Field Gulls: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Has Kentucky Improved Since the Non-Conference Season?

The Taylor Mays Microsoft Connection

I've been reading up on some of the players I feel like I would like to see Seattle draft, and the last day or two I have been really high on Taylor Mays.

I knew of him going to Odea HS, and local talent is something I always am interested in ( I wanted Stewart last year more than the world ).

Anyways, just recently discovered that Taylor Mays' dad works for Microsoft. I wonder if Paul Allen has any inclination to get a little home town support and make an effort to get this guy here.

From everything I have read, and learned over the last few years of following drafts, a S at the 4 pick is generally a stretch, and I truly don't know how good Mays is in comparison to a Sean Taylor. From everything I hear about his physical ability, he is an athletic marvel and has a rare combination of size and speed for the position, I mean, truly rare. I read at 6-3, 235 he has reported the fastest 40 yard dash times at USC the last two years.

The fact he is a USC player, and made a strong impact for arguably the best team in NCAA football also makes me more interested in him.

Trading down to possibly the 8 to 10 spot to Jacksonville or SF? Maybe they would be interested in drafting a QB or Michael Crabtree. If we could get the 10th pick, take Taylor Mays, and gather another 2nd round pick in the process, I would be 100 percent all for that.

A place to bury strangers.

0 recs  |  Comment 118 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

If we draft Mays

I’m going to Facepalm

You may gain some yards on the ground, but eventually Lofa will end up biting you in the ass.

by Scruffy Lefty on Jan 4, 2009 12:14 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

The thing is, he truly is an athletic marvel

which makes me wonder about his game smarts and knowledge since the two or three games I’ve watched, he doesn’t really stand out. He doesn’t strike me as even above average in this regard. With that kind of athletic ability, at the very least I’d hope that he would have a few big plays or hits during the season, but I’m not sure he has that either.

by LantermanC on Jan 4, 2009 12:22 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Can anyone explain to me why?

I personally have only read positive things, clearly being bias coming from Pete Carrol.

What are his negatives?

I just think the thought of having a potential impact safety would be nice.

Let's go.

by J Hens on Jan 4, 2009 12:34 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

No one throws to his side of the field

his number through the first 5 games this year were great, then people stopped throwing or running near him.

You know what? Fuck you Sports Gods, fuck you.

by bluemax on Jan 5, 2009 3:48 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

His numbers haven't changed much throughout the season.

Unless you’re counting something that doesn’t appear here.

by John Morgan on Jan 5, 2009 3:55 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Vernon Gholston

was a draft-time athletic marvel as well, but I haven’t heard his name too much this year. Mays has all the intangibles, but I have to agree that in the 3 games I saw of him, he was distinctly average

by ciarannh on Jan 4, 2009 12:56 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

yeah, i can understand

theres always that risk of playing on the best defense in college, appearing better than you are, ‘guilt by association’ in a positive way haha.

Let's go.

by J Hens on Jan 4, 2009 1:00 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

he's had no impact?

is this true or is this just a generalization?

Let's go.

by J Hens on Jan 4, 2009 12:59 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

So if my math is right,

that makes him 8 times better than Brian Russell. But I agree, I want a Safety that makes QBs afraid of throwing the ball deep, not just over the middle.

by SeaTownBlueDevil on Jan 4, 2009 4:07 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

High on Secondary

I expect Mays to be available lower than #4, and there are a couple of other nice corners and safeties that should be on the board until 10 or 15, so I wholeheartedly support trading down for another 2nd round pick. The one thing I would say about Mays, is he hits like a freight train. I watched him demolish a Penn St. receiver and he wasn’t the same for the rest of the game. I like hard hitters. I want Fitzgerald and Boldin thinking about it as they stretch for a catch.

by diehard82 on Jan 4, 2009 1:06 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Hard hitting is not very valuable, see recently benched Cowboys safety Roy Williams.

Mays has forced one fumble in three seasons. Josh Wilson forced three in 2008. I really wish Seattle would consider him at free safety.

by John Morgan on Jan 4, 2009 1:10 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Wilson at FS?

Interesting thought. I’d be curious to see how well that would work.

by BrianL on Jan 4, 2009 1:16 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

He would end up like Bob Sanders

only be healthy for 5 games a year

You may gain some yards on the ground, but eventually Lofa will end up biting you in the ass.

by Scruffy Lefty on Jan 4, 2009 1:24 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

i definitely don't think that he's anywhere near a player like ed reed in terms of skill set

it doesnt surprise me at all regarding that interception total

plus ed reed is what, the best safety in the NFL on the best defense in the NFL? is this really the comparison to relate their stats?

is Mays uncoachable, or does the fact that Pete Carrol has claimed him as one of the best players to come through USC all hype? likely, i mean i could clearly see that.

but why would USC target such an overrated player. not to mention he has increased his weight, strength and speed tremendously since he joined the trojans, what’s not to say he won’t develop into a smarter player.

