Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Full Coverage of 2012 Coke 600

The Rise and Fall of Tim Ruskell: 2005

Tim Ruskell was announced as Seattle's new general manager of football operations February 23, 2005. He inherited a good team, a team that had made the playoffs in each of the prior two seasons, and a team with a winning record in four of Mike Holmgren's six seasons as head coach. He inherited a franchise quarterback turning 30, Matt Hasselbeck, two hall of fame talents on the offensive line, Steven Hutchinson and Walter Jones, a great running back in his prime, a good young cornerback, a three-tech, an oft-injured one-tech, a pair of system correct wide receivers and two controversial young safeties. A year later, the team Ruskell inherited represented the National Football Conference in Super Bowl XL.

Rumors notwithstanding, Ruskell's contract is up after the season. Seattle was 4-12 in 2008 and is 4-7 so far in 2009. His job is in the balance.

Seattle ranked 16th in DVOA in 2004. It ranked 9th in 2003 and 18th in 2002. It had a below average defense in all three seasons. Ruskell was brought in to fix Seattle's defense. He built his reputation under Rich McKay and the Bucaneers dominant Tampa 2 defense was his living resume. The 2004 team finished 21st in total defensive DVOA, 17th in passing DVOA and 30th in rushing DVOA. Pro Football Reference provides the starting defense in 2004 and the starting defense in 2005.

Star-divide

dilk2

dilkSeattle finished 15th in defensive DVOA in 2005. It was worse against the pass, fading to 24th, but better against the run, 5th overall. The team did not make a sudden leap as is often described. It did improve significantly and through a significantly remade roster. The front seven was gutted. Rookies Lofa Tatupu, Leroy Hill, and free agent acquisitions Chuck Darby, Bryce Fisher and Jamie Sharper all started eight or more games.

All but Sharper started for Seattle in its two playoffs wins preceding the Super Bowl. Seattle allowed under 300 yards to the 10th ranked, Washington, and 14th ranked, Carolina, team offenses. It smothered the Redskins. Shaun Alexander missed most of the game, and Seattle lacked the rushing attack that defined it. The Seahawks dropped five fumbles and lost three, forced no interceptions and lost the turnover battle three to one. But it held the ninth ranked Redskins rushing attack to 59 yards on 25 attempts. The Redskins had only three rushing first downs, and were 0-2 in red zone efficiency.

Seattle hired Tim Ruskell to remake the defense and he did. The Seahawks won their first playoff game in 20 years because of that defense. It then blew out the Carolina Panthers, powered by three interceptions, a forced fumble, its trademark rushing attack and sound execution in every phase, by every unit.

Seattle lost Super Bowl XL, but was not outplayed. Ruskell was the toast of the NFL. He was hired to remake the defense and did, and his remade defense was critical for the greatest run in Seahawks history. Ruskell also scored on offense. He signed Joe Jurevicius and Jurevicius was Seattle's most valuable target, keeping the pass game afloat after Darrell Jackson missed ten games.

Ruskell was unimpeachable. He was the pulse of the organization and the face of its future. The Seahawks success lifted all boats. Mike Holmgren was venerated after a controversial start to his career. John Marshall stepped in for Ray Rhodes, who had suffered a stroke in September of 2005, and his defense looked young and promising. Fringe players like Jordan Babineaux had earned a following among a resurgent fanbase. Matt Hasselbeck was in the discussion of best quarterbacks in football. Shaun Alexander was the league's MVP. Walter Jones and Steve Hutchinson formed the best left side in football. The spectre that haunted Seattle, the Seahawks could not win in the playoffs, was exorcised. It had won and decisively.

It finished the season Super Bowl losers. It was a team in decline.

Comment 22 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

This
John Marshall stepped in for Ray Rhodes, who had suffered a stroke in September of 2005

Felt like the beginning of the end. Marshall singlehandedly took a talented defense and destroyed it with his stupid schemes and idiotic timing (3rd and 16 = Bring the house). I liked Ray Rhodes a lot. JM was an idiot with a playbook and he set our defense back as a result, in my opinion.

I miss Chad Brown.

ME! BANE!

by SSreporters on Nov 30, 2009 4:11 PM PST reply actions  

I was pleased with John Marshall for three years.

I was always disappointed with Ray Rhodes, I thought he was beyond conservative. I never understood how he had this rep for looking for cold-blooded killers, but then would underwhelmingly play not to lose.

But I liked Marshall. I always felt he more than doubled the stunts and twists we employed, to very great effect, but maybe the disparity was because of the personnel. Maybe Tubbs’ one great year simply enabled the rest of the guys.

by jacobstevens on Nov 30, 2009 4:15 PM PST up reply actions  

Marshall was actually pretty good in 2005 in 2006.

He came up with a great scheme to stop Steve Smith in the 2005 championship game. The Mashall decline seemed to begin in 2007 and then it seemed like he just gave up (I’m sure he didn’t, just felt like it) in 2008 probably knowing he was on the way out.

SEA!

by MFAN on Nov 30, 2009 4:16 PM PST up reply actions  

I've heard on KJR

two inferences that Holmgren actually told Marshall he wanted to schematicaly remove Smith from the game. Not that it was completely his idea, but that it originated from him and stemmed from his observation of the Panthers. It’s KJR, so I dunno, but it was interesting to hear.

by jacobstevens on Nov 30, 2009 4:18 PM PST up reply actions  

I thought JM stepped in pretty good for Rhodes at first.

Marshall was pretty good at first. I thought he got predictable the last 2 seasons. But inside the numbers his defenses gave up less points the last 2 years by week 11 than Bradley’s defense this year. So it’s kind of pick your poison.

by Mr. Blache III on Nov 30, 2009 10:00 PM PST up reply actions  

It's worth noting...

that Ruskell also inherited a team with a terrible injury profile. In many ways he never recovered from that. Injuries are hardly an excuse for some things he did. Nevertheless, he spent a lot of time re-doing things thought done.

All GMs deal with injuries. But this goes to your last sentence John. Instead of adding onto the base of a conference champion Ruskell was patching and gluing on the way to the Super Bowl, much less after the loss. Never getting ahead, in fact barely staying afloat—kinda like when a college coach fails to recruit well after a surprise good season. In 3-4 years that guy is usually gone.

"Those who fear disorder more than injustice inevitably produce more of both." -- Rev. William Coffin

by dcrockett17 on Nov 30, 2009 4:36 PM PST reply actions  

What's our injury profile now?

After 5 years of Ruskell? Seems to be getting worse.

by stallz on Nov 30, 2009 8:19 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

any more articles coming on alternatives to ruskell/holmgren?

minor tangent, i know, but i was interested in this and was wondering if there might be more than just the two guys you mentioned before.

by kow on Nov 30, 2009 4:48 PM PST reply actions  

John, please work on your book and blog 24/7.

Make that 32/9. No, I know you don’t mean it like that, just kidding. I’m interested, too.

by jacobstevens on Nov 30, 2009 4:56 PM PST up reply actions  

Absolutely Excellent Article.

This is needed perspective, John. Ruskell really did an excellent job with the 2005 defense and he deserves considerable credit for the 2005 playoff run enroute to the super bowl. its so often forgotten these days.

Comparing DVOA between 2004 and 2005, however, sort of masks the fact that the new defense was improving throughout 2005 and really performed once the playoffs started. That’s what great teams do, and Holmgren’s defense never did that before Ruskell rebuilt it.

I think its odd that you end the article with “It was a team in decline.” The 2005 super bowl team was not yet in decline. The decline began when Hutchinson signed in MN and then Alexander broke his foot. Things really started snowballing after that. Of course, everyone knows that. But just imagine if Ruskell had franchised Hutchinson, cut Alexander loose, and drafted Maurice Jones-Drew instead of Kelly Jennings in 2006, or Frank Gore instead of Spencer in 2005? That peak experienced in 2005 might have just keep going for awhile.

"Football players are temperamental. That's 90 percent temper and 10 percent mental." - Doug Plank

by Stevo's on Nov 30, 2009 7:02 PM PST reply actions  

if he'd drafted frank gore instead of spencer

we’d be lamenting his lack of attention to the OL. spencer isn’t great but as far as i’ve read he’s not bad. disappointing but not awful. kelly jennings on the other hand..

by kow on Nov 30, 2009 7:23 PM PST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SEA!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Avatar_small
The OT Thread---12thrs, Assemble!
Small
Just How Much Do Close Games Matter Anyway?
Small
Help Me Understand How Irvin Will be Used
Turbin_game_uni_small
Hand Size and Quarterbacks
Einstein_www-txt2pic-com_small
On Pete Carroll and Previous QB Competitions

Recent FanPosts

Horsey_small
Results from the 2012 Armchair GM Championship
Tasb_logo_small
Consider it Spun: The 5 Worst Moves of Carroll and Schneider Era in Seattle
Small
Plaxico Burress: viable option, or over the hill?
Small
Portland Seahawks Fans: Where You Be?
Small
Should Seattle Go After Kellen Winslow?
Small
Football where the head is sacred

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editor/Lead Writer

Screen_shot_2012-05-04_at_10 Danny Kelly

Staff Writers/Editors

Screen_shot_2011-01-05_at_9 Scruffy Lefty

Small BrianL

Avatar_small Benne

Olympiabeer_small Tyler Jorgensen

Madhatter_small Thomas Beekers

Profilepic_small DJ C-Raig

897267_o_small Kenneth Arthur

Sbn_pic_small Jacson Bevens

Photo__1__small Charlie Todaro

Staff Writers

Small Joshua Kasparek

Photo_small Matt Erickson

Davis_small Davis Hsu

Profile2_small Rob Staton

208114_505637750968_23709013_30160241_9483_n_small Scott Enyeart

Elephant_pink_clothes_small Chris Sully

Seattle_seahawk_white_1600_reasonably_small_small Derek Stephens

Ace_small Ben Harbaugh

Bu_fb_2_small Daniel Hill

Rob_small Rob Davies