Max Unger Matures or Fattens on Home Cooking
Max Unger ended the quarter with great block that helped convert the first. It wasn't flashy. Unger did not leave a trail of 49ers in his wake. It was simply good guard play.
Seattle and San Francisco battled to a standstill. Neither team could construct a drive in the third quarter. The 49ers couldn't battle back from bad field position and Seattle stubbornly attempted to establish the run.
In his first two plays, Unger pulled well but missed Takeo Spikes and landed only a glancing blow on Patrick Willis. He engaged and lost Ray McDonald and the drive ended in a three and out.
Unger was even less involved in the next series. He shifted left and controlled his zone, but otherwise did not factor. The play call was a line motion left, bootleg right with a pass to Justin Griffith. Greg Knapp needs the rushing attack to build his playbook off of and Seattle spent much of the game smashing into the pile, hoping Julius Jones could bust free. Unger pulled clean but did not factor on the next play and was beat back but cleared for Matt Hasselbeck. Hsselbeck rushed for four on third and eight.
Seattle completed its third three and out of the quarter before Unger could break a sweat. He occupied the left defensive end, Ray McDonald, and Jones hit the pile for five. He pulled and blocked out Willis and Jones narrowly turned the corner for four. Third and one, and as close to constructing a drive as they would be all quarter, Matt ran what looked like a designed roll out-run. The line moved left and Hasselbeck rolled right, but braced for impact before the first down marker. He didn't have a clear target and didn't want to run, so broke off his roll out and doubled over and dropped his shoulder. Dashon Goldson obliged and brutalized Hasselbeck behind the line.
Plays like this evidence just how desperate Knapp is to establish the run. He shifts the pocket constantly and throws on clear rushing downs, because he is attempting to stretch the linebackers vertically and horizontally -- anything to keep opposing linebackers from crashing the line. It all fails in turns. The deep pass doesn't work. Deion Branch single-matched against Shawntae Spencer turns into a duck dive bombing the left hash mark. Michael Boulware would have been all over that pass. The run doesn't work and so play action rollout passes to the fullback are sniffed out and `sploded. The deep pass and play-action fail, the linebackers continue to crash the line and even good blocks go wasted.
Chris Spencer teamed with Unger to blow back McDonald three yards and allow Spencer to pull and pop the next man in his way. It was a ripping hole that vanished. Jones missed the cutback lane, the cutback lane closed an instant later, and Jones sunk his shoulders and smashed into the pile as he's wont. Willis was credited with the tackle after two. It's a shame for such a pretty block to go wasted, but it's progress. On the next play, Unger was blown back by McDonald and that forced Jones to string the rush wide. Parys Haralson ripped through John Carlson and Jones went wider, and wider until he stepped out for a loss of three. That's on Unger.
It took Seattle until the end of the quarter to achieve a first down. It wasn't pretty. San Francisco blitzed and Gold and Red swarmed the edges of the pocket and threatened to swallow Hasselbeck during his backpedal. While the line caved around him, Unger held strong, standing up McDonald and giving Hasselbeck a crack to step into and find Nate Burleson for 23 and the first.
Now, maybe playing at home gave Unger that split-second needed to win off the snap. Maybe young Unger is growing stronger, or better timing his launch, or has improved his hand-fighting. I don't know. I do know that if Unger can continue holding ground against stouter defensive tackles, continue pulling cleanly, and continue teaming with Spencer to double out the nose tackle, the Seahawks run game could come alive.
20 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
What's this... a future for the inside of our line?
Sims/Spencer/Unger
Sure would be nice to have a position or two actually sewn up, whether or not our tackles are going to work out.
Of course, we have to re-sign Sims and Spencer for that to happen.
Are you saying
the LBers are having a field day defending Seattle because we can’t run and we can’t throw deep? Allowing them to just sit and wait for the inevitable short crossing routes that seem to be the only thing Hass can consistently throw now.
oops forgot to put in the quote I was referring to:
Plays like this evidence just how desperate Knapp is to establish the run. He shifts the pocket constantly and throws on clear rushing downs, because he is attempting to stretch the linebackers vertically and horizontally — anything to keep opposing linebackers from crashing the line.
