Field Gulls: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Cowboy Altitude for Wyoming Fans!

Seahawks Humiliated on the Road; Deliver Signature Loss of the 2009 Season

If ever a time for finger pointing and easy answers existed, it is now. I could attack the character, play and talent of about any Seahawk and score. We don't know exactly how Seattle failed, but we all certainly saw someone in blue fail and that, that guy, is the problem. Panic loves a demagogue and I've the rich pipes to shout orders at the assembling mob. To Renton!

The coaches! We can be sure they're dumb.

The line! Sucked like an Oreck.

Matt Hasselbeck! Boy that guy's done!

The Seattle Seahawks were 4-12 last season. They are now 5-8. They should win against Tampa, and since we're talking "shoulds", they should finish the season 6-10. That is a reasonable step forward for the 2008 Seattle Seahawks. The 2008 Seattle Seahawks were one of the five worst teams in football. The 2009 Seattle Seahawks are one of the ten worst teams in football. And when a bad team, with a suspect line, conservative playbook and aged quarterback gets behind early on the road, it has no answer. It is not one player's fault, but a complete team failure.

That Julius Jones! What a jobber.

And Housh! An overpaid primadonna!

I hope that is sufficient aperitif for everyone's hunger for blame.

Here are some sure to be unpopular observations.

Josh Wilson ran down the field and tipped away a deep pass. That was an exciting display of man cover for the kid and a small, small-small step towards realizing his potential. Wilson might settle at nickel and he is already a fine situational defensive back, but there's room for Pistol to develop into a Antoine Winfield type corner.

Deon Butler can own the short pattern. He's smooth into and out of his cuts and the rare receiver capable of quick acceleration and long-stride speed. Butler must be embraced as a receiver rather than a forty time. From the time he was drafted, Seattle has mismanaged his talent: Wasting time and development, not to mention risking injury, auditioning him as a returner; Sending him streaking up the sideline without a quarterback that could target him; seeing him as a deep receiver because of one attribute and missing his true profile as an underneath burner.

The defense kept its pride even after being handed its ass. Seattle forced two big turnovers that quickly dissolved into nothing, but were clean, meaningful turnovers. Seahawks fans are done thinking this is an elite unit, and with ample reason, but it is young, it is mostly cheap and it is worth picking apart and finding value within. Whether Seattle needs a complete rebuild or not is mootable. I see young talent growing within an otherwise crumbling team.

The team is crumbling. Today a pillar broke off and landed on the Seahawks coaching staff. I like Gus Bradley, Greg Knapp and Dan Quinn. I think all three have a future in this league, but probably not together. I can't see Jim Mora escaping such an embarrassing loss. It was always unlikely Mora would stay. New general managers want their guy. I will not look back at Mora and feel contempt, but he has not earned much respect in his short time here. Fiery is fine. I see desperation. The look of a man that thinks he can yell his way out of failure.

This loss hurt through the first half and settled in the second. Now I don't feel it all. A better team, at home, that matches strength against many of Seattle's weaknesses, playing from well ahead from the first quarter on...

And it won't matter a damn in a month. The Seahawks live beyond the players, coaches and fans. Suck as today sucks, and this sucks, Seattle will rise again. And someday, that good coverage down field by Wilson, the rollicking tiny power presence of Justin Forsett, that force of nature hitting by Aaron Curry, will matter again. Just not today. Or soon. Or even next year, probably.

Game ball: Brandon Mebane was stuck behind Chuck Darby not too long ago. Back then, I was sure to point out Darby's missteps and Mebane's potential. He finally got his shot when Darby was lost to injury and has been nothing but special ever since. He is, accounting for position, Seattle's best pass rusher. He is clearly Seattle's best run stuffer.

Mebane is the rare defensive lineman that bunches double teams and brutalizes them if the quarterback double-clutches. He sticks-out when he's in and even more when he's out. A dozen players on the current roster would be lucky to make the next winning team, but make one Brandon Mebane. Kid was playing for a good team, he would be bashing backs and sacking quarterbacks towards his second Pro Bowl.

0 recs  |  Comment 326 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from Field Gulls

Seahawks Notes: 9/4/10

Sep 2010 by John Morgan - 200 comments

Seattle Seahawks 53-man roster

Sep 2010 by Vasilii - 462 comments

Seahawks Notes: 9/2/10

Sep 2010 by John Morgan - 19 comments

Fall Forward, Anthony McCoy

Sep 2010 by John Morgan - 5 comments

Comments

Display:

Probably to early to ask, but are there any potential head coaches that you like?

Obviously it depends on the GM, but is there anyone you have your eye on?

SEA!

by MFAN on Dec 13, 2009 1:54 PM PST reply actions  

Well, yeah.

Anyone besides the obvious? (Also please not that useless Gruden)

It's Great to be a Florida Gator!

"I never met a llama I didn't like." - TJ Duckett

All I want for Christmas is Joe Haden, Eric Berry, and Nandamukong Suh in Seahawks blue.

by Wayward Llama on Dec 14, 2009 4:11 PM PST up reply actions  

I think Deon Butler is also deserving for game ball.

Maybe I’ll just give him game ball on offense

Sam Bradford, future Seattle Seahawk.

by Carl Shinyama on Dec 13, 2009 1:54 PM PST reply actions  

Butler really impressed me too

I want to gush about him, but its still so early. Courtney Taylor had a similar limited but impressive debut in 2007, and we saw how that turned out. : (

by kearly on Dec 13, 2009 3:30 PM PST up reply actions  

I found few positives in this game

Mainly the defense not giving up during the 3rd quarter. The offense didn’t do anything. Hasselbeck gave them 7 points.

Maybe this is just Seahawk Addicts but I’m sick of the line getting full blame for Hass’ shortcomings. When someone is done they are done. Hasselbeck has served us well but he’s a shell of his former self. The stats look pretty but when you peel the onion back he was a bunch of suck.

We’re looking at a massive rebuild on offense.

ME! BANE!

by SSreporters on Dec 13, 2009 1:54 PM PST reply actions  

#31 just made a great break on the ball.

I don’t think it was really so much Matt’s fault as it was #31 making a great read and breaking on the ball. That’s certainly what it looked like when I saw the replay

Sam Bradford, future Seattle Seahawk.

by Carl Shinyama on Dec 13, 2009 1:58 PM PST up reply actions  

It was a five yard pass that hung and hung and hung

Hasselbeck is 34, once had a league average at best arm, and is nursing a sore throwing shoulder. There’s not too many throws he can make right now, but Seattle has no one else to start.

by John Morgan on Dec 13, 2009 2:01 PM PST up reply actions  

Great break

But it also took an eternity to get there.

ME! BANE!

by SSreporters on Dec 13, 2009 2:15 PM PST up reply actions  

Sure

Good play, and an easy one when you’re team is way ahead. But that pass was painful.

by John Morgan on Dec 13, 2009 2:15 PM PST up reply actions  

The Houston D had clearly been coached to ignore anything deeper than 10 yards

The Cushing play they highlighted, where he just let Carlson run past him and sat on the short route, was evidence enough of that.

by Nate Dogg on Dec 13, 2009 7:09 PM PST up reply actions  

He has no zip on his pass.

