Seahawks Sign Mike Hass to Two-Year Deal
Hass to Hass? Perhaps.
Per Ed Thompson of Scout.com, the Seahawks have signed former Saints and Bears receiver Mike Hass to a two-year deal. Terms are undisclosed at this time. NFLDraftScout.com had Hass as the 16th-ranked receiver in the country in 2006 out of Oregon State. Reports at the NCAA and NFL level indicated that Hass was one of the best-kept secrets in the college game, and a star in training camp. Primarily a practice-squad kid who the Saints took in the sixth round of te 2006 draft, Hass is a good guy, a special teams standout in college, but also a guy who couldn't seem to make a dent in Chicago's receiver corps.
One thing we know for sure -- there won't be very many better places for receiver opportunities than in the Emerald City.
0 recs |
37 comments
Comments
2 years?
That seems odd, and so does the timing. Are free agents usually picked up around this time of year?
by Nate Dogg on
Jan 7, 2009 7:17 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Interesting
Not a bad signing. Low-risk signing of a Pacific Northwest player. He was a star in OSU and will have more opportunities in the Seahawks. Hopefully he delivers.
by aerozeppelin on
Jan 7, 2009 8:05 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
camp fodder
IIRC, he was one of the guys they brought in for a few different try outs when the Great WR Plague of ’08 hit. And he lost out to Sammie Parker & McMullen and then wound up back on the Bears PS.
Nothing against the guy, but IMO he’s Logan Payne 2.0. If we wind up starting ‘09 with a guy like Payne or Hass anywhere higher than 5th on the depth chart, it’s not a good sign.
by jteckmann on
Jan 7, 2009 8:18 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Don't tell BobbyK of the TNT peanut gallery that.
He’s advocating for Payne to start in ’09.
by Fearless Frog on
Jan 7, 2009 9:20 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
n/s
I don’t think you’re allowed to comment on Seahawks insider unless you hate Courtney Taylor, Rob Simms, Kelly Jennings, Baraka Atkins, T.J. Duckett and of course Tim Ruskell….and now Greg Knapp. Oh and you have support Holmgren for GM in 2010.
by MFAN on
Jan 7, 2009 9:33 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
the TNT blog comments
make my head melt.
by jteckmann on
Jan 8, 2009 8:53 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
They called John Morgan a racist against White people
You may gain some yards on the ground, but eventually Lofa will end up biting you in the ass.
by Scruffy Lefty on
Jan 8, 2009 8:54 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Maybe he is.
Try explaining the hate towards Brian Russell – the man is clearly an All-Pro.
by SeaTownBlueDevil on
Jan 8, 2009 10:34 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
That was "OccidentalTourist."
He is an idiot. The guy also posts on the Seahawk ESPN boards, and he spends countless hours bashing Tim Ruskell. It gets old.
by redwolf75 on
Jan 8, 2009 4:04 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I like it
Thought that they should have signed him over Parker. Adds another body that might be able to contribute to look over this preseason. Good special teamer and good hands, I can definitely see him sticking (depending on who else we add this offseason). Definitely projects as a slot guy with the upside of a Brandon Stokely type guy. If he doesn’t pan out, who cares? It’s kinda like the moves that the M’s have made this offseason. Two years does seem a bit odd though.
by Woodinville_12thMan on
Jan 7, 2009 9:45 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Two-year deals for street FAs usually are structured...
with a minimal cap hit up front and a very low back end. Not all that uncommon.
by Doug Farrar on
Jan 7, 2009 9:59 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
what about the time of year?
seems really weird to be picking up free agents in January.
by Nate Dogg on
Jan 7, 2009 10:05 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Not being facetious but
why do you say:
“there won’t be very many better places for receiver opportunities than in the Emerald City.”
by VBJohnson on
Jan 7, 2009 10:47 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
depelted receiving corps, lots of potential for turnover due to injuries / suck
I DRINK YOUR MILKSHAKE!!! I DRINK IT UP!!
by abender20 on
Jan 8, 2009 8:30 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
But if the Seahawks
are planning on acquiring some bigtime FA WRs, or high draft pick WR or both a guy like Hass isn’t going to get much of a look.
by VBJohnson on
Jan 8, 2009 12:46 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It might just be a little insurance.
