Field Gulls: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Interview With UMD Athletic Director, Dr. Debbie Yow

Auditing Last Season's Offseason Checklist, Pt. 2

Draft, Sign, Develop or Trade for a Starting Caliber Quarterback

Another move that should be done now, and not when the team is so destitute that it must look to the first round of the NFL draft to fill this need. Colt Brennan, John David Booty and/or Erik Ainge may all slip into the third round. Each, to my eyes, have what it takes to make it in the pros.

Ainge didn't see a snap before being suspended for steroid use. Brennan looks to be on the trajectory of the career backup. Booty's fate depends quite about on this next draft. I would have been happy to see any of the three take the field for Seattle in 2008. It's really way too early to know if any of the three has a future, but Seattle is again at square one in preparation for life after Hasselbeck. It's not a great group of quarterbacks, and I think I overestimated them before getting a better look, but if Seattle's unwilling to take a plunge on a top quarterback talent, continually drafting marginal talent and seeing if one develops beats the hell out of effectively doing nothing.

Permanently Covert Seneca Wallace to Wide Receiver

Wallace has the skills to be a Pro Bowl receiver, but nothing more than an adequate quarterback. Seattle needs a quarterback in place who can eventually supplant Matt Hasselbeck, they need a #1 wide receiver right now. The offseason is the perfect time to commit to turning the 27 y/o old Wallace into a full-time wide receiver. At the same time, Wallace could still be the emergency, third string quarterback.

Seattle did move Wallace to wide receiver, but only in desperation. Wallace was injured returning a punt and the experiment was permanently shelved. If Wallace is to become a competent wide receiver, the team needs to commit to it, not half step. The chance of that happening is quickly approaching zero.

Extend a Long Term Contract to Mike Clark and Darren Krein

The Seahawks strength and conditioning coaches are clearly doing a bang-up job. Taking care of this little stuff can pay huge dividends in team health.

Seattle suffered a slew of injuries in 2008, but broken bones, torn muscles and torn tendons are not the fault of the strength and conditioning coaches. I stand by the above. Both are still on staff.

Clear Up the Running Back Mess

It's not necessary that Seattle use an early round draft pick on a running back. A late round pick, or a low cost castoff like Julius Jones or Mewelde Moore would more than suffice - that is, if Seattle needs to add another running back at all. What is for certain, though, is that Seattle must at the very least drop Shaun Alexander down the depth chart. Way down. Even considering the cap penalty, it is justifiable to outright cut Alexander, ideally after June 1st, so that it would be split over the 2008 and 2009 seasons. Alexander, at his very best as a rusher, is still a liability for his extremely poor play as a receiver. The Seahawks cannot hope to be the best team in football with Shaun Alexander as their starting tailback.

Seattle cleared up its running back mess only to create another. I never understood why Seattle insisted on keeping Maurice Morris after signing Jones. Morris is a quality running back, and if Seattle retained him and didn't sign Jones, I would have been fine with it. Mike Holmgren does not do two running backs. He flirted with it in 2008, but when push came to shove, he rode his horse. The team was worse for it. Jones was pissed. Morris is a free agent. TJ Duckett could never escape short yardage downs. The team, despite having its two starting running backs on the roster all of last season, has more questions then answers entering 2009. Is Duckett a viable every down back. Is Jones?

Offer DJ Hackett a 1-Year, Incentive Laden Contract

No team in its right mind would offer Hackett a long term contract after a career wracked with injuries. At the same time, any and every team could use Hackett's talent. For Hackett, his goal is clearly long term security, and that's all about getting paid. He must know that his most recent season is not going to give him the leverage to demand much in free agency. The obvious solution is to offer Hackett an incentive laden one-year offer that will net him some scratch this season, and free him up to get paid next season - Should he earn it.

Tim Ruskell gave some lip service to Hackett exploring free agency, but Seattle still having interest in re-signing, but if Seattle had interest in re-signing Hackett, letting him explore free agency is fundamentally stupid. It's like me telling my wife that I still love her, but want her to date. I could always match their offer, honey. Seattle should have signed Hackett to a one-year, incentive laden contract, and after seeing Hacks suck wind in Carolina, I think they could have. Hackett cost less against Carolina's cap in 2008 than he did against Seattle's cap in 2007. Ruskell rightfully didn't overvalue Hackett the way some did, but Jesus Christ could Seattle have used him in 2008. Hackett is likely on his way out in Carolina, and though he proved he can be very valuable used correctly, I don't foresee Ruskell wasting the long distance minutes. Which seems to be another trademark of the Ruskell administration: stubbornness.

