Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Peyton Manning Medically Cleared To Resume NFL Career

Cedric Peerman at 104

Cedric Peerman

Birthdate: October 10, 1986

Height/Weight: 5'9 1/2"/216

Position: RB

College: Virginia, 41 games played  

Notable Stats: Senior season: 153 rush attempts, 824 yards, 44 receptions, 193 yards, 7 touchdowns

NFL Combine: 4.45/40 (first overall), 40"/vert (second overall)

My take: Let's say this is an unusually weak running back class. A running back class comparable to last year's wide receiver class. Could the first round end without a running back selected? It would be the first time since 1963 -- the first time in the modern era. But it's not a stretch. The position has been devalued by an increasingly pass-centric league, and if not proven fungible outright, at least proven very deep. Only two running backs are considered first round talents, and that designation may be by default. It would not surprise me to read that many GMs do not see a significant difference between presumed first-rated running back Knowshon Moreno and presumed fifth-rated running back Andre Brown. The result would be that much like last year's receiver class, mid-round could become late-round talent and some team will awake to a steal.

That's a rather elaborate way of saying: I'm big fan of Cedric Peerman and think his mix of spotty production and injuries could make him a steal.

Rob Rang ranks Peerman as the 9th best running back in the 2009 class. In a typical draft, that would mean Peerman should be selected in the third to fourth round. If the first round passes without a running back selected, or if teams simply hold off on drafting a running back until there's some kind of run, like what happened with wide receivers in the 2008 draft, Peerman could fall to the late fourth or even fifth. He could fall to the late fourth or even fifth if the teams that value him select running backs early, or even if enough teams question his ability or health. There's a lot of ways this could play out, but suffice to say, running backs like Peerman have a lot of latitude. They could be snapped up early in the second day or nearly fall out of the draft.

Peerman won't fall out of the draft. He's not Yvenson Bernard. Bernard left it all at Reser. Anyone who wondered if Bernard lost his speed on the operating table could watch him plod down the track at the 2008 NFL Combine. Which is a shame, because I think Bernard would have been a hell of a pro when 21 and tearing up the Pac-10. Such is the life of a running back. Even many NFL backs keep their jobs over better, cheaper competition for the sake of tradition, respect and committed cap dollars. If I were a GM, I wouldn't ever re-sign a running back. I would pioneer the draft and burn method for building a rushing attack, never re-signing a one, knowing that for most their best is already behind them.

Which isn't to say running backs are insignificant. I watched the 1998 Atlanta Falcons ride Jamal Anderson to Super Bowl XXXIII, and I watched him crumble the following season. Running backs are hugely valuable. If not as valuable as the offensive line blowing open holes or the passing attack backpedaling linebackers and safeties, still the single most valuable component of a good rushing attack. The man that can make the broken stuff sufferable, the alright stuff good and the good stuff great.

And Seattle could use an upgrade.

Peerman suffered a Lisfranc injury in 2007. It's a foot injury and can be career altering or even career ending; it's all about the severity. Peerman returned his senior season and had the best season of his career. He had a solid Senior Bowl, but, y'know, five carries, before he -- fumbled. One couldn't think of a worse fate for the 8"-handed man. It was tantamount to Chase Daniels throwing every pass into his O-line's head (he's short you know) or BJ Raji breaking huddle with a chaos bong made out of Cheetos. Fumbles haven't been a problem for Peerman, but Ken-sized mitts are going to raise eyebrows. I think fumble data is more noise than meaningful, so this particular red flag fails to dissuade me. Peerman also excelled at the Combine. Don't say it doesn't matter, because for a prospect with lingering questions about his recovery from a major foot injury, a combine best showing in the 40 and a second place showing in the vert go a long way in saying "healed". If Peerman is healed, and no one can deny this, I disagree his injuries are recurrent or indicative of injury-proneness. It's a fairly common football injury and it's an injury that's befallen otherwise healthy players: Dwight Freeney, Ty Law and the never-injured Aaron Schobel.

Peerman's numbers aren't eye-popping. The Cavelier offense was stuck in the stables and the rushing attack was especially horseshit, but Peerman did average 1.7 yards per carry more than stablemate Mikell Simpson. Simpson's no slouch, he stepped in after Peerman's injury and "saved the 2007 season". That same article mentions that Simpson "often looks hesitant at the line". Maybe the line sucked at blowing open holes. Dave Te' Thomas writes Peerman has "a bit of a hitch coming out of his stance, preventing him from generating good explosion into the holes," which is so weird, because he tore up the first ten yards of the Combine. Combine results being Combine results and thus not definitive, one still wouldn't expect a player to run any different. Peerman reached ten as fast as Chris Johnson, .06 seconds faster than Jonathan Stewart, .1 second faster than Darren McFadden and .13 seconds faster than Rashard Mendenhall. I'm not trying to discount a scout I respect, but, I don't see it, it didn't show at the Combine and I can't help but wonder if maybe Virginia's line sucked at blowing open holes. "Oh hitch! There's a linebacker in the backfield!"

Peerman is a good mix of punishing inside force, good moves, tackle breaking ability and straight line speed. After all this build up, maybe it's time I stop spittin' and just let you see the guy run. It's this first part, the part before we learn that Cedric Peerman is an ordained minister*.

Star-divide

An ordained minister that excelled in the ACC -- I'm just saying. And if Seattle selects him in the fourth or fifth and runs him hard until the wheels fall off, and he puts a little punch and pizazz into the rushing attack, and Seattle shows some restraint and says sayonara before that first free agent contract, I'm just saying that would give Seattle's suddenly essential run game a major boost and a much better chance of being Awesome.

