Owen Schmitt the Fullback
Between bursts of self-assault, Owen Schmitt occasionally plays fullback. Not that I don't find a man hitting himself in the head entertaining, but I thought we could take a break from analyzing the patterns of his blood spatters to watch him play football. Watching athletes play sports is an increasingly novel concept. I am awaiting the day ESPN does to its sports coverage what MTV has done with music videos.
Schmitt was named starter before the season, but lost that spot after week four of the preseason. I don't know that Justin Griffith actually outplayed Schmitt, but Seattle's then struggling running game picked up with Griffith playing fullback.
Schmitt has great potential as a fullback. He is a powerful blocker that savors contact. He is also rather new to the position after playing HB in Rich Rodriguez's spread-option offense. Griffith on the other hand, is to Greg Knapp's offense as Steve Buschemi was to 90s era Coen Brothers movies.
Schmitt played nine snaps in the first quarter. I picked the first quarter to watch him because the game was undecided and the Jaguars couldn't load up against the run. He worked nearly as much as a blocker and receiver.
His play was solid. He had one very good lead block, on the second play of Seattle's second drive, in which he moved into the hole, moved out Jaguars inside linebacker Russell Allen and doing so screened another Jaguar out of the play. Jones was slowed by end Derrick Harvey, but Allen was awarded the tackle. The attribution of a tackle seems almost arbitrary.
Schmitt didn't have any highlight worthy blocks, but his ability to square and power into his defender is impressive. He made an audible "pop" on his first block of the game, again against Allen.
Schmitt and Julius Jones have developed some chemistry, or so it looked. Schmitt ran in front and Jones followed and the two seemed to see the same hole on all but one run play. Schmitt turned a right-angle left just behind the offensive line and continued off-tackle, but Jones cut in and was tackled by the left defensive end. Ray Willis had attempted a cut block, but the Harvey anticipated it and stayed in play.
For one snap, Schmitt was again an HB. John Carlson was at left HB and Schmitt at right HB and the two ran symmetrical patterns. Both were to chip the outside linebacker and then release into a quick out into the flat. Schmitt chipped his man, but Carlson whiffed and Clint Ingram damn near killed Hasselbeck before he could shotput it away.
Schmitt's route running looks crisp, if elementary and he looks surprisingly swift as a receiver. He was the primary target on a godawful FB screen pass, but blanketed and skipped in favor of a wide open Nate Burleson. Schmitt did his part attracting coverage and keeping pressure off Hasselbeck.
I am not so sure if Schmitt is a work in progress or the best fullback on Seattle's roster. Griffith can't stay healthy, and he has yet to revive that magical ability to improve Seattle's run game that got him the job. If Schmitt had been Knapp's Mifune and not Griffith, and Schmitt the one that took the field against the Raider scrubs, would he be starting ahead of Griffith? I think so.
Seattle has shown a willingness to let its talent learn on the job. I have yet to see what Griffin can do that prevents Schmitt from starting. He might not know the offense as well, but that'll come, and his talent and potential as a lead blocker trump Griffith's. He wants it so bad. C'mon Knapp, lets Schmitt spill someone else's blood.
26 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Analogy
So Greg Knapp is the Akira Kurosawa of the NFL???
Man I really wana see Toshiro Mifune take on Schmitt in a self-assault battle now. Hari kiri vs. head-to-helmet bashing.
And all the land was in ruin, and burnination had forsaken the countryside.
I went through a big Miyamoto Musashi phase about 10 years ago
my favorite of all things Musashi was the book by Eiji Yoshikawa. I actually haven’t seen much else by Kurosawa, except Seven Samurai which was my favorite…and I finally got around to watching the Magnificent Seven this summer, and that movie really let me down, gawd.
Your analogy is a little strained but I love the intent.
by jacobstevens on Oct 14, 2009 10:23 AM PDT up reply actions
First, I love Schmitt
I like what he brings to the position/team and that Lattimer-esque quality he exudes. I don’t like WVU, but for whatever reason I was instantly stoked when he was taken in the 5th.
Secondly, people calling him an idiot for bashing his helmet against his head are ridiculous. No he isn’t an idiot, he’s just slightly insane, and maybe keyed so well to the 12th that knows how to feed their lust for battle.
