Arizona Cardinals Draft Overview
First Round Selection: Dominique Rogers-Cromartie
This pick is a bit vexing. In 2007, Arizona was miserable defending #1(26th) and #2(25th) receivers. This offseason, 2005 eighth overall pick Antrel Rolle was finally, mercifully, moved to free safety. That left Eric Green manning the #2 corner spot. The punditry conferred, decided the Buzzsaw must, absolutely must, draft a corner in the first round, phoned Rod Graves, he said “Ev” and it was done. That’s where the complications begin.
One of the major reasons Arizona played so poorly against primary and secondary receivers is that they lacked consistent pass rush. It’s one of those universal laws of football, given enough time, the player who knows where the ball is going will beat the guy who’s guessing. If a team could contain Darnell Dockett and pick up whatever mad scientist blitz Clancy Pendergast schemed, their QB could chuck it from a hammock. That’s eminently clear: From week 10 on, Dockett recorded just one sack. Opposing coordinators adjusted blocking schemes, doubling Dockett with a center or using offset I formations to align a fullback behind the 3 gap. Freed from his harassment, their offenses took off. The shoddy Cardinals D went from allowing a kinda lousy 21.7 points per game in weeks 1-9, to allowing an exploding oil derrick-like 28.1 in weeks 10-17. Aggravating this defensive deficiency, the cash strapped Cardinals lost their best blitzing linebacker, Calvin Pace, to free agency.
We don’t need confirmation that Eric Green sucks. Or that the Cardinals would benefit greatly from upgrading ASAP. But does drafting an unpolished, toolsy cornerback from Tennessee State really accomplish that? Cornerback is definitely a matchup position, and D2 isn’t known for its receiver talent. Put it like this, do you know who David Ball is? Exactly. This isn’t some harrowing story of struggle and redemption, either, Rogers didn’t do shit in high school and college scouts recruited him accordingly. So, when we talk about Rogers phenomenal man coverage skills, his mighty press coverage and general dominance, that’s dominance over a gaggle of receivers considerably worse than David Ball. Recently cut from the Bears’ practice squad, David Ball. All-time D2 touchdown leader, David Ball.
Rookie cornerbacks are known combustibles. The precision and complexity of route running in the NFL is a huge step up from all but the most pro-centric college offenses. Short of Champ Bailey, taking lumps your first few seasons is standard procedure for NFL corners. Rogers must transition from the speed and complexity of D2 football to the NFL. Presumably, as soon as week 1. That task might be less daunting could we assume Rogers dominated his competition at TSU, but I can find no record he did that. Combing through Tennessee State’s box scores, I noticed quite a few big passing days by opponents. Rogers can’t be blamed for his team’s ineptness, but you would expect, if nothing else, that he would limit the opposing #1 receiver. I limited my sample to TSU’s opponents who averaged more than 200 yards per game passing for the season (which, to put this into perspective, eliminated all but 7), defined their #1 receiver as, simply enough, their reception yardage leader among wide receivers and recorded how they performed against TSU. This is a pretty modest group, without a single thousand yard receiver. That group averaged 5 receptions for 76.6 yards per contest, including 3 100+ yard games. Bad team, bad passing defense, substandard competition and only anecdotal evidence of dominance; it’s not that I know Rogers will bust, only that it seems like a distinct possibility.
Best Pick: Early Doucet
This is a no-brainer for me, as I thought Doucet was among the safer skill position picks in the draft.
This Draft Could Turn Depending On: Tim Hightower
I cannot find tape or meaningful information on Hightower. He’s slow, that we can be pretty sure of. I do not devalue him for his less than vaunted alma mater; running back is a solitary position. Someone to watch in the preseason.
Final Grade: C+
Initially, I loved this draft. I bought into super-athlete DRC. No longer. For the second straight season, the Cards drafted a former can’t miss defensive line prospect. Both Calais Campbell and Alan Branch are giants among giants, 6076 and 6056 respectively, and both suffered sizable slides after proving to be inconsistent and ineffective football players. If I haven’t made it clear by now, I’m not a fan of picks whose potential inflates their stock, and whose play deflates it. Campbell, specifically, looks like he may have simply outgrown his speed. Doucet is a no-brainer in the third, but one wonders if a team with little depth and two injury racked starters should have put a greater premium on health. That’s hardly damning though. Chris Harrington is an interesting DE/OLB tweener that recalls the glory days of New England’s once dominant defense. A surprisingly high-upside pick I really like at 185. I don’t have much to add about Kenny Iwebama or Brandon Keith. On paper, the Cardinals could have the foundation of a dominant defense in a few years. By then, it’s very possible their offense will have eroded or skipped town. If Hightower is a real find, a feature back able to perform at a high level for 20+ carries a contest, the Cardinals could compete this year. If he’s not, and he likely isn’t, the Cardinals should, once again, be somewhere hovering around average.
. . .
