Field Gulls: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: Race to the BCS: rankings, in-game scores & blogs Bar-right-arrows



Terry Glenn?

Glenn was waived by the boys.

Should we add another ex cowboy with a chip on his shoulder? Or do we not need another injury prone reciever?

Either way I think we oughta give him a good hard look, though I have no idea how he would fit into our system due to my singular focus on the Seahawks.

I like our young receivers a lot, but adding a proven vet could be a better option. But then again, that's me sounding like the Mariners front office, which is generally dumb.

0 recs | Comment 3 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Won't happen.

The hawks clearly don’t want to sign a veteran WR. I think the strongest evidence is that we didn’t go after Isaac Bruce. Bruce is coming off a solid year, Glenn is not and has big question marks surrounding his knees.

With Engram and Burleson starting and Branch due back at some point, we WANT to get some of these younger guys on the field. We also have a TE and pass catchers in the backfield.

The problem isn’t experience (both starters are veterans, as is Branch). Many teams are younger at the position. The problem is that Branch was viewed as the #1 and we don’t really have a true #1 or #2 right now. Engram did well last year but was that an aberration? Burleson was alright last year also but not spectacular.

I hear the reasoning for bringing in a Chad Johnson – type player. I do not think brining in a player who is (at best) as good as Burleson and Engram is smart though. We will get Branch back. We will sign Carlson. We will throw to Weaver, Morris, and Jones. Beyond that I would rather give reps to the younger guys because one or two might really emerge into something special. Or, one or two might get as good as Burleson or Engram (ie very playable if not a star) and be very cheap at the same time.

by michaelfox99 on Jul 26, 2008 8:57 AM PDT   0 recs

I think

This Eric Parker/Terry Glenn/Bryan Gilmore to the Seahawks deal is worthless.

I think it’s basically saying we don’t want to develop Courtney Taylor or Logan Payne and just stick nothing but veterans in there.

And besides, after Glenn just blew up his knee, it’s not worth the risk.

I asked someone to identify which was a pile of garbage and which was the shooting of the Seattle Sonics....he failed.

by SSreporters on Jul 26, 2008 10:20 AM PDT   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Walter Jones, you were the greatest, most dominant player I've ever seen at any position. It's been an honor to be your fan.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Picture_1_small
Video Preview: Something to do with your friday
Small
GM Tim Ruskell breaks his silence.
Small
Utah's Attorney General suing the BCS?
Front_of_car_small
Should the Hawks go after TJ Houshmandzadeh in Free Agency
Small
Hakeem Nicks Goes Pro
Boomheadshot_small
Adam Schefter reports Rod Marinelli is talking with Seahawks for D Coordinator
Front_of_car_small
11 reasons not to draft Sam Bradford or Tim Tebow
Picofme_small
The Taylor Mays Microsoft Connection
Front_of_car_small
Big School Myth?
Small
Video Review - 2008 Season

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Managers

Image_114_small Shrug

Jj_flag_detail1_small John Morgan

Graphics Editor

Picture_1_small Scruffy Lefty

Writer

Small Doug Farrar

The Man Behind the Man

Small BrianL

ad

Site Meter