Three Senior Bowl Interests for Seattle
My buddy Michael Lombardo from Scout.com has the names of three players the Seahawks met with during Senior Bowl week. Now, the whole "Team X met with Player Y" thing is generally overheated by the media, but it’s a good time to start getting a collection of players together to anticipate, to a greater or lesser degree, Seattle’s specific interests. If any of these names pop up at the Combine as well (I’ll be going from the 18th though the 22nd) we can start to put a few things together. Well, maybe.
Anyhoo, here are the guys who confirmed with Michael that they talked to Seattle:
Hawaii DE David Veikune: 6-2, 255. 10th-rated DE per NFLDraftScout.com. Showed impressive effort, especially against Michael Oher, during Senior Bowl week. He’s a possible 4-3 end or 3-4 ‘backer (not unlike Everette Brown, who I recently interviewed for a Washington Post story) who put up nine sacks and 16.5 tackles for loss in his senior season. Projected as an early second-day guy, but we’ll see what the Combine tells us.
Connecticut CB Darius Butler: 5-10, 178. Undersized, and NFLDS compares him to Ronde Barber. Here we go again? Well, maybe. Started every game but one in his collegiate career, so there’s that as well. Ruskell likes him some guys with as many starts as possible. Kind a tweener/zone-corner/free-safety type. Haven’t watched him yet, but I will, as Butler sounds like a fit. His stats are misleading since he’s not often targeted, though he had 37 tackles and four pass breakups in 2008. His uncle played in the NFL, and Willis McGahee is his cousin. Deion Sanders sought Butler out to participate in one of his camps, which says something to me. You may or may not like Deion’s act (he’s grown on me), but I wouldn’t question his ability to spot talent at the position. Probable second-round pick, though he’s on a few sleeper lists as a potential first.
Ohio State WR Brian Robiskie: 6-3, 207. This one made me happy. Robiskie’s another prospect with family ties – his dad Terry played in the NFL for five seasons and has coached receivers at the pro level for a long, long time. Here’s a nice article about their relationship. Robiskie the younger is a First-Team Academic All-American and a Biletnikoff Award semi-finalist who caught 37 balls for 419 yards and eight touchdowns in his senior season, and 55/935/11 in 2007. Not bad for a team that isn’t exactly Quarterback U just yet. Many observers saw him as the most polished and route-correct of the receivers at the Senior Bowl. Top-end speed is lacking, but beggars can’t be choosers and the Seahawks are relying on a big bag of I Don’t Know at the position. Second-round projection at this point, and I don’t know if he’ll zoom up at the Combine. I like him as a hidden value guy and a player who can make a quick difference. And I'm of the opinion that the Seahawks have too many positional needs to make the big splash on Crabtree when there are some nice receivers later on.
22 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Robiskie
I’m a big Robiskie fan, though personally I don’t think we need anymore receivers with potential, we have a lot of those, I do however feel he might end up being better than any of the other WR except Crabtree and Maclin (and Percy Harvin),
Yeah, Atlanta's second round pick...
is right about where Robiskie should go anyway…I wouldn’t be surprised if the Falcons snagged him. He’ll come faster than most of the other wideouts for sure.
Excellent, another undersized CB.
Sigh.
"It's just one big guy against another big guy, both teams know what's at stake. The one of them comes out on top and it feels good."
-Chris Collinsworth, Madden 09
And another DE -_-
Robiskie is nice and all but if we skip on Crabtree in favor of a WR later (and I don’t mean late round fodder like Logan Payne), I’d rather have Hakeem Nicks.
"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."
by Fearless Frog on Jan 25, 2009 7:21 PM PST up reply actions
You can never have too many DE's or DT's
I don’t think Seattle should take a DE with its 1st pick, but depending on Kerney’s health DE could be a need for this team.
every position 'can' be a need
I think we addressed Kerney with Jackson in the last draft. We knew he was getting older and we knew he had increasing chance of injury. DE is not among our top needs.
Lawrence Jackson, Darryl Tapp, Baraka Atkins.
It’s about time they start producing.
"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."
by Fearless Frog on Jan 25, 2009 9:49 PM PST up reply actions
LJack was a rookie and one can expect those kind of struggles, I'd argue that Tapp DID produce
in his limited opportunities, and Atkins is a second year 4th round pick that played pretty well considering his nonexistent previous gametime experience and draft position.
Yeah, I'd really like to see Atkins get some more playing time
"It's just one big guy against another big guy, both teams know what's at stake. The one of them comes out on top and it feels good."
-Chris Collinsworth, Madden 09
by Wayward Llama on Jan 26, 2009 11:00 AM PST up reply actions
I don't disagree with those assessments.
I’m just saying that it’s to the point where we should have our own talent be consistently producing rather than drafting even higher at a position we’ve already drafted early multiple times.
"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."
by Fearless Frog on Jan 26, 2009 11:35 AM PST up reply actions
Yeah, DT makes sense, if only for depth. And even that can be added in FA.
"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."
by Fearless Frog on Jan 26, 2009 5:57 PM PST up reply actions
Hill's Arrest
With Hill’s drug arrest, does this make it much more likely that we won’t re-sign him, and might target Aaron Curry with our first round pick?
I don't think the FO will want to tie up that much money in linebackers
"It's just one big guy against another big guy, both teams know what's at stake. The one of them comes out on top and it feels good."
-Chris Collinsworth, Madden 09
by Wayward Llama on Jan 26, 2009 10:59 AM PST up reply actions
I would seppuku if we drafted Aaron Curry.
Cost more than Hill with no guarantee he’ll be better or even as good as him? No thanks.
"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."
by Fearless Frog on Jan 26, 2009 11:36 AM PST up reply actions
Well when you put it that way...
there’s no guarantee Crabtree will be better than Engram, or McCoy will be better than David Greene, etc.
Hill is on the cusp of being an elite OLB.
Engram is a guy who fits the system well and has chemistry with our particular QB. McCoy may very well turn out to be a bust, I just like him is all.
"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."
by Fearless Frog on Jan 26, 2009 12:29 PM PST up reply actions
maybe we can afford Hill now!
Hopefully the scandel will take a few million off the pricetag and we can bring him back.
and maybe his contract demands will suffer
when he requests a large amount of money and Ruskell says “Are you high!!?”… then Hill sheepishly signs for peanuts.
I DRINK YOUR MILKSHAKE!!! I DRINK IT UP!!
Or he could say 'What are YOU smoking?"
Wouldn’t that be hilarious if in the negotation process he kept making subtle (or not subtle) jokes?

by 






