This was known before the shoulder injury.

ME! BANE!

by SSreporters on Dec 13, 2009 2:05 PM PST up reply actions  

That was Bernard Pollard. Possibly the best steal we have gotten in terms of a guy on the street that noone was taking after KC cut him.

"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."

The ROSENFAIL : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAKAKE-uq-8&feature=related

by TexansForever on Dec 13, 2009 5:15 PM PST up reply actions  

I lobbied for Seattle to take a look at him when cut by KC.

But noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo. He may be better than Grant for heaven’s sakes.

This.

by Misfit74 on Dec 14, 2009 1:13 PM PST up reply actions  

is there anything close to concensus on whether or not spencer is telegraphing the snap?

it’d certainly explain why we seem to have a lot of plays where someone blitzes in so fast nobody can even get to them

by kow on Dec 13, 2009 2:00 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah, I don't know

it’s a theory that has run through my mind, not Spencer, but the general inability of Seattle to disrupt the defense’s timing. I think Seattle is getting a lot of instant pressure because it is behind and has no deep pass. Teams are stacking the box and why not?

by John Morgan on Dec 13, 2009 2:02 PM PST up reply actions  

I agree with you

but at the same time, for whatever combination of reasons, Hass was taking some vicious hits today. I think on two occasions, he was nailed only 2 seconds off the snap. I really hope that is addressed by the time Seattle starts its next franchise QB.

by kearly on Dec 13, 2009 3:35 PM PST up reply actions  

Hass Shortcomings

Maybe this is just Seahawk Addicts but I’m sick of the line getting full blame for Hass’ shortcomings. When someone is done they are done. Hasselbeck has served us well but he’s a shell of his former self. The stats look pretty but when you peel the onion back he was a bunch of suck.

It’s Offical! I am putting in my endorsement for J. Campbell

by cthunder on Dec 13, 2009 4:35 PM PST up reply actions  

not just Seahawk Addicts

almost all reactionary fans first answer to the “problem” is to build a dominate offensive line. You can’t even present the argument that 2/5 of the 2005 offensive line were older free agents when they were signed. I like the stat somewhre in this thread of the same offensive line now producing one of Hass’ best years.

by Hancock.Brett on Dec 13, 2009 4:38 PM PST up reply actions  

The line was blamed for Alexander's decline and now it's being blamed for Hasselbeck's decline.

This line isn’t good, but Matt’s inability to throw a five pass without hanging the ball is magnifying their problems.

by BrianL on Dec 13, 2009 4:39 PM PST up reply actions  

Truth is, Hasselbeck was never an elite QB

He was a good QB who had a couple of good seasons in a system that played to his strengths.

Problem is, Holmgren’s WCO put too exacting demands on the rest of the team, and the high level of play couldn’t be sustained.

by Mr Fish on Dec 13, 2009 4:40 PM PST up reply actions  

FO's keep chopping wood award seems contrived as hell, but

Aaron Curry tweeting last night about the spartans of thermopylae then getting carried out on a stretcher today seems like some kind of manifestation of fate

by kow on Dec 13, 2009 1:58 PM PST reply actions  

I hope Bradley recognizes

The blitz works with Babs and that Freeman is ripe for 7 INTs nex week.

ME! BANE!

by SSreporters on Dec 13, 2009 2:08 PM PST reply actions  

John

Realistically speaking, we going to see Hass next year? He was just utterly awful.

The demise of the Broncos in '09 is our future. Pray hard.

by Nick Andron on Dec 13, 2009 2:11 PM PST reply actions  

Hopefully his retirement press conference.

Otherwise we see him tutor Brady Quinn in Cleveland.

ME! BANE!

by SSreporters on Dec 13, 2009 2:12 PM PST up reply actions  

It is possible.

Depends on the incoming GM. I couldn’t see Holmgren moving Hasselbeck.

by John Morgan on Dec 13, 2009 2:15 PM PST up reply actions  

Could we even move him?

Would there be any takers for an injury-prone 35 year old with no arm strength to speak of?

The demise of the Broncos in '09 is our future. Pray hard.

by Nick Andron on Dec 13, 2009 3:22 PM PST up reply actions  

Oakland.

But I’m not that cruel.

Seneca to Oakland? Hellz yes.

ME! BANE!

by SSreporters on Dec 13, 2009 3:23 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah, something probably

He is a quarterback and he has proven capable at points in his career. Like a lot of Seahawks fans, someone out there thinks this isn’t his fault and that he could be respectable for a year or two.

by John Morgan on Dec 13, 2009 3:24 PM PST up reply actions  

I'll take it.

Otherwise we’ll watch him struggle behind a barely average line with no offensive playmakers. That sounds like a fun year for Hawks fans.

The demise of the Broncos in '09 is our future. Pray hard.

by Nick Andron on Dec 13, 2009 3:27 PM PST up reply actions  

Aside from the overall sentiment,

this,

I see desperation. The look of a man that thinks he can yell his way out of failure.

is exactly what I feel about Mora as well, and there is no future in that.

I'm gonna go calm submissive on your ass.

by Dukeshire on Dec 13, 2009 2:32 PM PST reply actions  

4th quarter against the Vikings

He was walking along the player benches trying to rally the troops. Maybe the guys were just gassed, but most either ignored him or glared back. He didn’t look like a man with much respect.

by gridiron on Dec 13, 2009 3:51 PM PST up reply actions  

Caption

The Bush in the photo is George Herbert Walker Bush. George Walker (“W”) Bush is the more recent president.

by jeager on Dec 13, 2009 2:35 PM PST via mobile reply actions  

Innocent question

Just wondering what the appeal with Mora was from the beginning. I mean, I understand he was brought in a year early and coach-in-waiting and whatever…..but I’ve just never been able to wrap my head around what he brings to the table. From a distance, it seems like all that fiery disposition crap would kind of wear on the players a little—was that not his undoing in Atlanta (along with Vick)?

Agree on the Butler point, as well.

So what’s the offseason gonna look like? Clean house with Kerney, Hass, Jones, Branch others (Housh)?

by WABronco on Dec 13, 2009 2:36 PM PST reply actions  

I think the appeal was that his staff looked sound

and Mora an acceptable public face. And I am sure Seattle is clearing out of plenty of contracts this offseason. I do not think it will cut Housh, but Housh might want out.

by John Morgan on Dec 13, 2009 2:51 PM PST up reply actions  

why so much disdain .....

For Housh? It’s not his fault? Hell, do you want to see Forsett or Butler cut because they can’t get the ball or more carries?

by cthunder on Dec 13, 2009 4:40 PM PST up reply actions  

I have no disdain for Housh

but he’s an older player that thought he signed with a contender. I think he will want out.

by John Morgan on Dec 13, 2009 4:41 PM PST up reply actions  

How would we get rid of him?

Wouldn’t that mean humongous dead money on the cap?