I have a lot more to add about Seattle's division mates. In terms of total value, Seattle did not have the best draft. But in terms of total talent added through the draft and free agency, young talent, existing talent on roster, coaching stability, depth and cap fitness, the Seahawks stand as a sequoia among saplings. Tomorrow, the first edition of my projected NFC West standings for 2008.
16 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Hear, hear! All those nay sayers who believe the Cards can take Seattle this year are deluded as they are every year! Thanks for the post and go Hawks!!!
the Larry Fitzgerald nonsense really underlines
that despite the evident talents of many Cardinals, this FO does them no favors.
I think you put too much on strength of competetion
There have been lots of great players to come out of small schools, obviously there is greater risk there but like everything else in the draft in needs to be taken into consideration as part of the entire package. College recruiters aren’t perfect, sometimes these guys slip through the cracks.
And I don’t see what David Ball has to do with DRC. Timmy Chang can’t make a pro team, what does that say about D1? Nothing.
It's the difference
between hitting .350 with 30 HR in a pitcher’s park in AAA, and doing so in a hitter’s park in high-A.
by The Ancient Mariner on May 12, 2008 5:34 PM PDT up reply actions
Ya, I get it, D1 is harder than D2
but that doesn’t mean that you can’t go from D2 to the NFL. Lets not punish someone for doing what they’re supposed to do. Whatever reason landed DRC in D2 from high school isn’t as important as the fact that he’s done the work to go from D2 to the NFL.
Also, in his opportunities to compete against higher competition, namely the senior bowl and the combine, he’s stood out.
You can have lots of reasons to dislike DRC, but I don’t think where he went to school should be too far up on that list.
Its not that d2 guys cant make it
The point is that there really isn’t any results that translate to the nfl. There is a reason why 95 percent of the guys in league played at a d1 school or even d1aa. The combine and senior bowl mostly showcase premier athletes, with drc clearly is. It is unkown if he will be able to translate that ability to becoming a good corner in the nfl.
Its pretty comparable to how the nba teams drafted athletes out of high school. Somtimes you get a dwight howard, sometimes you get a kwame brown.
The main point is that it will probably take a while for his abilities to be known either way they fall.
by akseattlefan on May 12, 2008 8:35 PM PDT up reply actions
I'd be interested to see the success rate
of drafted D2 players. Since they’re harder to evaluate they usually drop down in the draft and frequently are UDFA. Theres no questioning that most, as in 99.9%, D2 players aren’t anywhere near NFL quality players, so for one of them to get drafted they have to be pretty special.
And as far as D2 and D1aa go, I’m gonna be honest and say I have no idea what the difference is, but Tennesse State is D1aa…... It’s all “not D1” to me.
In that case
it would be more like AA.
And the point is, has he done the work? Or does he just look good in shorts? John’s evaluation would seem to indicate the latter.
by The Ancient Mariner on May 13, 2008 6:21 AM PDT up reply actions
Combing through box scores
is not one of John’s typical evaluations, so forgive me if I’m not going to sour on him because of poor team performance.
That's fine and I understand.
I couldn’t find any tape on Rogers-Cromartie, and am not sure I’d trust what I saw if I did. Nevertheless, I think allowing big games to very substandard wide receivers is significant and is a concern I’ve seen echoed elsewhere. More to watch in the preseason.
DRC
I understand the concern of drafting a DII guy early in the draft and he’ll no doubt go through a learning curve adjusting the size and speed of NFL receivers, but he was the best CB at the Senior Bowl and the most athletic CB at the combine. Considering that pass defense was their greatest need, it’s hard for me to argue with them drafting the arguably best CB on the board.
I’d question you’re argument that DRC didn’t dominate his competition though. It’s really hard to judge a CB’s skills by looking at a box score considering that offenses probably schemed around staying away from him. Here’s a excerpt from my post-draft wrap-up of the DRC pick:
At the end of his senior season his stats were mind-boggling. In 44 career games (39 starts), teams threw in his immediate area 161 times but completed just 55 of them (34.2% completion percentage). Those attempts led to just 620 yards (3.85 yards per attempt) and 3 touchdowns. That was the lowest yards per attempt of any defensive back in college football over the past three seasons.
I'm curious, where are those stats from?
Researching for this last draft I’ve noticed a proliferation of team produced stats. They get thrown around, but without context or objectivity, I have to question their merit. TSU has every reason to cast DRC in the best light imaginable.
can't disagree with that logic
I’d imagine TSU would try and pump him up but I got the stats from his player profile at combine (via nfl.com/combine). I have no idea if those stats are just submitted to NFL.com by TSU or if those are actually compiled by the League. Either way though, if we can’t trust stats from the League’s official web-site, who can we trust.
Well...
I’m very interested to see how he plays in the preseason. If he’s half the player some think he can be, the Cards could make some noise.
by John Morgan on May 14, 2008 10:24 AM PDT up reply actions

by 

























