Matchups: Chris Spencer, Max Unger and Steve Vallos/Mansfield Wrotto V. Bryan Robinson, Alan Branch, Darnell Dockett and Gabe Watson
With the stages of execution described, we can now explore the matchups that will determine if that execution is successful. The many individual matchups that must be won explain why teams do not break long runs on every attempt. In a way, the stages help determine the -1 to 2 yards, 0 to 5 yards, and 5 to n yards of the run.
Chris Spencer, Max Unger and Steve Vallos/Mansfield Wrotto versus Bryan Robinson, Darnell Dockett, Alan Branch and Gabe Watson: Dockett is the most talented of the group, but as a one-gap player, I do not think he is likely to play nose against a two tight end front. If Dockett is in, the play will turn less on if Seattle can move Dockett, Unger and Spencer should be able to, but more if Dockett can tie up Spencer or, more likely, break Unger's single block and get back into the play. When Dockett is in, Julius Jones should be cutting back inside to help neutralize his speed and perhaps take advantage of over-pursuit.
Robinson is the starter and he rotates with Branch. This is the matchup that will do much to determine if Seattle can run. A giant among giants, Branch was once dubbed a top ten overall selection, but very real concerns about his effort dropped him into the second round. He hasn't done much for Arizona since being drafted, but he's only 24. Branch has begun to establish himself this season.
Whoever the nose, and Arizona sometimes plays a double nose and a 2-4 in nickel situations, the Cardinals have a young, powerful and huge defensive line that is difficult to move. Indianapolis had some success running delays to the outside. Whatever the play call, outside is the destination.
Seattle's interior may wish only to battle to a stalemate. Branch and Robinson move well off the line and both are athletic within their space. The two make it difficult to disengage and move into the second level. Branch's power off threatens an interior collapse on every snap and rushers can have trouble receiving the hand off without defenders in their face.
That is why you draft Chris Spencer. Once a upon a time, he could move out and wall off nose tackles with ease. There wasn't a nose tackle in football short of Vince Wilfork I would bet against Spencer. But it's been a long time since we've seen that power, even as his technique has begun to catch up with his athleticism. Seattle's mishmash of guards matter, but a fraction as much as Spencer. If Spencer can stagger the nose off the snap, Unger or Vallos can exploit the momentum enough for Spencer to release. If he can't, Jones will miss essential second level blocking. If Spencer cannot even control Branch or Robinson off the snap, Jones will be facing a pile upon receiving the hand off.
0 recs |
16 comments
|
Comments
I will wrap this up
and talk about the Cardinals passing game tomorrow. Have a nice Friday night everyone.
by John Morgan on Oct 16, 2009 6:49 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Disturbing me with the need for a successful Spencer
He was the man when we drafted him, promising upon arrival, hindered by (probable) injury during his rise phase, now swimming when he should be crushing (hopefully by inexperience rather than malignant injury).
This is the game Is his chance to demonstrate elite skill.
Beaks & Red feathers. Eat your wheaties, Chris Spencer.
by Birdfeeder on Oct 16, 2009 7:51 PM PDT via mobile reply actions 0 recs
Hey John
Last season in the Superbowl preview, Bill Belichick had video where the Cardinals’ defense all swarmed to where the ball was going, thus potentially leading them to give up a huge gain on a reverse. Do you still see their defense as one that bites onto running plays like that?
by Trepidation on Oct 16, 2009 8:09 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Whatsup man.
I think most teams swarm to where the ball is going.
The 2009 Cardinals are more gap sound, but still slow. The problem is, they have an athletic and hard hitting secondary (Wilson’s strip would break an average man’s fingers) and Seattle doesn’t have skill position players versed in the reverse. I don’t trust Nate’s execution. I think Branch is a little (rightfully) wary of contact. TJ’s an athlete, but guy’s getting a little slow. Obo is an option. Butler netted -3 yards in four rushes at Penn St.
I’d rather Seattle worked in some more cutback zone plays. That attacks swarming but slower defenses without getting cute.
by John Morgan on Oct 16, 2009 9:39 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I dare someone to make a poster of that and bring it to the game.
I can just see everyone on TV going “WTF?”.
by djafrot on Oct 17, 2009 12:26 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Someone high-res it and I'll try to.
"Mayhap a hidden door lurks nigh. Let us search the environs."
by Fearless Frog on Oct 17, 2009 1:34 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Spencer would do alot of boost confidence in him
by having a monster game tomorrow. I hope he is up to the challenge. Has the physical tools to manhandle, but he must develop the mentality. Dominating tomorrow would be a nice first step.
I was listening to Robbie Toebeck on the Brock and Salk show the other day. He’s great to listen to. For a guy that didn’t have the physical tools, he sure had the confidence and the mentality to play center. I’d love to see Spencer develop Robbie Toebeck’s junkyard dog attitude with Spencer’s physical ability.
by ASeahawkfan on Oct 16, 2009 9:27 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I shouldn't have any confidence in Sunday's game...but I do
Our Offensive Line is in shambles (I don’t need to list all the junk we have going on there), our QB is still recovering from a rib injury, and our #1 corner isn’t yet back to combat one of the best receiving corps in the league.
For whatever reason, this team has sucked me in, and I’ll probably go into Sunday expecting to win. Hopefully they don’t let me down, but it seems like that Arizona team only shows up every other game, we have one of the last remaining massive home field advantages in the league, and a quick passing game will hopefully offset OL issues. I just feel good about it, and I couldn’t tell you why.
by the777joker777 on Oct 16, 2009 10:42 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I can tell you why.
Because you saw the game last week, and you saw a brand new team. This is Mora’s thing, now, and to me it looks like for the first time the players really felt it.
I think the key difference here is the sheer amount of targets we have to throw to. Housh and Burly on their own are dangerous enough, but having Branch and Carlson in the mix just makes it ridiculous. Honestly, I think we could move to a spread offense 24/7 and tear it up even better than we did in 2007.
I absolutely expect us to win, despite the injuries.
by djafrot on Oct 17, 2009 12:30 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dead last passing defense.
That includes stiffs like Garrard and Hill opposite Peyton and Schaub. How can you be dead last with 2 poor QBs, and an average one (Schaub)??
It’s not like we haven’t shut down this passing game before. Remember 42-21?
October 11th, 2009: The day Justin Forsett became loved by Seahawks fans forever.
by SSreporters on Oct 17, 2009 12:41 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Granted 42-21 was with Tru
But we had no running game and Hasselbeck was making Marcus Pollard a star. Patrick Kerney annihilated Warner and Darryl Tapp will do the same tomorrow.
October 11th, 2009: The day Justin Forsett became loved by Seahawks fans forever.
by SSreporters on Oct 17, 2009 12:42 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Teams have to pass in order to keep up w/ Arizona's scoring.
I’m guessing that the pass-defense isn’t as bad as advertised, but that teams spend a lot of plays passing in games with the Cardinals.
Early prospect watch: RB C.J. Spiller, OT Ciron Black, DT Gerald McCoy, S Eric Berry, DT Ndamukong Suh, CB Ras-I Dowling 6'2, 200, RB Jonathan Dwyer, Sam Bradford*.
by Misfit74 on Oct 17, 2009 12:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't expect the defense to stop Zona
But I’d love to see them hammer Warner and prove me wrong. I’m never confident in our defense to hold leads against teams like Zona or any good offense.
by ASeahawkfan on Oct 17, 2009 1:15 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 

















