http://myespn.go.com/blogs/hashmarks

Brohm? the top WR?

Clemson DE, DT?

Brohm is not out of the question here.

They’re not even trying to feign interest in the Hawks

Two times on the clock. Two commercial breaks. Sweeeeeet.

I pondered whether or not I should go defense here. But, Seattle has lost DJ Hackett and Deion Branch suffered a devastating knee injury. Bobby Engram is getting old, so it’s time to bring in a new set of receivers for Seattle.

Hardy may not be fast (4.51 40), but he has massive hands and I don’t see him dropping many passes, something that has plagued the Seahawks for years. James also has a 42 inch vertical leap and since he is 6’7, I think that will help with jump balls. He has good upper body strength, and should be a powerful receiver for Matt Hasselbeck.

In 2008, I wouldn’t mind seeing Hardy, Burleson, Obumanu and Engram as the four WR set.

becuase Mel has no clue who Ruskell likes

NO!!!!

I don’t know anything about this guy

Another pick we’ll get ripped for!

we go defense again? Seriously?

I’m out y’all.

John named a bunch of guys that didn’t get picked last year. Don’t worry so much about this.

Perhaps a better potential, but Jackson will be ready to play.

Awesome

Center, Seattle Storm.

It’s just that I remember looking out at the offense at one point last year and being stunned at the lack of playmakers. That offense got old in a hurry, and it’s only getting older. This doesn’t help AT ALL. We added to a strength with this pick, and I don’t think that’s a good thing.

I trust ruskel he is a man who seems to know what he is doing

Lawrence Jackson played at fucking USC, he’s not exactly a nobody.

Obviously I’m biased but I love LoJack.

The Good: Jackson is a mobile, strong athlete who uses his strength to battle bigger tackles. He combines good technique, power and quickness with a relentless attitude to pressure the passer effectively. He has been effective in run support despite marginal size.

The Bad: Lacks the burst of speed needed to be an elite edge rusher. Gets caught up with blockers at times and gets "washed out" of too many plays to his side. He can struggle facing double-team blocks. Lacks ideal size.

Outlook: His size is a concern, but his quickness and strength more than compensate for that factor. He can play either side at end. He’s a probable second-round pick, with clubs such as the Titans, Bengals, Eagles and Bucs interested.

You need someone willing to trade up

Perhaps it just wasn’t there. I’ll give Ruskell the benefit of the doubt on this one.

Have we ever traded up? Or am I thinking that we dont ever go for someone….effin M’s making me hate front offices.

Mel Kiper didnt like that one either. Thats why he is a douche bag

turns out I am a Jehovahs Witness today.

I, for one, am really pissed off. We’re probably the only team to rate this guy higher than merling, campbell and groves. we could have sat in the second and taken him, and got desean jackson or trevor laws

what number? also loljets

Ruskell said they would be drafting the famed “best player available.” That means they think Lawrence Jackson was the best player available. Hmmmmm …

Carlson or Bennet will, you have to think at this stage some wideouts with great value will be as well

TE?
WR?
DT?
Trade down?

Can you imagine how Holmgren could move him around, both inside and outside, to exploit matchups? That is a guy who is still getting better—he’s only focused on football for a couple of years.

call me if something good happens….I cant watch this anymore.

Tear Shed

It took 2 minutes to find the channel and only caught the last 30 secods of blah blah blah. Anyone else see the interview?

would be a decent second-round pick.

Although Davis is a bit short for the tight end position, he’s a solid pass catcher and a much, much better blocker than Dustin Keller - who thankfully was passed on by Tim Ruskell - however, anything is a possibility at this point.

that the draft played out perfectly for us, until we picked. Everyone that we have collectively dreamed of for the last few months, laws, jackson, phillips, were all available. We chose to reach for a player in a spot that isn’t as high a need as SS,DT, or WR, positions in which there was great value. We need a receiver in the second

wideouts still available who fit the mold as a prototypical possession receiver at split end.

At least one of Linas Sweed, Malcolm Kelly, and James Hardy should drop to the 55th pick.

nothin wrong with improving the pass rush. i dunno if merling/campbell were better prospects or not, but I’m sure there must have been obvious positives in Jackson’s game that would have made the Hawks FO decide on him.

Obviously the Packers saw something they liked…

he may or may not be a better player that is irrelevant

the point is, he was low on other teams radar and could have been gotten later for less

DE wasn’t a priority. Phillips is also a sure thing

OH SHITBALLS!!!

Well at least it was the TE I would have preferred

not laws though, haha that sent me for a loop

We’re fucking retarded! HE”D BE THERE AT 55!