Can he restructure his contract and then be traded?

by djafrot on Dec 13, 2009 4:43 PM PST up reply actions  

I think he can be traded

Fan hatred notwithstanding, there was huge demand last offseason.

by John Morgan on Dec 13, 2009 4:46 PM PST up reply actions  

With an elite QB how many points do the hawks score today?

14 or 17? Hass isn’t what he used to be but the offensive line can’t get enough blame in my mind.

Hawks have one of the 10 worst o lines in football and one of the 10 worst pass rushes.

I’m not really sure what people want, it’s frustrating, but this is a team that has the talent of a 5-7 win team.

by Badmotostinkfinger on Dec 13, 2009 2:38 PM PST reply actions  

If we magically traded Hasselbeck for Manning

I think Seattle would have won, perhaps with ease. I am not saying Seattle has a great line, it doesn’t, and bottom ten is probably accurate, but Hasselbeck puts a huge burden on this offense.

by John Morgan on Dec 13, 2009 2:53 PM PST up reply actions  

I doubt we win with Eli.

Oh wait you mean Peyton?

Yeah after all of these years his QB brain is incredibly strong and opposing defenses are routinely his bitch. He makes no-name receivers like Austin Collie look like stars.

Imagine what he could do with Housh, Burly, Butler, and Carlson?

ME! BANE!

by SSreporters on Dec 13, 2009 2:55 PM PST up reply actions  

It's not black and white, of course

but Manning is white, so to speak. Most teams could expect a sea change by going from their quarterback to Peyton Manning. Hasselbeck isn’t the worst quarterback in football, but he’s a lesser starter, and injured as he is, he is among the worst starting quarterbacks in football.

by John Morgan on Dec 13, 2009 2:58 PM PST up reply actions  

Hmm...

I agree that Hasselbeck puts a burden on the offense, but today, I don’t think that even Manning could have pulled out a victory for the Seahawks. Matt was hit on almost half of his passes, most of them within 3 to 4 seconds. On one play, he was hit as he was completing a 1-step drop just as he was getting rid of the ball. Even Manning has been made to look mortal when he can’t get pass protection, either. Combine that with 3 failed exchanges between the center and the QB, and the amount of penalties, it would likely have been a very ugly game for Manning.

Couple that with the way that Houston’s offense was playing against Seattle’s defense. I think Manning would have had a very frustrating day. Likely a loss to me even with Manning on the roster.

Sam Bradford, future Seattle Seahawk.

by Carl Shinyama on Dec 13, 2009 3:02 PM PST up reply actions  

Manning does a better job of getting rid of the ball.

Or noticing when the blitz is coming so he audibles.

ME! BANE!

by SSreporters on Dec 13, 2009 3:03 PM PST up reply actions  

This game did not come down to not stopping the blitz.

I disagree that Manning keeps teams from blitzing. I’ve seen numerous times throughout his career that teams have not only blitzed against him, but successfully so.

I do agree that Manning discourages it based on his ability and intelligence alone, and that Manning does a better job of , not just recognizing the blitz but also in getting rid of the ball, but if he’s getting hit and put on his back on half of his passes, something is wrong, and it’s not necessarily the quarterback that’s shouldering the majority of the blame. Especially considering that this was against a team that before today, had very little success generating a consistent pass rush throughout the year. (Their adjusted sack rate was 5.4%, 28th in the league.)

Sam Bradford, future Seattle Seahawk.

by Carl Shinyama on Dec 13, 2009 3:14 PM PST up reply actions  

For instance, by completing passes and avoiding long down and distance.

Beating the blitz and discouraging teams from using it. Making quicker reads and throwing down field. Moving in the pocket instead of running into pressure.

by John Morgan on Dec 13, 2009 3:19 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm not crazy in thinking that Matt has been holding on to the ball way too long lately, am I?

I just don’t remember him ever double clutching and loafing around in the pocket as much as he seems to be doing this season.

by BrianL on Dec 13, 2009 3:20 PM PST up reply actions  

You're not

But I think it is worth noting that a factor that adds to a perception such as that is that the rush is getting to Hasselbeck sooner than usual.

Sam Bradford, future Seattle Seahawk.

by Carl Shinyama on Dec 13, 2009 3:26 PM PST up reply actions  

His arm is failing him

he needs receivers to be more open than ever. Holmgren’s timing system hid that somewhat, and Knapp isn’t as tight. Hasselbeck could throw to a spot and that helped a ton because he wasn’t finding a man and threading the needle. He was throwing to a spot that the receiver new and could run to.

by John Morgan on Dec 13, 2009 3:28 PM PST up reply actions  

A lot of that is theoretical as much as it is practical. It works a lot, but a lot of times, that's also not the case.

I have seen with my own eyes that the very same quarterback that we’re discussing, Manning, get hit on half of his passes. And struggle.

Sam Bradford, future Seattle Seahawk.

by Carl Shinyama on Dec 13, 2009 3:25 PM PST up reply actions  

I don't think the disagreement is

could Manning struggle, it’s, would Manning struggle if he was in Hasselbeck’s place. I don’t think he would.

by John Morgan on Dec 13, 2009 3:27 PM PST up reply actions  

I think he would.

Sam Bradford, future Seattle Seahawk.

by Carl Shinyama on Dec 13, 2009 3:30 PM PST up reply actions  

I'd like to say that I'm not trying to be a Hasselbeck-defender. I think he is part of the problem

But Manning is also my favorite player. Even I think he would have struggled today were he in Hasselbeck’s place.

Sam Bradford, future Seattle Seahawk.

by Carl Shinyama on Dec 13, 2009 3:33 PM PST up reply actions  

It's a defensible opinion

I am spent pointing fingers. Seattle has a lot of problems, and on any given play, one weakness is exposing another.

by John Morgan on Dec 13, 2009 3:37 PM PST up reply actions  

And we can't resolve that

because like you said, it’s hypothetical. But I don’t think Manning plays with a better line or with better skill position players.

by John Morgan on Dec 13, 2009 3:31 PM PST up reply actions  

Is it a law

If you are a fan of Hasselbeck you must defend him no matter what ?

by A'Seahawks_Warriors on Dec 13, 2009 3:35 PM PST up reply actions  

Eli ?

j/k

Peyton would not be under this much duress IMO.

by A'Seahawks_Warriors on Dec 13, 2009 3:37 PM PST up reply actions  

Who on the Hawks are better then Clark and Wayne.

And I know i asked the hypothetical, but we’re really comparing Matt to arguably the Greatest QB of his generation? Rogers, Rivers, McNabb and Eli don;t win that game.

by Badmotostinkfinger on Dec 13, 2009 3:42 PM PST up reply actions  

No one is better than Wayne

but Housh is better than Clark. And Seattle’s overall skill position players are comparable.

by John Morgan on Dec 13, 2009 3:43 PM PST up reply actions  

I would take Seattle's running backs

and Carlson is still what he was last season, if not better. There’s talent on this roster, but there’s talent on every roster.

by John Morgan on Dec 13, 2009 3:45 PM PST up reply actions  

Seattle was well behind with no deep threat

Houston pinned their ears back and attacked. It’s not like Hasselbeck was going to beat them over top.

by John Morgan on Dec 13, 2009 3:05 PM PST up reply actions  

Of course not

But if you’re able to get to a quarterback on half of his passes, do you stop?