Let's go.

by J Hens on Jan 4, 2009 1:15 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Mays plays for the best defense in college and if drafted at #4 should be expected to be one of the best safeties in the NFL.

Reed had nine picks in 2001. Basically, if a player is not doing something in college, you shouldn’t expect them to do it in the pros. The only way we can assume Mays is a great player is if he’s so good teams are completely avoiding him. I haven’t seen that. I’ve seen him targeted and thrown past.

by John Morgan on Jan 4, 2009 1:22 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

at 4 there is no doubt

i agree with u 100 percent, and i definitely am not a supporter of taking mays at the 4 spot in this draft.

but pick totals are your assumption of talent here, that to me doesn’t justify disregarding his other obvious talents.

why is he starting for USC’s #1 defense, receiving praise, and developing a rep for being a fast, hard hitting safety when if he was really struggling he would have easily appeared as a weak link for the team.

Let's go.

by J Hens on Jan 4, 2009 1:26 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Problem is he has North to South speed but is stiff as a tree moving West to East

I’ve yet to see him really move laterally to make a play. A Safety needs to be able to range all over the field. His celling is going to be Roy Williams who needs to be a smallish LB

You may gain some yards on the ground, but eventually Lofa will end up biting you in the ass.

by Scruffy Lefty on Jan 4, 2009 1:22 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

actually

is there any proof that he isn’t a smart player or has that he doesn’t have ability in coverage? other than the interception total?

i mean trufant has had one year of high pick totals, and i think everyone can safely say that he’s been avoided and lacked confidence, or whatever, to attack the ball at times

everything i’ve read so far, i mean just miscellaneous quotes from coaches, and random scouting reports say he has good ball hawk ability

i personally haven’t diagnosed any film of him, but the comparisons to Roy Williams seem questionable and easy to pinpoint due to his size and rep for hitting big, because he is a much better athlete

Let's go.

by J Hens on Jan 4, 2009 1:24 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Roy Williams was a beast in College

Because college players are slow. Mays stands out because of the inferior athletes he plays in College. That won’t happen in the Pros

You may gain some yards on the ground, but eventually Lofa will end up biting you in the ass.

by Scruffy Lefty on Jan 4, 2009 1:26 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

also, Mays was a HS WR

he clearly isn’t just some S that can hit but can’t catch

out of HS, some people thought he might be best in college as a deep threat WR.

and inferior athletes? how is that possible when he is arguably one of the best athletes in terms of size, speed and durability there are in this draft.

i mean the more i read, he’s been starting since his 2nd game as a freshmen at USC? why on earth is he playing for the #1 defense if he cant play? they could get anybody to play for them.

Let's go.

by J Hens on Jan 4, 2009 1:32 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

look at USC's schedule

And name the playmakers that he faced that are going to be standout pros

You may gain some yards on the ground, but eventually Lofa will end up biting you in the ass.

by Scruffy Lefty on Jan 4, 2009 1:34 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

n/s
and inferior athletes? how is that possible when he is arguably one of the best athletes in terms of size, speed and durability there are in this draft

It makes him standout even more. In the Pros everyone is faster, stronger and better.

You may gain some yards on the ground, but eventually Lofa will end up biting you in the ass.

by Scruffy Lefty on Jan 4, 2009 1:38 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

but he's playing on a defense full of the best athletes in the country

and mays at his position his stronger, faster and bigger than any NFL safety in terms of size to speed, i mean there’s no doubting it. as a rookie he would already have that title.

and again, are we assuming he’s reached his potential. because i really feel that it’s not unlikely for him to actually improve once he receives proper coaching.

Let's go.

by J Hens on Jan 4, 2009 1:40 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Your missing the point

His 40 time doesn’t help tackle Adrian Peterson when he shakes him out of his shoes. You’ve never watched the guy play. Daryll Clark made him look bad with one simple move.

You may gain some yards on the ground, but eventually Lofa will end up biting you in the ass.

by Scruffy Lefty on Jan 4, 2009 1:44 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

i'm not missing the point

my point about his size and speed have zero to do with his ability to tackle. but it definitely does relate to you indicating his skill set wouldn’t translate to the NFL. i don’t know if it will or not, but he’s definitely in the physical realm of most NFL elite athletes.

i have seen the guy play, in fact i’ve been watching as much tape of him as i can this morning. but have i watched every USC game and pin pointed him, no, you’re definitely right.

Let's go.

by J Hens on Jan 4, 2009 1:48 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Highlight reels don't count as tape :)

You may gain some yards on the ground, but eventually Lofa will end up biting you in the ass.

by Scruffy Lefty on Jan 4, 2009 1:53 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

yeah, good thing i'm not watching them

trust me, i’m not a headline reader, i am indulging into this topic very much and researching as much as i can from my laptop. i have plenty of time today.

Let's go.

by J Hens on Jan 4, 2009 1:58 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

i'm not saying anything regarding his schedule

but why point out the negatives, and ignore the obvious positives.

is it really impossible for a player like this to not receive coaching to improve certain areas of his game? he will be a rookie.

usc plays a 2 deep zone, which has stood up to be one of the best defenses this year.

he is a 230 pound safety who can hit, and will come up in run support. he has been an all american athlete at multiple sports in high school, running a 10.5 100 yard dash, and being an all american wide receiver in high school.

he has never missed a game

and has been starting since his freshman year on a team that gathers one of the best recruiting classes every off season.

Let's go.

by J Hens on Jan 4, 2009 1:37 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

from my observation

USC played a cover 3 all season, and have for years. In the Bowl game Mays was playing deep center field all day.

by Jo-Jo on Jan 4, 2009 1:41 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Use reply
usc plays a 2 deep zone, which has stood up to be one of the best defenses this year.

he is a 230 pound safety who can hit, and will come up in run support. he has been an all american athlete at multiple sports in high school, running a 10.5 100 yard dash, and being an all american wide receiver in high school.

he has never missed a game

and has been starting since his freshman year on a team that gathers one of the best recruiting classes every off season.

How is any of this relevant to his ability to play in the NFL. Its all beat writer scouting report bullshit.

You may gain some yards on the ground, but eventually Lofa will end up biting you in the ass.

by Scruffy Lefty on Jan 4, 2009 1:42 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

lol

ok none of that does, i’m not stupid, but for you to say that he only stood out because he faced inferior athletic competition made me wonder if you realized he was obviously an elite athlete himself.

and how can you not take into account the fact he’s been a starter on the best defense in college football since the day he signed up as a 17 year old? never missed a game, for a run support safety as you guys call him?

the fact he’s a WR shows that he does have ball skills, so I mean how does this not relate to his skill set, which is what he would be bringing to the NFL.

Let's go.

by J Hens on Jan 4, 2009 1:44 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Yes he is a elite athlete in college

But so is everyone in the Pro which doesn’t allow him to standout as much. Its the same reason why all those sloppy route running athletic receivers dominate college but fall out of the NFL real quick.

You may gain some yards on the ground, but eventually Lofa will end up biting you in the ass.

by Scruffy Lefty on Jan 4, 2009 1:48 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

but can't he receive coaching?

as far as what i’ve understood so far, his coverage ability is not awful by any means.

weaknesses they say are change of direction like you mentioned, and his backpedal as well. from what i’ve seen he has amazing closing speed and can be an intimidating player.

i just assume that with coaching, it does seem possible for him to improve. he’s clearly not a complete player, but that’s part of developing him.

Let's go.

by J Hens on Jan 4, 2009 1:49 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

He could receive coaching

And he might prove us all wrong and be a lights out Safety. I’m just not betting on it

You may gain some yards on the ground, but eventually Lofa will end up biting you in the ass.

by Scruffy Lefty on Jan 4, 2009 1:55 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I guess I just get excited

.. at the thought of a big, roaming, fast safety making huge hits on players.

that and the microsoft-paul allen-seattle-usc-tatupu connection made me jump a little more haha

Let's go.

by J Hens on Jan 4, 2009 2:06 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I would love it too

if all his hype is true and the ‘Hawks had him. That’d be cool. IF … all the hype were true.

by Jo-Jo on Jan 4, 2009 2:08 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Wow

I’m impressed. Your arguments are not without merit.

I haven’t seen this all day, but I know what little I’ve seen from John says he thinks he’s going to keep getting bigger(there is serious evidence of this) and he already doesn’t have great agility, nor is he a college star in terms of production.

But considering the idea of him being a SS for our team, putting Deion Grant at FS, that sounds great to me. And considering it is a coaching staff’s(and strength/training staff) job to work on a player’s strengths and weaknesses you are completely correct.

Lots of players are HS WRs, so that doesn’t prove that much about his hands, but most likely he doesn’t have hands of stone. And there are a lot of tools with him that can be worked on. The biggest thing I like is the idea of having a player that breaks the mold athletically, because we are like the anti-Chargers when it comes to size/athleticism/strength combinations.

