, unselfish philosophy in a club that hasn't had this kind of leadership since the early 80's.

Seriously guys, Tim Ruskell is the type of GM that every franchise in professional sports wishes they had.

by dlinsley on Mar 21, 2008 6:48 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'd have to agree on the Tats name
Its just not doing it for me. Plus you only give nicknames to guys that have lame first names like Jerry. Not awesome names like Lofa
Coach Owens = Scruffy's spell check

by Scruffy Lefty on Mar 21, 2008 7:42 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The draft is not a crapshoot.
You're destroying the exception.

Nor was Seattle lucky to draft Tatupu in the second. That's just factually incorrect. Seattle was one of a handful of teams that thought Tats* was a second rounder. They were certainly the only team willing to trade up for him.

*No offense, but I'm not soliciting opinions about my nicknames.

by John Morgan on Mar 21, 2008 8:00 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You lost me
on the "destroying the exception".  Not saying I'm not, just saying I'm not sure how I see that it applies here.

And like I said, whether he would be around later or not I don't know.  Sound like not.  I'll compare it to this.  Long long ago, I was shopping for clothes with my mom.  She wanted to buy me some jeans because they were cheap.  I said I didn't need jeans.  She said that if we buy them now we'll save money cause they're on sale.  I said we're not saving any money if we're buying something we don't need, even if it's cheaper than normal.  

Bringing it back to sports, Tom Brady obviously deserved to go in the 1st.  However he would have been a reach in the first, since he would have been available later, and that first pick could have been used on a player that would not have been around in the coming rounds.

And I agree, Lofa is plenty cool on it's own.

by Nate Dogg on Mar 21, 2008 8:31 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Destroying the Exception

Means that you attribute an uncommon event (aka exception to the rule) to luck rather than foresight.

Nobody thought Tatupu was a second rounder that is true. But to assume that Ruskell simply got lucky by "reaching" for him, rather than seeing something there that other scouts had missed, is what is factually incorrect.  Tatupu always had the talent, it was the false biases of the other GM's about what it takes to succeed in the NFL at his position that dropped him to a "3rd round talent" when his actual value was quite above that, and credit Ruskell for realizing it rather than just crediting luck.

Ruskell has been right about undervalued players so often, I have a hard time believing he didn't realize exactly what Tatupu offered when he picked him.

by notor on Mar 21, 2008 10:34 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I see
and agree.  Didn't mean to imply that Ruskell was lucky, just saying that if you can get some one later on, even if they're worth taking now, you should wait.  You're 100% right on his eye for talent.

by Nate Dogg on Mar 21, 2008 10:51 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Such a straw man arguement
Sure, Ruskell could have waited a couple rounds for Lofa, but cmon, arguing in hindsight is retarded.

by dlinsley on Mar 21, 2008 11:21 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Destroying the Exception
basically, the argument that xyz great players were drafted in later rounds proves that the draft is pure luck is a logical fallacy. You are working from the exceptional (Tom Brady) to the general (the whole draft). That wasn't a response to you, but to dlinsley. The threading on these can get confusing, but I think you'll see my response was to dlinsley's response to your original comment.

I understand your argument, that if a player CAN be taken in the 3rd, but is taken in 2nd that no matter how good that player ends up being the team reached to acquire him. While I think that's fundamentally correct, I don't think we can be sure where Tatupu would have otherwise been drafted. I wouldn't put too much stock in draft boards. Especially not internet draft boards. Teams have their own opinions of the value of an individual player and it's not taken from NFLdraftdawgdaddy. I think Seattle knew Tatupu would be gone before their next pick and did what it took to grab a special talent.

by John Morgan on Mar 22, 2008 10:20 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Zuh?
Jerry Rice was drafted in the 1st round. And Bill Walsh was heavily criticized for it.
Jimmimoose

by Phildopip on Mar 22, 2008 9:26 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

2 things
Supposedly Lofa wasn't going to make it til there next pick and it doesn't clear any cap space for this year but it doesn't add any either.
Coach Owens = Scruffy's spell check

by Scruffy Lefty on Mar 21, 2008 7:43 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Worried about the jellyfish.
Start posting about the Seahawks »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Jj_flag_detail1_small
Field Gulls Mod-enforced Rules and Standards

Recent FanPosts

Tigeravitar_small
Football Logic: 101
Olympiabeer_small
The Official Fantasy Football Thread – Week 11. The place for fantasy talk, thought, questions and general fantasy ranting.
Small
Post Your Hawk: Week 11
Rainbow_small
Video Preview: Seattle Seahawks at Minnesota Vikings
Small
Putting a bow on the Hutchinson debate for hawk fans
Jj_flag_detail1_small
Off Topic: Best Sequels, Worst Decisions and Plans for 2010
Profilepic_small
Alright, I Officially Hate Adrian Peterson.
Me_at_the_vikings_game_small
Ask the Daily Norseman
Small
The Two 1st-Rounders in 2010
Profilepic_small
Mora's Presser and General Feelings Towards Our HC

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation


Managers

Image_114_small Shrug

Jj_flag_detail1_small John Morgan

Rainbow_small Scruffy Lefty

Authors

Vp081-c_small Christian

Small BrianL

Small abender20

Small Doug Farrar

Dksbtwit_small Johnny Peel (DKSB)