Assuring we have some WR depth in case Crabtree is gone or the bidding for somebody like Houshmanzadeh gets too high.
by SeaTownBlueDevil on
Jan 8, 2009 1:10 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
That's what I would think, but
Farrar’s statement that Hass would get a greater opportunity in Seattle than most anywhere else made me wonder if had some kind of inside information about the Seahawks not pursuing FAs or high draft pick WRs.
by VBJohnson on
Jan 8, 2009 6:47 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Bear in mind...
I don’t who’s under contract or who’s coming back that isn’t, but Deion Branch, Bobby Engram, Koren Robinson, Nate Burleson, and Ben Obomanu will all be healthy going into next year, not even counting any of the youngsters that may or may not develop yet. I think we have depth of above average bodies and projects (as I would define Hass). What we could really use is either a deep speedster or big (6-4, 6-5) possession receiver that you can throw it up to in the end zone (although perhaps Carlson takes care of that).
Regarding Crabtree, I don’t know how fast he is (game speed mnd you, not 40-time; Jerry Rice was never conventionally fast), but he does have really nice size (listed 6-3, 214 lbs).
by Azimeir on
Jan 9, 2009 11:45 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Didn't they just sign McMuffin back?
There’s your big guy!
by Jo-Jo on
Jan 9, 2009 12:01 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Scooping him up early
and signing him for two years seems like another “ton of potential” type of guy. It’s just up to the coaches to develop
by myx on
Jan 7, 2009 11:59 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
he was a player i kinda wanted
back in that draft, all the talk was that his lack of speed had him dropping far but he was super underrated and ultra productive with good hands.
Let's go.
by J Hens on
Jan 8, 2009 8:39 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Really?
Why is anyone excited about this?
Hes another WR that can only get open by design.
You may gain some yards on the ground, but eventually Lofa will end up biting you in the ass.
by Scruffy Lefty on
Jan 8, 2009 8:53 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
It does...
…kind of smell of noodle throwing. But I always root for fellow PacNorWest guys : )
by Azimeir on
Jan 8, 2009 9:53 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Eh, it sounds fairly low-risk.
If he shows something, great. If not, no big deal.
by BrianL on
Jan 8, 2009 10:42 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
His risk increases with each more talented receiver he out-practices.
A low price flier is how Seattle was saddled with Brian Russell, professional athlete.
by John Morgan on
Jan 8, 2009 10:52 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Dammit Morgan, there you go bursting my bubble again.
by BrianL on
Jan 8, 2009 11:27 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I don't see this being a problem.
That’s just my racism speaking.
by John Morgan on
Jan 8, 2009 1:25 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
He got beat out by McMuffin
You may gain some yards on the ground, but eventually Lofa will end up biting you in the ass.
by Scruffy Lefty on
Jan 8, 2009 11:16 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Ugh.
Now we’ve got TWO overrated-because-they’re-white receivers on the team. And this one’s from the PNW as well.
I can hardly wait for the first time Courtney Taylor drops a pass and every guy from here to Astoria is like “WTF this guy sux put Hass in he rulez”.
by djafrot on
Jan 8, 2009 1:45 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
A sign of things to come?
Maybe, just maybe, this is a sign the current regime plans to spend top draft picks and free agent money on something other than Wide Receiver, and they’re figuring to solve the receiver “issue” with quantity vs. quality. We do know that they will focus on the running game. (I think I know that) And we know in Atlanta they used the three headed monster running back effectively, i.e. no real feature back. If all of that makes sense, I’d be looking for them to spend picks and money re-tooling the O-line, D-backfield, and adding an outside linebacker and D-tackle and maybe picking up a potential future franchise QB. Some mocks have us picking up a RB in round 1 or 2. If this were still Holmgrens team, I’d say probably, but I don’t think Mora and Ruskell will go that way.
by diehard82 on
Jan 8, 2009 3:53 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
DC news?
“The National Football Post’s Michael Lombardi reports the Seahawks will hire Bucs assistant coach Casey "Gus” Bradley as their new defensive coordinator.
Lombardi is alone on this one, but he’s a reliable source. Bradley’s resume includes developing Barrett Ruud into a Pro Bowl-caliber MLB as Bucs linebackers coach. His hiring means Rod Marinelli will likely be headed to Houston or Chicago." -Rotoworld
by Misfit74 on
Jan 8, 2009 2:32 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
The Seattle Times is also reporting
that the Seahawks are getting set to interview Brian Schneider of the Raiders for the special teams coordinator opening.
by BrianL on
Jan 8, 2009 2:59 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs











