Field Gulls: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Steve McNair Found Shot to Death


Terry Glenn?

Glenn was waived by the boys.

Should we add another ex cowboy with a chip on his shoulder? Or do we not need another injury prone reciever?

Either way I think we oughta give him a good hard look, though I have no idea how he would fit into our system due to my singular focus on the Seahawks.

I like our young receivers a lot, but adding a proven vet could be a better option. But then again, that's me sounding like the Mariners front office, which is generally dumb.

0 recs | Comment 3 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Won't happen.

The hawks clearly don’t want to sign a veteran WR. I think the strongest evidence is that we didn’t go after Isaac Bruce. Bruce is coming off a solid year, Glenn is not and has big question marks surrounding his knees.

With Engram and Burleson starting and Branch due back at some point, we WANT to get some of these younger guys on the field. We also have a TE and pass catchers in the backfield.

The problem isn’t experience (both starters are veterans, as is Branch). Many teams are younger at the position. The problem is that Branch was viewed as the #1 and we don’t really have a true #1 or #2 right now. Engram did well last year but was that an aberration? Burleson was alright last year also but not spectacular.

I hear the reasoning for bringing in a Chad Johnson – type player. I do not think brining in a player who is (at best) as good as Burleson and Engram is smart though. We will get Branch back. We will sign Carlson. We will throw to Weaver, Morris, and Jones. Beyond that I would rather give reps to the younger guys because one or two might really emerge into something special. Or, one or two might get as good as Burleson or Engram (ie very playable if not a star) and be very cheap at the same time.

by michaelfox99 on Jul 26, 2008 8:57 AM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I think

This Eric Parker/Terry Glenn/Bryan Gilmore to the Seahawks deal is worthless.

I think it’s basically saying we don’t want to develop Courtney Taylor or Logan Payne and just stick nothing but veterans in there.

And besides, after Glenn just blew up his knee, it’s not worth the risk.

I asked someone to identify which was a pile of garbage and which was the shooting of the Seattle Sonics....he failed.

by SSreporters on Jul 26, 2008 10:20 AM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Where the writing's bad and the discussion banal.
Start posting about the Seahawks »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Lolcat_small
FG - Training Camp Meet up/Awesome dudes excited to meet other dudes with same interests.
Nielson_small
The Turnaround Season: A Fictional Look Into the 2009 Seattle Seahawks
Steve2006_small
THE WAY WE WERE: Comparing the 2009 Seahawks to the 2005 NFC Champions

Recent FanPosts

Imagen_015_small
Misfit is famous!
Small
Trade for Thigpen
Xhand_small
Housh: A Psychic or Loudmouth?
Michaelscott_small
Impact of Coverage LBs On A Defense?
Small
TE Cameron Morrah signed, 4 years, $1.79 Million
Small
Burleson to train at Athletes' Performance in Arizona
Small
FB Owen Schmitt enters camp as the starter

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Managers

Image_114_small Shrug

Jj_flag_detail1_small John Morgan

Editors

Lolcat_small Scruffy Lefty

Authors

Vp081-c_small Christian

Small BrianL

Small abender20

Small Doug Farrar

Official Partner of Yahoo! Sports