The Future of Matt Hasselbeck is the Future of the Seattle Seahawks, Pt. 1
Last post for a few days. Enjoy the holiday if you celebrate. I know I can't count my blessings with every bone in a newborn baby's body.
This is the first in a multipart series examining how Seattle can determine its future by determining its quarterback of the future. The second part should be up on black Friday.
The Matt Hasselbeck Plan
A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away, Matt Hasselbeck started the season 25 of 36 for 279 yards. He wasn't well ahead or living on RAC. He wasn't Admiral Checkdown commanding the Y-wings to martyr themselves against the turrets of the opposing defense's Death Star. Hasselbeck was a capable quarterback, leading his team back from his own blunders to a shutout slaying of the St. Louis Rams.
Then Hasselbeck dropped his deflector shields and threw himself bodily down the 49ers exhaust shaft and towards the team's reactor core. He was stopped short by Patrick Willis' superlaser elbow smash.
Everything that has followed has sucked. Broken down Hasselbeck is not much more valuable than General Sack-Himself, Seneca Wallace. Hasselbeck has had broken ribs, and still suffers from a throwing-shoulder injury of unknown origin. The injuries, we must conclude, have taken their toll.
When Shaun Alexander slowed, his decline was inexorable. The smartest, most skilled back in the world can not overcome zero burst and swampfooted cutting ability. Hasselbeck and his fans are enduring a more complicated but no less painful decline. Unlike Alexander, Hasselbeck is not cooked, done, debilitated and embarrassing himself.
Matt Hasselbeck could recover and be a good quarterback again. His marginal arm strength is likely to decline, but not so badly he can no longer make his bread and butter mid-range throws. Hasselbeck can not do that today, but when he's healthy, he can.
In this plan, Seattle accepts what it has and does not have at quarterback. It sticks with Hasselbeck and attempts to build itself around what he can do. It improves the line and run game to keep Hasselbeck healthy and keep Hasselbeck viable when he is inevitably injured. Tim Ruskell continues to build the defense towards elite.
The plan might be enacted thus:
Rework and extend Hasselbeck's contract in the offseason. This will free immediate cap dollars and preempt a quarterback controversy.
Cut Patrick Kerney and Walter Jones.
Be players in free agency and in the trade market. Target undervalued backs from teams with depth, and attempt to buy elite free agents like Julius Peppers, Elvis Dumervil, Carlos Rogers and Richard Seymour. Seattle is no longer an attractive destination for players that want to win, but Paul Allen's money is no less green.
Approach the draft from a best talent available standpoint, but understand the need for talent at offensive line, running back and potentially wide receiver.
Tap Mike Teel as the long term replacement, or acquire young talent to contest him for the position.
How it works: Hasselbeck regains arm strength as his health improves, but, more importantly, Hasselbeck the signal caller comes to fore as Hasselbeck the quarterback recedes. The team builds around Hasselbeck's intelligence at the position and compensates for his deteriorating tools.
The Seahawks continue to redefine themselves as a defense-minded team. It doesn't panic and pour resources into the offense, attempting to remake an elite offense around a quarterback not capable of helming such an attack, but buttresses the offense and improves and stabilizes the offensive line. The Seahawks young talent gels, perhaps pushed over the top by a Peppers, Berry or Dunlap, and begins a run of dominance over a still very weak NFC West. If things break right, one February night in the coming decade, Robert dies of joy. We spread his ashes accross Qwest hiding our barely stifled smiles.
How it fails: Hasselbeck is never fully free of routine football abuse and therefore never free of debilitating injuries. The team invests in Matt Hasselbeck's skills and leadership and get Trent Green, Jake Delhomme, Mark Brunell, etc: A once very good quarterback at his body's end. The discord on offense prevents major gains by a talented defense, or, what gains are made, are wasted because of the Seahawks untenably bad offense.
Having invested in Hasselbeck and otherwise ignored the quarterback position, the team is stuck between stations, improving on defense as the offense crumbles--seasons away from any chance of renewal. Seattle spends its coming seasons betwixt good and bad, often settling into mediocre, but never a true contender. The upshot: The Seahawks can't collapse enough to rebuild.
