Step Three: Julius Jones Becomes Paramount
Seattle is well on its way to a successful stretch left. In a perfect world, Chris Spencer and John Owens are dominant enough to contain or stagger their respective linebackers enough that neither is able to get back into the play. In the real world, one or both is likely to bounce off their block and get back into the play. This is where Julius Jones becomes paramount.
Jones must first pick a lane. "One cut and go" is for real. A zone blocking rusher loses if he is too choosy. Picking the right hole is a key to success. In the first example, Jones takes the conservative path inside.

This path protects Owens and relies on Spencer. Owens must only pick the right outside linebacker for Jones to run behind Owens block and into the second level. Spencer, however is in a very difficult situation. He is pulling from the right to engage a defender on the left that is moving left. His chances of blocking that linebacker squarely are small, so he must be able to angle-block, reach block or pancake block the linebacker. Alternately, a truly elite rusher could cutback horizontally and behind Spencer, but Jones is not that back.
Jones is in ‘go' mode and must rush and is mostly likely to rush outside and away from the right inside linebacker. His second gear will determine if he can power through the second level or if he gets trapped in the hole and swarmed by the two right linebackers, the right defensive end and the left outside linebacker. The narrowness of this hole limits its big play potential, but the directness and shortness of Jones cut ensures positive yardage.
Alternately, Jones can choose to go outside. This is the money play, with the added risk of the play being blown up. The major advantage of Jones rushing outside is that it moves him away from the opponent's inside linebackers and defensive line. It matches him against two blocked defenders. Nate Burleson must dominate the corner and John Owens must seal or at least sufficiently slow the right outside linebacker.
This is the run I am looking for, but it has its own set of weaknesses, not least of which is exposing Jones in the open field to Adrian Wilson. If Wilson is in the box and reads the play correctly, he should be able to track Jones to the outside and hit him in the open field. Jones can attempt to avoid Wilson by cutting outside and towards the corner, but Burleson must be game with his tackle.
If we take Wilson out of the box and out of the equation, we can explore the more fundamental matchups. Jones is now into his hole and much ‘go'. We assume Seattle' line has moved out the nose tackle and sealed the right defensive end. The next most likely position of failure is Owens blocking the right outside linebacker. If Owens fails, Jones will be tackled, slowed, swarmed or forced to bounce the play even further outside. If Owens succeeds, Jones is enabled to explode into the third level with speed enough to evade the right inside linebacker and only defensive backs to beat. Jones could bounce outside further and still succeed, but that forces Seattle to win one more matchup and decreases the likelihood of a successful rush.
11 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
All of a sudden I've lost all confidence in seeing this pay off against the Cards
But I will say, damn. I thought I understood the stretch, very well. Now I know, that all I know is that I don’t know Diddly.
this article was actually the first result on google for "julius jones" as I checked his uni #
these images are great, but I need to keep flipping back to the description to figure out the uniform #s. (whose a TE and whose Left Tackle?)
maybe you could replace #8 with “QB”, as on running places I imagine it’d be pretty generic. Or #22 with “RB”. If you want to keep the #s for the other players, saying their # the first time you write about them ("Chris Spencer (#65) and Max Unger (#60) are dominant enough….) would be pretty helpful.
not a big deal as I can figure almost all of it out by context
but clarity being a virtue and so forth….
If you're interested enough in this series, I would assume
you’re interested in studying the game itself, and the abilities and execution of the players. If so, memorizing your team’s jersey numbers is your friend.
by jacobstevens on Oct 16, 2009 5:01 PM PDT up reply actions
I'm assuming you are a non-seahawk fan?
I don’t know of any Seahawk fans who wouldn’t know Jones’s or Hasselbeck’s numbers. Or even that 22 is most likely a running back and 8 a QB. The lineman and tight ends I can see people getting confused on and I could see how mentioning the number with the player within the article would help out. Although I did notice Sean Locklear is number 75, who is injured. Kyle Williams is 78. Pretty easy for me to figure out though I’m much more interested in the content. And, though doesn’t matter here, it looks like McIntosh will be number 72 for those watching on gameday.
Excellent informative articles John, more more more!
by B.B.Finnegan on Oct 16, 2009 6:35 PM PDT up reply actions
Mora kicked Sean in the ankle when he violated the team itinerary for the week when he stuffed it in his mouth and ate it
Solari was not amused. By either of them.
by B.B.Finnegan on Oct 16, 2009 6:44 PM PDT up reply actions
.....
I see my fan cred is in doubt. I know QB’s have single digits and WRs are usually in the 80s. And that Hasselbeck’s #8.
The real point as you said is figuring out whose who with TE and OL, particularly when there are players popping out to the second level or pull blocking.
Also, I keep hoping never to have reason to learn Kyle Williams’ number, although fate has apparently had different ideas lately.
Nice Diagram and very possible.
Jones will always take it outside. That being said, any RB would kill for the one on one matc-up with the saftey. That’s what coaches design run plays for. Jones has to win that match up with Wilson. Ultimately if he has a one on one match-up with Wilson that means everyone else did there job and it’s up to Jones to do his. Either make Wilson miss (like most elite RB’s would do, but he’s not one) or run through him and drag him for positive yardage. Knowing Jones he’ll get hit and fumble the damn ball.
Excellent diagram John. Jones is not good at reading his blocks or reading his fullback so it always leaves us in a tough position evaluating where he might run. I pray it’s Forsett running this play and not Jones. Forsett has the shiftness to go through either hole and get good positive yardage. Plus the way he’s been attacking the 2nd level in his runs, I could see him carrying Adrian Wilson on his back for a few yards….“All aboard the Forsett Express”!
by Mr. Blache III on Oct 16, 2009 11:19 PM PDT reply actions
Hrm?
Jones will fumble based on what? He hasn’t shown much propensity for fumbling over his career… in fact, he has 12 fumbles in 1112 rushes and 110 receptions.
I like the not-so-subtle dig at his not being elite… “most elite RB’s would do” as if there’s fifteen of them in the league.
Meanwhile, Forsett is apparently an elite RB. Since when is Forsett so great at running in anything else other than passing situations? I haven’t seen it. It’s not too hard to “attack the 2nd level” when defensive ends are running past him looking for the QB and LB’s are trailing WR’s across the field. Running a stretch play behind a run-only TE in a double-TE set is a different situation entirely.
Is this the personnel group...
that netted John Owens a bunch of targets from Hasselbeck via play action?
I ask because it’s painful to watch Owens try to make plays as a pass catcher. I recall Hasselbeck going to Owens repeatedly against the 49ers and it led to drops, three and outs, and near interceptions off tipped passes.

by 























