Season Retro: Leonard Weaver
Leonard Weaver
0 recs |
11
comments
Read Related
Comments
I believe in Weaver
and I think the drafting of Schmitt’s going to motivate him to work hard on his weakness; I think he’s going to come out in training camp and show that he can do his job the way Holmgren wants it done. I continue to hope that Holmgren (or somebody) is thinking the way I’m thinking and decides to try putting Weaver and Schmitt in the same backfield—both guys who can block, catch, and run over people; if Duckett’s still got it, we could become the league’s first power-rushing WCO, and really make opposing defenses miserable.
Incidentally, do you mean B. R. Myers’ Reader’s Manifesto, or are you thinking of a different one? (Is there a different one?)
by The Ancient Mariner on Jun 28, 2008 10:38 PM PDT 0 recs
And just to clarify, not a dig against Myers...
just kind of how I envisioned the character.
OoF, Myers would scorn that statement.
by John Morgan on
Jun 30, 2008 10:34 AM PDT
up
0 recs
I didn't take it as a dig
—just making sure I was tracking with you. It wasn’t quite the image I would have expected.
by The Ancient Mariner on
Jun 30, 2008 12:18 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Power package
John, how would that dream power package you mention look? Weaver at H-Back? Wishbone? Just curious, with three backs on the field. As I recall, GB threw a bunch of three-back stuff at us during that game about which we must not speak.
by jeager on Jun 29, 2008 6:33 PM PDT 0 recs
. . .
Duckett at tailback, Weaver at fullback, Carlson at tight end, Schmitt at H-back and Burleson at split end…
or
Duckett at fullback, Weaver, Carlson and Schmitt in trips tight and Burleson at split end…
or
4 wide tight, with Burleson and Carlson the wide receiver, Weaver and Schmitt in the slots and Jones at tailback—need a little more speed there.
The cool thing is that they can all catch, block (-Burleson) or rush (-Carlson).
by John Morgan on
Jun 30, 2008 10:31 AM PDT
up
0 recs
The chances of Holmgren ever running those packages
are slim to none though right?
by Nate Dogg on
Jun 30, 2008 4:24 PM PDT
up
0 recs
I don't know...
word is that because he’s retiring next season he’s up to all sorts of of unwholesome hijinks!
But, yeah, slim->none.
by John Morgan on
Jun 30, 2008 4:27 PM PDT
up
0 recs
“Execution without innovation is Philip Roth”
them are fighting words. both the Kepesh trilogy and the four main Zuckerman books are very innovative. come on, man!
by shams on Jun 30, 2008 10:51 AM PDT 0 recs
I knew that would PO someone.
I guess I just associate Roth with flawless technique rather than innovation in a Joyce or Miller or Kerouac sense.
But, I won’t lie—it was shameless baiting.
by John Morgan on
Jun 30, 2008 11:52 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Incidentally
that shot really looks like Weaver’s practicing his ballet moves with that Niner . . .
by The Ancient Mariner on Jun 30, 2008 12:19 PM PDT 0 recs