2 recs |
47 comments
|
Comments
This line made me happy:
If things break right, one February night in the coming decade, Robert dies of joy.
by Fear on Nov 24, 2009 3:53 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Call me a geek if you must,
but this line was my favorite:
He wasn’t Admiral Checkdown commanding the Y-wings to martyr themselves against the turrets of the opposing defense’s Death Star.
by John Edwards on Nov 24, 2009 4:34 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That is a good one.
But Robert’s enthusiasm makes me happy. And I know that, in the case that JM was alluding to, Robert would probably die from sheer joy.
by Fear on Nov 24, 2009 5:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
But, but, but...
Then he’d miss years two, three and four of the dynasty :(
by John Edwards on Nov 24, 2009 8:28 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
NNNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOO
Matt will never be healthy again. He was never an elite QB even during his (up and down) mini-peak 2003-2007. I hope he is a Dilfer like mentor for our next Qb. I assume that’s what part 2 is.
by Hawqz on Nov 24, 2009 4:02 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
You're joking right?
Hass was an elite QB from 2003-2007. 3 Pro Bowls and a Super Bowl appearance, 4 NFC West Titles. What Seahawk team were you watching? He would’ve been a Super Bowl winner if Stevens could catch and the Refs weren’t paid off.
by Mr. Blache III on Nov 25, 2009 3:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know, this plan smacks of 'rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic"
If it works, then we might get 1 or 2 playoff runs out of it, but the odds are long.
I’m reminded of a baseball example—the San Francisco Giants. Earlier this decade, they tried a similar strategy—ignored a youth movement and tried to acquire veteran FAs in a last-gasp effort to get Barry Bonds a ring. That plan didn’t work, Bonds moved on, and the team was saddled with a barren farm system and albatross contracts.
I’m not saying we should take Hass behind the woodshed right now, but it’s foolish to try and build the next offseason around him. This team needs new blood on offense, and soon.
Is that the light at the end of the tunnel, or the headlights of an oncoming train?
by Benne on Nov 24, 2009 4:08 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Yes, this plan has one big flaw...
“acquire young talent to contest [Hasselbeck] for the position” is presented here as little more than a footnote. It must be the heart of our plan. A contract extension for Matt sounds fine IF it saves the team significant cap space, but Teel was not drafted to be the future of this franchise, and the future QB plan cannot be handled casually.
Drafting a young QB with great potential is the most important move this franchise can make. Other plans should revolve around that.
"Football players are temperamental. That's 90 percent temper and 10 percent mental." - Doug Plank
by Stevo's on Nov 25, 2009 12:07 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Carlos Rogers is an appalling DB
He will bite on any pumpfake, double move, or just straight-up whiff on a tackle. Rogers is a bust for a former top 15 first round pick. Also Rogers thinks that giving a receiver 10 yards at the 5 yard line is smart. I wouldn’t want a Kelly Jennings clone after we would have already released Kelly Jennings.
Seattle Seahawks: The only team in the NFL to trail 17-17 according to Dick Stockton.
by SSreporters on Nov 24, 2009 4:34 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Hunting aging, risky propositions like Richard Seymour is not my idea of a good time
He’s entering the decline-phase of his career as an FA.
The “How it fails” of this plan looks so much more likely than “How it works”.
Let’s call this Plan Z, please.
by Vasilii on Nov 24, 2009 5:09 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
"The "How it fails" of this plan looks so much more likely than How it works"
I was thinking exactly the same thing. The “how it works” scenario sounds eerily like the same exact plan we had entering the 2008 and 2009 seasons.
by kearly on Nov 24, 2009 6:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
2009 Hasselbeck reminds me of 2009 Griffey
They didn’t completely embarrass themselves, but showed they are a shell of the former greats they once were. Building a team around them with the intent of returning to contention would be incredibly foolish.
Reworking Hasselbeck’s contract and giving him a long term extension would be just as foolhardy as when the Panthers did the same for Jake Delhomme.
I respect Ruskell for the good things he’s done. He’s not a bad GM. But its scenarios like this that make me uneasy about Ruskell remaining GM, because this feels like a path he would take.
by kearly on Nov 24, 2009 6:11 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
2008 or 2007 Griffey.
2009 Griffey would be like… Brad Johnson on the Cowboys last year.
by LantermanC on Nov 24, 2009 8:46 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Speaking of awful free agents
Who would want a head case like peppers. I’d take him if i can sign him to a $1 contract with a $1million bonus for every sack. Giving that guy guaranteed money would be a disaster
by Hawqz on Nov 24, 2009 6:14 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
John... you are one ubiquitous SOB.
May I call you a pimp?
Absolutely dead on. I have already seen the foreshadowing and like where it’s going. Like all good writers you have set the stage for the finale (part 2). I anxiously await your sequel to find out where you believe the reality of the Seahawks situation lies.
For the rest of you who believe John is implying Hass will come back… he’s not. This is just part one, of a comprehensive look at what COULD happen (albeit unlikely). Remember… we didn’t know Jigsaw was laying right in front of us until the credits were rolling.
Bring Your Game, Leave Your Name.
by iverson2169 on Nov 24, 2009 6:22 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I don't think his return is unlikely
Remember how bad a new quarterback usually is, notwithstanding a few outliers. But heavy, heavy grooming of the future QB is not unlikely.
by paul2 on Nov 24, 2009 8:45 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
As long as it's grooming, not petting.
That would just be creepy.
by sev79 on Nov 25, 2009 2:54 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The Future of Matt Hasselbeck is the Future of the Seattle Seahawks, Pt. 1
Or: How I Learned to Stop Caring and Forget About the Seahawks.
by Nate Dogg on Nov 24, 2009 6:26 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
This is what I would call the "muddle through" scenario
(homage to John Mauldin from the economics beat)
by Mr Fish on Nov 24, 2009 6:39 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Lets see what part two holds.
I fear we keep Matt as his trade value is now worse than it was last year. Oh I wanted to part with hm and Walt for a rebuild. No matter who the GM is, Matt either goes or stays on. He won’t take a BU position on this team. I can’t imagine any offensive coordinater enthused about a non scrambling, weak armed injury prone never-was QB leading his rebuild charge.
Like to see what you have in store for us…
by GnarlyHawk on Nov 24, 2009 7:33 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
For the love of God
Take the risk, and pay two starting QB’s in 2010. Hedge. Hedge. Hedge.
Banks do it for all large loans these days: Credit Debt Swaps (CDS). They sell loans and then insure a portion or all of the amount. It is basically insurance for poor due dilligence.
Trade 2011 #1 for Kevin Kolb. This is not as far fetched as it sounds. McNabb is a Reid mainstay. If he stays, so does McNabb.
And keep Hasselbeck for 2010. Play the odds. Play for 2010, and let Beck win the job.
I am beyond tired of Beck having to be “given” the job. Sport is competition. If Hasselbeck cannot handle the heat, he needs to get out.
Draft or trade for a high level QB, and let Matt compete.
Ask yourself this one question: What would the NFL give for Matt Hasselbeck today?
I’d say a 5th round draft choice. Maybe.
It is what it is...
by kidder95 on Nov 24, 2009 9:16 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
This will not sit well with the FG community
But I would gladly trade Curry for a chance at a new QB:
Kolb
Lienert
Hoyer
Josh Johnson
Young
Maybe an early 2nd round pick
Yes, would seem a poor trade. I realize I’m going to get roasted here. Positional value does not bode well for Curry. And QB’s run the NFL. Perhaps it is time we invested in the core of what drives the NFL and give up some bling bling to do so.
Just a thought.
It is what it is...
by kidder95 on Nov 24, 2009 10:14 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Yeah I'm sure we can trade FAR less for any QB like that
Seattle Seahawks: The only team in the NFL to trail 17-17 according to Dick Stockton.
by SSreporters on Nov 25, 2009 7:02 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The going price for a #2 QB
Would be a two down OLB.
