Five Fearless Preseason Predictions
The preseason is my favorite part of the football year. The season--I live and die. The preseason--I sit and root. For the team, the youth, the scrappers, the hacks and the hanger-ons. The big egos sit and the hungry kids fight for employment. And none of it matters a damn. I love the preseason because it’s about stories and who’s gonna make it and who’s gonna surprise. It’s frivolous. It’s fun.
So is the spirit of this article. Potshots welcome.
John Carlson will be the story.
Seattle expects Carlson to start week 1. He’s been in and out of camps courtesy a gimpy hamstring. I expect Holmgren and company to give Carlson a crash course in the West Coast come preseason: lots of snaps, lots of targets and lots of minutes. Carlson has just the skill-set to torch opponent’s second and third stringers. He’s an excellent route runner and a surgeon at dissecting zones. The preseason is about getting players up to speed and evaluating talent. The fire zone can wait. I expect to see Carlson streaking down the seam against a grip of cover 2 zone and cover 2 man. He won’t Stevens it up.
Seattle will shutout an opponent.
The Hawks have silly defensive line depth. In the third quarter, against the Bears and Raiders second string offensive lines, Seattle will roll Red Bryant, Marcus Tubbs, Craig Terrill, Larry Triplett, Lawrence Jackson, Baraka Atkins and Darryl Tapp. That’s just not fair. Lance Laury and Will Herring aren’t superstars, but both are quick and technically sound. Seattle’s second string corners are Josh Wilson and Kevin Hobbs. The Hawks are a deep, young defense and against a pair of talent poor and gold leaf thin offenses, not only will they shut someone out, they’ll explode for a second half defensive rout.
Jordan Kent will do something incredible.
I’m picturing scramble left, Wallace to Kent for 70 and the score.
Olindo Mare will beat out Brandon Coutu.
I wasn’t fond of the Coutu pick and I think he’s the Hawk’s most precarious player. So far, all I’ve heard about Coutu’s performance is explanations: Nerves, inexperience—BS. I think the kid’s lost a few ticks off his fastball. His senior season his kickoff average plummeted to a Mike Vandejagt-like 59.0 and he notched only one touchback, but 3 kicks out of bounds. I expect Mare to completely outclass the rookie.
Charlie Frye will suck.
…And the search for a backup quarterback continues.
0 recs |
7
comments
Read Related
Comments
My crystal ball predicts....
Marcus Tubbs blows out both knees running out of the tunnel.
by Silky_Salamander on Jun 27, 2008 4:54 PM PDT 0 recs
I have a
strange feeling that the rookie kicker will beat out the Veteran for the spot..bet ya?
Take a seat, well somewhere...nevermind
by Chris Hansen on Jun 27, 2008 6:46 PM PDT 0 recs
I'd agree with everything
except the presumption that Frye will suck. He’s had a year to gather himself mentally and learn the playbook. I know when he looked bad, he looked terrible for Cleveland but he played very well at times as well. I’m not saying he’s above average, but he’s in an ideal situation in Seattle and he does have talent and room to improve. The fact that Holmgren didn’t make a move for a QB in free agency and the draft would suggest that Charlie’s at a point that he can move up to number two in pre-season, allowing Wallace to lay a little WR.
by ciarannh on Jun 28, 2008 5:46 AM PDT 0 recs
your crystal ball prediction....
Just made me shoot coffee through my nose laughing.. thanks.
After the major disappointment that was Jeramy Stevens, I’m hoping that John Carlson does everything you say.
by Professor on Jul 1, 2008 4:55 AM PDT 0 recs
I thought
you said the acquisition of Chuck Frye was a smart move last season?
by Shawk on Jul 3, 2008 2:38 PM PDT 0 recs
I remember saying this...
September 10th: The resulting opening allows Seattle to trade a draft pick for Charlie Frye. Frye is an accurate pocket passer who fits Mike Holmgren’s system. He has a very weak arm and limited upside, but with the right coaching could become a Trent Dilfer or Tim Rattay-like backup. Step one, though, is learning some pocket awareness. Frye (10.9% Adjusted Sack Rate 2005, 9.4% 2006) was quite a bit worse than fellow Browns Qbs Trent Dilfer (6.2% ASR, 2005) and Derek Anderson (5.9% ASR, 2006) at avoiding the sack. This has been a longstanding problem for Frye who was sacked 38 times his senior season at Akron. Net Loss = Draft Pick. Net Gain = Potentially competent second string quarterback.
Which is to say the team was desperate for a second string quarterback, but I don’t remember ever saying I thought Frye would be good.
by John Morgan on
Jul 3, 2008 10:17 PM PDT
up
0 recs









