Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Odds On Peyton Manning's Next Home Includes Three Teams

Seahawks 6th Round Pick: Tyler Schmitt

Schmitt is simply a very talented long snapper. No sex appeal here, but do I need to say...

Boone Stutz?

Nevertheless, as I said below, I can't get behind this pick. I think Ruskell is chasing it after the long snapper debacle last season. You want to learn from your mistakes, but not mistake the exception for the rule. Seattle suffered easily the worst LS play I've ever seen, and no one suffered more than Ryan Plackemeier. Now, Placks will again be nails and Seattle has picked up some field position. That's great, but adequate long snappers can be had in free agency.

The saving grace for this pick is that Schmitt is a real athlete. With his size and speed, I think he'll be able to fill out the special teams. He could be a Z string linebacker, too.

To finish this off, he never botched a snap in college. Is said to have .53 second release snap to punter, I'm cribbing this from NFL.com BTW, as I didn't really research LSers, and played defensive end in high school. I don't know, he won't likely bust, but then, he's a long snapper.

Comment 37 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I have a hard time imagining

that you couldn’t have gotten him as an NDFA, or atleast with one of the 7th round picks.

by Nate Dogg on Apr 27, 2008 1:09 PM PDT reply actions  

Really, I can't get behind this pick.

I think Ruskell is chasing it after the LS debacle last year.

by John Morgan on Apr 27, 2008 1:10 PM PDT reply actions  

Yeah, but how many of us really broke down the Long Snapper talent?

Did you have another LS rated higher? ; ) If he ends up as our starting LS this year and beyond, then he’s a solid pick in the 6th.

by lemonverbena on Apr 27, 2008 1:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

I like it.

He’s must be the best LS available, so they didn’t want to risk losing him in the 7th. The difference in value between a low 6th and a 7th is negligible anyway.

by lemonverbena on Apr 27, 2008 1:14 PM PDT reply actions  

I like that every one of these picks fills an immediate need

and they will all likely get good playing time in next year and contribute.

Kudos to Ruskell and this draft strategy. They are going for it this year.

by marinator on Apr 27, 2008 1:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

maybe...

but if you lose guys like barton or hishsmith by taking a guy who would be there in 40 picks… then it is a bad move.

by WWUPhil on Apr 27, 2008 1:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

You have to quantify need against talent at this level of the draft though.

They really, really needed an answer at LS. Linebacker isn’t a need at the starting level, so the backup/ST need can likely be filled in the 7th, with undrafted FA’s, or with the waiver wire.

by lemonverbena on Apr 27, 2008 1:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

Sorry

I think the best available player philosophy supports your argument better than a need philosophy.

by WWUPhil on Apr 27, 2008 1:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

also

I would rather hear what a sleeper we grabbed than find out we filled a need that I think we could have filled by other means.

by WWUPhil on Apr 27, 2008 1:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hmm

Hard to believe this guy wouldn’t be there in round 7. I imagine he must be demonstrably better than the other in the Hawks’ eyes, so they grabbed him now.

by BrianV on Apr 27, 2008 1:14 PM PDT reply actions  

I'll be ok with the pick

if we can still get Highsmith, Silva or Barton in the 7th

FREE JEREMY REED!!

by MFAN on Apr 27, 2008 1:14 PM PDT reply actions  

Time to get a custom Schmitt jersey

with Owen’s number on the front and left shoulder and Tyler’s on the back and right shoulder.

by Strang on Apr 27, 2008 1:15 PM PDT reply actions  

Drafting for the window

No project picks so far. All of them should contribute this year. I suppose that’s fine, but the OT situation is cause for concern. Please, Walt, stay healthy.

by jeager on Apr 27, 2008 1:19 PM PDT reply actions  

although we don't know

the status of Mansfield Wrotto or Ray Willis. It could mean the FO is satisfied enough with their progress.

by Will Kier on Apr 27, 2008 1:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

True

Which would be consistent with a Locklear replaces Walt scenario. Either that or the FO just didn’t see any valuable OT picks. Or, more likely, some combination of the two.

by jeager on Apr 27, 2008 1:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

Going back to J.P Darche

I think the brain trust was worried about the effect his hip injury would have on Special Teams. If this guy is a real athlete then the Hawks may finally have found what they’re looking for WRT Special Teams support.

by Will Kier on Apr 27, 2008 1:20 PM PDT reply actions  

I read that he said he'd unretire if the Hawks needed him

I don’t know what Special Teams connections the Hawks have with him, but I thought that was hilarious considering we dragged him out of retirement last season.

by Will Kier on Apr 27, 2008 1:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

McShay likes the Steelers draft

I have to admit I wasn’t big on their draft. Mendenhall couldn’t beat out Pierre Thomas at Illinois and had one big year with a team that runs the option. I’m also not very high on Sweed.

FREE JEREMY REED!!

by MFAN on Apr 27, 2008 1:25 PM PDT reply actions  

NFLN talks shit on Ruskell and then backtracks… still making jokes.

by WWUPhil on Apr 27, 2008 1:26 PM PDT reply actions  

Meh

If this guy can contribute on special teams, as well as be a consistant LS… I can be ok with that, reach or not. Fills an immediate need. Probabaly could have filled it with a later pick, but I can be alright with it.

by AtomicGarden on Apr 27, 2008 1:27 PM PDT reply actions  

Frankly

if this pick avoids the LS fiasco we had last season, I’m fine with it.

by BrianL on Apr 27, 2008 1:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yep

The corollary of the Owen Schmitt factor is, the first time Tyler Schmitt f’s up a snap, he’s gonna hear about it.

by Strang on Apr 27, 2008 1:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

Mike Hart to the Colts

I think this stems at least partially from Kenton Keith’s recent legal troubles

"Hey, guess what? Nobody cares who would win in a crazy fantasy fist-fight between Anne Frank and Lizzie Borden." The Monarch

by crushedoptimist on Apr 27, 2008 1:39 PM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SEA!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Avatar_small
The Official Field Gulls OT Thread - In Which We Gush About Our Favorite TV Shows
Hatersgonnahate_small
A short note on what worked for the 49ers, but isn't really a "model"
Halloween_mobster_small
Come on in!

Recent FanPosts

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editor/Lead Writer

284430_601240951600_44900771_32958650_2317286_n_small Danny Kelly

Staff Writers/Editors

Screen_shot_2011-01-05_at_9 Scruffy Lefty

Small BrianL

Avatar_small Benne

Olympiabeer_small Tyler Jorgensen

Hatersgonnahate_small Thomas Beekers

Profilepic_small DJ C-Raig

897267_o_small Kenneth Arthur

Halloween_mobster_small Jacson Bevens

Photo__1__small Charlie Todaro

Staff Writers

Small Joshua Kasparek

Mail Matt Erickson

Davis_small Davis Hsu

Profile2_small Rob Staton

208114_505637750968_23709013_30160241_9483_n_small Scott Enyeart

Elephant_pink_clothes_small Chris Sully

Seattle_seahawk_white_1600_reasonably_small_small Derek Stephens

Osprey1_small Ben Harbaugh

Bu_fb_2_small Daniel Hill