Sean Locklear Scheduled to Practice
Danny O'Neil is reporting that Sean Locklear will practice today for the first time since suffering a high ankle sprain. Of the many injuries Locklear has endured, this latest might be the most worrying because of the chance of recurrence. The Seahawks will determine Locklear's fitness and start him, sit him or render him inactive. If he can, Locklear should start.
A week ago, Locklear's return would have seemed an essential step to Seattle playing itself back into contention. After Damion McIntosh performed ably against the Cowboys ferocious pass rush, I am sure many see no reason to bench him. There is one. Seattle wants Locklear to stick at left. Locklear is under contract and short of being cut (don't count it out) will be with Seattle next season. It needs to give him every opportunity to prove he can stick or demonstrably prove he can't.
McIntosh is not a long-term solution for Seattle at left. He will want more money in the offseason and that alone would put Seattle in a bind. It cannot pay Locklear and McIntosh good money to be mediocre tackles. Locklear is nearing his sell-by date. The essential idea of converting him to left tackle was smart, but it always had risk. Lock hasn't flunked out on the field, but 2009 marks his third season in the last four that he has lost significant time to injury. Dumb luck is still the best and most sound theory for why some players suffer injuries throughout their careers and others stay healthy. But following another season disabled by player injury, pressure will be the on Seahawks front office to expel injury report regulars.
The Seahawks still must balance winning now with overall talent evaluation. It cannot deny McIntosh's performance. The solution might be to start McIntosh over Ray Willis. Willis has not been bad, but he has not be good either, and he doesn't fit with what Seattle wants to do or where it's going as an offense. Tim Ruskell let Willis walk and I now understand why. It's a finesse blocking system and Willis is a bull in a china shop.
Ultimately, Seattle will probably be cautious with Locklear and retain the status quo. For the first time all season, the Seahawks offensive line looked good against a good opponent on Sunday. It held against multiple blitzes and got push in the run game. Rob Sims and Chris Spencer are the undoubted strengths of this line. Max Unger is coming along though he often looks bad. From what they have and who they can re-sign, one tackle spot should be filled, but the other is an overdue offseason priority. It Locklear can stick at left tackle, finding a zone blocking right tackle should be a test too easy to fail.
0 recs |
34 comments
|
Comments
Possible
but hardly something to count on.
by John Morgan on Nov 4, 2009 2:54 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
After McIntosh's performance last week, I'd start him against the Lions.
Give Locklear one more week. Start him too early, and he’s apt to make mistakes (see: Trufant’s return @ Dallas) and he could re-aggravate a serious injury.
I understand the necessity to evaluate talent; time is limited and the FO will have to make a decision soon whether to pursue a new LT or not. But the Hawks need to win, as well. Many people may be counting them out of contention this year, but I’m not and the team cannot, for obvious reasons.
Luckily, they’ve got an easier matchup this week. If they do decide to go with Locklear, it isn’t as risky as it might be against a different (read: just about any other) opponent.
The demise of the Broncos in '09 is our future. Pray hard.
by Nick Andron on Nov 4, 2009 3:25 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Our O-Line looked good on Sunday?
It wasn’t as bad as I expected, but I wouldn’t describe it as good…
by sam1313 on Nov 4, 2009 3:26 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
It was good in comparison to the rest of the season :)
The demise of the Broncos in '09 is our future. Pray hard.
by Nick Andron on Nov 4, 2009 3:48 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
A patchwork line against Ware, Ratliff, etc.
And not getting manhandled like in the Arizona game is pretty good to me.
Broncos 12 Bengals 7: The story of the 2009 Seattle Seahawks.
by SSreporters on Nov 4, 2009 4:31 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
While injuries are our main concerns now
I think this OL could look pretty decent with a 4-5 games playing as a unit.
"Its not that I can't read and write, its just that I don't like to read and write."
-Charlie
by ninjasocks on Nov 4, 2009 6:59 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Lock didn't look all that great
but Frye and McIntosh haven’t been horrible. I think we need to draft a tackle and a guard next year, but we could be decent if we had some continuity.
"Its not that I can't read and write, its just that I don't like to read and write."
-Charlie
by ninjasocks on Nov 5, 2009 8:41 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think we'll need a guard
seeing as Sims is playing well and Spencer will likely stay at Center for a while (with Unger at RG)
The demise of the Broncos in '09 is our future. Pray hard.
by Nick Andron on Nov 5, 2009 10:42 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If nothing else, we need depth at the postion
Ruskell (if he sticks around) is going to want to make sure we don’t have a repeat of 2009 and will stock the position with extra depth (like he did over this last offseason with the WR position).
Beyond that, we don’t know if Spencer will stay with Hawks, whether Wrotto or Willis are part of the long-term ZBS plan. Sims and Spencer have been injured for significant stretches of the last two years, so we can’t really rely on them for 16 games. If we don’t replace them, I’d imagine we’d at least bring in more (real) depth.
"Its not that I can't read and write, its just that I don't like to read and write."
-Charlie
by ninjasocks on Nov 5, 2009 3:53 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Remember his game before 'lock left on injury
He was completely owned, shoved around, looked terrible. Tho’ now I wonder if he wasn’t injured already…
by paul2 on Nov 4, 2009 7:12 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Locklear's contract
Isn’t it dependent on his playing LT? Why not move Locklear to RT and let McIntosh continue at Lt?
by Ocho on Nov 4, 2009 7:18 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
You're asking for a holdout if you do that.
Sam Bradford, future Seattle Seahawk.
by Carl Shinyama on Nov 4, 2009 9:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Besides, the team needs to know if Lock can hang at LT.
RTs are easier to find in the draft, and can often be had in later rounds, as well.