0 recs  |  Comment 36 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

"but broken bones, torn muscles and torn tendons are not the fault of the strength and conditioning coaches. "

They aren’t? What exactly are they responsible for, then? They get the credit when everyone’s healthy as a horse, but not when the biblical plague of injuries comes?

And I’m not basing this off of the regular season injuries either. Something didn’t seem right as early as training camp, where just about everyone and their brothers were missing time due to back ailments.

"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."

by Fearless Frog on Feb 12, 2009 3:51 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

I think the strength and conditioning coach's job is strength and conditioning

I’m not sure what kind of conditioning can be done to prevent a torn pec or a broken collar bone. Or, for that matter, a bulging disk. I’ve always felt Seattle is committed to strength and conditioning. I mean, who would Seattle’s designated fat body be, Howard Green? Seems like a pretty fit group.

by John Morgan on Feb 12, 2009 3:58 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Oh, okay. I see what you mean.

I suppose we could make a case for Pork Chop but his frequent injury history already speaks for itself.

"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."

by Fearless Frog on Feb 12, 2009 4:15 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

In my experience being involved with personal training

If their job is only Strength and Conditioning you have to wonder who is in charge of the rest of what a personal trainer would do for a client.

A large part of it is to discover peoples imbalances and to get them from overusing one part of their body in preference of another.

So like Chris Spencer having back troubles could really be the result of him having weak glutes and hamstrings to pull him upright, so he’s compensating by over-utilizing his back muscles, causing the strain.

Certainly football will cause injuries on its own (broken collar bones, knees), but its certainly possible our S & C coaches are focusing to much on strength and not enough body mechanics.

by Justise on Feb 12, 2009 5:22 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

"Ruskell rightfully didn't overvalue Hackett the way some did, but Jesus Christ could Seattle have used him in 2008"

Seattle could’ve used an other injured receiver in ’08? :)

I think they go after another project QB this draft, in the 3-5 rounds. Not sure who though or if it’s worth it. Seneca Wallace is signed for two more years, they’d better find someone to groom soon, not sure how much Matt has left

by B.B.Finnegan on Feb 12, 2009 4:23 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

See

I think they’re here

the team is so destitute that it must look to the first round of the NFL draft to fill this need

And I’d wager money they take Stafford at four.

by John Morgan on Feb 12, 2009 4:25 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

As much as I want Crabtree

I think Stafford or Sanchez is the right call.

by Nate Dogg on Feb 12, 2009 4:25 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

this does seem to be the appropriate year to take a QB

unfortunately i’m not so high on either quarterback, though I could easily be dead wrong. If they pick one, I’d be happy to be dead wrong. It’s just that Crabtree seems like a can’t miss star player. Such a tough decision.

by B.B.Finnegan on Feb 12, 2009 5:55 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

really? I don't see the urgency.

Hass is a pro bowl calibre Quarterback.
In my opinion, he couldn’t justify playing a season with spare wide receiver parts.
First it was Engram, then then injury dominos all started falling.

we aren’t very fare away from pollard in the end zone in greenbay (what was that???).
He is a quality QB when he has chemistry with his weapons.

CRABTREE!

Cogito Ergo Sum

by censor1979 on Feb 12, 2009 11:14 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

You're ignoring Hass' extensive injury history

which is becoming more and more of an issue.

In my opinion, he couldn’t justify playing a season with spare wide receiver parts.

I’m sure that bulging disc in his back had nothing to do with him not playing a full season. Clearly the blame rests with the receivers.

by BrianL on Feb 12, 2009 11:23 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I just think.....

losing so many starters was to much to justify playing all dinged up.
If they started out 4-4 it might have made it easier to lace em up with the disc problem.

Cogito Ergo Sum

by censor1979 on Feb 12, 2009 11:28 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Matt was far more than "dinged up"

That bulging disc was a causing other problems

The back problem is affecting a nerve in Hasselbeck’s lower back, coach Mike Holmgren said, and is also creating a weakness in Hasselbeck’s leg that brought on the knee injury. Hasselbeck left for Los Angeles to see a medical specialist after Sunday’s loss to the Green Bay Packers and was there Monday.:

Matt is 34 and has a long injury history. The odds are stacked against him, so it would be prudent for the Seahawks to begin looking for a new franchise quarterback sooner rather than later.

by BrianL on Feb 12, 2009 11:38 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

They should always be looking for that.

just not at #4 (not this year)
and you don’t pass up a chance to pick so high by trading down.