*Or if you're watching your daily allowance of hype:

Comment 14 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

YES YES YES

Caldwell is probably the better pick here but Pearman is the guy that really excites me. He’s probably why I’ve been so ambivalent towards a guy like Moreno.

by Nate Dogg on Apr 13, 2009 3:34 PM PDT reply actions  

"and that designation may be by default."

I disagree with this in the case of Moreno. One could make a convincing case he’s a top 10 talent falling because of last season’s splurge by every team getting a new runningback or three.

"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."

by Fearless Frog on Apr 13, 2009 4:06 PM PDT reply actions  

I'm not so sure about that

Backs that run 4.62 forties are rarely first round picks, much less top ten picks. I’m a Moreno backer, but not only is he slow, but he’ll get slower, and should he ever suffer a catastrophic injury, he’s going to be fullback slow.

by John Morgan on Apr 13, 2009 4:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

A secondary advantage towards the draft and dump strategy for RB's

is you will probably be dumping these guys at the peak of their hype. Which means you either get good trades for them, or you get good compensation for them in the form of compensatory picks. After Shaun Alexander crashed and burned, I became a big fan of this strategy. Why pay top dollar, when you can get similar production from a guy that cost’s 25-75% less (depending on the round you take him in)? We just need a good o-line that will allow us to plug in random RB’s.

by Fear on Apr 13, 2009 4:07 PM PDT reply actions  

Didn't Denver already pioneer the draft and burn strategy?

…and is it only a coincidence that they also were the ones who introduced zone blocking?

by Mr Fish on Apr 13, 2009 5:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yes and no, in that order.

They became famous for being able to turn any RB into a 1,000 yard back, and they would just dump off that back onto another team and grab a new one rather then pay top dollar to keep their RB’s. I doubt it was coincidence that they also used zone blocking.

by Fear on Apr 13, 2009 6:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

Denver and RBs

is like Oakland and Closers.

by LantermanC on Apr 13, 2009 7:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

Or me and women.

ZING!

Ahem.

Bucs and QBs could work.

"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."

by Fearless Frog on Apr 13, 2009 8:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

O_<

Ouch

"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."

by Fearless Frog on Apr 14, 2009 4:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

Draft and burn

I like it for RBs. How long are rookie contracts? Typically four or five years, I think. How many RBs in their fifth or sixth year are more productive than a rookie replacement of similar (or even lower) draft stock would be? What if we assume the RB is, say, Shaun Alexander, and he gets a load of carries during his rookie contract. The Seahawks almost certainly would have been considerably better off in the first year of Shaun’s free agent contract if they had instead drafted a RB somewhere in the first few rounds and let someone else pay Shaun the big bucks. I’m not sure how representative the Shaun scenario is, but it’s awfully compelling anecdotal evidence for draft and burn.

I suppose unerring adherance to draft and burn would lead to some unfortunate mistakes, like, say, getting rid of Tiki Barber while he still had a number of very productive years in him. But then I don’t think Tiki was a feature back and so probably didn’t have the durability concerns of a Shaun Alexander. And I did have to think for a minute or two before coming up with an older back who continued to be productive, which either says something about their scarcity or my lack of football knowledge. Or maybe both.

by jeager on Apr 13, 2009 4:39 PM PDT reply actions  

It's a percentage play

Although it might mean losing the services of a RB whose career length beats the average, the odds say you’re going to win your bet more often than you lose. Football Outsiders has done some excellent studies on the correlation between a running back’s odometer reading and declining production. RB’s are like cars, you want them shiny new and fast.

Positions where experience matters and therefore where it makes sense to do that second and maybe even third contract: quarterback, left tackle, center, possession receiver.

by Mr Fish on Apr 13, 2009 5:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

8" hands are tiny?

I think mine may measure 6.5". It’s weird, but some lineman or basketball player out there probably has hands that weigh more than 3x what mine weigh.
I’d say it’s a bit of a concern, though finger and hand strength would concern me a lot as well. I’m not sure how to measure that accurately though.

by LantermanC on Apr 13, 2009 4:42 PM PDT reply actions  

How do the measure?

How do the measure hands, and arm length for linemen? Anybody know?

by walruz on Apr 13, 2009 5:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SEA!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Avatar_small
The Official Field Gulls OT Thread - In Which We Gush About Our Favorite TV Shows
Hatersgonnahate_small
A short note on what worked for the 49ers, but isn't really a "model"
Halloween_mobster_small
Come on in!
Mail
A Reply to Beekers and Some Comments About Comments

Recent FanPosts

208114_505637750968_23709013_30160241_9483_n_small
GM John Schneider On The Ideal QB
Bodypaint_small
Delocated ad
Beast_mode_tshirt_small
Tats Comeback Attempt?
994_small
Free Agents vs. NFL Draft - Wide Receivers
Small
Where Will the Seahawks' Churn Hit? Defensive Line Edition
Small
Expanding Our Football Knowledge
994_small
Free Agents vs. NFL Draft - Defensive End

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editor/Lead Writer

284430_601240951600_44900771_32958650_2317286_n_small Danny Kelly

Staff Writers/Editors

Screen_shot_2011-01-05_at_9 Scruffy Lefty

Small BrianL

Avatar_small Benne

Olympiabeer_small Tyler Jorgensen

Hatersgonnahate_small Thomas Beekers

Profilepic_small DJ C-Raig

897267_o_small Kenneth Arthur

Halloween_mobster_small Jacson Bevens

Photo__1__small Charlie Todaro

Staff Writers

Small Joshua Kasparek

Mail Matt Erickson

Davis_small Davis Hsu

Profile2_small Rob Staton

208114_505637750968_23709013_30160241_9483_n_small Scott Enyeart

Elephant_pink_clothes_small Chris Sully

Seattle_seahawk_white_1600_reasonably_small_small Derek Stephens

Osprey1_small Ben Harbaugh

Bu_fb_2_small Daniel Hill