Early prospect watch: RB C.J. Spiller, OT Ciron Black, DT Gerald McCoy, S Eric Berry, DT Ndamukong Suh, CB Ras-I Dowling 6'2, 200, RB Jonathan Dwyer, Sam Bradford*.
by Misfit74 on Nov 4, 2009 9:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That would mean
just more time getting readjusted. Maybe next year depending on how things play out the next few games or more.
And all the land was in ruin, and burnination had forsaken the countryside.
by Cheddar28 on Nov 4, 2009 10:05 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Internet tough guy time...
Who cares about Lock’s feelings. The team has to do what it can to win games, and if that means playing Sean Locklear at right tackle then so be it..
According to some posters on a KC Chiefs forum, McIntosh was a decent LT for the team but really struggled when they moved him to RT. We know Locklear is a good, even above-average RT but hasn’t looked great when he’s gotten action on the left side.
This team must play to win right now. It has a chance to get back into the playoff hunt if it can beat Arizona in 2 weeks. Playing to win means making decisions that put victories above all else. When and if this season goes south (or stays south really) that’s when you make decisions more based on 2010 personnel and positions.
by Keasley on Nov 5, 2009 7:19 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Its not about Locks feelings
Its about getting Lock some snaps at LT so that the FO can figure out whether (a) he’s going to stick at LT or (b) we should draft an LT with our top pick and shift him over to RT.
At this point, we’re no longer in contention for the playoffs this year. We’re trying to get guys working on their game and preparing for next year. Think of the next 8 games as an extended preseason, where the games and don’t count. We’re going to try to get guys on the same page, figuring out who gets it and who doesn’t, who’s willing to put in the effort during a losing season and who won’t.
"Its not that I can't read and write, its just that I don't like to read and write."
-Charlie
by ninjasocks on Nov 5, 2009 8:48 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
What a crock
“We’re no longer in contention for the playoffs this year” MY ASS. Throwing in the towel already? The regular season’s not even half over. A win over Detroit with losses by San Fran and AZ and we’re right back into the thick of it. We’re not leading now, but we’re far from out of it. And while we’re getting Locklear back, and MacIntosh played pretty well, the Niners have lost both tackles in successive weeks. The team is obligated to play to win and put the best 11 guys on the field at all times. If MacIntosh gives them a better chance to win on Sunday, he plays. Period.
by diehard82 on Nov 5, 2009 12:20 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
they are better teams then us
with more talent and easier schedules(I assume). Realistically we will lose out on the road and win out at home. It’s not about throwing in the towel it’s about realizing what has already happened this year, what it indicates, and being able to accept what will likely happen from here on out.
by Hancock.Brett on Nov 5, 2009 12:53 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
We're beating St. Louis
Probably by a heart-attack play like we have done the last 4 years in St. Louis.
Today is my birthday. Whoo hoo!
by SSreporters on Nov 5, 2009 1:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yea, unless their line has improved pass and run-blocking (which, given it's makeup, it could).
And, if we can hold down one of the truly elite backs in our league. It’s no gimme.
Early prospect watch: RB C.J. Spiller, OT Ciron Black, DT Gerald McCoy, S Eric Berry, DT Ndamukong Suh, CB Ras-I Dowling 6'2, 200, RB Jonathan Dwyer, Sam Bradford*.
by Misfit74 on Nov 5, 2009 2:34 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
agreed
Jackson has been a beast the last couple of games. He is running like he has the whole team on his shoulders though. I wonder if he can keep a full head of steam entering that game.
I still think we win.
I ROCK out with my HAWK out, therefore I am....
by durteehawk on Nov 5, 2009 2:35 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Poor bastard has been carrying that team
for several years.
It's Great to be a Florida Gator!
They forgot El-ahrairah, for what use had they for tricks and cunning, living in the enemy's warren and paying his price?
by Wayward Llama on Nov 5, 2009 3:04 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Let's just see if we can get to 3-5, and then we'll think about the Cardinals.
It’s OK to throw in the emotional towel as a fan, and not feel like the playoffs are riding on every play. Season ain’t over. But we have to beat the Lions to get there, so let’s just focus on that for now.
by jacobstevens on Nov 6, 2009 11:54 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I forgot about that game
that’s the easiest one on the road, the rest are going to be ugly. If we somehow steal 2/3 against Houston, Arizona, and Minnesota I guess it’s an entirely different season.
by Hancock.Brett on Nov 5, 2009 1:19 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Call me crazy
But I think that if things go as planned (AKA Matt doesn’t get crippled and the injuries are kept to a minimum then I think we have a shot to beat Green Bay. Their offensive line is terrible.
Either way with this schedule 7-9 should be our minimum.
Today is my birthday. Whoo hoo!
by SSreporters on Nov 5, 2009 1:35 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
9-7 is looking very possible for both Seahawks and Cardinals
Who knows, we could end up in a tiebreaker for the division. No time to give up now.
"Football players are temperamental. That's 90 percent temper and 10 percent mental." - Doug Plank
by Stevo's on Nov 5, 2009 6:06 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You never give up
Of course, but there’s little reason to believe Seattle could do anything better than back its way into a Wildcard blowout. Contention is not what’s on my mind. I want to see this team get better.
by John Morgan on Nov 5, 2009 7:12 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I see a playoff spot a lot less likely than a playoff victory
I think we could be competitive if we could make it into the playoffs relatively healthy. We’ve done pretty well in the playoffs in recent years.
"Its not that I can't read and write, its just that I don't like to read and write."
-Charlie
by ninjasocks on Nov 5, 2009 9:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
PLAYOFFS!?
Don’t talk about playoffs! You kidding me?
by Fear on Nov 6, 2009 12:59 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
I just wana win a game!!
And all the land was in ruin, and burnination had forsaken the countryside.
by Cheddar28 on Nov 6, 2009 9:43 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs

by 


