 

Cogito Ergo Sum

by censor1979 on Feb 13, 2009 8:45 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Am I reading this wrong? Because it doesn't seem to make sense.

Tim Ruskell gave some lip service to Hackett exploring free agency, but Seattle still having interest in re-signing, but if Seattle had interest in re-signing Hackett, letting him explore free agency is fundamentally stupid.

by Coach Owens on Feb 12, 2009 4:36 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Tim Ruskell said he was interested in re-signing Hackett

but also said he would let Hackett see what other teams would offer. Obviously, if a team is truly interested in re-signing a player, they will try to re-sign him before he talks with other teams. Seattle wouldn’t have endorsed Marcus Trufant talking with other teams. It lowers the chance Seattle will sign him, and potentially increases his price.

by John Morgan on Feb 12, 2009 4:50 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree, I don't think he intended to sign him at all

It’s not like Carolina offered him a whole heck of a lot that we couldn’t have matched anyway. I think he thought Hackett was a good guy, but too injury prone, and he just didn’t want to hurt any feelings so he said all the right things. Too bad the rest of our receivers ended up being just about as injury prone.

by B.B.Finnegan on Feb 12, 2009 6:00 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Colt Brennan, John David Booty and/or Erik Ainge may all slip into the third round. Each, to my eyes, have what it takes to make it in the pros.

Thank the lord Jesus on high that you are not the GM of this team. Not a one of those guys was a day one pick, and you can’t have seriously watched any one of them play and thought to yourself “Yes, this guy could be a quality starter in the NFL.” None of them have arm strength that is anything above average, Booty couldn’t throw the ball down field in college (but he’s supposed to be able to in the NFL?) and Brennan was a kid with HUGE character concerns who played rarely (and poorly) against top college competition. The only one with a shot was Ainge, but he’s a guy who had injury problems his entire college career and really, if you ever watched him, he was unimpressive and his success his senior year was an artifact of the talent on Tennessee’s offensive line.
Did any one of them have a chance of even being better than Seneca Wallace? Nope. Not even close really.

by Seahawker on Feb 12, 2009 5:47 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Yes, their careers really turned out to be disappointing.

How could anyone have expected these highly productive college quarterbacks to have outplayed Seneca “Arm Cannon” Wallace in the NFL?

by Nate Dogg on Feb 12, 2009 5:50 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Wait what?

First off, it seems like JM was partly just throwing out mid round names.
Second off, to write any of these guys off after one year would be insane. Tom Brady, Kurt Warner, Matt Hasselbeck, etc. Plenty of QBs who did nothing their first year.

by LantermanC on Feb 12, 2009 7:11 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Brennan wasn't bad in preseason.

he might flourish with Zorn as his coach.
I mean no Zorn, Alexander……. Plackemeier, only 4 wins.
Coincidence?
sorry I get a little choked up.

Cogito Ergo Sum

by censor1979 on Feb 12, 2009 11:23 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

But the exceptions are irrelevant.

It’s a cardinal rule that Correlation != causation, unless one has concrete evidence, which you clearly do not.

by redwolf75 on Feb 13, 2009 10:35 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Great write up.

I laughed pretty hard at this bit:

“Ruskell rightfully didn’t overvalue Hackett the way some did, but Jesus Christ could Seattle have used him in 2008.”

The use of Jesus Christ was wholly appropriate. I was pissed when the Seahawks let Hackett walk for the same money Mare got, and was beside myself as I watched the brutal opening weeks of the Season when any living, breathing WR could have been the difference in perhaps a 2-2 or 3-1 start.

by kearly on Feb 12, 2009 6:36 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

How many games did Hackett play this year?

9 games 2 starts. Why was that? He was injured. He started when Steve Smith was suspend and then he disappeared. After week 4, he had a whopping 3 catches for 50 yards. If DJ was on the team, he would have volunteered to be the first WR on IR, cutting Ben Obamanu who broke a collarbone.

by Built2Spill on Feb 12, 2009 10:11 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Not to mention he was so bad in the rare occasion that he did play that the Panthers are likely cutting bait.

And Mare was money well spent.

"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."

by Fearless Frog on Feb 13, 2009 11:25 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree they should have found a way to sign Hackett. Good call, but...

but if Seattle had interest in re-signing Hackett, letting him explore free agency is fundamentally stupid.

How do you know the Seahawks didn’t make Hackett an offer before he hit free agency? Often a player will ask for too much before they hit free agency and it would be dumb to sign them at that point. Then the player ends up signing with someone for much less in free agency when they see how much less they are worth than they thought they were.

by Marshal on Feb 12, 2009 10:51 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Or Hutch signs a poison pill. On the other hand, Leroy Hill passes out in his hooptie with weed on him.

