That said, what do you expect his contract to look like?

…because if you look at the straight Knapp offense in Atlanta/SF, there isn’t much room at the inn. This is obviously what Duckett was signed for, right? Maybe he can play the part of Anthony Fasano if they run some Wildcat? Oh, wait, there’s John Carlson for that. David Martin, then.

I don’t like to pull numbers out of my whatsis with no basis, but I’d guesstimate a couple years at a couple mil per, for potential’s sake. That includes guaranteed, with a 30-40 percent lop-off if he doesn’t make the life of the deal for whatever reason.

Solid runner, good receiver, above average pass blocking, lead blocking might leave a little to be desired. I’m surprised no team is interested in him as a hybrid-third down back, a creative OC should be able to use him really effectively in a RBBC situation.

But it would be cool if he came back!

  Yes, Weaver and agent are asking to much – reason he hasn’t been signed yet. I am not sure that Seattle wants him back that badly… Griffith is a pure FB and a good blocker and will be signed soon, if Weaver doesn’t make it back – I’d say by next week.
   Remember that Weaver was almost cut a couple years ago, and in one play was given an opportunity to play (by the SeaHawks). He has learned and then last year had a DECENT year, not great, but decent and now he thinks he deserves RB money? What a laugh… don’t most FB run the ball a few times a season? Don’t some even catch the ball a few times? And ALL of them block — Weavers very weak point. If we are going to run more, and I have no doubt to say otherwise when the coaching staff says they will, then a Lead blocker is what we need in that position. He has showed his gratitude, (that he has NO LOYALTY to us, but, trying out the market – personally and for the Seahawks, they don’t need a player that is NOT loyal. We have RBs and FBs… don’t kid yourself,,, Owens may be a little raw, but, bringing in a Griffith, will only help him learn his job better and faster… Good bye Weaver – nice to see you on another team – Sorry about the punctuation, try to live with it… this is the way I write – being a writer you should be able to understand what I have said.

  He can’t get a RB postions because he isn’t one. He wants the money for something that no team has seen him do for any length of time. You people can laugh all you want. I notice that you all stick together just like a family, tho. How nice. Too bad my opinions differ from yours. I thot this was a free speech forum, but guess I was mistaken. I can be incorrect and many of you usually are wrong. Try looking at all the angles before you write an article on a subject. John, and another guy here are the only two worth really reading, but, John, you do an excellent job in writing. I could have had this finished in half the time, if you guys would let me string my thots
   Anyhow, if given the opportunity to write my opinions here again, please try to focus on the subject of my opinions.
   I know in places I usually write, the others don’t just make all snide remarks about my punctuation and ellipses, instead of the subject. You are downright wrong in doing that if you want to gain viewers, John.

  As the running game is supposed to be put into effect, I would imagine that Weaver would have a lot more carries and there would be more plays for him. I don’t know if he talked that over with the Seahawks before he went out to search, but, he should have listened to an offer, and maybe did. But, until he proves he can be a RB, he isn’t. A small raise would be in order, for sure, but, I have no idea what they are asking for his services. But, if he signs with somebody else, a good pure blocking FB will be there for us.