Field Gulls: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Cal RB Jahvid Best Seriously Injured, Carted Off Field

Leroy Hill faces marijuana charge

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3858164

 

 

Seattle Seahawks linebacker Leroy Hill faces a misdemeanor charge for marijuana possession after authorities found him passed out behind the wheel at an intersection in suburban Atlanta, according to authorities.

Hill Hill

 

Hill, 26, is scheduled to become an unrestricted free agent Feb. 27.

A third-round choice from Clemson in 2005, Hill has led the Seahawks in tackles or tied for the lead five times in seven playoff games. He started Super Bowl XL as a rookie and has started 50 regular-season games in four NFL seasons, all with Seattle.

 

A place to bury strangers.

0 recs  |  Comment 68 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Ugh. Bad timing right before free agency.

Damn Leroy….I’m only a few hours south of Atlanta, you could have totally crashed at my pad.

"It's just one big guy against another big guy, both teams know what's at stake. The one of them comes out on top and it feels good."
-Chris Collinsworth, Madden 09

by Wayward Llama on Jan 24, 2009 5:42 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

What an idiot.

That could cost him a million dollars possibly.

by LantermanC on Jan 24, 2009 6:00 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Ah shit.

Goddamit LeRoy. Looks like he’s gone. Hopefully we’ll get some kind of compensatory pick.

by redwolf75 on Jan 24, 2009 6:05 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Hopefully this is just an isolated incident like Tatupu's DUI last year

He’ll be fine, so long as he shows enough remorse and says the right things.

Is that the light at the end of the tunnel, or the headlights of an oncoming train?

by Benne on Jan 24, 2009 7:29 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Chance of suspension, I think, too.

Hill could be suspended by the NFL under the league’s substance-abuse policy. First-time offenders are subject to suspensions ranging from one to four games.

by Misfit74 on Jan 24, 2009 7:39 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Thanks for the link Misfit

Really sucks. Issue isn’t just that it was less than an ounce, and he’ll get through it. He just created a lot of unknowns. How will the commish react (will he be eligible to play 16 games next year?), and how will the pending court proceedings and probable court ordered treatment and community service affect his training, mindset and ultimately his play on the field. He was already a bit of a risk due to injury history. He just created more. On the plus side, may have made it easier to re-sign him, and he probably just created a little more cap room.

by diehard82 on Jan 24, 2009 8:52 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

So

just this mean Curry becomes a possibility?

by J_G on Jan 24, 2009 10:25 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Doubtful TR would throw away the 4th overall like that.

"It's just one big guy against another big guy, both teams know what's at stake. The one of them comes out on top and it feels good."
-Chris Collinsworth, Madden 09

by Wayward Llama on Jan 24, 2009 10:55 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed.

I think TR will slot in a player like DD Lewis to replace Hill or sign an FA. Or maybe later round. He’s not going to put even more money into the LB position.

by redwolf75 on Jan 24, 2009 10:56 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

God damn it Leroy

Not only did you diminish your FA potential, now it isn’t a guarantee we’ll actively pursue him. And that opens the door to Curry, who will cost more with no sure thing he’ll be great.

"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."

by Fearless Frog on Jan 24, 2009 10:47 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

according to Sando

it sounds like it was Leroy’s consent to the police search that did him in. If he’d politely declined the police probably would have done a BAC, and judging from the lack of additional alcohol charges he might have gone off with a warning.

by Will Kier on Jan 24, 2009 11:12 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

I was confused by the way Sando characterized it

that makes sense, but saying Hill consented to the search suggests he had a choice in the matter.

by Will Kier on Jan 25, 2009 11:31 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

even with probable cause

the cops probably asked for consent for search. it’s smarter to cover your bases like that. If he had said ‘no’ then they would have considered if they had probably cause to do it on their own.

it’s amazing how frequently people consent to searches when they have something illegal…

by Snuffleupagus on Jan 26, 2009 6:07 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Can Ruskell just let this slide?

C’mon, it’s just marijuana…

by aerozeppelin on Jan 25, 2009 12:08 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

What disturbs me is that he was asleep at an intersection

I had a very active youth, but I’ve never been nor have ever known anyone who has been so high as to fall asleep at the wheel. Even if it was simple fatigue, driving that tired is much more dangerous than driving stoned. I worry it wasn’t simple fatigue.

by John Morgan on Jan 25, 2009 8:01 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

He did tell the police

that he had a “couple” of drinks with some college buddies. I blame Holmgren for taking them to see Pineapple Express last summer.

by Dukeshire on Jan 25, 2009 9:00 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Tatupu should take notes

if you’ve got an old car, don’t pick a Hyundai

by Will Kier on Jan 25, 2009 11:32 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Is that Hill's car?

If so, good taste!

by vj on Jan 25, 2009 11:49 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Plenty of room to pass out in that car. even behind the wheel.

So comfortable you could easily pass out driving the thing, maybe we need to lighten up on Leroy. I’m betting it has a trunk that can comfortably seat six.

by Misfit74 on Jan 25, 2009 11:58 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

75 Buick Electra

"It's just one big guy against another big guy, both teams know what's at stake. The one of them comes out on top and it feels good."
-Chris Collinsworth, Madden 09

by Wayward Llama on Jan 25, 2009 3:34 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Soooooo Leroy rolls in a 75' Buick,

and Lofa cruises around in a late model Hyundai, what the hell does Julian drive? An 1982 Dodge Aries K car??

Beer, its not just for breakfast anymore.

by Dougula on Jan 26, 2009 9:29 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

A 1972 Mercury....Morris!

Har har i so funnay

"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."

by Fearless Frog on Jan 26, 2009 10:11 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

What a moron.

This is going to cost him sooo much money. He had to make it through about two months of off-season without getting in trouble to cash in and he couldn’t pull it off. What an idiot. With so much money on the line, if you have to roll around after drinking, weed, and POSSESSING THE FUCKING CHRONIC- DO IT IN THE BACK OF A LIMO. The cost of taking a limo everywhere he went for the entire period until he got signed was much less than what he will lose now.

I don’t understand these stupid athletes, I would only ride a limo in an FA offseason if it was my career, but that might be because I am a scientist and not an athlete… wait no, these guys are just stupid.

by michaelfox99 on Jan 25, 2009 12:08 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

decisions

While I agree with you that a series of poor choices were made, there sounds to be a chance he actually may have a problem beyond decision-making. A true problem of addiction is not an issue of stupidity. Without being in Leroy’s shoes, I have no way of knowing that. The evidence is strongly against him. However, dismissing it as strictly an act of stupidity might be ignorance.

by Misfit74 on Jan 25, 2009 12:24 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I've never smoked before.

So the ritual of lighting up the grass is addictive, but not the actually herb itself?

"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."

by Fearless Frog on Jan 26, 2009 11:32 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

People form smoking habits

but it doesn’t hook someone like nicotine or morphine.

by John Morgan on Jan 26, 2009 11:42 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

maybe not physically

but I don’t think there’s any question it’s “addictive”. I know many, many people who have wanted to quit and couldn’t.

by djafrot on Jan 26, 2009 4:40 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

False?

Yesterday's Pants
A blog-thingy about the Mariners and stuff.

by BrettJMiller on Jan 26, 2009 10:40 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

cue bob sagat...

“Marijuana is not a drug. I used to suck dick for coke. Now that’s an addiction. You ever suck some dick for marijuana?”

by cro-mag! on Jan 27, 2009 12:58 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

nope.

I didn’t dismiss the blazing as stupidity. Just driving when he can easily afford to roll around in a limo…

by michaelfox99 on Jan 25, 2009 2:15 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Cowboys

Guess we’ll be seeing Leroy Hill in a Cowboys uniform next year….

by Keasley on Jan 25, 2009 12:55 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

ugh, heresy.

"It's just one big guy against another big guy, both teams know what's at stake. The one of them comes out on top and it feels good."
-Chris Collinsworth, Madden 09

by Wayward Llama on Jan 25, 2009 3:35 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

OMG bad mental image

Especially after his final play of the season was that awesome smash-stuff of Barber on Thanksgiving.

"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."

by Fearless Frog on Jan 25, 2009 8:39 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I think everyone is over reacting to this a bit

I doubt a minor marijuana charge is going to affect Ruskell’s interest much, and it’s certainly not going to cost him any money. His downturn in production however might. We’re maybe talking about a game or two suspension.

by Nate Dogg on Jan 25, 2009 3:27 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Getting suspended one game is going to cost him one games pay.

And any red flag I imagine will reduce his value a little bit. 20 million down to 19 million is a small percentage, but it’s still a million dollars…

by LantermanC on Jan 25, 2009 8:41 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Wouldn't this possibly make him a little cheaper to sign for Ruskell?

If Ruskell can forget about the minor charge do you think he could use this as leverage to giving him less money? Or less guaranteed money and a clause to take away something or other if charged again?….Shows my knowledge concerning contracts, don’t I sound smart……………

But then again I could just be talking out of my ass because it is not like every team in the league will care about this, and he could just give Seattle a big “Fuck You” and go sign somewhere else for more money anyways.

by Communick on Jan 26, 2009 6:37 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Probably.

I don’t think him leaving will cripple our defense like our offense like when Hutch left, but if we want our defense to reach something resembling elite, it would be advisable to keep a young promising star like him.

"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."

by Fearless Frog on Jan 26, 2009 7:50 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I used to care...

…until somehow John threw me off with the whole coverage thing.

How good is Bart Scott?

by Communick on Jan 26, 2009 10:36 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I don't care at all.

I think a lot of what he does is a product of playing next to one of the best MLB OLB combinations in the league (except maybe this past year, looking at you Tatupu). I think a DD Lewis would be more than fine if it meant we spent our money elsewhere (Dawkins for a season, Suggs or Peppers or Haynesworth long term… drool).

by LantermanC on Jan 27, 2009 8:14 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Ruskell will never sign Haynesworth.

I’m glad, as his services will likely be bid up higher than he’s worth, killing our cap.

He also has some big injury red flags, and is on the wrong side of the DT aging curve.

by redwolf75 on Jan 27, 2009 8:28 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

If our new defense means we're not going to blitz our LB's,

…than I’d say let Leroy go unless he’s cheap. Though he’s a tackle machine, he’s not much for coverage.

I’m sure there is a serviceable OLB vet out there that fits the bill, or we all know that Ruskell can find LB’s in the draft in the mid-rounds.

by djafrot on Jan 27, 2009 2:06 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Couldnt agree more...

…lets see where Mora and Bradley take us

by Communick on Jan 27, 2009 10:07 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Scruffy Lefty I completely agree with you. In fact I see us letting him walk and picking up Zach Follett in the 3rd or 4th round. He is a LB who fits Ruskell mold and is a Cal grad. Started almost all his years at Cal. Leader of the defense. Good in coverage and understands gap assignments. High motor. Even though Cal runs a 3-4 defense, Follett should be very good Weak side and great Strong side. At 245, he is prototypical size, his only knocks is his height 5’11 and not fast enough to stay with elite TE but that is why we have JP.

by Built2Spill on Jan 26, 2009 9:08 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

FYI, try to use the reply button at the bottom of a comment when responding to a specific post.

It helps promote comment flow and generally makes discussions easier to follow. It’s one of the nice SBN quirks.

by BrianL on Jan 26, 2009 9:26 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Haynesworth???

If Ruskell has a problem with Hill’s misdemeanor possession charge, I doubt he’ll be coveting Haynesworth. I’d rather see them pay 7-8 million per year to Suggs or Peppers though, than about the same amount to the #4 pick, so I agree with you there. I’m not aware of any behaviour issues with either of them (am I missing something?).

by diehard82 on Jan 27, 2009 10:15 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Players always have ideas of sticking together,

but then money talks ane one of them leaves.

It’s like when Baron Davis signed with the Clips to play with Elton Brand, and they texted a lot about how good their team was going to be. Then Philly made Brand a better offer, and Brand stopped texting Davis and bolted for the money.

Not that I blame them though. The only reason I wouldn’t bolt for more money is if I:
A) couldn’t imagine ever spending that much money.
B) Didnt’ like the new city or loved the old one.
C) Was in a position like WR, which is really dependant on the QB, and a team like Chicago was offering me the extra money, which would set me up for retirement, but also possibly end my career.

by LantermanC on Jan 27, 2009 4:03 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Thanks, Walter.
Start posting about the Seahawks »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Post Your Hawk: Week 9
6a00d8341c873353ef00e5528e99be8833-800wi_small
Wild speculation
Rainbow_small
Video Preview - Detroit Lions vs Seattle Seahawks
Small
Chris Spencer is the Betancourt of the Seahawks
Small
SBN Layout Upgrade
Dscn0146_small
The necessity of shutting Detroit out on Sunday
Jj_flag_detail1_small
Seahawks Fall Hard - Bitch Thread
Small
In defense of Tim Ruskell
Front_of_car_small
What's Bugging Me
Small
Post Your Hawk: Week 8

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Pats Pulpit
Sunday Fish Fry Part 2: Man the Longboats! Patriots offense v. Dolphin D
Arrowhead Pride
Chiefs Release WR Bobby Engram; RB Kolby Smith to Active Roster
Stampede Blue
Dear Bill Polian: Please sign Jack Williams ASAP

Managers

Image_114_small Shrug

Jj_flag_detail1_small John Morgan

Editors

Rainbow_small Scruffy Lefty

Authors

Vp081-c_small Christian

Small BrianL

Small abender20

Small Doug Farrar

Dksbtwit_small Johnny Peel (DKSB)