Mostly, I was just impressed when you said “he’s clearly not a complete player, but that’s part of developing him.”

by cashless on Jan 4, 2009 6:40 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I think the defensive scheme that the 'Hawks will run next year would play a role in whether or not Mays would be a fit for this team

Assuming that he is all that he is said to be, which I am not, he looks like a SS to me, and then you would have to assume that they move Grant to FS (where he belongs). But the ‘Hawks played so much cover 2 last year, I don’t really see Mays as a cover 2 safety.

Does anybody else see this?

by Jo-Jo on Jan 4, 2009 1:40 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

i'm not sold on Mays 100 percent myself

so i’m not making the argument that he has to be the pick, i truly feel at 4 we should go offensive line, but i do think we need a good safety. and he has alot of positives that i feel are worth noting.

Let's go.

by J Hens on Jan 4, 2009 1:46 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Intangibles make all the difference

Mays has been described repeatedly as freakish in size, speed and skills. But there have been many top prospects who tanked after being shown the money. For example, i always thought Boz was more interested in starting his acting career than finishing his football career. Hopefully, the Hawks staff does a good job of getting inside their heads to assess motivation and work ethic and desire to stay out of trouble. Sorry, but it’s hard for me to believe anyone can accurately assess his ability after watching a couple of games. I watched the same game and thought he played well.

by diehard82 on Jan 4, 2009 1:57 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Another thing

as far as intangibles, that’s why i chose to mention his durability and the fact he’s been a starter for such an elite program since he was a 17 year old kid.

Mays is only 20 years old, I think he’ll be 21 when it’s draft time. This isn’t a player that is complete, and to me it can’t be that set in stone that he can never improve in coverage, although I will say everything I’m reading so far, shows that he does possess ball skills and he must to be a starter for a program such as USC. He’s definitely not too small to be a college linebacker, there is a reason he’s been playing safety.

That and look at his history. His dad is a UW alum, and a former NFL player. He has good bloodlines, and from the looks of it, is very dedicated based on his success in school and athletics. I haven’t seen too many things so far negative about his character, but who knows, I could clearly be wrong.

Let's go.

by J Hens on Jan 4, 2009 2:02 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Three reasons why he is playing safety and not LB at USC

1.) Brian Cushing
2.) Clay Matthews
3.) Rey Maualuga

by Jo-Jo on Jan 4, 2009 2:06 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Keith Rivers

I DRINK YOUR MILKSHAKE!!! I DRINK IT UP!!

by abender20 on Jan 5, 2009 9:41 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Maiva.

You know what? Fuck you Sports Gods, fuck you.

by bluemax on Jan 5, 2009 3:50 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

All good. Until I hear something more subtantial than one guy not liking his lateral movement in a couple of games and not enough picks, I’ll continue to believe he’d be a good selection, although probably a stretch at #4. IF we can trade down to 10 and pickup a second round pick, I’d say it’s a no-brainer.

by diehard82 on Jan 4, 2009 2:07 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

true

but to completely ignore the fact that he was considered a possible offensive playmaker heading into college does say something about his ability to catch a football.

Let's go.

by J Hens on Jan 4, 2009 2:13 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

It really doesn't

It’s high school. That’s like saying acing an algebra exam means you could be a NASA scientist.

by John Morgan on Jan 4, 2009 2:18 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

ehhh, not really.

like i said, he was recruited as a WR for college.

not saying he has elite ball skills, or that he is a WR. but he was considered a possible wide receiver as an NCAA athlete.

considering he was one of the most highly touted athletes in the west coast, it’s not like it isn’t something i can’t bring up.

Let's go.

by J Hens on Jan 4, 2009 2:20 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

likely

but like i said, if anything, my point wasn’t to relate his ability as HS WR to his future ability as an NFL S.

mainly i just figured it would be something to mention, and at the very most, in defense of people saying he is a run support safety only.

Let's go.

by J Hens on Jan 4, 2009 2:28 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Mays to Wide Receiver???

Given his speed, and given that he played wide receiver prior to being moved to safety, could he be moved to wide receiver???

by diehard82 on Jan 4, 2009 2:10 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

i really dont know

from what ive read he was pretty highly scouted as a WR coming out of highschool, said he played quarterback as well.

Let's go.

by J Hens on Jan 4, 2009 2:12 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

well i don't really know what all the negativity is to be honest

it’s like i give a little rundown about his history as far as what he was considered in school, and it’s a reply like

‘’ oh well that says nothing ’’

i’m not trying to say ANYTHING. but i’m putting out this information as i read it. and i find it pretty interesting, so i mean would you just rather not know anything about how he was considered as a football player when USC recruited him?

