Meet Tyson Alualu
Since we are talking about optimizing Seattle's defensive line, let's look at a talent it could add to help that process: Tyson Alualu. Alualu is a four-year contributor and 36 game starter. He has played mostly end at Cal, but is built like a three-tech tackle. He has a great frame and overall build. My writing that may surprise some. Alualu is not hulking like Taylor Mays or cut like Patrick Kerney, but instead has broad shoulders, wide hips and smooth musculature. It's a frame that could add weight with ease and will add muscle with age.
He has five sacks and six tackles for a loss this season and 20.5 and 14.5 for his career. Alualu (pronounced Ah-loo Ah-loo) is a good mix of young, experienced and peaking at the right time. Note: The below was created before his monster senior season. Alualu is #44.
0 recs |
35 comments
|
Comments
Where is he projected to go? Looks like a 3rd rounder maybe.
I could get behind that.
by Nate Dogg on Nov 17, 2009 6:07 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
When you get a chance John
You might want to check out Oregon State’s Stephen Paea. He may be just what the doctored ordered as well. He is not big. But we did well with Darby and Tubbs. Maybe Paea and Mebane?
He is a Junior, so this might be moot.
It is what it is...
by kidder95 on Nov 17, 2009 6:35 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
The NFL Combine will be essential for a guy like Paea
There’s a lot to like about Paea. His build looks similar to Tommie Harris. But he’s someone I would want to see shoulder to shoulder with other NFL talent. The fear is that a slight, tweener type like Paea might be rag dolled by NFL offensive linemen.
by John Morgan on Nov 17, 2009 7:48 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Why isn't this also a concern for Alualu?
by Nate Dogg on Nov 17, 2009 7:55 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
They are both the same weight
But Alualu is 2 inches taller and looks to have wider/thicker frame to put weight on. I’m a Beavs fan, so I love Paea, but I agree with John that I would be interested in seeing him directly pitted against other pro-talent. I think he’ll do well though.
by DJ C-Raig on Nov 17, 2009 8:28 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
They are both the same weight if you think listed college weight and height mean anything.
Michael Crabtree and DeSean Jackson disagree.
by John Morgan on Nov 17, 2009 8:46 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I've been tracking Alualu this year
For the very reason John has been pointing out. I remember him saying that he is almost “obsessed” with getting a DT to pair with Mebane so his talent doesn’t go to waste with Colin Cole beside him. This reminds me very much of when Tez was getting no help and Seattle finally drafted Adams to pair with him.
Outside of Suh and G. McCoy, who will probably both go top 10, I’ve been systematically going through any DT’s that might qualify as a good 3-tech to pair with Mebane (moving him back to 1). The next group of names is led by Arthur Jones, who may drop now with the injury, but I wasn’t as impressed with Jones as I was with Alualu. My only slight concern with Tyson is height, but if he really is 6022 then I don’t think he’s too short for a 3. I laugh when I read the reports about him being more of a “hustle” player than “athlete” because the analysts are always assuming athleticism based on long speed measurables while discounting the more important traits of quickness, coordination and “leverage strength.” To my eyes, Alualu looks more coordinated, quick and in control (and therefore more athletic) than Jones, Odrick and Oghobaase, and at least as athletic as Marsh and stronger than Bailey. I also like his hustle from start to finish. Even McCoy will stand around occasionally when he overruns the play (although I still think he is a great player), but Alualu is relentless, which reminds me of another DT we drafted from Cal.
Here is another, more recent video of him going against USC including a couple of plays against LT Charles Brown.
by scratchandsniff on Nov 17, 2009 7:57 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
He looks extremely smooth moving through the line
Am I wrong in thinking that he doesn’t have any pass rush moves outside of his bull rush? He seems similar to Mebane more than a complement to Mebane.
by Nate Dogg on Nov 17, 2009 8:20 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
He can shed guards pretty well
I don’t put to much into any matchups with LT’s or RT’s because he just seems to bull rush and hand fight his way to the quarterback when he’s matched up at end, which I don’t think is his optimal position in the NFL. But inside he gets good leverage, works down the line on running plays and sheds or swims through on passing plays. I’m not an expert scout, so I’m sure John could add much more, but I do notice he sheds gaurds and splits double teams better than all the “tier 2” DT’s (after Suh and McCoy) that I have watched and that I named above. He doesn’t get blown back by double teams the way I saw Arthur Jones (and others) get wiped out of some plays. He seems strong and has a good understanding and use of leverage.
by scratchandsniff on Nov 17, 2009 8:29 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Mebane looked like a superstar in his Cal highlight video a few years ago
Alualu just looks “ok” in this one. I take it his senior highlights are a lot better?
I definitely agree about the two Mebane thing. If Alualu is another Mebane, he’d be a steal in the 2nd or 3rd round and would do wonders for our defensive line.
by kearly on Nov 17, 2009 9:03 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Its not a matter of "not liking"
Just saying Mebane’s highlight package was much more impressive.
by kearly on Nov 18, 2009 3:51 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I should elaborate more
If you didn’t know anything else about Mebane, you would have guessed he was a 1st round pick caliber DT from his highlights. He blew into the backfield with incredible ease and once he got back there would land monster hits on the ball carrier. He even had some highlights were he’d break though on goal line formations. Mebane was exceptionally fast and destructive despite looking pretty chunky.
AluAlu looks totally different, compared to Mebane’s video Alualu looks like a finesse player. Whereas Mebane destroyed anyone that had the nerve to stand in his way, Alualu uses what the OL gives him and hustles to the ball. Alualu dominates some single blocking but doesn’t really dominate double teams, just splits them when the blockers mess up.
He looks very skinny compared to Mebane. But that’s probably a good thing because it means he could add some decent weight. And he probably needs to beat NFL lineman with just brute force.
Sadly the Mebane video isn’t around anymore, I just tried looking for it. It was awesome too.
by kearly on Nov 18, 2009 4:18 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
+ a LT to anchor the left side
And a dream fantasy-general-manager trade for Robert Gallery, and the team is set for a playoff run.
Sam Bradford, future Seattle Seahawk.
by Carl Shinyama on Nov 17, 2009 10:15 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
We aren't that close to the playoffs
The team just needs too much. New QB, some new OL, new WR, new RB.
On defense, the team needs more CB’s equiped for zone coverage. They also need an elite pass rusher in the front four. Oh, and a safety.
Pretty much everything except for TE and LB. Kinda sad. Not all of it has to be elite talent, but I’m thinking its going to take about 3 years assuming the job is done competently.
by kearly on Nov 18, 2009 3:57 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
They're closer than you think.
They can win with Matt if he’s getting the protection he needs, and if they’re blocking in the running game the way that they supposed to. I do agree the Seahawks need a QB of the future, but they can win with Matt next year if they have the O-line to do it with.
On the defensive side of the ball, they’re really only short a really, really good, if not dominant DT, which would change things dramatically for them. They won’t need an elite pass rusher if they have a DT constantly drawing double teams, and is paired with Mebane; just an above average production at the position. I’m not against acquiring a new DE, but I’m not against sticking with the guys that are currently on the roster, except for perhaps Kerney. Just imagine: Guys like Lawrence Jackson, Darryl Tapp, Aaron Curry, and Leroy Hill will get more clean looks at the quarterback.
Sam Bradford, future Seattle Seahawk.
by Carl Shinyama on Nov 18, 2009 7:35 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
my thoughts
You’ll notice I said elite pass rusher in the “front four.” I was vague on purpose because if the Seahawks are so fortunate to have a crack at Suh or G. McCoy, they could actually add that elite pass rusher at DT, which would just be amazing. There are some very good pass rushing DE’s also, but my preference would be for a DT since Tapp creates good pressure already and Jackson should be at least an average NFL DE. I’m crossing my fingers that one of those elite DT/DE will still be available when the Seahawks pick.
The Seahawks were have been almost totally healthy for a few weeks now, and lost by two scores to the good teams they played and came from behind to beat the lions. If the Seahawks are a good team next year, it would be a 2009 Broncos sized surprise. Matt Hasselbeck is basically a rich man’s Shaun Hill at this point, he’s a game manager who struggles when he tries to put the game on his shoulders. Last Sunday, he threw picks and made several near picks even when he wasn’t pressured. He’ll be even worse next season, due to age. At best, he’ll be a league average QB in 2010, unless he inexplicably goes Kurt Warner or Brett Favre on us.
Fixing the OL will not happen over-night. There are some decent ZBS prospects in this draft, but OL tend to struggle as rookies and often take 2+ years to play well in the NFL. Free agency for OL is really bad too. The line probably won’t noticeably improve for a couple years still, especially if the team decides to cut bait with Spencer and Sims for not being Alex Gibbs types.
