Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Clippers Need To Realize That Spurs Are The Anti-Grizzlies

Clayton Spurns Hawks for Bucs

Pewter Report has the scoop -- the Bucs have re-signed receiver Michael Clayton to a new five-year contract. The interesting part of the story is that Clayton turned down more money from Seattle to stay in Tampa Bay.

I'm not sure how much money Clayton got, the deal being very new and all, but this seems to be to be as good a bullet-dodge as there is, and yet another ding in my opinion of Tim Ruskell's ability to evaluate receivers. Clayton hasn't posted a positive DVOA since his rookie season of 2004, has been outplayed by Joey Galloway, Ike Hilliard and Antonio Bryant in the last few seasons, and isn't even a lock to start despite the new deal. And Tampa Bay's receiver situation isn't much better than Seattle's - Pewter Report also mentions that a certain Mr. T.J. Whosyourmama will visit Tampa in the near future.

Sometimes, you succeed by not getting what you think you want. This, I suspect, is an example of that particular phenomenon.

UPDATE: According to the St. Petersburg Times, Clayton got five years, $10.5 million guaranteed, and as much as $26 million based on certain incentives. Here's an intresting wrinkle:

Tampa Bay's 2004 first-round pick agreed to terms on a five-year contract with the Bucs, who stepped in with a lucrative deal just as Clayton was preparing to make a free agent visit to Seattle. He was 90 minutes from boarding a flight Saturday when the Bucs called and the sides struck an agreement in principle.

Again, ***whew***. Now, "free-agent visit" doesn't sound like an offer of more money than Tampa Bay was offering, unless the Seahawks had to promise to up the ante just to get Clayton on the plane. Pewter Report isn't generally wrong, but I really hope they are this time.

And as far as what the market will bear, consider that the Lions just signed former Cardinals and 49ers receiver Bryant Johnson to a three-year, $9 million deal. Not that Johnson would be some great fit for Seattle - he's pretty much a straight-line guy. But both Johnson and Clayton were disappointing first round picks -- Johnson in 2003 and Clayton in 2004, and there's very little difference in career production even when you include Clayton's outlier of a rookie season:

Per-season averages:

Johnson: 43 catches, 537 yards, 2 TD
Clayton: 41 catches, 541 yards, 1.8 TD

If the Bucs want to overpay for limited production at the wide receiver position, that's their problem -- actually, it's been their problem for a very long time. But if Ruskell, who was obviously part of that problem in Tampa Bay, hasn't learned from those mistakes, there's trouble in the Emerald City.

Comment 29 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

::Wipes sweat from brow::

Thank you, Tampa.

"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."

by Fearless Frog on Feb 28, 2009 9:19 PM PST reply actions  

Huh.

Well, more power to to him, if he really would rather spend time in (gag) Tampa than Seattle.

"It's just one big guy against another big guy, both teams know what's at stake. The one of them comes out on top and it feels good."
-Chris Collinsworth, Madden 09

by Wayward Llama on Feb 28, 2009 9:19 PM PST reply actions  

Shoot, I'D certainly rather him staying in Tampa than here.

Adam Shefter reports it’s unlikely Housh is leaving Minnesota without a contract. That’s that.

"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."

by Fearless Frog on Feb 28, 2009 9:39 PM PST up reply actions  

Kinda hard to believe

because they did give Bernard Berrian a 6 year/42 million dollar contract last year. I think they should have been the ones trading for Matt Cassel because that is the only piece they are missing. Why they think they can win with mediocre quarterbacks, I have no idea. Berrian’s a speedster and Bobby Wade is definately a more than adequate slot receiver in my opinion. Also, Sydney Rice is a big target capable of making catches. So I don’t really think wide receiver is their biggest need right now. But, Mr. Wylfe does love to spend money.

by SoCalHawksFan on Feb 28, 2009 9:48 PM PST up reply actions  

This.

I’m sort of at a loss as to why he even extended a contract to someone like Clayton.

"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."

by Fearless Frog on Feb 28, 2009 10:29 PM PST up reply actions  

So he has an excuse not to draft Crabtree

"It's just one big guy against another big guy, both teams know what's at stake. The one of them comes out on top and it feels good."
-Chris Collinsworth, Madden 09

by Wayward Llama on Feb 28, 2009 10:37 PM PST up reply actions  

Obviously that's the first thought that pops into everyone's head, but someone like Clayton wouldn't even fit the bill.

I mean, if we signed Housh or someone similar, it would at least be a reasonable excuse…but Michael Clayton? O_o That’s just odd. He would barely be #4 on the depth chart, and Ruskell can’t possibly think the fanbase would be appeased with a pedestrian signing like that.

"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."

by Fearless Frog on Feb 28, 2009 11:26 PM PST up reply actions  

at this point

a lot of people would be appeased by any movement whatsoever.

But I get what you’re saying. Clayton is a big-mouthed, butterfingered dolt, just like Jerramy Stevens. Just skimming the FA WR list, there are plenty of guys I’d rather bring in than Clayton.

With the hilarious addition of Kellen Winslow, the Bucs are going to be a circus this coming year.

"It's just one big guy against another big guy, both teams know what's at stake. The one of them comes out on top and it feels good."
-Chris Collinsworth, Madden 09

by Wayward Llama on Feb 28, 2009 11:34 PM PST up reply actions  

I really hope Ruskell doesn't give a damn about fan base reactions.

Denver fans are calling for McDaniel’s and Xander’s head right now, but if they’re in the playoffs come January no one will remember some stupid Cutler trade rumors. Just win, baby.

by Nate Dogg on Feb 28, 2009 11:39 PM PST up reply actions  

We should see if they want to trade Cutler for Russell.

