Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Knicks Beat Lakers With Familiar Strategy

2008 Season Retrospective: Darryl Tapp

Darryl Tapp

Overview: Rookie Lawrence Jackson started ahead of Tapp until week 7. Tapp didn't win the job; Jackson lost it. On a depleted defensive end rotation, Tapp made up for missed time, recording 5.5 sacks in those eleven starts and ending the season as Seattle's most active end, playing nearly two-thirds of all defensive snaps.

What Went Wrong: Jackson starting ahead of Tapp. Jackson didn't so much earn the spot as be appointed. A pass rush is hugely dependent on the front four. Seattle rushes just four on about two-third of all plays, and even when a blitzer or three is added, the thrust of the rush comes from the defensive line. Swapping Jackson for Tapp weakened the entire pass rush, from allowing easy double teams on Kerney, to allowing guards and centers to peel off and pick up free blitzers or apply a double team.

What Went Right: Tapp is solid exactly as he is. He's consistently disruptive, able to beat about any type of tackle, and not so bad in run support as to be a liability. Tapp has a great first step, good dip, good inside move, good rip and a capable bull rush, plus the kind of suddenness to convert penetration into a sack. He makes those around him better.

Quintessential Game: Seahawks at 49ers

Seattle 34 - San Francisco 13

3-2-SF 39 (5:38)

Niners, 4 WR (2 Left/2 Right0, Rb. Seattle in a 4-1 Dime. At the snap, Tapp explodes on a nice short angled edge rush that pulls Adam Snyder wide. This is important because an offensive line is strongest when its compact, as it bows and players are isolated pass rushing gaps appear. Tapp's edge rush and Brandon Mebane's forced double team isolates Tony Wragge and Bernard is able to exploit the gaping "C" gap on Wragge's right. From there it's just a good skill and talent showing by Bernard as he closes on Hill and swats the ball from his hand. It's two games, but it's good to see Tapp back.

Outlook: Tapp turns 25 next September. 2009 is his walk season. Seattle would be best served to lock him up now, but won't. Instead, expect Tapp to be franchised and paid a little too much next season. Tapp is entering his prime seasons, but he won't enjoy a huge mid-career breakout. Instead, he should start hovering around double digit sacks for the next three seasons or so. In between those sacks he'll be the guy forcing off balance throws and check downs, bowing the pocket and being an unassuming difference maker.

Comment 9 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

It's a shame Lawrence Jackson was handed the starting job just because he was a first round pick.

And a slight reach, at that.

"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."

by Fearless Frog on Mar 10, 2009 3:23 PM PDT reply actions  

Only 25 entering next season

with 3 years in already, damn right Ruskell should lock him up now. " unassuming difference maker" is an apt description, and along with Wilson, fast becoming my favorite Seahawk.

by Dukeshire on Mar 10, 2009 3:30 PM PDT reply actions  

Franchised in 2010?

He’s got a long way to go to earn that one year salary. Got to be near $10M/year for defensive linemen.

by stallz on Mar 10, 2009 3:33 PM PDT reply actions  

True that

Of course, there’s this whole CBA mess to work out, so who knows what the financial landscape will look like, or if the FT is a legitimate option after the new one’s in place.

by jteckmann on Mar 10, 2009 8:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

John, could you

give a tape review of Tapp’s run defense skills? I had emailed Doug, before the season had started, after reading Pro Football Prospectus 2008 and noticing that Tapp had the best run defense numbers on the team. And the trustable reports from training camp, like from Farnsworth, indicated the coaches wanted a run defense upgrade and that was partially the reason they were leaning toward starting Jackson over Tapp.

My speculation, to Doug, was whether Leroy Hill being on that side of the defense most often could have contributed to teams were puptting a hat or hats on blocking Hill, which opened up more rushes towards Tapp, and he responded, or whether he really was that good at run defense and no one noticed.

I’ve gone back and watched the Miami game, from last year, and on Wild Cat snaps he was awful, he was frozen. He doesn’t have super quick reaction, and the Wild Cat exploited that, but aside from that, I didn’t see any actual mis-steps against the run. I’ve re-watched a couple games now, trying to gauge how good Tapp is against the run, but I still can’t tell.

I figure, he couldn’t have been 8th best in the league against the run among all DEs and the coaches still would think he’s a liability. They could be very wrong on him, easily, but I can’t imagine he’d have been that good and it would be completely lost on them. I figure, something else has to account for that gap. OK it’s late and I’m running out the door, but I’ll post the PFP2008 front seven run defense numbers tomorrow if anyone’s interested.

by jacobstevens on Mar 10, 2009 6:15 PM PDT reply actions  

Concerns over the run defense killed that unit last year

Think about it. Starting LoJack instead of Tapp early in the year was done for run D. Moving Deon Grant into the box and leaving Russell back was done to improve the run D. What did it get them? Pass D giving up big plays. So what was the concern? Was it more an over-confidence in the pass D, or was it a true concern about the ability of the 2007 front seven to stop the run?

by Section 128 on Mar 11, 2009 12:06 PM PDT reply actions  

Both?

Particularly, overconfidence in the secondary to perform when pass rush broke down.

Maybe there wasn’t actual, significant concern about stopping the run, but acknowledgement about Jackson, and covering Russell up / putting him in position to capitalize on his “strengths,” particularly because the former directly made the latter more of an issue.

And it brings up the question about what Russell’s bigger weakness was, angles/tackling, or his lost step and inability to get in position. I think before the season started it was the former, and the latter developed this season, as it wasn’t as much of an issue prior. Now? I dunno, angles/tackling by a hair.

by jacobstevens on Mar 11, 2009 2:43 PM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SEA!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Avatar_small
The Official Field Gulls OT Thread - In Which We Gush About Our Favorite TV Shows

Recent FanPosts

Photo_on_2011-10-14_at_23
Jim Harbaugh Vs. Pete Carroll
Small
Nation Wide Mock Draft
Small
Could Dre Kirkpatrick be the key to our 2012 draft?
Einstein_www-txt2pic-com_small
Seahawks QB Situation: Not a Defense for Tarvaris Jackson
Small
Team Needs - The National Perception of Seattle
Small
2012 Mock Draft, Version 1.0
Walshrun_small
Super Bowl XLVI Reaction: New England Patriots
Small
My Friend has a Friend who works for Nike...
208114_505637750968_23709013_30160241_9483_n_small
GM John Schneider On The Ideal QB
Bodypaint_small
Delocated ad

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editor/Lead Writer

284430_601240951600_44900771_32958650_2317286_n_small Danny Kelly

Staff Writers/Editors

Screen_shot_2011-01-05_at_9 Scruffy Lefty

Small BrianL

Avatar_small Benne

Olympiabeer_small Tyler Jorgensen

Hatersgonnahate_small Thomas Beekers

Profilepic_small DJ C-Raig

897267_o_small Kenneth Arthur

Halloween_mobster_small Jacson Bevens

Photo__1__small Charlie Todaro

Staff Writers

Small Joshua Kasparek

Mail Matt Erickson

Davis_small Davis Hsu

Profile2_small Rob Staton

208114_505637750968_23709013_30160241_9483_n_small Scott Enyeart

Elephant_pink_clothes_small Chris Sully

Seattle_seahawk_white_1600_reasonably_small_small Derek Stephens

Osprey1_small Ben Harbaugh

Easleystreet2_small ChadDavis45

Bu_fb_2_small Daniel Hill