Field Gulls: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: Race to the BCS: rankings, in-game scores & blogs Bar-right-arrows



spread the word

Matchupalooza: 49ers @ Seahawks: Spikes, Yikes and Gore

Leonard Weaver versus Takeo Spikes

Takeospikes_medium
Not pictured: Blocking.

On August 10th, days before the start of the preseason, the San Francisco 49ers signed Takeo Spikes out of semi-retirement to play their Ted linebacker. The Ted linebacker, plainly, is the inside linebacker within a two-gap 3-4 that attacks blockers and opens lanes for the playmaking Mike linebacker. The Mike linebacker is the other inside linebacker and not unlike a traditional 4-3 middle linebacker. Spikes makes for a curious signing at Ted. Spikes, nearing 32, is just 6'2", 240 and known, when he was known, as a playmaker. A Ted is anything but, playing a support role as grueling and unrewarding as its closest offensive equivalent: fullback.

Coincidentally, Leonard Weaver is also a playmaker less known for the actual priority of his position, blocking, and more for the ancillaries of his position, rushing and receiving. These two mismatched misfits square off in an important matchup neither surely has the advantage in.

As a run blocker, Weaver still shows little ability to deliver a block on the run. That's problematic facing a Ted linebacker as intent at making the tackle himself as neutralizing the lead blocker. One game caveats apply, but San Francisco's week one contest against the Cardinals involved the second lowest single game tackle total of Patrick Willis' career. Nearly matching his five, Spikes tackled four. Weaver's odd pick and push is sometimes effective at confusing would-be tacklers, giving a rusher time to evade a defender if never really effectively blowing open a hole. But as Ted linebackers go, Spikes is agile and a decent tackler. Spikes might simply avoid Weaver, undercut his block and attack the rusher himself. It's one of the more frustrating elements of a strict depth chart. Seattle would benefit from looks by Owen Schmitt, who would destroy Spikes and blot out the sun with the bodies of his defeated. Schmitt is versatile enough that he wouldn't sell the play call, and using Schmitt on the occasional series wouldn't cut greatly into Weaver's touches. Instead, this is a pick`em. Weaver could show and help power a much needed Seahawks rushing attack, or he could flounder, miss Spikes and allow easy tackles while Seattle's rushing attack founders.

The other half of this matchup is pass blocking. Weaver should have it all over Spikes as a pass blocker. That matchup, with Weaver knocking Spikes back and into the hole Spikes is meant to create, should help contain the Niners blitzing linebackers. It helps, greatly in fact, that Maurice Morris is out with injury. Julius Jones is a very good pass blocker and the two, Jones and Weaver, showed good chemistry picking up blitzes against the Bills. They'll need it, because after last week, every future opponent won't stop blitzing until Seattle forces them to.

Courtney Taylor versus Nate Clements

I hear you. "What matchup? Clements a rock star and Taylor dropped drawers." Well, this certainly won't be the matchup that revives fans trust in Taylor. Clements is faster than Taylor, more skilled than Taylor and likely even stronger than Taylor. This matchup isn't about winning, though, but challenging and staying viable. Even after dropping two early passes, Matt Hasselbeck clearly trusted Taylor, targeting him nine times total. That trust must carry over, because keeping Taylor involved forces San Francisco from blanketing Billy McMullen and Logan Payne. Neither receiver can survive such attention. It will also keep Clements from playing "off" Taylor. If Clements feels confident he can defend/contain Taylor while playing off coverage, he becomes a dangerous interception threat and a potential game altering force. Game planning matters, drawing Clements deep(er) with John Carlson and Sammie Parker will open space for Taylor to work underneath, but execution is decisive. Taylor cannot quit a single route. Taylor cannot drop easy passes or allow a charging Clement to knock nearly-caught passes out. Taylor must show his potential for run after the catch or risk becoming irrelevant. Essentially, Taylor must stay involved, stay active, be viable and be valuable. Do all that and it won't get the box score skimmers off your back, but it will do wonders for Seattle's passing offense.

Lofa Tatupu versus Frank Gore

Lofa_tatupu_5b1_5d_medium
Best of five? We're just getting started.

Frank Gore made his name against the Seahawks, but those were different times. Gore thrived behind Moran Norris in Norv Turner's power rushing attack and though Mike Martz shares Turner's Air Coryell roots, the two couldn't be more different calling the run. Norris didn't survive San Francisco' final wave of cuts, partly because he might be washed up and partly because Martz has little use for a back that blocks and little else. Enter Ivy Leaguer (a phrase coined specifically to insult a college's football program) Zak Keasey. As a blocker, the change from Norris to Keasy is a bit like going from prime rib to weird brother of prime rib, but it doesn't much matter. The Lions ran 64% of all plays from a single back set, and the 49ers will do likewise.

So ladies and germs, I'll let you figure this one out yourself. Seattle's fleet linebackers do almost everything well, but still sometimes struggle shedding blockers. Unlike former Gorings, Gore won't be entering the second level with a man-battering-ram at his hest. Instead, he'll survive on skills, surprise and favorable matchups. But one Hawk never leaves the field, Lofa Tatupu, and the two should square off in an entertaining, essential matchup that will impact field position, San Francisco's play calling, Seattle's formations and, should it stay close, very possibly the game. I couldn't place my confidence in better hands. 49ers fans feel exactly the same way.