Then you have all the other needs listed in the previous post. It hasn’t dawned on most people, but the Seahawks offense is extremely lacking in athleticism. They have enough solid players to occasionally put together a nice drive, but they simply do not have a home-run threat that would scare defenses and add explosiveness. Even if Hasselbeck bounces back next year, he’d still be throwing 8 yard passes to Housh and Carlson most of the time. The team needs to add explosiveness to RB and WR, and quality to OL. By the time all that is in place and clicking, Hasselbeck will long since be gone. So the team should also look at getting a franchise QB as soon as possible too.
I’m excited for the Seahawks future, but its still a long ways away.
by kearly on Nov 18, 2009 4:29 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I was about to post a question:
Which would be more important to draft next year: a potentially-franchise QB, or a DT to pair with Mebane?
Then you posted the above, which pretty much answers that.
by djafrot on Nov 18, 2009 12:21 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
What do you think?
I agree that DT and QB are huge priorities this offseason. If by some miracle Bradford and Gerald McCoy were still on the board when the Seahawks pick, I’d probably go Bradford since good QB’s are harder to find and take longer to develop. The Seahawks need to find Matt’s heir and start his painful road to NFL success as early as possible, because the longer they wait, the longer it will take to be a good football team again.
The Seahawks have a ton of areas that need new talent. The team should take the best combination of BPA and need at each pick, but In a perfect world, they should invest in the positions that take the longest to develop this offseason (QB, OL, DE, WR) and save the positions that tend to excel quickly for later offseasons (DT, S, RB).
by kearly on Nov 18, 2009 4:35 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
not to mention cb.
I think we all forget that Trufant is 30, Lucas is a one-year contract, Jennings is useless, and Pistol can only do so much.
We’re like a leaking dam that has had its holes plugged with very expensive, old glue. I maintain that this team needs a purge in the offseason. The aging and mediocre need to go. We’re wasting cap space on them.
It's Great to be a Florida Gator!
"I never met a llama I didn't like." - TJ Duckett
All I want for Christmas is Joe Haden, Eric Berry, and Nandamukong Suh in Seahawks blue.
by Wayward Llama on Nov 19, 2009 4:54 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm very impressed. He actually reminds me of Brandon Mebane.
He gets quick separation awfully fast and he really knows how to get leverage. He doesn’t seem as explosive as Mebane, but the rate at which he gets separation is about the same as Mebane. I do agree that DE is probably not his optimal position in the NFL.
I now officially have someone on my draft board for the second round :)
Sam Bradford, future Seattle Seahawk.
by Carl Shinyama on Nov 17, 2009 10:18 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
No thanks.
I don’t think we need another “tweener” like this guy. We need a solid, ferocious DT to pair with Mebane. We just have so many holes, another DE is really the last thing we should be spending draft picks on.
It's Great to be a Florida Gator!
"I never met a llama I didn't like." - TJ Duckett
All I want for Christmas is Joe Haden, Eric Berry, and Nandamukong Suh in Seahawks blue.
by Wayward Llama on Nov 18, 2009 4:06 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I'm not sure I'm a fan either
He only looked truly dominant in a handful of those highlights. If he reminded me of any Seahawk, its actually Lawrence Jackson. He relies on the bull-rush, he looks skinny for a DT, usually plays himself into position and then makes a smart play, which isn’t bad but Mebane looked much more dominant. Maybe this isn’t fair but Alualu looked like he was barely making some of those plays. Those “barely made it” plays become “almost, nice try’s” in the NFL. Now if he adds a lot more weight and begins to physically resemble Mebane, he could near Mebane’s ability, and in that event he’d be a difference maker for the Seahawks.
Barring further improvement, Alualu looks like another average to slightly above average DL that Ruskell is so good at finding. If the Seahawks had a 3rd round pick, I’d be fine with taking him there, but he doesn’t strike me as the missing piece of the front 4. Although anything that benches Cole would be a nice upgrade.
by kearly on Nov 18, 2009 4:29 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Wow, I really want this guy based on the name alone!
Who’s with me?
by Tyopiod on Nov 18, 2009 11:47 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
What do you guys think
about Terrance Cody?
sorry if this has been brought up in previous threads, but I’m kind of new
by Lock_down on Nov 18, 2009 9:03 PM PST reply actions 0 recs

by 


