Let's go.

by J Hens on Jan 4, 2009 2:14 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Thanks for the thread

I for one really appreciated the microsoft connection. Had no idea. In fact I didn’t realize he was local. I think that is important, particularly if you want to retain a good player beyond their initial contract.

by diehard82 on Jan 4, 2009 2:17 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

yeah

he might be the wrong guy completely. and it’s pretty common for people to shy away and doubt the big school big athlete.

but it’s not like there aren’t obvious positives. he’s obviously a coachable, dedicated athlete, and to be able to handle the pressure of playing safety for USC as a 17 year old and only improve physically from there to me does say something.

Let's go.

by J Hens on Jan 4, 2009 2:22 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

A lot of people want Seattle to draft him because of a lot of coach speak, local connections, rumors and purported combine numbers and it's frustrating.

I want Seattle to be successful and committing a huge sum of money and a very valuable pick on a player that hasn’t proven much is not a path to success.

by John Morgan on Jan 4, 2009 2:23 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

understandable

and just to clarify, i never supported choosing mays with the 4th pick.

i personally have always felt we need to go offensive tackle.

but i can’t lie in that i would be excited to see a player with his ability, skill set and potential making plays for us in the secondary. it isn’t like we’ve ever had a safety of his size that we could bring in to a new coach, and potentially mold into an even better player in coverage.

Let's go.

by J Hens on Jan 4, 2009 2:27 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not trying to be negative man, you make all the positive points.

But I have heard quite a bit in the media about him being drastically over rated as well.

Evaluating a safety from USC is fairly dificult. They have employed a deep cover 3 for years, and they murder people with their front 7/8. That kind of front should lead to a lot of picks for defensive backs. In their system his job is simply to keep the ball in front of him and usually those linebackers eat everyone up. He was playing SOOO deep in the first half against Penn St. the other day. He was quite late on several plays underneath.

USC hasn’t been known recently for producing stud DB’s to the NFL. Darnell Bing comes to mind; big dude, athletic, cleaned up in the back for the Trojans. Not quite the athlete that Mays is, obviously, but he looked like a killer when he was in college. It just makes me a bit skeptical.

Again, if Mays really is all that he is said to be, then that would be an awesome weapon to have.

by Jo-Jo on Jan 4, 2009 2:28 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

yeah i understand

and i mean, the risk is very large, and you don’t want to take much of a risk with this rare opportunity for us to pick.

i guess mainly i like him as an athlete, and feel it’s a seattle need position.

Let's go.

by J Hens on Jan 4, 2009 2:29 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Oh yeah, I'd be lying if I were to say that I didn't want him.

I think he could walk in off the street be better than Coach Russell. And with the local connection and all that, it’d be like a fairy tale. I wet my pants with joy when they drafted Tru.

But with the #4 pick? I don’t know. And the trade down option, is only an option if somebody else wants that pick. It’s out of the ’Hawks hands.

by Jo-Jo on Jan 4, 2009 2:35 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

definitely

and definitely not with the 4 pick. i would also consider that a big reach, and at that spot i think we take advantage of other positions.

Let's go.

by J Hens on Jan 4, 2009 2:38 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not trying to be hard on you man, but I think you're only looking at the "what if?" and that's Matt Millen drafting.

I would love Mays to be as awesome as his tools seem to indicate he can be. I would love that player to play on my favorite team. But Seattle’s going to have a tough time trading out of the four and Mays won’t likely make it to the second round. So what we’re talking about, realistically, is taking a hugely valuable asset and wagering it on a player that hasn’t proven much of anything in college. I bristle at that idea.

by John Morgan on Jan 4, 2009 2:38 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

That all makes sense

And like I said, I truly am going off more or less the excitement of an athletic player seemingly able to fit into a need position for Seattle. You are certainly right about the What If scenario I’m approaching this from, but at this point, I go through dozens of What If’s regarding the talent we will draft. It’s what I do on a yearly basis, as this is one of my favorite times of the year.

I haven’t looked closely at the top 3 OT’s, Smith Monroe and Oher, but I do feel that if they are up to snuff and worthy of a pic in that place, that’s the direction I feel is the best for us.