0 recs | Comment 16 comments | Digg!

Read Related

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I'm starting to think that with Weaver, Schmitt and Jones

We should employ some type of 3 back 1 TE 1 WR formations.

You may gain some yards on the ground, but eventually Lofa will end up biting you in the ass.

by Scruffy Lefty on Sep 12, 2008 2:35 PM PDT   0 recs

Do you have an idea of how many series Schmidt had last week?

I spent some time watching him in the preseason and he is 1 hell of a run blocker. A play that stands out is on TJ Ducketts 1 yard TD run vs the Raiders. Schmidt delivered a punishing lead block that took 3 defenders out of the picture and completely sealed off 1 side of the hole.

With our lack of experienced WR, it seems like we will try to establish the run and run often. Schmidt might be a better option in this case than Weaver. I hope he doesn’t get held on the sideline just because he’s a rookie and Weaver is the incumbent. It seems silly to not use your players to their best abilities.

Remaining cautiously optimistic...

by Badical Turbo Radness on Sep 12, 2008 2:38 PM PDT   0 recs

I don't think he got on the field

You may gain some yards on the ground, but eventually Lofa will end up biting you in the ass.

by Scruffy Lefty on Sep 12, 2008 2:41 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

= loss.

XBOX live gamertag: BANE509...I would die tonight for my beliefs.

by Christian on Sep 12, 2008 8:17 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

!

Step 1: Recievers catch balls
Step 2: Provide good defense
Step 3: ??? (Schmitt plays?)
Step 4: PROFIT!!!

Sounds like we have a game plan ccoming…

I was the poor bastard that had Tom Brady on my Field Gulls fantasy football team.

by Chickadee on Sep 12, 2008 8:19 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Huh?

I was making a remark that if Schmitt doesn’t play, we don’t win. it was a sarcastic remark.

XBOX live gamertag: BANE509...I would die tonight for my beliefs.

by Christian on Sep 12, 2008 9:08 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Me 2

I was supporting your point, not refuting it

I was the poor bastard that had Tom Brady on my Field Gulls fantasy football team.

by Chickadee on Sep 12, 2008 9:27 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Christians fails at internet :)

Can’t believe you never seen the step program.

You may gain some yards on the ground, but eventually Lofa will end up biting you in the ass.

by Scruffy Lefty on Sep 13, 2008 11:20 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Should Christian not Christians

Scruffy fails at internet

You may gain some yards on the ground, but eventually Lofa will end up biting you in the ass.

by Scruffy Lefty on Sep 13, 2008 11:20 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Christians do fail at internet now and then

Just search “church camp” on youtube. Many lulz.

I was the poor bastard that had Tom Brady on my Field Gulls fantasy football team.

by Chickadee on Sep 13, 2008 2:10 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

two questions

It might not be an important match-up, but I’m just curious as to what you think about Lo-Jack going up against Joe Staley? I know you really liked both of them coming out of the draft (Staley obviously being drafted last season). Any opinion on who should/will win this matchup? and does it bear any importance on the outcome of the game?

 Oh and I need a score prediction from you John!

by MFAN on Sep 12, 2008 3:05 PM PDT   0 recs

I'm not predicting the score, but...

am just as interested in the Staley/Jackson matchup as you. I can’t call it, but RDE vs. LT is always important. Jackson looked competitive on every snap against Buffalo, and I was especially impressed in his improvement anticipating the snap count. Given Qwest, I think Jackson has a slight edge. We shall see.

by John Morgan on Sep 12, 2008 3:14 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

I wanted to pick LoJack as my Hawk of the week

but I’m too chicken to do it with this match up.

by Nate Dogg on Sep 12, 2008 3:46 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Anyone else

notice that Courtney jogged his routes during running plays?

It is what it is...

by kidder95 on Sep 13, 2008 9:57 AM PDT   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Walter Jones, you were the greatest, most dominant player I've ever seen at any position. It's been an honor to be your fan.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Picture_1_small
Video Preview: Something to do with your friday
Small
GM Tim Ruskell breaks his silence.
Small
Utah's Attorney General suing the BCS?
Front_of_car_small
Should the Hawks go after TJ Houshmandzadeh in Free Agency
Small
Hakeem Nicks Goes Pro
Boomheadshot_small
Adam Schefter reports Rod Marinelli is talking with Seahawks for D Coordinator
Front_of_car_small
11 reasons not to draft Sam Bradford or Tim Tebow
Picofme_small
The Taylor Mays Microsoft Connection
Front_of_car_small
Big School Myth?
Small
Video Review - 2008 Season

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Managers

Image_114_small Shrug

Jj_flag_detail1_small John Morgan

Graphics Editor

Picture_1_small Scruffy Lefty

Writer

Small Doug Farrar

The Man Behind the Man

Small BrianL

ad

Site Meter