Just reading some quotes and its sounds like he got a little chirpy.
http://seahawkaddicts.com/2009-articles/november/mora-presser-notes.html

Like Willis, Housh, Forsett, Butler and Schmitt (still think T.J. has a few more seasons in him). I think it’s more of a transition from a pass-first Holmgren offense to a run-first offense using Knapp’s ZBS. It’s time we purge as many veterans as we can (except Hass, for one more season at least) after the season, but give as many young’ins playing time right now.

Patrick Kerney, Deion Branch and Julius Jones don’t have a future here any more; on both offense and defense we need to look toward the future, even if 2009 becomes an extended preseason for 2010.

but I think it bears asking now: should we jettison Leroy Hill after the season, to give Hawthorne a starting spot?

I will be labeled a pessimist, and a de-railer, but I do not see the purpose in staying the course. Hasselbeck is not getting younger, and we are going to have a great defense and no offense for years.

This is the same position the ‘94 Seahawk’s were in. I do not see the value in the Tampa organizational approach. It worked for Tampa after drafting elite defensive players and hiring an offensive minded coach.

I would argue we do not have elite defense players, and we have a defensive minded coach.

To get to the playoffs in the NFL, you must have a offense that scores points against other explosive teams. We do not have that, and will not for many years.

I am sad this day. Brandon Mebane may yet become the next Cortez Kennedy; in more ways than one.

How one could look at this result and call it improvement because we gave up fewer sacks and actually scored a touchdown is mind boggling.

This post is not to be antagonistic, but it may ruffle those who differ in opinion. Ban me if you must.

We were uncompetitive. It is an objective truth. At no point did Dallas ever fear for this game.

If we are to begin rebuilding the offense with next year’s draft, do we first find a QB or do we start with the offensive line?

Should get together, drink nice beer, and commiserate, and then I realized it would probably end up in:

A: Bar-fighting.
B: Multiple arrests.
C: The burning down of a celebrated local Bronco’s bar.
D: Any combination of the above.

MAC played great today i thought, I couldnt help but keep my eye on him everytime Matt dropped back. David played great but i expected it. Man Babs played fired up today! but damn did i think John was gonna give the game ball to David.

Pressure did seem to come from inside. But I’m not sure who gave up the stunts; was that on Sims or Spencer?

They showed a lot of different plays from the same set. I think it’s something that the hawks could possibly build into the offense in the long term, assuming we keep, trade for, or draft the same ‘1-2 punch’.

It reminds me a bit of miami, not in the “wildcat” sense, that word is overused, it just reminds me of a bad team taking a tangent from their plan and building around the talent they had.

I can’t think of many cases in the (admittedly few) years of watching football where a having a player get so unhappy for not being targeted worked out well.

Hass has enough brain farts without having to waste brain time on keeping Housh happy.

Zona running away with it would be unfun. I don’t see us winning the Div, but having a fighting chance makes the year a little bit more fun.

I like the way little Mora handles things theres a certain savy about it, He understands he has to battle through adversity and keep fighting regardless the situation. He doesn’t just fold up his gameplan and put in his back pocket at the first sign of urgency and i like that. Our defense is starting to resemble Mora more and more.

Detroit
Titans
Rams

I would say that next weeks game is for jobs at the highest level. Big time pucker factor next week.

Sad. Seattle’s big game of 2009: Detroit.

Nor was I happy with the PI call against Trufant where Austin ran into him, and it wasn’t even Trufant’s fault. Both were calls that led to 14 points for the Cowboys.

That said, the Cowboys played better today, even without the aid of those two calls.

Dallas was hitting its stride before today and there was little we knew the Hawks could do it to halt that. They’re a solid team and staying competitive through the first half is nothing to smash laptops over.

Here’s what I take out of today:
We’ve finally established that Seattle does indeed lack the tools to beat a majority of opponents. But we have seen some satisfactory to satisfying defensive play and sparks (of debatable voltage…amperage? idk.) of production on offense. Which teams we can and cannot beat seems clear to me at this point. In knowing all this, I for one can start resigning myself to what the rest of the season will be like and more importantly…
just enjoy seeing the Seahawks play; Shrug at the bad stuff and fist pump when Burleson makes a leaping catch or little Forsett pops between people for big gains.

I can’t help but wonder if we need to add a 3-tech through the draft and move ’Bane back to his old spot. I love him to death, but I think he might better suited there. I can understand the switch, since good 3-techs are hard to find – especially good ones. Maybe we were biding our time to find that player in this upcoming draft. Suh or McCoy next to Mebane would give me a lot of hope for the future of our defensive line along w/ our other young piece in Jackson and hopefully Tapp.

*I expected the game to transpire much like it did and braced myself for it. I just didn’t see this year’s team much different than the one that didn’t stack up last Thanksgiving.

*I saw a few bad plays from Babs. Hopefully, my perception is off because of it, because I can see that John holds some hope about him. I’ll have to be convinced to want to keep anyone in the secondary other than Josh at nickle and Tru at one corner spot. That said, we need offense.

*We need everything on offense save for TE1 and Fullback.

*The offensive line needs overhauled or serious competition for several positions. We need a playmaker at RB – not a stopgap. Jones is adequate. We need thoroughbred explosive. Special. QB concerns are obvious. I like our WRs but I can see Branch coming off the books, who hits age 31 next July and is clearly a role-player right now – an expensive one.

*Money may be strange discussion with no CBA, yet. I take a lot of joy in the fact we have one of the best Owners in football who does what it takes to win – even if it means change. I think Paul Allen will entrust Mora and Co. to continue building, but I’m not convinced Ruskell will be here. I think he will, though.

A lot of people have mentioned that Ruskell tore down the 2005 team (or some version of tore down) and broke up the core of the team. Would we be happy if the Seahawks roster was exactly the same as it was in 2005? Because it would be a disaster. I don’t think a lot of people realize that the 2005 offense was actually getting old and about to be past it’s prime and that Ruskell actually inherited a rebuilding team. The 2006 team was lucky to make the playoffs and the 2007 team had remarkable health for its age.

It’s a different era now, the team is in transition and has shown some improvements after collapsing last season. So far they’ve struggled with good teams and beaten up on bad teams, that’s usually the sign of a .500 team (maybe 7-9, who knows) and that is a huge step forward.

So….SEA!

Hmm don’t know what defense your watching but the defense im watching is palying inspired football and most importantly playing as a unit, even with their own set of injuries and setbacks STILL pushing and fighting!

Ya know when an offense isn’t clicking and seemingly struggling it puts a hell of alot of pressure on your defense, And when your defense gets dragged 60 70 80 yards down field or whatever it may be. And then the offense posts a short drive 3 and out or turnover on their ensuing posession, And you start seeing more of the same from that. Well that tends to wear on a defense and with our offense not where it’s supposed to be its really hurting our above average defense…

So “bad” No on the field too much yea sure.. But i still believe our defense is playing much better than our other sides of the ball.. Remember just 2 years ago the Hawks made up 2/3 of the NFC’s starting defense in the pro-bowl..Im not one to read in to things like that but by any standards thats impressive..

Well maybe not 2/3 XD