Sam Bradford, future Seattle Seahawk.

by Carl Shinyama on Dec 13, 2009 3:14 PM PST up reply actions  

Of course not

but the point I think John is trying to make is that if someone else were behind center, they wouldn’t be getting to the QB on half of their passes.

by BrianL on Dec 13, 2009 3:16 PM PST up reply actions  

Yes

a quarterback has a lot of control over their own pressure.

by John Morgan on Dec 13, 2009 3:17 PM PST up reply actions  

The only Qb i can see "Controlling" their own pressure

would be Vick. How do you control the pressure when you have a man in your face with one step? How does a player with legs of a 35 year old avoid young players with Mario Williams type speed?

by Bruto56 on Dec 14, 2009 12:10 PM PST up reply actions  

By throwing quickly

3 seconds is all a QB should really need in the pocket. If he wants to get rid of it quickly, he can do it in 1 second. If a QB knows the blitz is coming, he should get rid of it quickly. If a QB can throw deep (before the WR is open, when he’s on a go route) he can absolutely burn a defense that is blitzing because there will only be the one DB covering him. This forces the defense to be careful when they blitz, or not blitz at all. Matt can’t do that anymore.

by Fear on Dec 14, 2009 1:06 PM PST up reply actions  

Bad analogy

John, if you want to use the vacuum analogy, at least use a vacuum worthy of the verb “suck”. How about “they suck like a Bosch shop vac”? Or, “they suck like a Tri-Star”?

Always start and end your day with a smile, and just for today, do something for someone else and don't tell anyone about it.

by Fuster Beeshit on Dec 13, 2009 3:10 PM PST reply actions  

You'll have to ask my wife about vacuum quality

I use it sometimes and fix it when it doesn’t work, but I only know the name Oreck from the commercials.

by John Morgan on Dec 13, 2009 3:12 PM PST up reply actions  

dyson is by far the best vacuum ever, according to my wife

who actually loves vacuuming for some reason. lucky me.

by kow on Dec 13, 2009 7:52 PM PST up reply actions  

Our Oreck is a beast.

We’ve never had a problem with it, and if it ever does get clogged, it’s easy to taker apart and clean.

It's Great to be a Florida Gator!

"I never met a llama I didn't like." - TJ Duckett

All I want for Christmas is Joe Haden, Eric Berry, and Nandamukong Suh in Seahawks blue.

by Wayward Llama on Dec 14, 2009 4:03 AM PST up reply actions  

well, I'm glad at least that rock bottom isn't worst in the NFL

yes, faint praise, but there are worse things than a 4-12 or 5-11 season being the catalyst for a rebuild.

by Will Kier on Dec 13, 2009 3:27 PM PST reply actions  

4-12 AND 5-11

next year probably won’t be that much better win wise, but it’ll be heading uphill

by Will Kier on Dec 13, 2009 3:28 PM PST up reply actions  

John you are a rockstar

Best write-up of the season so far.

by kearly on Dec 13, 2009 3:28 PM PST reply actions  

Not you that is the truth.

I don’t want him to get hurt but I am always happy when he goes to the sidelines now rather see Seneca even though he’s sucked a lot this season.

by A'Seahawks_Warriors on Dec 13, 2009 3:36 PM PST up reply actions  

It's sad because beating blitzes used to be something he was really good at.

Does learning a new playbook near the end of your career have anything to do with that?

by Big E-Z on Dec 13, 2009 3:40 PM PST up reply actions  

I think he knows the playbook

but I think the looser playbook exposes his arm strength. It is worth noting that Knapp has never worked with a quarterback like Hasselbeck. We used to talk about that like it was a good thing.

by John Morgan on Dec 13, 2009 3:42 PM PST up reply actions  

Knapp offenses have always had a QB with some mobility

Even without the arm strength (Garcia) or the QB ability (Vick).

I won’t count Oakland because it’s Oakland.

Point remains it has been there.

ME! BANE!

by SSreporters on Dec 13, 2009 3:44 PM PST up reply actions  

I really dont understand how it's his own doing?

When people say that about Rogers or Rothlisberger i get it, but Matt doesn’t hold the ball like they do, but they all have 3 things in common, bad o lines.

by Badmotostinkfinger on Dec 13, 2009 3:44 PM PST up reply actions  

Not audibling when it's an obvious blitz

Or throwing the ball away instead of forcing something that isn’t there (which often leads to a 2 yard loss on a dump off).

That is something the QB can control.

ME! BANE!

by SSreporters on Dec 13, 2009 3:46 PM PST up reply actions  

That's been surprising.

I don’t remember him being this unaware of the blitz; maybe memory is playing tricks on me but didn’t he audible his way out of those a lot more in past years?

by thebyron on Dec 14, 2009 8:19 AM PST up reply actions  

It seems to me that everyone is debating Hass vs. O-line,

Both of them can be bad, it doesn’t have to be and isn’t an either-or

by Big E-Z on Dec 13, 2009 3:46 PM PST up reply actions  

Both clearly have their faults

It’s one weakness exposing another out there.

by John Morgan on Dec 13, 2009 3:47 PM PST up reply actions  

I'd lean Hass in the QB v. OL debate

Compare the stats from this year to Matt’s most productive year: 2007-

2009 adjusted sack rate: 6.9%
2007 adjusted sack rate: 7.1%

Run blocking was almost identical as well.

The OL is almost a carbon copy of 2007’s statistically, and Hasselbeck put up huge numbers back then, with arguably inferior WR and RB talent. Clearly, Hasselbeck’s 2009 decline should not be put on the OL, but on his own shoulders.

by kearly on Dec 13, 2009 4:28 PM PST up reply actions  

I think it's both

But an elite QB would be much better than this, some people still believe Matt is elite he’s no where close.

by A'Seahawks_Warriors on Dec 13, 2009 3:48 PM PST up reply actions  

It's self serving for some to defend Matt

some are in denial, some are rationalizing and I think most would rather blame faceless bunch of kids than the best quarterback in franchise history.

by John Morgan on Dec 13, 2009 3:50 PM PST up reply actions  

Agreed

Both are at fault. But where’s the running game and who’s your #1 WR? The Lions are better at WR and RB, and hell, QB for that matter.

by Badmotostinkfinger on Dec 13, 2009 3:51 PM PST up reply actions  

The Seahawks are better than the Seahawks? ;-)

Amazing how so many of those ex-Seahawks hopped to the Lions.

