Reviving Red
Red Bryant is a reclamation project. When he’s off, he looks unfixable – not even scraping pro-caliber. When he’s on, he looks interesting, talented, but no where as good as you’d expect. His development is instantly the story of the preseason. Bryant is either going to get it, take to Seattle’s coaching and begin to translate some of his immense talent into production or he’s going to flop. Off the roster, flop.
I started by watching Bryant and Texas A&M duke it out with Texas. I was aghast. Bryant looked just awful. He was slow, slow off the snap, slow in stunts and slow to the ball carrier, the few times he was anywhere near the ball carrier. I couldn’t believe my eyes. “Why would any team draft Bryant?” I thought, and especially “Why would a team that puts so much stake in production draft Bryant?” He was weak, washed out by single blocks, incapable of splitting double teams and generally outclassed by his linemates, college fodder like Henry Smith and Kellen Heard. Most troubling, though, he was lazy, giving up if losing off the snap, coasting against double teams and eventually off the field entirely.
God bless condensed games. Second, I watched the Aggies battle the Oklahoma Sooners. The Sooners have a decent offensive line, headlined by money left guard Duke Robinson. Bryant plays primarily out of the 3, catawampus to Robinson. Suddenly, Bryant is alive. Showing a cool shake and bake stutter step, getting inside and outside advantage and disrupting plays. He’s holding or splitting double teams, firing off the snap, fighting his way back into plays and looking for once like an NFL prospect. As the game wore on, and the score grew lopsided, Bryant’s fire sputtered. One play on, two plays off. Two plays off, one series on the sideline. But my hope was rekindled.
Onto Miami. Bryant starts strong but fades. By halftime, Miami is up 24-0. Masquerading as an Aggies fan, I must say, what an awful, joyless and discouraging team. Their top talent, presumably Martellus Bennett, has all the pizzazz of Randy McMichael and jumps like he’s attached to the turf by rubber bands. I’m starting to see a story develop. The team captain, the NFL talent on a team full of scrubs, reeled in for his senior season, because of loyalty, duty, a degree and one more shot at the top with the boys. Crushed. By an absent coach and barely mediocre team.
So I thought I’d hop back to the past. Texas A&M’s second contest and first against a team worth a damn, Fresno State. Fresno finished 13th in unadjusted offensive FEI and Scout.com calls the line its strength. The Aggies entered 1-0 after stomping a big 38-7 bootprint into Montana State. “We’re a contender!" spirit soaring, Coach Fran not yet depantsed, huzzah! And huzzah is right, because Bryant looks awesome: Exploding single blocks, cleaving doubles, working the right defensive end on three man fronts and playing like a pro prospect among fodder, scrubs and jobbers. Bryant finished with his lone big statistical showing of the season: 6.5 total tackles, 1 solo tackle for a loss and 1 sack.
I started this morning intending to write a scouting report, but 6 hours and 4 condensed games later, I realize it would be pointless. The player Bryant is and the player that Bryant could be do not exist in the same dimension. One is cripplingly inconsistent and so bad when he’s off the Arena League would scoff. That one limped from a failed season, through an embarrassing showing at the Senior Bowl (most noteworthy for a macho slapfest with Chris Williams) and into the combine, where the man who should have killed the bench posted just 20. The other better show up fast at mini-camp. The Seattle Seahawks have a reclamation project on their hands. One with a huge frame, silly quicks and once-upon-a-time rare upside. Over the next few months, Bryant is worth scouring the local fish wraps for. What are the coaches saying? Is John Marshall sanguine, Dwaine Board impressed, is everyone hush-hush or a-gush about LoJack or Owen Schmitt? And when the preseason comes, good news or bad, I’ll be glued to the tube, hoping Joseph “Red” Bryant has begun that long path back to being a top defensive tackle, because, man, that would be something to see.
0 recs |
9
comments
| Add your comment
Read Related
Comments
Parts of this worried me
but I have a lot of faith in this front office to identify a specific sort of talent that can be used by the coaching staff.
This D-line is a few ‘if’s away from being scary scary.
by Strang on
May 1, 2008 4:04 PM PDT
reply
0 recs
Ruskell, so keen on work ethic and character must have had his reasons..
Ruskell has picked guys alone for their work ethic, so it is interesting to see that he struggled with motivation during the season. Rob Rang, in October, had Bryant as the 5th best defensive lineman, and LoJack the 4th. So obviously the talent is there.
by ASUBoyd on
May 1, 2008 5:41 PM PDT
reply
0 recs
I'd be real interested in how he did in past seasons
Since Rang had some pretty nice words about him early in the season, it really seems like it would be valuable to see how he played previously to this season. Not to doom you to more boring A & M games John… but I have a feeling we’re going to be revisiting Red quite a bit over next 4 months.
by gridiron on
May 1, 2008 7:10 PM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
dude, you're killing me here...
"Those who fear disorder more than injustice inevitably produce more of both." -- Rev. William Coffin
by dcrockett17 on
May 2, 2008 7:08 AM PDT
reply
0 recs
Fourth round
Watching the draft while working this weekend, the acclaim for the Red Bryant pick was plentiful. I think the NFL Network guys had that pick as one of the better ones on the second day. So, I wondered, if this Red Bryant guy is so great, why the fourth round? If the Seahawks had him pegged in the third, why did he slip thirty-some picks down to the Hawks position in the fourth? Why were the Hawks willing to give up their third pick, which they apparently had slated for Bryant, in order to move up half a round to ensure that they got John Carlson? Because the scouts saw what John saw on the tape.
Hopefully, being part of a winning program and the coaching will help, but the fact that I’m thinking that demonstrates that this really is the anti-Ruskell pick. I don’t think this is a defense on which the players allow their fellows to take plays off.
by jeager on
May 2, 2008 7:34 AM PDT
reply
0 recs
Interesting comment
“I don’t think this is a defense on which the players allow their fellows to take plays off.”
IMHO, that would be exactly the reason for concluding this is a Ruskell pick: you put faith not just in the coaches but in the other players to motivate, inspire and shape Red Bryant. Handcuff him to Bane and let Bane show him how it’s done . . .
by The Ancient Mariner on
May 2, 2008 9:44 AM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
100%
agree on that one Mariner
Why? Because the Seahawks rock my socks.
by Chickadee on
May 2, 2008 2:10 PM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
Tim Ruskell or John Morgan?
Who to put my faith in? Hmmm.. There’s a tough call.. Wait, what?
Ruskell knows what he’s doing, especially on the defensive side of the ball. Bryant’s talent and upside are undeniable..
I haven’t heard a single negative report out of camp this weekend..
by BS! on
May 4, 2008 3:10 PM PDT
reply
0 recs











