Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Identifying The 19th-Best Team In Baseball

Which pass coverage scheme are the Seahawks best staffed for?

It is time for a serious discu ssion.

We all saw the horrifying effects of a strong wide receiver corps combined with the deep ball vs. the 49ers. Play after play, despite heavy pressure, the Seahawks were unable to stop the aerial bombardment. Are running the wrong coverage schemes for our players?

The Seahawks have great LBs & DEs who might be used more creatively in short zones, spies, and other deceptive modes. Are they being put to their best use?

Our DBs are somewhat short, but quick. When we confront 6-4 WRs & TEs with 5-11 CBs, it often produces poor results. Is this rational? 

What do you believe is our best coverage scheme out of our 4-3 base defense given who we have on our roster?

Below is the current defensive roster sorted by echelon and height:

 

No. Name Pos. H W Age Exp.
92 Brandon Mebane DT 6-1 314 23 2
94 Howard Green DT 6-2 320 29 4
93 Craig Terrill DT 6-2 295 28 5
99 Rocky Bernard DT 6-3 308 29 7
79 Red Bryant DT 6-4 318 24 R
55 Darryl Tapp DE 6-1 270 24 3
52 Jason Babin DE 6-3 267 28 5
91 Baraka Atkins DE 6-4 268 23 2
95 Lawrence Jackson DE 6-4 271 23 R
97 Patrick Kerney DE 6-5 272 31 10
59 David Hawthorne LB 6-1 240 23 R
51 Lofa Tatupu MLB 6-1 242 25 4
58 D.D. Lewis LB 6-1 241 29 7
56 Leroy Hill OLB 6-1 238 26 4
50 Lance Laury OLB 6-2 237 26 3
54 Will Herring (PUP) LB 6-3 235 25 2
98 Julian Peterson OLB 6-3 240 30 9
26 Josh Wilson CB 5-9 192 23 2
21 Kelly Jennings CB 5-11 180 25 3
23 Marcus Trufant CB 5-11 197 27 6
32 Kevin Hobbs CB 6-1 188 25 2
27 Jordan Babineaux FS 6-1 206 26 5
39 C.J. Wallace SS 6-1 218 23 2
24 Deon Grant FS 6-2 215 29 9
25 Brian Russell SS 6-2 210 30 7

 

Practice Squad & IR:

 

No. Name Pos. H W Age Exp.
36 Jamar Adams (PS) S 6-2 212 22 R
29 Marquis Floyd (PS) CB 6-1 190 28 1
28 DeMichael Dizer (IR) CB 5-11 183 23 R

 

 

Discuss...

Poll
Which pass coverage scheme are the Seahawks best staffed for?
Cover 0
2 votes
Cover 1
0 votes
Cover 2
7 votes
Tampa 2
8 votes
Cover 3
4 votes
Cover 4
0 votes
Man-to-Man
4 votes

25 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 18 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

So why Cover 2?

I would choose Cover 2, but with drastic changes to the safeties. Russell gone. Grant is now your FS. With that you can put Jamar Adams as your SS and bring him along slowly in practices. The guy is smart, big, made 34 starts at Michigan at FS, but I think he can play SS in a system such as our Cover 2. The problem with that is well John Marshall and Brian Russell.

XBOX live gamertag: BANE509...I would die tonight for my beliefs.

by Christian on Sep 15, 2008 10:13 AM PDT reply actions  

I gotta agree

With our current situation at safety we can’t afford to ever run a cover 1 with Russell being the deep man. He just doesn’t have the speed to cover sideline to sideline. With Cover 2 we can at least somewhat hide him on the field.

I like Johns idea a while back of using Wilson as a safety because although he is small he is a tough tackler. But just like Bob Sanders would probably get hurt quite often from having to deliver so many hits.

You may gain some yards on the ground, but eventually Lofa will end up biting you in the ass.

by Scruffy Lefty on Sep 15, 2008 10:36 AM PDT reply actions  

How can he play safety?

When he will be our slot receiver next week?

XBOX live gamertag: BANE509...I would die tonight for my beliefs.

by Christian on Sep 15, 2008 10:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

Deion Sanders?

You may gain some yards on the ground, but eventually Lofa will end up biting you in the ass.

by Scruffy Lefty on Sep 15, 2008 11:02 AM PDT up reply actions  

I want our team to win.

Not smoke crack.

XBOX live gamertag: BANE509...I would die tonight for my beliefs.

by Christian on Sep 15, 2008 11:21 AM PDT up reply actions  

On Axing Russell

I agree on bringing in a taller player (and our PS talent) into the mix. I have a hard time with abandoning Russell altogether. He has been strong in the past. It seems like last year he and Grant had excellent chemistry and success, but then the defense coaches made all kinds of statements in the off & pre-season about improving our coverage from last year.

Perhaps he is a victim of their system?

Why would the coaches choose to fix something that wasn’t broken anyhow? We allowed among the fewest passing TDs in the league.

by Birdfeeder on Sep 15, 2008 10:36 AM PDT reply actions  

But Russell was bad last year

His tackling angles were poor. His Coverage was so so and he gives up way to much yardage on completions that are in front of him. Russell is asked to play deep. That he does fine except now he doesn’t have the speed to come up and make a play (speed that was disappearing last year). A perfect example was JT O’Sullivan scramble yesterday where he should of been called for a late hit. I don’t know what Russell was waiting for because JT committed to the run pretty early and had 9 yards to go.

You may gain some yards on the ground, but eventually Lofa will end up biting you in the ass.

by Scruffy Lefty on Sep 15, 2008 10:44 AM PDT up reply actions  

Roving LB

What about the expanded use of the LBs & DEs in short-zone coverage? Bigger defenders can produce more forced fumbles and injuries.

The excessive use of man-to-man in the 5-15 yard range denied us many INTs and the receivers still got open on short routes and crossing patterns.

by Birdfeeder on Sep 15, 2008 10:43 AM PDT reply actions  

We do occasionally drop Kearney and Jackson into coverage.

Which I like. But most of the big completions came on the typical John Marshall 3rd down blitz. Our front 4 is good enough to get pressure consistently. We need to stop calling those blitzes and drop lofa into coverage.

You may gain some yards on the ground, but eventually Lofa will end up biting you in the ass.

by Scruffy Lefty on Sep 15, 2008 10:47 AM PDT up reply actions  

Wasn't man also

It was Cover 1. With Russell as the safety.

You may gain some yards on the ground, but eventually Lofa will end up biting you in the ass.

by Scruffy Lefty on Sep 15, 2008 10:48 AM PDT up reply actions  

QB runs

There certainly were at least two flushed pocket-QB scrambles which I was expecting someone from the secondary to come flying in from the side of the TV and smash O’Sullivan.

Both times I was sorely disappointed.

And he was wildly late on the play you describe. Thank god the refs didn’t flag him then.

by Birdfeeder on Sep 15, 2008 10:49 AM PDT reply actions  

Ya I don't know how that wasn't a late hit.

I just want to know what he was looking at. It wasn’t like JT pump faked him. He tucked that ball and started running.

You may gain some yards on the ground, but eventually Lofa will end up biting you in the ass.

by Scruffy Lefty on Sep 15, 2008 10:53 AM PDT up reply actions  

ditto

You may gain some yards on the ground, but eventually Lofa will end up biting you in the ass.

by Scruffy Lefty on Sep 15, 2008 11:24 AM PDT up reply actions  

More productive then the "Fucking Trainwreck Emo Bullshit"

Its more on along the lines. “We got beat how do we fix it”

You may gain some yards on the ground, but eventually Lofa will end up biting you in the ass.

by Scruffy Lefty on Sep 15, 2008 11:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

Exactly.

This is a constructive fanpost that facilitates discussion rather than tossing the community into a panicked (for no reason) frenzy.

by BrianL on Sep 15, 2008 11:27 AM PDT up reply actions  

Nobody frenzies like us Field Gull Folk

We should challenge St Louis to a frenzy contest.

You may gain some yards on the ground, but eventually Lofa will end up biting you in the ass.

by Scruffy Lefty on Sep 15, 2008 11:29 AM PDT up reply actions  

Thanks

I am hoping this post & discussion will spur on more of the same. I only discovered Field Gulls a month ago and was pumped to discover a site that offered detailed & deep analysis of plays, formations, match-ups & more which is so hard to find in the sports media. Glad to be of service!

by Birdfeeder on Sep 16, 2008 8:42 AM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SEA!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Avatar_small
The Official Field Gulls OT Thread - In Which We Gush About Our Favorite TV Shows
Hatersgonnahate_small
A short note on what worked for the 49ers, but isn't really a "model"
Halloween_mobster_small
Come on in!
Mail
A Reply to Beekers and Some Comments About Comments

Recent FanPosts

Walshrun_small
Super Bowl XLVI Reaction: New England Patriots
Small
My Friend has a Friend who works for Nike...
208114_505637750968_23709013_30160241_9483_n_small
GM John Schneider On The Ideal QB
Bodypaint_small
Delocated ad
Beast_mode_tshirt_small
Tats Comeback Attempt?
994_small
Free Agents vs. NFL Draft - Wide Receivers
Small
Where Will the Seahawks' Churn Hit? Defensive Line Edition
Small
Expanding Our Football Knowledge

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editor/Lead Writer

284430_601240951600_44900771_32958650_2317286_n_small Danny Kelly

Staff Writers/Editors

Screen_shot_2011-01-05_at_9 Scruffy Lefty

Small BrianL

Avatar_small Benne

Olympiabeer_small Tyler Jorgensen

Hatersgonnahate_small Thomas Beekers

Profilepic_small DJ C-Raig

897267_o_small Kenneth Arthur

Halloween_mobster_small Jacson Bevens

Photo__1__small Charlie Todaro

Staff Writers

Small Joshua Kasparek

Mail Matt Erickson

Davis_small Davis Hsu

Profile2_small Rob Staton

208114_505637750968_23709013_30160241_9483_n_small Scott Enyeart

Elephant_pink_clothes_small Chris Sully

Seattle_seahawk_white_1600_reasonably_small_small Derek Stephens

Osprey1_small Ben Harbaugh

Bu_fb_2_small Daniel Hill