ME! BANE!

by SSreporters on Dec 13, 2009 3:53 PM PST up reply actions  

Not a ton

but for a sixth round pick, he looked somewhat promising.

by John Morgan on Dec 13, 2009 3:57 PM PST up reply actions  

He has that damning fault a lot of big armed passers do

No telling where the next throw will be. He looks awesome for a pass and then hopeless for a pass. That kind of crap doesn’t play in the NFL.

by John Morgan on Dec 13, 2009 3:57 PM PST up reply actions  

I'd rather Seattle invest massive resources into the position

and roll the dice. Or, if a rookie salary cap is imminent, I would rather Seattle trade one its picks for a 2011 pick and select two quarterbacks.

by John Morgan on Dec 13, 2009 4:01 PM PST up reply actions  

Two in 2011

when it would be affordable.

by John Morgan on Dec 13, 2009 4:01 PM PST up reply actions  

Whoever

I would rather Seattle just pick up a few random players and run them through, but Hasselbeck could finish his contract if the team wanted.

by John Morgan on Dec 13, 2009 4:04 PM PST up reply actions  

I'd pay money out of my pocket

Not to see Hass take the snaps.

That said I could probably only pony up about $100 for that cause so it won’t change anything.

by A'Seahawks_Warriors on Dec 13, 2009 4:23 PM PST up reply actions  

If the rookie salary structure was dramatically changed

I would have no problem with a rebuilding team drafting two quarterbacks and letting them compete for a spot.

by John Morgan on Dec 13, 2009 4:26 PM PST up reply actions  

Good point.

I think the only way we see Teel or Obo and Butler getting a lot of reps is if Mora and his staff are let go. Same for the defense with Bryant and Curry not playing on 3rd downs.

SEA!

by MFAN on Dec 13, 2009 4:00 PM PST up reply actions  

You can blame some of this on Matt

He’s getting old, his arm is toast, and he’s about as fast as my arthritic gramma. But even Peyton needs a couple of seconds to set up and get rid of the ball.
 I agree with you, but most fans won’t see it. I think it’s going to be a boo bath….

Fearless Frog is my hero
FIRE KNAPP!

by ToadEnt on Dec 13, 2009 4:02 PM PST up reply actions  

We need Nick Reed at QB

He can get rid of the ball in .001 seconds.

ME! BANE!

by SSreporters on Dec 13, 2009 4:03 PM PST up reply actions  

What do you want from him?

You guys want him to throw downfield more but he cant with the time he is receiving, correct? He has to check down

by Bruto56 on Dec 14, 2009 12:12 PM PST up reply actions  

He's had time to throw downfield.

The problem is that he appears to be physically incapable of throwing downfield. He double clutches a lot and even his short routes are floating.

by BrianL on Dec 14, 2009 12:16 PM PST up reply actions  

Do you have any clips from the game yesterday?

Because i dont remember very many plays where he could. Matt is not a rookie, and will not just loft one 30 yards deep with 1.2 secconds of time in the pocket for the sake of throwing a deep pass. Trust me i think Matt is no where near the top 3 tiers of Qb’s in this league, but is not as bad as the rift he is taking.

by Bruto56 on Dec 14, 2009 12:19 PM PST up reply actions  

I have the game stored on my computer at home, but I don't have a way to cut clips and share them with you.

All I can say is that this is a problem that has been on display for a while. Matt has had time to throw and he’s missing open receivers, floating passes, and holding on to the ball too long. I’m not saying the O-line play is great, but Matt’s inability to throw the ball with adequate strength and zip is making them look worse than they really are.

by BrianL on Dec 14, 2009 12:25 PM PST up reply actions  

Pick and bitch, bitch and pick

The game was poorly planned, poorly managed, and poorly executed. I saw no workable recovery plan, and the players seemed to be playing with no emotion whatsoever (with the exception of Curry and Hass). Now Mora’s going to get up on the podium and say that the players need to execute the plays, which is true. It is also the coaches responsibility to plan, manage, and recover. The lions’ share of this debacle goes to the coaches.

Fearless Frog is my hero
FIRE KNAPP!

by ToadEnt on Dec 13, 2009 3:55 PM PST reply actions  

John have you seen any improvements on defense

From last year to this year under Bradley?

It’s a vague question but an example would be “Are they defending 3rd and 12 better than Marshall’s D did?”.

ME! BANE!

by SSreporters on Dec 13, 2009 4:01 PM PST reply actions  

The coaching is better but the talent worse

Peterson is gone and he was, we can be sure now, an irreplaceable pass rush presence. Mebane was better at one. Tru was healthy. Etc.

by John Morgan on Dec 13, 2009 4:03 PM PST up reply actions  

Seattle is blitzing smarter, but the blitz designs are still stupid

the Tampa 2 elements and quarters coverage is awful, but I think that’s on Mora. In fact, if we assume Mora still has a lot to say about the secondary, it’s been run poorly since he joined Seattle.

by John Morgan on Dec 13, 2009 4:06 PM PST up reply actions  

what about our protection schemes?

We keep Carlson in to single block Mario Williams? How do you not key in on the best pass rusher on the opposing team? I don’t get how our o-line is so confused by stunts and twists, or blitz delays. It seems like we are very vulnerable to inside pressure from a delayed blitz. Every time Matt drops back, I cringe.

by quickhandsandfeet on Dec 13, 2009 4:08 PM PST reply actions  

Because they had other guys who are able to rush the passer, notably, their linebacking trio of Barwin, Ryans, and Cushing.

Especially Ryans. The Seahawks had to compensate against other capable defensive players. Also, Okoye and Cody had a lot to do with leaving Carlson out there to defend Williams on that play.

Sam Bradford, future Seattle Seahawk.

by Carl Shinyama on Dec 13, 2009 4:41 PM PST up reply actions  

Since I know you all love Furness

He said the only reason we haven’t hired Holmgren is because he is in Mexico

by Big E-Z on Dec 13, 2009 4:19 PM PST reply actions  

Well, to be fair, that's not exactly what Furness said

He said the only reason they aren’t interviewing Holmgren right now is that he’s out of the country.

But Hugh Millen sure looked like he wanted to punch him during that postgame show.

by Mr Fish on Dec 13, 2009 4:29 PM PST up reply actions  

I really want Suh

He’s a true 3-tech which would allow us to move Mebane back to the one. However, there’s no chance he’ll be there and I’m skeptical about trading up.

I’ve started to see Gerald McCoy slipping in mocks and he very well could be available. He’s not the dominant force that Suh is but he’s a prototype 3-tech and a top talent.

by Hawkhammer19 on Dec 13, 2009 4:26 PM PST reply actions  

would we trade up in the 1st to get McCoy?