It is what it is...
by kidder95 on Nov 25, 2009 9:03 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
So you're willing to sell the #4 overall pick after one season
For one of THOSE QBs? That makes no sense.
Seattle Seahawks: The only team in the NFL to trail 17-17 according to Dick Stockton.
by SSreporters on Nov 25, 2009 1:55 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
For Kolb, absolutely.
It might be a bit high for the others. Curry has not impressed me at all this year. I hope I eat my words.
It is what it is...
by kidder95 on Nov 26, 2009 11:39 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You're joking right?
The list of QB’s that have been showed are mediocre at best. Only a dumbass would trade Curry for a QB. You can’t judge a player based on their rookie season. That’s absurd and dumb. Strahan had a terrible first year and look what happened after. Hell even Manning was criticized for his rookie season because he was too much of a gambler. Sure Curry hasn’t been all mighty or anything but it’s not surprising at all. He has made rookie mistakes which is natural. Give him time.
by Seahawksfan23 on Nov 26, 2009 5:14 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That's an absolutely ludicrous statement
Based on 10 games you want to trade him for another team’s backup QB?
ME! BANE!
by SSreporters on Nov 28, 2009 6:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
One year to late. Offense wins Championships!
This should’ve been Ruskells approach going into this season. Address skill positions in the draft to help Hass. Like I mentioned in an earlier Post, we should’ve gone Crabtree then McCoy to help Hass and then we could’ve focused on the OL along with the Defense. Teel could’ve had time to gel with his new mates and we could’ve avoided the collapse were in now. Instead of having the nucleus in waiting were now stuck having to address both sides of the ball agian.
A bigtime DE would be great but I thought that was what Lawrence Jackson was suppose to be. Ruskell will be admitting he whiffed with that pick if he does that. I think Hass still has years ahead of him but building a Dominating Defense in the New NFL doesn’t work. This is an Offensive League now. Gone are the Steel Curtain, the 86 Bears and the Tampa 2. It’s all about Brady, Manning, Brees, Rivers, Warner, and Favre. Last SB was an example of the New League we have now. The vaunted Steelers Defense could not stop our division winning Cards prolific offense. The Steelers had to outscore them to win. We need to pour our resources into our offense and hope the Defense we have can make critical stops in crucial situations instead asking them to shutout the Saints. Going all Defense now will get you beat in this League. It may get you to the playoffs but you will not go to the SB unless you have a high powered offense.
by Mr. Blache III on Nov 25, 2009 3:19 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I really don't understand your conclusion from last year's SB.
The defensive force defeated the offensive juggernaut, and did so by virtue of a 100-yard pick-six.
by thebyron on Nov 25, 2009 3:31 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
As I recall, the offense won.
My point being that the no ones defense is going to shut down these high powered offenses. That’s my conclusion.
That being said, we need to focus on rebuilding our offense to compete with other high powered offenses. If my memory serves me correctly the Cards scored the go ahead touchdown against the “vaunted” defense of the Steelers with 2 minutes left. Luckily the Steelers boasted a high powered offense of their own, that went down and scored the winning TD. The SB win was not won by a defensive stop at the end but by an offensive score at the end.
by Mr. Blache III on Nov 25, 2009 4:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
High powered offence
No such thing as a high powered offense without an at least adequate offensive line. That takes precedence over pretty boys with tight pants. this team needs a line, er O line
yea dude
by dirtyktm on Nov 25, 2009 10:52 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
"The Seahawks can't collapse enough to rebuild"
That is one of those things thats just really scary to think about. Stuck in limbo. At best mediocrity.
May the FORCE be with us..
by NW_BRED on Nov 25, 2009 3:58 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
If Matthew Hasselbeck won the SB for the Seahawks I would use my dying breath to repeatedly orgasm on every person on this planet.
by Robert on Nov 27, 2009 3:27 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
Last second TD to Carlson.
Robert’s cause of death is officially ruled an orgasplosion.
by thebyron on Nov 27, 2009 7:02 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs

by 