TR rarely, if his public statements are to be believed, negotiates deals during the season. It’s a philosophy too uniformly applied in my opinion. Some players are loyal and can be signed to fair deals if they’re made to feel wanted by negotiating prior to free agency.

Better to piss off a few guys with expiring contracts then every one of them.

by lemonverbena on Feb 12, 2009 11:54 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

The best time period to make offers

is right now, after the season, before free agency hits. And we know they made offers to Hutchinson before he hit free agency. The offer would have made him the highest paid guard in history, just not the crazy highest paid guard, like the contract Minn gave him.

by Marshal on Feb 13, 2009 8:02 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Takes two at the table.

Players want to hit Free Agency … it drives their price up. Even if they plan on signing with their original team, they want to know their market value.

IMO, Ruskell has shown that when players are willing to negotiate, and there’s a known baseline out there of what their services are worth, he can get deals done early. The Lofa extension. extending Babs before FA, the offers to Hutch that would’ve made him the highest paid OG, etc …. .

by jteckmann on Feb 13, 2009 9:15 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Fair enough point,

There have been exceptions, as you noted above (Lofa = good, Babs = hmm). I still think TR was the “right” hire, but naybe I’m still biased against his philosophy because of the Hutch fuckup. I still think his stance tends to alienate some players that might otherwise be mollified by earlier gestures at the very least.

by lemonverbena on Feb 13, 2009 10:46 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

It's a fine balancing act, for sure.

How early do you want to start making gestures? After Jennings 2nd year, he looked like a keeper (still may be, but looks less certain) … but jump the gun to early, and you’re stuck in a worse contract if a player regresses. Once a player reaches the final year of the deal, they have little incentive to re-up before FA. Take Tru’s situation – the club’s offering $$ based on what last years top CB signed for, but he’s going to want to see what money Nate Clements gets, and then base his demands off that. I’m sure the same thing is going on in Hill & his agent’s minds.

The few squabbles TR has had all seem to be special circumstances, IMO. There was D-Jack, but that seemed to be rooted in some broken promise from prior management. Engram’s complaints seem justified, but then you consider the team treated him very well when he had his thyroid condition.

The Hutch thing was such a soap-opera on all sides, with a perfect storm of bad mojo. There were good faith gestures from TR. But then there was a new CBA, an extreme jump in cap space, an agent who had his own agenda in setting the market for OG’s = with OT’s and reportedly the last minute push by Reinfeldt to go with the Transition Tag … Oh, and then a special ruling upholding the poison pill that even the NFL head office argued against …… In other words, I think the whole thing was such an outlier that I have a difficult time pinning it all on TR or his negotiating philosophy. Just my thoughts on it, though.

by jteckmann on Feb 13, 2009 12:09 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

This.

Although I must say I don’t like his adamant refusal to negotiate contracts before free agency.

"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."

by Fearless Frog on Feb 14, 2009 10:16 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Hail to the greatest Seahawk to ever live: Walter Junior Jones.
Start posting about the Seahawks »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Comcast NFL RedZone Moments from SB Nation

Music City Miracles
Tennessee Titans Red Zone Report
Bleeding Green Nation
Comcast NFL Red Zone stat of the week - Something doesn't have to give
Niners Nation
49ers Red Zone numbers: How effective are they?

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Jack22_small
Super Bowl XLIV Open Thread
Olympiabeer_small
My problem with the Colts winning-- the absence of immortality.
Small
Random Super Bowl Thoughts
Profilepic_small
Diamonds in the Rough
Jack22_small
"Pro Bowl" "Open Thread"
Seattle_seahawks_small
Pro Bowl Folly
Small
Kerney Retires?
Nielson_small
Replacing Matt Hasselbeck
Sketch_haggar_small
USC Recruiting 2002-2009 Offensive Line
Profilepic_small
Nicknames for the 'Hawks

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Arrowhead Pride
Chiefs Give Missouri Teachers A Discount On Season Tickets
Arrowhead Pride
Mystery Candidate For Donte Stallworth Emerges
Turf Show Times
Charges dropped against Steven Jackson

Managers

Image_114_small Shrug

Jj_flag_detail1_small John Morgan

Whiteken_small Scruffy Lefty

Small BrianL

Small abender20

Authors

Vp081-c_small Christian

Small Doug Farrar

Dksbtwit_small Johnny Peel (DKSB)