Let's go.

by J Hens on Jan 4, 2009 2:41 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Totally agree

It’s amazing how the NFL Draft has become one of my favorite “sporting events” (did I just say that?) of the calander year. It’s dizzying and full of wonder, paril and joy. And with a #4 pick to torture myself with, I probably wont be able to sleep for a few months.

by Jo-Jo on Jan 4, 2009 2:44 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

exactly the same for me

this is like the perfect combination for me.

sadly, at the seahawks expense.

id much rather have a winning season, but as a fan of the draft, this is pretty much heaven for me.

and i cant lie, not waiting 3 hours to see our pick will be nice.

Let's go.

by J Hens on Jan 4, 2009 2:46 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, no kidding

this year in three and a half hours they’ll be making their second pick. It’s like two for the price of one! Except for the punishment the team salary will take.

by Jo-Jo on Jan 4, 2009 2:49 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Me too

I really plan to watch just like it’s the superbowl, chips, dips, chili, cold beer, friends over, how sick am I?

I think the salary issue will cause them to trade down if at all possible. Still, that should mean 3 picks in the first 2 rounds. Goodie!

by diehard82 on Jan 4, 2009 3:20 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

You're not sick, you're awesome

Like ME!

just kidding. But seriously, awesome.

by Jo-Jo on Jan 4, 2009 3:31 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Bing left school too early

he needed another year before he was NFL ready, but the allure of the money was too much for him.

You know what? Fuck you Sports Gods, fuck you.

by bluemax on Jan 5, 2009 3:51 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Mays = no.

After the Ole Miss game the other day I am pretty sold on Michael Oher. That said, he probably won’t be available past the top 3 picks. We will just have to see who is there…

Talking about whether to draft Mays or not in isolation is a waste of time. I have made this point on this blog before.. If you want to discuss how you think the Hawks should draft, rate the top 5. Then whoever is available that is highest on your list is the guy we take. Passing up on Oher for Mays would be suicide.

by michaelfox99 on Jan 4, 2009 5:06 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Suicide???

I get your point, but you never know, Mays could be a pro-bowl safety and Oher might decide he hates the rain and wants to be closer to home.

by diehard82 on Jan 4, 2009 5:31 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Oher has a good chance of going #4

Detroit’s picking a QB, St. Louis is picking an OL, and KC is picking… defensive end?

Yeah, I know it’s premature, but either Michael Oher or Andre Smith should still be up for grabs afer the 3rd pick.

by aerozeppelin on Jan 4, 2009 8:52 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I hear you

I should have prefaced this with saying that I believe we should go offensive tackle with our pick. I feel it benefits our most pressing need for now and the future.

But I also feel like we need an impact safety. Mays to me just has a ridiculous skill set, and the local connections make an obvious reason to at least bring him up during this time.

Let's go.

by J Hens on Jan 4, 2009 11:46 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe he will, maybe he won't...

The point has been made above, and I think it is a good one.. While Mays has a rare combination of size and athleticism, he has not shown much on the field. That is not to say he has been terrible, but he just hasn’t made a big impact. He has played for an otherworldly USC defense that hasn’t really relied on him for much other than clean up duties behind an awesome front 7. No one knows how good he will be. Safety is a non-premium position compared to QB or OT so I would not think it wise to use such a high pick on a guy who might not ever be that good of a player.

You completely misunderstood my post if you think i needed to preface it with ‘we should go OT in this draft’. A GM (and you if you want to contribute to a conversation about it) need to RATE the top 5 players. You then take the highest of those guys remaining. If you think the top 5 players are all OT’s then you would be “going OT” although I am not sure any sane person could do that. We can use a QB and an OT right now and you can bet the best ones will go top 5. Pretty simple. If you think Mays is really outstanding, where would you rank him? 10th? Does that mean we take him with the 5th pick? I think not..

by michaelfox99 on Jan 5, 2009 5:45 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

You completely misunderstood my post if you think i needed to preface it with ‘we should go OT in this draft’

He said

I should have prefaced this with saying that I believe we should go offensive tackle with our pick

;)

by vanrijn on Jan 5, 2009 8:15 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I HAVE A DREAM

Try this scenario on for size. Bret calls it quits in NY. The Jets are left with Kellen Clemens, drafted 2nd round in 2006, and Brett Ratliff, undrafted free agent from 2007. How badly do they want another QB option? Free agent? Doubt they’ll find anything worth pursueing, and even if they do, they still need a franchise guy for the future. They still long for the good old days with Joe Namath. So, they trade up to 4 in order to get Stafford, because I think the Lions take Bradford. Not a smart move, but it’s the Lions. We get the Jets #17 and #53 and another pick or two next year. With 17 we take Knowshon Moreno or Beanie Wells and have our feature back. With our # 37 we take Eben Britton (OT, Arizona) and with #53 we take Patrick Chung (SS, Oregon).

I know, picking specific players is silly, but hey, I did say I have a dream. What’s yours?

by diehard82 on Jan 5, 2009 10:17 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

I like Taylor Mays..

but I like his teammate Kevin Ellison more.

And if your looking for the ideal cover-2 safety in this draft check out Miss State S, Derek Pegues.

Or just sign Cleveland S Sean Jones.

by puerto on Jan 5, 2009 11:30 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

What don't others see?

If Peques is that good, why is he projected to go 4th round while Mays is projected top 15? What is the knock on him?

by diehard82 on Jan 6, 2009 2:18 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

The media isn't as smart as they think they are

Mays is an athletic freak, so he must be great right? Pegues is tiny (worrisomely so) and plays for Mississipi State, which is a little less flashy of a school than USC. We’re still 4 months away from the draft, we’ll see who rises and falls as we get closer. Last year the boards had Calais Campbell going in the top 20 and Dustin Keller who? A couple years ago Alan Branch was a top 10 pick until about a month out of the draft when he began slipping. I wouldn’t get too caught up in draft projections yet.

by Nate Dogg on Jan 6, 2009 3:31 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

You have no idea what your talking about

The media is all-knowing and omnipotent. Their projected pick #189? Accurate. He’s already signed his provisional contract. Mays is god and Peques sucks! He’s too small, he’ll get injured, he can’t hack it. Turn to your local media outlet and you too can be so well informed. And quit wasting your time with all this research – thats what your media correspondent is for!

by vanrijn on Jan 6, 2009 3:42 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

BTW

Here he’s projected 1st round, pick 23, with William Moore the first S off the board at 16. Wheres your precious Mays?

http://profootball.scout.com/2/743015.html

by vanrijn on Jan 6, 2009 3:43 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

whoa

that draft is totally fucked and using last years draft order, i just looked at players. denver seemed about right @ 23~. ignore that completely. my bad.

by vanrijn on Jan 6, 2009 3:46 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

lol

Actually there is no order, and they have us taking Graham Harrell in the first round. Great example of what Nate was talking about.

by vanrijn on Jan 6, 2009 3:50 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I was gonna keep going

But it was near 4 and time to clock out. Next time I’m shooting for 10.

by vanrijn on Jan 7, 2009 8:25 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Pegues

The knock on Pegues is that he is average size for a CB. So, pretty undersized for a safety. And that he is also unlikely to run a 4.4

So you essentially have around a 5’10 190 lbs safety prospect that will run a 4.5. There’s nothing sexy about him.

But when I watch him I see a guy with temendous sideline to sideline range, he plays fast – alot faster than he’ll time, great ball skills, can turn ints into touchdowns, great closing speed with good angles and competent tackling, and he seems to be very aware and have great instincts.

I would love to have him as a Hawk, I think he is going to be a steal and will be one of the best cover-2 safetys in the NFL.

He’s had a few off field incidents though, that could scare Ruskell away – I hope not though.

by puerto on Jan 6, 2009 7:24 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

So far the negatives about him are..

he’s apparently a great athlete, on a tremendous defense, and that has ballooned his stock.

i still find other positives about his college career:

http://usctrojans.cstv.com/sports/m-footbl/mtt/mays_taylor00.html

‘’Overall in 2006 while appearing in all 13 games, he had 62 tackles, a team-best 3 interceptions that he returned 40 yards (13.3 avg.) and 3 deflections.’’

That’s his freshman year,

and from there he has had multiple nominations for awards, now I personally don’t know the extent of big school bias in terms of award voting, surely it holds little stock in an argument regarding his talent, but it doesn’t necessarily seem like he’s been unsuccessful at his position, or in terms of what the Trojans have asked of him.

Maybe I’m wrong, to me, there is NO doubt that he is not worth the #4 pick, but I still think that Seattle needs a Safety, and under any circumstance in where Seattle were to trade down and Mays be available late in the first, I would still be intrigued and hopeful at a dedicated, durable, athletic person such as him to improve with NFL coaching.

Let's go.

by J Hens on Jan 6, 2009 11:10 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

well,
Maybe I’m wrong, to me, there is NO doubt that he is not worth the #4 pick

Simply put, you’re wrong. I don’t mean this to be rude, but drafting a player based mostly on athleticism and potential at #4 is foolhardy. You are banking not only a large amount of money on said player, but also face the opportunity cost of NOT drafting someone more productive.

Since other attempts to convince you of this haven’t taken hold, I submit for your review:

NBA Draft, Seattle Sonics.

3 straight selections of Swift, Petro, then Sene. All 3 had the same allure – gifted physically, young, and “with potential”. Let’s understand that potential means raw physical ability that is unfulfilled at the time of evaluation. All 3 have been colossal wastes of draft picks because they were not evaluated based on their performances but rather the “what if” potential that they could not fulfill. Meanwhile, Paul Millsap goes mid second round and is a better basketball player than all 3 of them combined, but just happens to be short. Millsap led college basketball in rebounding for 3 straight years. He SHOWED that he could do it in college.

Back to Mays – He is undeniably gifted physically, which no one will argue. He’s big, tall, and fast, and that’s great if you are running track or lifting weights. What several people have been pleading is that he has not, to date, been an impact player. Tangible evidence has been provided in this regard. As a part of a very talented defense, he has not been great in coverage, has not proven to have great ball skills (so throw out what he may have been in high school), and has not been the disruptive force like Troy Polamalu etc. There are many other options (basically every player in college) for the Hawks at 4, and they will be able to find someone who has provided more evidence that he will succeed in the NFL.

While I realize you really like the guy, and you want to see him on your team, it would be irresponsible to draft him at #4.

I DRINK YOUR MILKSHAKE!!! I DRINK IT UP!!

by abender20 on Jan 7, 2009 11:57 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

This is probably none of my business

But I think you misread the quote.

by busplunger on Jan 7, 2009 2:25 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

no, no I did not

I DRINK YOUR MILKSHAKE!!! I DRINK IT UP!!

by abender20 on Jan 7, 2009 2:40 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Bro, the dude said

that he is not worth the #4 pick

by Jo-Jo on Jan 7, 2009 3:13 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

yeah, but the talent pool and depth are totally different.

I see what you’re saying, and I agree with your origional point, but using the NBA draft (in my opinion) is a bit of a stretch.

by Jo-Jo on Jan 7, 2009 6:44 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

so I'm illiterate. I can't be bothered to read

I DRINK YOUR MILKSHAKE!!! I DRINK IT UP!!

by abender20 on Jan 7, 2009 3:46 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

how is me saying

that there is no doubt he’s not worth the #4 pick hard to understand.

 i don’t screen every one of my posts, as far as i’m concerned these threads are like sports conversations with friends.

like i’ve said repeatedly, he is not worth the #4, and i think that we should go OT at that pick.

like i said in the first post, if there were any situation in where we were to trade down, only then would i be interested in taking Taylor Mays, and only in the right position.

Let's go.

by J Hens on Jan 7, 2009 4:54 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

FG has a lot of comment traffic

so we do appreciate it if you proof-read your comments before posting them. Little grammatical fixes make it a lot easier to read through large threads.

All we really ask is that you use the “reply” button under a message you’re responding to so we can follow the flow of conversation better. After that point any proof-reading you do on your own part is greatly appreciated.

by BrianL on Jan 7, 2009 5:02 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

i guess i was just saying

‘’ there is no doubt he’s not worth the #4 pick ’’

wasn’t really a sentence that needed strong revision. i figured the point had made itself clear enough to understand. i hear you on proof reading, i generally do.

Let's go.

by J Hens on Jan 8, 2009 8:42 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Hail to the greatest Seahawk to ever live: Walter Junior Jones.
Start posting about the Seahawks »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Comcast NFL RedZone Moments from SB Nation

Music City Miracles
Tennessee Titans Red Zone Report
Bleeding Green Nation
Comcast NFL Red Zone stat of the week - Something doesn't have to give
Niners Nation
49ers Red Zone numbers: How effective are they?

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Sketch_haggar_small
USC Recruiting 2002-2009 Defensive End
Jack22_small
Super Bowl XLIV Open Thread
Olympiabeer_small
My problem with the Colts winning-- the absence of immortality.
Small
Random Super Bowl Thoughts
Profilepic_small
Diamonds in the Rough
Jack22_small
"Pro Bowl" "Open Thread"
Seattle_seahawks_small
Pro Bowl Folly
Small
Kerney Retires?
Nielson_small
Replacing Matt Hasselbeck
Sketch_haggar_small
USC Recruiting 2002-2009 Offensive Line

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Mocking The Draft
A case for Sam Bradford going first overall
Turf Show Times
TSTocracy - Feb. 10th
Arrowhead Pride
Back Home From Super Bowl XLIV In South Florida

Managers

Image_114_small Shrug

Jj_flag_detail1_small John Morgan

Whiteken_small Scruffy Lefty

Small BrianL

Small abender20

Authors

Vp081-c_small Christian

Small Doug Farrar

Dksbtwit_small Johnny Peel (DKSB)