Might be interesting. If we finish with 6 wins(likely) that would put us likely out of reach of McCoy.

by Hancock.Brett on Dec 13, 2009 4:35 PM PST up reply actions  

No that's what I'm saying

I wouldn’t trade up for either of them but it might be that we wouldn’t have to with McCoy. 3-tech’s not in huge demand and he’s not the presence that Suh is. He could slip to us.

by Hawkhammer19 on Dec 13, 2009 4:38 PM PST up reply actions  

I missed where you said "skeptical about trading up"

reading comprehension is not my strong suit today, its the blinding Seahawks rage.

by Hancock.Brett on Dec 13, 2009 4:40 PM PST up reply actions  

I love Suh, and I remember Suh when he was more talent than production

but the further this teams sinks, the less I could justify trading up to get Suh or anyone else. Yes, Seattle needs building blocks, but anyone can bust, and first overall busts are crippling. And I hate to fly in the face of the Suh love, but if you watch more tape on the guy, he takes a ton of plays off. He could bust like anyone else.

by John Morgan on Dec 13, 2009 4:38 PM PST up reply actions  

i don't agree with trading up 99% of the time

Just thought it was interesting food for though since we do have two first rounders. New GM new philosophy though.

by Hancock.Brett on Dec 13, 2009 4:39 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm curious what you think McCoy

I don’t see Suh being available but I could see McCoy being there.

by Hawkhammer19 on Dec 13, 2009 4:42 PM PST up reply actions  

I do not have an informed opinion of McCoy

The draft coverage might not be as deep as year’s past. My January is busy enough that I am renting a room to concentrate. It may bleed into February, and that’s when I cram tape. So, maybe after the Ides of March I will have a better chance to answer questions.

by John Morgan on Dec 13, 2009 4:44 PM PST up reply actions  

I've had plenty of opportunities to watch McCoy these past two years. Other than the Huskies, I've watched Oklahoma more than any other team in the country.

And I’d say that McCoy generates more production and factors into the effects of a game from game to game, especially when the better offenses are involved. Suh seems to be… streaky.

Sam Bradford, future Seattle Seahawk.

by Carl Shinyama on Dec 13, 2009 4:50 PM PST up reply actions  

That's my take as well

McCoy is not dominant in any one respect but he’s very active and productive. To me that sounds like the type of high value player that could slip in the draft.

by Hawkhammer19 on Dec 13, 2009 4:54 PM PST up reply actions  

Yes, exactly.

But I have to be fair to Suh. When he’s on, he’s ON.

Sam Bradford, future Seattle Seahawk.

by Carl Shinyama on Dec 13, 2009 4:56 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm not sure about two great picks

Seattle’s first pick should be a winner. Almost every mock I’ve seen has Joe Haden still on the board, and some still have Bradford. I think very likely, that first pick will net a falling star, although it may not be a position of urgent need.

The Denver pick is a lot tougher. Very few mocks have Charles Brown or CJ Spiller lasting that long. Both of the top safeties are usually gone by then too. The crop of guys I typically see lasting that long are almost all 2nd round prospects. I’d feel a lot better about that Denver pick if it was just a bit higher- in just about every 2010 mock I’ve seen, the talent pool dries up really fast in the early 20s.

by kearly on Dec 13, 2009 6:36 PM PST up reply actions  

Without a 3rd round pick this year.

I really would not be surprised to see Seattle use one of its first round picks to trade down and acquire more picks.

Sam Bradford, future Seattle Seahawk.

by Carl Shinyama on Dec 13, 2009 4:44 PM PST up reply actions  

Yep.

Whether or not we do have a lot of needs, I’m sure with the turnover in the FO there’s going to be a lot of turnover on the roster as well. I can certainly see us stockpiling picks.

And why not? If the talent of the latter half of the first is comparable to the middle, it’s worth it to me.

by djafrot on Dec 13, 2009 4:46 PM PST up reply actions  

I agree.

With this in mind, it makes me start wondering about which prospects to keep an eye out for. (I’ve only been paying attention to prospects, who, at this point are more likely to go in the top half of the first round).

Who else besides me likes Earl Thomas?

Sam Bradford, future Seattle Seahawk.

by Carl Shinyama on Dec 13, 2009 4:54 PM PST up reply actions  

Speaking of 3-techs.

I’ve liked the look of Jared Odrick from Penn State. He should be available in the late first or early second and a great pass rusher. What’s more, he could conceivably convert to 5-tech which would allow us to experiment with 3-4 if we miss out on Carlos Dunlap.

by Hawkhammer19 on Dec 13, 2009 4:59 PM PST up reply actions  

Haven't watched him.

If he’s a Paea-like player, I’d be very interested learning more about him. Too bad the college season is pretty much over except for the Bowl games.

Sam Bradford, future Seattle Seahawk.

by Carl Shinyama on Dec 13, 2009 5:01 PM PST up reply actions  

Charles Brown I like.

I have a hard time seeing him slip past a team like the Browns or the Lions.

Sam Bradford, future Seattle Seahawk.

by Carl Shinyama on Dec 13, 2009 5:11 PM PST up reply actions  

I was talking about top of the 2nd round.

If Brown fell past the 1st round, I have trouble seeing him fall past the early 2nd round.

At this point, though, because of the depth of the QB and Safety positions this year, I see him going really late in 1st, as early as Indianapolis, because none of the teams like the Patriots, Chargers, Cardinals, Saints, Ravens, etc., who are likely to make the playoffs have a need to upgrade at tackle. (Although.. there’s always the Packers, who might be the wild card for Brown as they really do need to make some serious upgrades on their line).

But if Green Bay and Indianapolis were to pass… I have a hard time seeing him slip past teams like the Browns or the Lions in the early 2nd round.

Sam Bradford, future Seattle Seahawk.

by Carl Shinyama on Dec 13, 2009 5:30 PM PST up reply actions  

Oh gotcha.

Well I think if he performs well in the combine he could even warrant a top 15 pick which makes us an eligible candidate. I’d be thrilled if we could get him with our Denver pick. I think the Packers will take a long look at him. They too run a zone blocking scheme which Brown looks like a good fit for.

by Hawkhammer19 on Dec 13, 2009 5:45 PM PST up reply actions  

Given his athleticism, he could be a good fit.

I just like him because he makes it very difficult for DE’s to get a sack off of him, though, in the game against Oregon, he had a lot of trouble with their speed.

But, for as athletic as he is, he needs some size. He’s 285. That’s actually why I have him going late in the 1st round.

Sam Bradford, future Seattle Seahawk.

by Carl Shinyama on Dec 13, 2009 5:54 PM PST up reply actions  

Went over to Walterfootball.com

And on their Dec. 11th update, guess who they had as the Seahawks’ pick? Well, maybe it’s not so much of a stretch for Brown to go in the top 15.

Sam Bradford, future Seattle Seahawk.

by Carl Shinyama on Dec 13, 2009 5:58 PM PST up reply actions  

I see us trading one of our 1st rounders next year

For what exactly I don’t know but I feel like we have a lot of leverage above other teams in next year’s draft.

If Denver misses the playoffs the leverage gets even greater because we have two top 16 picks to play with.

ME! BANE!

by SSreporters on Dec 13, 2009 4:48 PM PST up reply actions  

Denver is 8-5

with 2 of its 3 games againnt Oakland and KC. Den goes 10-6 , makes playoffs

by Bruto56 on Dec 14, 2009 12:16 PM PST up reply actions  

Does a new GM lick his chops at 2 first rounders?

Or cringe at the contract thoughts next years CBA is still up in the air?

by Big E-Z on Dec 13, 2009 4:41 PM PST reply actions  

With a rookie salary restructure likely on its way

I would think that two firsts would be extra appealing since a #8 pick (~$40 million) and a #25 (~$15 million) pick would have combined salaries significantly lower than a #1. Suh could potentially be the last rookie to get a $70 million deal, and as great as Suh is, it has the potential to look like an albatross deal in a few years.