"It's just one big guy against another big guy, both teams know what's at stake. The one of them comes out on top and it feels good."
-Chris Collinsworth, Madden 09

by Wayward Llama on Feb 28, 2009 11:47 PM PST up reply actions  

Not necessarily the fanbase reaction..

But the fact that Clayton is a bad receiver and would probably make the offense worse.

"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."

by Fearless Frog on Mar 1, 2009 8:55 AM PST up reply actions  

IMO it depends on what the contract details were

If it was an incentive-laden, backloaded deal predicated on Clayton regaining his rookie form or he’s cast off, then I wouldn’t have had a problem with it.

If TR was offering a lot of upfront $$$ then … shudders … my optimism of us ever regaining an above average passing game continues to circle the drain.

by jteckmann on Feb 28, 2009 10:53 PM PST up reply actions  

Agreed

I refuse to take this at face value:

According to the Duemig, Clayton turned down more money with Seattle to re-sign with Tampa Bay.

NFL contracts are notoriously convoluted and without knowing the guaranteed and incentives, I think it’s fair to be a bit cynical about the purport that Clayton turned down more money to stay in Tampa. I mean, why? The Bucs do not even have a starting quarterback.

by John Morgan on Mar 1, 2009 12:23 AM PST up reply actions  

I agree

Without knowing more about the contract I won’t know what to think about this.

by SPENCEMAN on Mar 1, 2009 12:34 AM PST up reply actions  

weather?

I’m deadly serious. Some people just hate hate hate the rain. Seattle doesn’t exactly have a party-town reputation, either.

by djafrot on Mar 1, 2009 12:50 PM PST up reply actions  

Matt Cassel is an example of Pioli's NE fetish

Holmgren had a big Green Bay fetish when he showed up.

I think every coach & GM in the NFL would rather go with a known commodity over a complete unknown. They like to stick with guys that they’ve worked with, heavily scouted in the past, or have trusted recommendations for.

You see it with every single team, every year – players rejoining former coaches. Ruskell’s hardly unique in that regard, and I think he’s unfairly slammed for it at times.

by jteckmann on Mar 1, 2009 9:27 AM PST up reply actions  

I read this as Ruskell is "desperate" for WR talent with experience

and if we were willing to go hard after Clayton, we probably did go hard after Housh. According to John Clayton a minute ago on ESPN News, Housh is deciding between Cincy, Vikes and Hawks and he believes Hawks have the edge. The visit by Clayton may have been a fallback in the event they don’t get Housh, and with Tampa shutting that door, I expect Hawks to be even more aggressive trying to lock up Housh.

by diehard82 on Mar 1, 2009 10:15 AM PST reply actions  

I hope by 'aggressive' they don't mean 10 million a year.

That’s simply ludicrous for someone like Housh.

"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."

by Fearless Frog on Mar 1, 2009 10:36 AM PST up reply actions  

Yeah, I heard.

And Moss is arguably the best receiver in the league. Housh…is a good #2, something like a larger Bobby Engram, but not even close to a game-changer.

"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."

by Fearless Frog on Mar 1, 2009 11:04 AM PST up reply actions  

true

you cannot compare Moss to TJ, it’s not even close.

by djafrot on Mar 1, 2009 12:51 PM PST up reply actions  

That's my point...

Moss is 10 times the player TJ is and is even younger to boot.

by redwolf75 on Mar 1, 2009 1:19 PM PST up reply actions  

Which is sort of odd when you think about it because it seems like Moss has been in the league forever.

Perhaps its because he was shattering records left and right as a rookie so his impact was more noticed.

"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."

by Fearless Frog on Mar 1, 2009 1:32 PM PST up reply actions  

You know, I've been waiting, and waiting, and waiting for Seattle do do something

And I wake up to this.

"It's just one big guy against another big guy, both teams know what's at stake. The one of them comes out on top and it feels good."
-Chris Collinsworth, Madden 09

by Wayward Llama on Mar 1, 2009 1:41 PM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SEA!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Einstein_www-txt2pic-com_small
A Fan's Reflection: Things I've Learned from a Casual 12th
Small
Seahawks Sacks: Statistical Analysis

Recent FanPosts

Marty_small
You should want Flynn to be our starter this year
Small
Fountain of Eternal Youth: Predicting the Week 1 Seahawks Roster
Horsey_small
Why Russell Wilson will be the starting QB for the Seattle Seahawks
Small
Golden Tate not at (voluntary) practice, big deal or not?
Small
Is it just me or does Mike Williams look fat?
Small
2012 Seahawks Draft Hopes vs. Expectations
Hawkface_small
Seahawk Greatness
Horsey_small
The Young Seahawks

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editor/Lead Writer

Screen_shot_2012-05-04_at_10 Danny Kelly

Staff Writers/Editors

Screen_shot_2011-01-05_at_9 Scruffy Lefty

Small BrianL

Avatar_small Benne

Olympiabeer_small Tyler Jorgensen

Hatersgonnahate_small Thomas Beekers

Profilepic_small DJ C-Raig

897267_o_small Kenneth Arthur

Sbn_pic_small Jacson Bevens

Photo__1__small Charlie Todaro

Staff Writers

Small Joshua Kasparek

Photo_small Matt Erickson

Davis_small Davis Hsu

Profile2_small Rob Staton

208114_505637750968_23709013_30160241_9483_n_small Scott Enyeart

Elephant_pink_clothes_small Chris Sully

Seattle_seahawk_white_1600_reasonably_small_small Derek Stephens

Ace_small Ben Harbaugh

Bu_fb_2_small Daniel Hill

Rob_small Rob Davies