Linebackers are taking a first step towards the line off the snap
knowing Seattle won’t beat them along the edges or over the top. Seattle’s offense has a tiny window of effectiveness and it is killing the short passing game and rushing attack.
Ya that's what I thought you were saying
and it’s what I had been noticing as well. We desperately need another way to attack defenses, and Hass just can’t deliver it. Here’s hoping the run game shows up against the defenses we are facing soon. The gauntlet of top 5-10 ranked run defenses is over.
I'm no John Morgan
but that’s my theory. Short crossing routes and screens are what we can successfully do and the defenses know it, so they aggressively defend them.
The demise of the Broncos in '09 is our future. Pray hard.
sounds about right
Also I’d say Hasselbeck who has suffered from happy feet before is missing Walter at LT. Those 15-25 yard routes that he used to thrive on are no longer there or hes unwilling to throw them. Then the defense doesn’t have to account for them and so on.
by Hancock.Brett on Dec 8, 2009 5:53 PM PST up reply actions
I'm curious if 3-4 teams defend the edges, including screens, better than 4-3s.
It would make sense having 4 agile linebackers instead of 3 in some respects. Maybe FO has something.
Typically yes, but alignment really counts
A base 3-4 will typically have linebackers lined up in a 9-technique, while a base 4-3 will not. Ostensibly this would put the defending linebacker in a much better position to set the edge and funnel the outside run into the backside pursuit.
However, this isn’t always true in practice. Often offenses will nullify this advantage by motioning a TE towards the play side OLB from a wider split. The TE can then down block the OLB and (in the idyllic world in which most Offensive coordinators reside) set a strong enough edge that the play side tackle can leave the DE to the guard and pull outside the TE into the second level.
What is true no matter what is that the 3-4 generally sets a wider line, which in turn will generally push plays attacking the outside wider.
Then again one can always shift a 4-3 to an over or under look and achieve much the same effect.
I think the big factor is our Tackles
The defensive coordinators know that our tackles are not Walter Jones clones or even close to starter status on many teams in the NFL so they will attack the edges and middle of the line with multiple looks. The bad play of the tackles allows so much rush that the linebackers are free to sit down in the zone and pick the short crossing patterns and screen passes.
If memory serves and Johns breakdowns are correct it is the pulling guard on screens that needs to get to the next level while the tackles seals the edge. If that tackle can’t seal the edge effectively then the screen is easier to bust for the linebackers.
"If, now this is a hypothetical, If I were offered the job, I would start with the offensive line" Mike Holmgren on KJR
I am folding the third quarter notes on Josh Wilson into the fourth quarter notes
He didn’t impact enough for a full break down of his third quarter.
It reads as if Max Unger is morping into Chris Gray right before our eyes
athletic enough to provide quality guard play within the demands of the offense, (increasingly) assignment correct, and occasionally overpowered by stout tackles.
"Those who fear disorder more than injustice inevitably produce more of both." -- Rev. William Coffin
note: when Chris Gray was a rookie (Dolphins, 1993 ) he was no Max Unger.
I remember watching Gray as a rookie. Unger is a much more powerful run blocker than Gray was as a youngster.
"Football players are temperamental. That's 90 percent temper and 10 percent mental." - Doug Plank
I've been happy with the Unger Pick
"If, now this is a hypothetical, If I were offered the job, I would start with the offensive line" Mike Holmgren on KJR
Carlson's blocking looked horrible at times.
It’s good to know he wasn’t exactly responsible. If the run is designed inside, the TE allowing the DE to run outside into the backfield should take the DE out of the play completely – unless the RB tries to skip outside. Still, some solid contact with the defender would have been nice.
With this offense struggling,
It makes sense to keep in the biggest threat to the 3-4 LB’s, especially when establishing the run. Owens is in on short yardage runs, though those are few and far between this year.
It is odd that we’re not seeing the two TE set that was more prevalent in the pre and early regular season.
O/T but the 49ers just signed Baraka Atkins to replace Kentwan Balmer (IRed)
I like Unger. The line hasn’t been that bad but Unger has been the weak link. He’s a rookie and I expect that. I want to see him handle the blitz a little bit better. More often than not he looks lost and loses his assignment.
ME! BANE!

by 






