That said, I think Suh will be so coveted that two firsts probably won’t be enough. He deserves the hype, don’t get me wrong, but I think there will be some serious Suh mania near draft day.

by kearly on Dec 13, 2009 6:44 PM PST up reply actions  

Very well said. I see that I'm not the only one who thinks the Seahawks will be picking somewhere around #8.

Looks like they could be tied with several teams with identical records by the end of the season. Does anyone know the tie-breakers for playoff teams, but what are the tie-breakers for draft position for teams with identical records?

On Suh, I think he got robbed yesterday.

Sam Bradford, future Seattle Seahawk.

by Carl Shinyama on Dec 13, 2009 6:50 PM PST up reply actions  

Seeing these questions

Any chance we have another All Questions Answered thread in the future?

ME! BANE!

by SSreporters on Dec 13, 2009 4:42 PM PST reply actions  

Sure, if there's interest

I always try to answer questions when they’re asked. There’s something arrogant about an AQA thread.

by John Morgan on Dec 13, 2009 4:45 PM PST up reply actions  

I'd like it

I like to mull things over and always think of my inquiries and comments long after the related thread has past haha.

by Hawkhammer19 on Dec 13, 2009 4:57 PM PST up reply actions  

Me too.

Sam Bradford, future Seattle Seahawk.

by Carl Shinyama on Dec 13, 2009 5:02 PM PST up reply actions  

Moras post game comments really concern me

Why throw the Oline under the bus without blaming Hass at all. Ugh.

by Hancock.Brett on Dec 13, 2009 4:43 PM PST reply actions  

still frightens me

I almost miss Holmgren’s subtle criticism of everyone even on there best days.

by Hancock.Brett on Dec 13, 2009 4:46 PM PST up reply actions  

I wasn't born when Chuck Knox was coaching.

But looking at the tape he was the man who put the Seahawks on the map for the 80s.

I don’t miss Holmgren the playcaller and I don’t miss the GM.

ME! BANE!

by SSreporters on Dec 13, 2009 4:51 PM PST up reply actions  

I miss Holmgren's leadership and aplomb in the face of adversity.

Mora seems like someone I wouldn’t want managing a Jack in the Box during the lunch rush.

by John Morgan on Dec 13, 2009 4:48 PM PST up reply actions  

That visual is hilarious

It all works as long as the burger flippers have consistancy

by Big E-Z on Dec 13, 2009 4:50 PM PST up reply actions  

That's the truth.

I work in retail and black friday was a mess with the all the managers have no leadership skills.

SEA!

by MFAN on Dec 13, 2009 4:50 PM PST up reply actions  

he reminds me way to much of my current boss(with more experience)

Constantly putting me into bad situations then unfairly criticizing me when things go wrong(Mare situation). I have skills but without quality leadership they are being wasted.

by Hancock.Brett on Dec 13, 2009 5:07 PM PST up reply actions  

Well the O-line did struggle and Lock is looking bad at left tackle.

He didn’t mention anyone by name, so he didn’t throw any player in particular under the bus, which I guess is good. It’s probably going to end up being an empty threat, the only move that would potentially help is putting Mcintosh and LT and Lock at RT, but there really isn’t anything to gain by doing that.

SEA!

by MFAN on Dec 13, 2009 4:49 PM PST up reply actions  

Well he did say that the o-line would be his focus during the next two days

and that they’d use the remaining three games to evaluate the rest of the team. So Hasselbeck isn’t necessarily off the hook.

by Mr Fish on Dec 13, 2009 4:47 PM PST reply actions  

If he has the chance.

This team seems ready for an interim.

by John Morgan on Dec 13, 2009 4:49 PM PST up reply actions  

New management

If Seattle is on the verge of collapse then they probably aren’t the solution.

ME! BANE!

by SSreporters on Dec 13, 2009 4:58 PM PST up reply actions  

I am not for it, per se

But without Ruskell, and with the team losing, often ugly, it makes sense that Seattle might make the switch.

by John Morgan on Dec 13, 2009 4:59 PM PST up reply actions  

It's also fair to Mora. If the team is planning to move on without him.

He’s in a tough place, not sure if he even has a job and the players know this.

SEA!

by MFAN on Dec 13, 2009 5:00 PM PST up reply actions  

Hmm...

…odds that Mora gets dumped BEFORE the season ends? That he leaves prematurely?

Who else on staff could presumably take over for the rest of the season?

by djafrot on Dec 13, 2009 5:19 PM PST up reply actions  

OK, thanks for clarifying

I just thought it’s interesting how the climate of opinion has shifted.

by Mr Fish on Dec 13, 2009 5:01 PM PST up reply actions  

Agreed.

I guess the absolute suckitude of the team has influenced us a lot.

by redwolf75 on Dec 18, 2009 9:31 PM PST up reply actions  

true

but he singled out the o-line, he could have just as easily said we are looking at the QB play specifically.

by Hancock.Brett on Dec 13, 2009 5:07 PM PST up reply actions  

whats worse, a center with a broken hand that snaps with his wrong hand?

Or coaches who know this and don’t do anything about and then blame said center?

by Big E-Z on Dec 13, 2009 5:01 PM PST up reply actions  

Spencer snapped with his left

for much of 2007. I am not sure what is wrong right now. I think the coaching staff must think he’s ok to snap.

by John Morgan on Dec 13, 2009 5:03 PM PST up reply actions  

I think Mora is stumbling into a no win argument

Either Spencer can snap and something else was wrong, or he can’t snap, and why the hell was he playing.

by John Morgan on Dec 13, 2009 5:09 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah, 3 times.

Sam Bradford, future Seattle Seahawk.

by Carl Shinyama on Dec 13, 2009 5:12 PM PST up reply actions  

Carl

I hope we get Bradford like your sig says what do you think our chances are of landing him ?

by A'Seahawks_Warriors on Dec 13, 2009 5:26 PM PST up reply actions  

Campbell had another good game today

and might have convinced the Redskins to keep him

by Mr Fish on Dec 13, 2009 5:53 PM PST up reply actions  

I watched some of that game

And he does look good if we can’t get Brafford maybe JC as a free agent is not the worst thing.

by A'Seahawks_Warriors on Dec 13, 2009 5:54 PM PST up reply actions  

I haven't been convinced by John's articles trying to sell us on Campbell

My point was that Washington might decide to stay with him after investing so much to develop him. That would take them out of the QB derby in the draft.

by Mr Fish on Dec 13, 2009 5:56 PM PST up reply actions  

Oh good!

I don’t want anyone else gunning for him.

Sam Bradford, future Seattle Seahawk.

by Carl Shinyama on Dec 13, 2009 5:55 PM PST up reply actions  

Thanks all for a great first FieldGulls experience

buuut I have to go to my new mother-in-laws birthday dinner

by Big E-Z on Dec 13, 2009 5:10 PM PST reply actions  

My sympathy.

