Red Bryant
Hi ya'll,
I was going through some old posts I wrote at Big Cat Country during the draft season and stumbled upon an article I wrote about Red Bryant. I was wondering how he was doing for you guys? I was pretty high on him (as you can see here http://www.bigcatcountry.com/2008/4/13/182256/881 ), but I always like to compare my armchair scouting to reality.
Thanks for the help.
-Chris
12 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Still raw for his progress
but has shown flashes of incredible dominance. For instance, dramatically overpowering a triple-team to force an INT in the red zone in about 3 seconds.
Honestly, he’s kind of a hard fit for most traditional roles. He’s got so much quickness for his size. But as a three-technique, he’d have the disadvantage of being so tall, higher center of gravity, and how well can he hold up, over a game, over a season, over a career, moving all that weight around to chase QBs, something that demands a little more exertion in some regards.
Then as a one-tech, a large portion of what makes his talent-set so special could be underutilized. He doesn’t so much have great trunk strength, to hold the point, like a one-tech, as he has great power in movement, to bull rush and shed blockers and collapse pockets. And again the height thing. But he could work well as a one-tech. It’s probably a better fit than nose tackle. Maybe the answer is to set up a half yard more off the ball.
And I don’t know why it’s showing up in flashes and not with more consistency. I don’t know about technique, except that he’s just raw in some ways, he was a bit more of a project as a prospect than pro ready. Maybe his awareness is a little poor. Maybe he focuses on the battle with the blocker too much. Maybe it’s just something that comes along with veteran savvy and he’ll become a great player in time.
I was going to reply but nevermind. Just read jacobstevens.
Nailed it.
"Those who fear disorder more than injustice inevitably produce more of both." -- Rev. William Coffin
No, and for good reason.
Sam Bradford, future Seattle Seahawk.
by Carl Shinyama on Dec 3, 2009 2:52 PM PST up reply actions
It crossed my mind while I was writing.
I think there’s not enough speed when he can’t go straight through his blocker. Not enough agility or COD speed; a liability as a run defender on the edge. On top of probably not being good enough as a pass rusher. The most frequent path to the QB from the ends is that roundabout edge of the pocket. He’s gotta be an inside guy.
I'm thinking there is an outside possibility he could swing wide...
but only IF we move to a 3-4.
Bird Law in this country isn't governed by reason.
by Tyler Jorgensen on Dec 3, 2009 3:52 PM PST up reply actions
So we'd then have 5 starting caliber LBs.
Tapp (he might want to lose 10 pounds), Curry, Hill, OLBS
Hawthorne, Tatupu ILBs (I’m sure Hill could also play inside)
Herring seems a mismatch for a 3-4. Reed could play OLB. DD Lewis ILB.
Redding/LoJack/Bryant 3-4 DEs
Mebane/draft pick/FA NT
Kerney, Terrill cut.
I like the looks of that lineup
I find myself sketching that same lineup down quite often. Bryant and Redding could look great as 3-4 DEs. If we had the big man to fill the NT spot, our guys might line up well in a 3-4.
As for Bryant, I thought I saw the next Marcus Tubbs coming on when I watched him in training camp. But he has been disappointing this season. Usually nicked, and when healthy the coaches don’t trust him to stay in for many snaps.
"Football players are temperamental. That's 90 percent temper and 10 percent mental." - Doug Plank

by 


























