Projecting Seattle's 53 Man Roster: Offense
I'm not going to flatter anyone's ego, or claim that common sense lists with 50 word blurbs are strictly for the "hard core". It's patronizing and adds credence to what is in reality filler. Instead, let's look at a feasible 53 man roster, why I think Seattle will end up with this group, its strength and its weaknesses and you can tell me where you think I've gone wrong.
Quarterback
Matt Hasselbeck
Seneca Wallace
Charlie Frye
Strengths: Top talent in Hasselbeck. Serviceable backups in Wallace and Frye.
Weaknesses: The long term potential of Frye.

Running Back
Julius Jones
Maurice Morris
TJ Duckett
Justin Forsett
Nothing Morris did on Friday changes the fact that he can't pass block. So, despite looking like a man on fire against a stout run defense, Morris should stay a second string, situational running back. What Morris did do, though, is make himself borderline untradeable. Seattle will finds spots for him, in much the same they did last season, exploiting his perceived strengths: receiving and draws.
Jones is Seattle's complete back and the player Mike Holmgren wants to win the position outright. That's because Jones complete skills will add versatility to an offense that will need versatility to thrive. In short, Jones is fighting for carries and Morris is fighting for Jones' carries.
Duckett will be used in short yardage, to kill the clock, occasionally as a fullback or in split backs and, probably, in the rare tricky draw.
Forsett will play the Alvin Pearman role. Punt returner, change of pace back. Should get some screen passes on especially long third downs.
Expected split: Jones 50%, Morris 30%, Ducket 15%, Forsett 5%
Strengths: Depth. Complimentary skills sets. Versatility.
Weaknesses: No single premier rusher. Only Jones is complete, meaning plays will be somewhat telegraphed when the other three play.
Fullback
Leonard Weaver
Owen Schmitt
Weaver starts and should see all non-garbage time snaps. Weaver has Pro Bowl potential, mainly for his contributions running, receiving and pass blocking. Still not a great run blocker.
Schmitt will contribute on special teams and be in the mix for garbage time, clock killing drives. Schmitt is the team's best run blocker and could pair with Duckett to create a punishing run-first, fourth quarter offense.
Strengths: Overall talent is excellent. Weaver needs only to become a great lead blocker to be among the best fullbacks in the NFL. Schmitt can contribute on special teams and gives Seattle an ace in the hole when playing with the lead.
Weaknesses: None.
Tight End
John Carlson
Will Heller
Carlson is the starter in waiting. Seattle needs him to show enough over the next three weeks for Seattle to shed Putzier. Putz is an all receive no block tight end that adds nothing in the red zone. Seattle has no need for him unless Carlson falters or is injured. Injury is more likely.
Heller is the designated blocking tight end, but does enough as a receiver to sell two tight end sets. Heller will see most of his snaps in the red zone. Three tight end sets can be filled out with Ray Willis or Steve Vallos.
Strengths: Efficiency. Top end talent. Red zone ability. Blocking.
Weaknesses: Depth. Injuries.
Offensive Tackle
Walter Jones
Sean Locklear
Ray Willis
Kyle Williams
Willis offers depth at guard and tackle.
Kyle Williams makes the list for his ability to play left tackle in a bind.
Strengths: Front line talent. First unit run and pass blocking. Right tackle pass blocking depth.
Weaknesses: Left tackle depth.
Offensive Guard
Mike Wahle
Rob Sims
Mansfield Wrotto
The health of Wahle and Sims, plus that Willis and Vallos can play guard in a pinch gives Seattle the luxury to go thin here.
Strengths: Pass blocking. Power. Health. Potential.
Weaknesses: Downgrade at left guard from Wahle to anyone else.
Center
Chris Spencer
Steve Vallos
Vallos played tackle at Wake Forest and looks to be Seattle's newest everyman.
Strengths: Potential. Athleticism.
Weaknesses: Current ability. Run blocking. Blitz recognition. Health (Spencer).
Flanker
Courtney Taylor
Logan Payne
If Taylor wins the spot, Holmgren will call it like Darrell Jackson. A more open game designed for a top receiver. If Payne wins the spot, Holmgren will call it like last season when Engram saw snaps at flanker. More bottled up, and out of more three and four wide sets.
Strengths: Current ability. Red zone.
Weaknesses: Health. Potential.
Split End
Nate Burleson
Jordan Kent
Burleson will start, with Kent probably getting looks in the red zone and out of 4 wide receiver packages. Kent's potential is best suited for split end, where his mix of speed, size and athleticism will force defenses to account for him, while his lack of skills and inconsistent play will be less detrimental.
Strengths: Red zone. Big play. Deep threat (Kent).
Weaknesses: Consistency. Route running. Possession.
Slot
Bobby Engram
Ben Obomanu
Payne and Kent can play an alternate slot when going four wide.
Strengths: Speed, big play ability and an ability to stretch the seam.
Weaknesses: Depth. Third down conversions. Consistency.
I'll project the defense, special teams and practice squad later today.
0 recs |
26 comments
Comments
Do you really think there ready to shed Porkchop?