I think I will move on to the night thread and see if I can like football again. I’ve taken a shine to the Eagles.

by John Morgan on Dec 13, 2009 5:12 PM PST up reply actions  

good pick

I know you like Desean but McNabb has been one of my favorite non Seahawks for years. I always like a player that doesn’t seem phased by idiotic fans booing him for no reason.

by Hancock.Brett on Dec 13, 2009 5:13 PM PST up reply actions  

Then you'll find it easy to root for Philly players for years to come.

Because in my experience, the majority of Philly fans are… well.. idiots.

Sam Bradford, future Seattle Seahawk.

by Carl Shinyama on Dec 13, 2009 5:15 PM PST up reply actions  

sounds good

I love me some Andy Reid as well. Any coach that could make James Thrash and Todd Pinkston an effective WR tandem……

by Hancock.Brett on Dec 13, 2009 5:18 PM PST up reply actions  

Some thoughts from an amateur;

Matt IS too old. Which is sad considering that his mentor is still playing lights out, however it is quite doubtful that even Favre could perform behind that pathetic excuse of an offensive line. That O-line outside of Unger and maybe Willis is more than welcome to seek employment elsewhere next season if any other team would have them. They will not be missed.

Sene-suck would not be missed either next year.

I think you keep Matt on as the aged mentor (from the bench) for Teel or whomever the (please Mike Holmgren) new GM and coach (please not Mora) draft with the (Bradford) 1st, 1st round pick next year.

Defense? I think will be fine if the offense can stay on the damned field however we need……something in that secondary.

Coaching staff? Why in God’s name did the Seahawks hire Greg Knapp? Wasn’t he a coach with the Raiders during their multi-year suck-fest until this year?

by mrcoffee1969 on Dec 14, 2009 9:31 AM PST reply actions  

Response

Greg Knapp can’t do much with a quarterback that can’t pass further than five yards without floating the ball. There’s no offensive scheme out there designed to work with that.

Keeping Matt to be a mentor to whoever we draft is only reasonable if Matt coughs up a ton of salary and is willing to be buried on the depth chart.

If Mike Holmgren is the new GM you can probably forget about the Seahawks finding a new QB.

The problems with the O-Line are exacerbated by Matthew not being able to throw the ball, which in turn forces him to hang on for too long, which in turn results in sacks, which is then blamed on the O-Line.

by BrianL on Dec 14, 2009 9:46 AM PST up reply actions  

Last week

Matt sure seemed to have enough arm strength to connect on a game winning catch 32-yards down the field, did he not? Amazing what happens when someone has more than 2 secs to throw.

by Bruto56 on Dec 14, 2009 12:25 PM PST up reply actions  

He also had a number of passes that badly missed his receivers.

Off the top of my head there was a wide-open look to Nate Burleson early on that he floated over him.

by BrianL on Dec 14, 2009 12:27 PM PST up reply actions  

The line has played better since Locklear, Spencer, and Sims returned from injury.

Things were bad when Vallos and Williams were starting next to eachother, but the overall play has improved. You’ve also got to consider that some of the sacks Matt has endured is a product of holding onto the ball too long.

The line isn’t great, but it’s not as bad as it’s made out to be. Part of the problem is that they’re working in front of a quarterback that’s having a hard time throwing the ball with zip and strength, and that’s going to make the line look worse than it really is.

If Matt can’t throw a medium-shallow pass anymore, the defense has no reason to do anything but stack the box and rush the passer.

by BrianL on Dec 14, 2009 12:35 PM PST up reply actions  

If the line is playing better

Then what do you call yesterday? i just dont understand Brian, Im sorry. I just dont see what your seeing. They showed the Stats yesterday during the game and matt was hurried on half of his 36 passes, including 3 sacks. Locklear is not a LT, but is our best LT on this team, that is saying alot, ALOT to what this line has. Every Elite qb in this league, Even Manning has one Pro Bowl caliber player on its line. Jeff Saturday is better than any 2 OL on our team

by Bruto56 on Dec 14, 2009 12:40 PM PST up reply actions  

I think the ZBS

has alot to do with it IMO, I just dont feel its a great fit for this team. It worked in Den with their personel, in ATL with that personel, and In SF with their personel. I just dont see it working with the type of Lineman we have nor the type of QB we have.

by Bruto56 on Dec 14, 2009 12:42 PM PST up reply actions  

Yesterday was a mixture of poor line play and poor quarterback play.

One effects the other.

If the line plays better, Matt’s declining skills are somewhat masked. If Matt plays better, the offensive line’s issues are masked.

by BrianL on Dec 14, 2009 12:46 PM PST up reply actions  

It is not a short pass either

Brian said Greg Knapp’s offense can’t operate with a QB that can’t throw longer than 5 yards, well I think this shows that Matt can throw down field on occasion.

by Bad Mayo on Dec 14, 2009 3:52 PM PST up reply actions  

It was hyperbole

A single pass of 25 or 30 yards says little about a quarterback’s arm strength. I am sure many of us could muster a 30 yard pass, but couldn’t throw a five yard out to a covered receiver.

by John Morgan on Dec 15, 2009 2:39 PM PST up reply actions  

Yikes.

Mike Salk is ripping apart Jim Mora for throwing Spencer under the bus.

by BrianL on Dec 14, 2009 11:18 AM PST reply actions  

This is incredibly discouraging to see from Mora.

The more he does this, the less I’d like to see him back next year.

It's Great to be a Florida Gator!

"I never met a llama I didn't like." - TJ Duckett

All I want for Christmas is Joe Haden, Eric Berry, and Nandamukong Suh in Seahawks blue.

by Wayward Llama on Dec 14, 2009 4:13 PM PST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Start posting about the Seahawks »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

SBNation.com Recent Stories

New York Jets wide receiver Darrelle Revis signals to the fans during football practice at the new Meadowlands Stadium, Wednesday, June 16, 2010 in East Rutherford, N.J. (AP Photo/Bill Kostroun) +22 updates

When You're A Jet: Darrelle Revis Agrees To Terms With New York On Extension

FILE - In this Aug. 28, 2009, file photo, Arizona Cardinals quarterback Matt Leinart looks to throw against the Green Bay Packers during the third quarter of a preseason NFL football game. Leinart seems to be passing the challenge to his role as No. 2 quarterback. Passing would be the operative word. He threw for 360 yards in the second half against the Packers.  (AP Photo/Paul Connors, File) +8 updates

NFL Roster Cuts: Leinart, Houshmandzadeh Among Players Cut As Teams Trim To 53 Players

St. Louis Rams quarterback Sam Bradford warms up before the start of a preseason NFL football game between the St. Louis Rams and the Minnesota Vikings Saturday, Aug. 14, 2010, in St. Louis. (AP Photo/Jeff Roberson) link

Rams Pencil In Rookie Sam Bradford As Starting Quarterback

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

Image_114_small Shrug

Jj_flag_detail1_small John Morgan

Screen_shot_2010-07-12_at_11 Scruffy Lefty

Small BrianL

Small abender20

Authors

Vp081-c_small Christian

Small Doug Farrar

Catch_small Vasilii

Dksbtwit_small Johnny Peel (DKSB)

Profilepic_small DJ C-Raig