Plus, the way our season was going, the Football gods required blood sacrifices to be made. Schmitt was first…Warner is next.
I'm glad to hear that Schmitt looks like a capable pass catcher. I figured he was just a heavy running halfback
who could bulldoze people, but if he is versatile, then great. I like my FBs and TEs to be good at several areas, which is probably why I was so hesitant when we let Weaver go.
On at least one play he was lined up wide on the line. I would like to see a quick pass to him out
there and then let him punish smaller corners.
by Trojan Knight on Oct 13, 2009 11:32 PM PDT up reply actions
I'm sure they'll think about this, given the right situation.
But it seems like whenever we motion a back out, it’s against man coverage, and an LB ends up moving out to cover the back.
That certainly works out for faster backs, though… that’s why Matt went to the “go” route for MoMo once when he was out wide and covered by an LB.
I think our screen game in general holds us back
more than any receiving back’s capabilities. I like that we’re sticking to it, but even still, just the grace and timing of execution hasn’t really allowed for much success. Hasselbeck’s touch isn’t quite there for screens. We might not sell it well, either. I’m pretty sure this is all Shaun Alexander’s fault.
by jacobstevens on Oct 14, 2009 10:26 AM PDT up reply actions
I never felt Griffith was the permanent solution. I'll take 6'2" 247 lbs over 6' 230
at the FB position provided they offer the same skill set. Not to mention being 5 years younger.
Smashing football good.
I like Schmitt because he likes to hit. I loved it when Mack Strong would just blow opposing players up. Hass says we’re a tough smash mouth team now and we need to establish that rep and not remain the savvy, wily, latte sipping team of the past. Give the opponents more to fear than the 12th Man.
Growl & etc.
First, FB is more the William H. Macy of football...
…and second, I’m surprised I’m the first one here to reference the 60 Minutes article from last Sunday about the alarming number of football players giving themselves Alzheimer’s due to too many blows to the head. Schmitt’s gesture was good theater, but it was also, er, boneheaded. I wish the guy would put a higher premium on his brains.
Lay it on the line...
I, for one, do not want a football team made up of a bunch of players wondering what life will be like at 60 if they continue to put themselves out there every week. I want a team full of crazy SOB’s whose only concern is getting the next first down or the next big stop. Brains be damned, put it in the endzone!
I think he has upside but ..
It sure felt weird watching Weaver take it to the house on a pass from McNabb on Sunday. I hated seeing Weaver go because of what he brought to the table as a runner/pass catcher and I would have liked to see if he could develope into a dominant blocker. Schmitt is a better blocker then Weaver but I don’t think by that much, considering the other tools Weaver brought to the table. I thought we turned our back on Weaver to soon before he could truly develope into a complete FB, but we are now faced with now watching Schmitt develope into a better blocker without the other tools Weaver had. I think Rusk doesn’t quite have that eye for offense as he does for defense.
by Mr. Blache III on Oct 14, 2009 11:20 AM PDT reply actions
Weaver had his chances to do so.
It’s blocking, not building a space shuttle by scractch.
It wasn't because we didn't recognize what we had in Weaver
It was fit. It was return on investment. He wasn’t a running back. He blocked well, received well, ran well, but we needed better blocking. And, though we don’t have great runners, we needed that from another position, another guy. Weaver wouldn’t have helped our backfield except that the dozen FB carries we’d see all year, would be marginally more effective with Weaver than with Schmitt. He was a good runner, but not a good short yardage runner. He wasn’t worth the cost, and he wasn’t a good fit for what Knapp was installing.
I think we all wish him well. It would have been great to make it work, here. We had very little cap room, however, and had much greater needs to attend to. WR, namely. Re-working the defense. Paying for the super expensive draft picks. Retaining and fortifying our questionable offensive line depth.
Weaver was just far down the priority list. We didn’t have a lot to spend. He’d earned a salary that put him out of our reach for the value that he’d bring, when replacement FBs to do exactly the job we want, were attainable, less expensive, could provide the elements that we needed — blocking, and a little blocking on the side — better, and in the case of Schmitt, already in hand and younger.
by jacobstevens on Oct 14, 2009 12:23 PM PDT up reply actions

by 






