Coach Owens = No Fun Zone
by Scruffy Lefty on
Aug 14, 2008 1:28 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
they're
against Vegas reliever Casey Hoorelbeke, whose ancestors clearly couldn't spell Hurlbeck properly.
by Christian on
Aug 14, 2008 1:53 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
get a job
Coach Owens = No Fun Zone
by Scruffy Lefty on
Aug 14, 2008 2:13 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
get a golf game.
against Vegas reliever Casey Hoorelbeke, whose ancestors clearly couldn't spell Hurlbeck properly.
by Christian on
Aug 14, 2008 9:12 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
mines still better than yours
Coach Owens = No Fun Zone
by Scruffy Lefty on
Aug 15, 2008 7:15 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
fixed my drives.....now what.
against Vegas reliever Casey Hoorelbeke, whose ancestors clearly couldn't spell Hurlbeck properly.
by Christian on
Aug 15, 2008 10:25 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I can still get in your head and make you shoot a 150
if I wanted to
Coach Owens = No Fun Zone
by Scruffy Lefty on
Aug 15, 2008 10:35 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I can still play "I kissed a girl" before any of your shots.
Don’t forget you said you would be coming over here next month.
against Vegas reliever Casey Hoorelbeke, whose ancestors clearly couldn't spell Hurlbeck properly.
by Christian on
Aug 15, 2008 11:34 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
get on AIM
against Vegas reliever Casey Hoorelbeke, whose ancestors clearly couldn't spell Hurlbeck properly.
by Christian on
Aug 15, 2008 11:44 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Company BBQ
Going to go win $200 in Horseshoes
Coach Owens = No Fun Zone
by Scruffy Lefty on
Aug 15, 2008 12:18 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
porkchop will be on ir
by the time the season starts.
i’ve never understood why the team likes him so much, he’s not been very good when he’s gotten into games the last 2 years.
by bitterguy on
Aug 14, 2008 1:47 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I kinda hope not.
From what I’ve heard, he’s actually played quite well in spot duty, especially in relief of Walter.
by djafrot on
Aug 14, 2008 1:47 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
The Forsett ManCrush
ceases to amaze. I would much prefer TE depth than to carry six backs. Josh Wilson will not win the Nickel, and may even be a reach for the Dime… thus, he is the pime KR and PR.
There is no room for Forsett. And I highly doubt anyone would pick him up on waivers. No room at SF, STL, and AZ, especially. Let it go. He had one good run in the scrimmage, a couple decent runs against garbage, and cannot block.
Forsett is a liability, and Putzier will spread the field.
Otherwise, really awesome.
Appreciate the chance to voice.
Peace
by kidder95 on
Aug 14, 2008 5:30 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Ahh, so you're bigmaq
under another handle. I’d wondered about that . . .
by The Ancient Mariner on
Aug 14, 2008 10:05 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Nope... no idea who bigmaq is...
Just a fan of the website… just not agreeing with the Forsett love. JM’s work is outstanding.
Be well :)
by kidder95 on
Aug 15, 2008 8:35 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Ahh--you sound like him
and you signed off like him, which is why I came to that conclusion.
by The Ancient Mariner on
Aug 15, 2008 9:32 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I don't use the word "mancrush"
And Forsett can only be judged by the opportunities he’s had. Make what you will of the level of competition he faced, but remember too that Forsett was running behind a patched together, third string offensive line. Running back is not a true matchup position and nothing he did on Friday shouldn’t be able to translate to the regular season.
Substantiating your opinion would help people take it and yourself more seriously. It’s not enough to say Josh Wilson will not win the Nickel, you must provide some reason you think that.
by John Morgan on
Aug 15, 2008 10:11 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Fair enough...
I will do more to substantiate my positions. We said. I am a subjective viewer of the games, and do not take time to crush numbers. So, in that case, I’ve already lost my ability to substantiate. However, if one can ‘sense’ aspects of the game… like ‘sensing’ Justin Tuck will have a massive year this year, and that we will most likely make dire decisions (such as Atkins over Babin, Forsett over Scmitt).
That, however, is based on ‘sensing’… which, in all honesty, is BS.
That is why I comment, and you blog :)
by kidder95 on
Aug 16, 2008 10:26 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
We = well...
ghesh, I need an automated spell checker.
by kidder95 on
Aug 16, 2008 10:26 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Fixed your post.
I will do more to substantiate my positions. We said. I am a subjective viewer of the games, and do not take time to crush numbers. So, in that case, I’ve already lost my ability to substantiate. However, if one can ‘sense’ aspects of the game… like ‘sensing’ Justin Tuck will have a massive year this year, and that we will most likely make dire decisions (such as Atkins over Babin, Forsett over Scmitt).
is BS.
That, however, is based on ‘sensing’… which, in all honesty,
That is why I comment, and you blog :)
against Vegas reliever Casey Hoorelbeke, whose ancestors clearly couldn't spell Hurlbeck properly.
by Christian on
Aug 16, 2008 11:17 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Branch?
Where is Branch and Engram? They will be on the roster.
by m_b on
Aug 15, 2008 8:54 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs












