Field Gulls: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Defend That, Digger! The Overrated/underrated edition

Field Gulls Mod-enforced Rules and Standards

The following is the final set of rules and regulations decided upon by the community of Field Gulls.

Star-divide

Zero Tolerance

Abuse of the following rules will lead to immediate banning, possibly without chance of reinstatement.

Sexism, Racism or other Bigotry: MTV raised you right. You know better than to use "gay" in the pejorative. Cull the sexist, hate-filled slang from your vocabulary or expect an immediate ban.

Name Calling: Except to call Scruffy "Lance". He likes that. This has never been a problem here, but for the sake of comprehensiveness, let it be known that name calling of any kind will not be tolerated.

Spam: One and you're done.

Hoaxes: False headlines used to capture attention will be rewarded with a deletion of the post and a banning. Misreported news of any kind is not allowed.

Standards

Mods will enforce standards through a three strike system: correction, warning and finally banning. Mods will not punish innocent errors, but habitual abuse.

Links: A link must be provided for all news and quoted material.

Spelling and Grammar: The readers of Field Gulls are Field Gulls. Therefore you are held to basic editorial standards. Commenters must attempt proper spelling and grammar within the best of their ability. Many internet browsers have a spell check included.

Subject Line: The subject line is the small box above the body of a comment. SBN software requires this box be used. Use it.

Reply: The reply button is below and to the right of a posted comment. It's a wonderful organization and communication tool. Use it.

Site Etiquette

Site etiquette is to be enforced at the moderators discretion. It is a catch all for behavior not explicitly covered by the above rules that can be abusive to the site, those who contribute to the site and its readers.

Belligerence, Fault finding and Trollish behavior: Rudeness can be couched in the nicest words and divisive and destructive commenting can be framed as civil discussion. Persistent negative comments, thread-jacking, fault finding, petty correction, stubborn ignorance or illogic, meanness, calls to perfection, refusal to drop an argument, unfounded claims of prejudice and other acts of self-importance will be dealt with on a case by case basis.

Respect the moderators.

Never root against the Seahawks.

Fantasy discussion is for the weekly fantasy post: Fantasy comments outside of the post may be met with sarcasm.

Rosterbation: Fanposts containing logical, supported and novel roster moves are accepted, even endorsed. Fanposts that propose farfetched trades, signings, schemes or that endorse exhausted topics (ie Michael Vick, Mike Holmgren, the officiating of Super Bowl XL, etc) are not allowed.

Chat Speak: Acceptable in moderation, but "+1", "LOL" and "roflcopter" should not be stand alone comments.

A place to bury strangers.

23 recs  |  Comment 73 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Put this in the "recommended fanpost" section???

A good list, but not draconian by any means, and nice to have it out in the public’s eye permanently.

Bird Law in this country isn't governed by reason.

by whiskey chainsaw on Nov 16, 2009 4:08 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

I didn't realize "rec's" were how something got to the recommended fanpost section.

I thought a mod just placed it up there. Yay for democracy.

Bird Law in this country isn't governed by reason.

by whiskey chainsaw on Nov 16, 2009 4:18 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Yep.

If something is good, just asking for it be recommended will usually do the trick.

by John Morgan on Nov 16, 2009 4:21 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Define spam

Does that mean something like those stupid Brits that keep hounding me for my info after winning their lottery?

I’m fine with everything else.

Fire Bruce DeHaven.

by SSreporters on Nov 16, 2009 4:14 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Spam is solicitation, essentially.

The most likely form of spam on a blog is a post that’s primary goal is to redirect readers to another site.

The best example I can think of right off the top of my head is Seahawks Addicts repeatedly spamming the Seahawks Insider comments about two years ago.

by John Morgan on Nov 16, 2009 4:20 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

There was talk about Fanshot vs Fanpost the other day.

I think a Fanshot would be the best place to put a link to a blog or site. If someone here starts their own blog and wants to share the link, the fanshot would be a good place for it.

SEA!

by MFAN on Nov 16, 2009 4:26 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Signature is probably the best way to go for all involved

A signature is more visible and is, theoretically, affixed to content. Also, the blogger can contact me and I can put it in the links. The best way for someone to launch a blog, the Seahawk Addicts example not withstanding, is to write quality content. Write quality content and point it out to me and I won’t hesitate to link to it. Posting a link to your blog on another blog is generally considered rude.

by John Morgan on Nov 16, 2009 4:34 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

One exception to this was (whats his name) that kept posting his stuff in fanshots

But actually discussed his stuff here which I was fine with.

abender20 hates freedom.

by Scruffy Lefty on Nov 16, 2009 4:46 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Sure.

I did not personally like it, but it’s not spam in the worst sense. He didn’t bombard the comments section or anything. As always, the standard for fanshots is very low.

by John Morgan on Nov 16, 2009 4:52 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

When I think spam, I think

erection pills and secret inheritances. It’s not worth banning someone that is trying to get their work attention. We can all empathize with that.

by John Morgan on Nov 16, 2009 4:53 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Chat speak is fine in moderation.

I am not going to enforce something that is as much culture gap as standard. Excessive use of chat speak or use of chat speak (like +1) without other content falls under site etiquette. I will update that. Thanks.

by John Morgan on Nov 16, 2009 4:32 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

That's a very reasonable middleground.

I get annoyed by constant usage of chatspeak but also get annoyed at those who jump on someone for a rare usage.

by redwolf75 on Nov 16, 2009 6:04 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Thank you for including "roflcopter."

Nothing makes me want to strangle people like that word.

It's Great to be a Florida Gator!

"I never met a llama I didn't like." - TJ Duckett

All I want for Christmas is Joe Haden, Eric Berry, and Nandamukong Suh in Seahawks blue.

by Wayward Llama on Nov 16, 2009 5:03 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

I am so out of touch with "chat speak"..

What the hell is a roflcopter?

Bring Your Game, Leave Your Name.

by iverson2169 on Nov 16, 2009 9:06 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

On A Scale of 1 to 10...

How similar can my comments be to ones I’d read on Kissing Suzy Kolber?

by Surf Hawk on Nov 16, 2009 10:33 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

I have a question...

Where do smileys fall in the gamut? Are they generally considered annoying?… or bearable?

Bring Your Game, Leave Your Name.

by iverson2169 on Nov 17, 2009 2:46 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

I think "no plagiarism" should be added here

Doesn’t happen a lot but just in case it does…

Fire Bruce DeHaven.

by SSreporters on Nov 17, 2009 7:17 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

OK... Just had another thought (my last of the night)...

A guy (or gal) makes comments that are misunderstood by the mod’s and he gets banned.

What is the appeal process?

Bring Your Game, Leave Your Name.

by iverson2169 on Nov 17, 2009 9:51 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

lol?

Is there some sort of an inside joke to all these rules?

by dsludo on Nov 17, 2009 3:59 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

stop by the ESPN forums, and see the difference between how sane it is at Field Gulls in comparison.

That’s the reason for the rules.

It's Great to be a Florida Gator!

"I never met a llama I didn't like." - TJ Duckett

All I want for Christmas is Joe Haden, Eric Berry, and Nandamukong Suh in Seahawks blue.

by Wayward Llama on Nov 17, 2009 6:01 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Here's a question on some of these more recent fanposts.

Are they a bit too close to rosterbating/speculating? Or if enough thought is put into it and it is a new idea, is that acceptable?

by LantermanC on Nov 23, 2009 12:44 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Hopefully with the Minnesota matchup in the rearview

the Hutchinson stories will disappear. I have a feeling that “Holmgren for GM” is going to be a reoccurring annoyance though.

It's Great to be a Florida Gator!

"I never met a llama I didn't like." - TJ Duckett

All I want for Christmas is Joe Haden, Eric Berry, and Nandamukong Suh in Seahawks blue.

by Wayward Llama on Nov 24, 2009 4:06 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I think there's been more

but as the season falls apart and there’s not much else to say about anything until some solidification in the front office and the direction the personnel is moving, what pieces to keep and what not to, I can see being more flexible there.

That being said, if it’s not John doing it, I’m not very interested. So maybe it does clutter up the place and we need more moderation there now than normal.

by jacobstevens on Nov 24, 2009 12:24 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think it's a problem.

People come to talk about the team… when it becomes a problem, it is a thread jacking, pervasive thing as opposed to a desire to talk about the future of your team getting better…

Besides, if the fanpost idea is a worthwhile one, people will go and comment. If it isn’t, it wont get much action. And frankly, I do want to hear what people think and have to say about things and what we could do, as long as it doesn’t consist of “trade Wrotto and Branch and a first rounder for Hutch and Rice” type arguments.

Bird Law in this country isn't governed by reason.

by whiskey chainsaw on Nov 24, 2009 2:15 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Byron your from NY...yes?

I have seen some crazy things in Soho after hours that weren’t nearly as bad as what “rosterbation” sound like.

Bring Your Game, Leave Your Name.

by iverson2169 on Dec 8, 2009 7:42 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Ha!

Yeah, New Yorker for the past 8 years….and yeah, there’s some crazy happenings.

by thebyron on Dec 9, 2009 7:39 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I'll throw this out to the community

Should Field Gulls enforce some standard of factual accuracy? Sometimes information is thrown around or used to support and argument and that information is wholly incorrect. Now, in theory it is easy enough to fact check that information and disprove the claim, but not everyone has time to do that, and not everyone does do it for whatever reason.

If someone is fast and loose with their facts, given sufficient transgressions and warnings, should it then be a bannable offense?

by John Morgan on Dec 9, 2009 3:49 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

There's been a bit too much random percentage slinging for my liking.

I’d be okay with this being a bannable offense if it’s a recurring problem with a user.

by BrianL on Dec 9, 2009 3:58 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Tough one...

I have seen sites on the net that contain stats that contradict each other… some references are more accurate than others.

How about this as food for thought:

Stats that are used as “evidence” to support a claim in a debate should have a source cited. This way, a person is held responsible for having done a modest amount of “due diligence” but isn’t responsible for possibly inaccurate resources.

Bring Your Game, Leave Your Name.

by iverson2169 on Dec 9, 2009 7:30 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm wary.

I think an important part of the Field Gulls (and SBN) community is the assumption of good faith, but also the understanding that we don’t do this full-time. Not everyone fact checks everything others say, but enough do that I don’t think we let a ton of BS stand without being challenged. Further, we sometimes suffer from information overload and are forced to use our memory (hence the prevalence of IIRC and similar qualifiers). However, if it’s a repeat offender (and by “repeat” I don’t mean “second time”) and if the person has been warned multiple times then I’d tentatively be on board.

by thebyron on Dec 10, 2009 7:51 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Hail to the greatest Seahawk to ever live: Walter Junior Jones.
Start posting about the Seahawks »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Comcast NFL RedZone Moments from SB Nation

Music City Miracles
Tennessee Titans Red Zone Report
Bleeding Green Nation
Comcast NFL Red Zone stat of the week - Something doesn't have to give
Niners Nation
49ers Red Zone numbers: How effective are they?

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Jack22_small
Super Bowl XLIV Open Thread
Olympiabeer_small
My problem with the Colts winning-- the absence of immortality.
Small
Random Super Bowl Thoughts
Profilepic_small
Diamonds in the Rough
Jack22_small
"Pro Bowl" "Open Thread"
Seattle_seahawks_small
Pro Bowl Folly
Small
Kerney Retires?
Nielson_small
Replacing Matt Hasselbeck
Sketch_haggar_small
USC Recruiting 2002-2009 Offensive Line
Profilepic_small
Nicknames for the 'Hawks

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation


Managers

Image_114_small Shrug

Jj_flag_detail1_small John Morgan

Whiteken_small Scruffy Lefty

Small BrianL

Small abender20

Authors

Vp081-c_small Christian

Small Doug Farrar

Dksbtwit_small Johnny Peel (DKSB)