Assessing the Seahawks' Need at Offensive Tackle
+ Round-by-round picks
Offensive Tackle
Strengths: Depth, versatility, run blocking
Weaknesses: Talent, health, pass blocking
In Brief: Kyle Williams proved serviceable in limited action, and serviceable from a third string left tackle is stupendous. I'm not sure if Walter Jones is good for another season or just yet to retire, but for now we'll say he contributes to the overall depth at the position. Jones is a fantastic tackle, and you have to believe if someone can gut out a decent season at well below top form, it's Jones. Sean Locklear looks like an average left tackle that's a bit above average against the pass and has the kind of acumen in space to take to zone blocking. Locklear is the strength of this line. Willis is versatile and could be a good enough pass blocker in a system that de-emphasizes that duty. He showed some flashes of elite run blocking ability.
Targets by round
- Eugene Monroe: Monroe is a bit thin in the upper body, and has the look of a tight end that converted to tackle. He's a rare talent in pass protection and that makes him an elite prospect. A team like Seattle that doesn't need point of attack maulers but instead smart, agile blockers that are good on the move could maximize a player with Monroe's skill set. Injury concerns make him an risky pick at four, but should he stay healthy, he certainly would give an otherwise average unit a boost.
- William Beatty: Beatty is built a bit like Monroe, but isn't nearly the pass blocker. Effectively, Beatty played right tackle at Connecticut, because though he played left tackle, he played left tackle for a left-handed quarterback. That might confuse people a bit when they're imagining Beatty's profile. He has the frame and the footwork of Monroe, but not nearly the skills. Beatty is a good athlete and a project, but project offensive linemen with questions about their pass protection skills is not my idea of a good pick in the early second round. May be more sizzle than steak.
- Troy Kropog: If Seattle targets a tackle in the third, they will probably target Kropog, but if they target Kropog the temptation to trade down or wait to see if he falls to the fourth will be strong. Kropog isn't a typical Tim Ruskell pick, but only because Tulane is not a big school or from a powerhouse conference. That's not enough to disqualify him. Tulane faces its share of top talent and graduates its share of NFL prospects. In a zone blocking system that de-emphasizes raw power, and for a team that needs not just talent at tackle but talent throughout the offensive line, Kropog is a solid fit. Athletic and skilled, knowledgeable of his position and knowledgeable of his offense, Kropog is the kind of good-upside, low-downside value pick that's perfect for an offensive line that needs talent, but has no aspirations of greatness.
- Andrew Gardner: Gardner is Sam Baker-East and like Baker is farther down your average mock draft than your average NFL exec's draft board. Gardner has suffered from lack of news. After starting 48 consecutive games at Georgia Tech, Gardner finally succumbed to a torn labrum suffered early in the season. He played through it for much of the 2008 season, but prudently elected to have surgery well in advance of the draft. He didn't participate in the Senior Bowl or the NFL Combine, and did not work out for scouts until Tech's pro day. Despite the labrum tear, Gardner was again elected first team All-ACC. He was a core member of a surprisingly resilient, and very good offense. Tech recently graduated Calvin Johnson and Tashard Choice, but still finished 14th in offensive FEI. Gardner is a good athlete, very skilled, has an NFL-ready mean streak and good upside in a variety of systems.
- Jason Watkins: Like Kropog, if Watkins is available in the fifth, Seattle will be tempted to trade down or wait for the sixth. And like Kropog, Watkins makes the most sense to a team that doesn't need a mauling run blocker or a tackle that must start right away. Watkins is quick and gets by on good athleticism. He has a bad mix of below average strength and bad technique, and I could see him cut several times before his first professional snap, but the upside is that of an average to below average left tackle in a zone blocking scheme, and that's excellent value in the sixth. Watkins is a bit old for a developmental prospect.
- Phil Trautwein: The other half of Florida' starting offensive tackles, Trautwein is a good example of what happens when a just-good tackle prospect faces lots of top competition on national television. Trautwein is undoubtedly better than some prospects rated above him, and even penciling him in in the sixth feels a bit like succumbing to pre-draft hype, but his potential, upside, whatever you want to call it is probably no greater than Luke Petitgout, and that's a little taste-less.
- Cameron Goldberg: Goldberg has everything but size. Effective college offense linemen who seem to lack NFL-size typically top out at Steve Vallos. Goldberg is practice squad fodder and not likely drafted.
0 recs |
19 comments
|
Comments
I like Monroe even more now
but I just don’t know if an OT is worth it. I really wish Football had some stats like Baseball does (impossible I know) that showed things like how many wins a position is worth to a team. For example, a top quality QB obviously effects his offense the most, but where does a WR compare to a Center? Or a LB compared to a Safety? Unfortunately, there’s just too much noise in any stats we can look at. Adjusting for offense types, teammate success (a good line allowing a RB to shine for example), and different positions within a position (#1 WR, #2, etc.) are just a few examples I can think of off the top of my head. I wouldn’t know where to start.
by Fear on Apr 20, 2009 2:11 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Tashard choice
*Choice
"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."
by Fearless Frog on Apr 20, 2009 2:22 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I'd still much rather have Michael Oher.
But I could live with Monroe.
Weez the juice!!
by Carl Shinyama on Apr 20, 2009 2:29 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
John - do you feel the Hawks need to draft a tackle in rounds 1-3?
You do a phenomenal job analyzing the situation and the choices, but you (smartly?) left out your opinion. You could say you’re providing the analysis because you feel we need a tackle, but I have a feeling you’re providing the analysis because EVERYONE ELSE IN THE WORLD thinks we need to address tackle, to some extent.
Do you feel the Hawks need to address the position via the draft his year? And if so, at what round? (assuming that “third round talent” would be available in the third round, as an example)
by Nick Andron on Apr 20, 2009 2:34 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I plan on covering every position
I do not think Seattle needs to draft a tackle in the first three rounds and don’t think the talent is there to justify drafting a tackle in the first three rounds.
by John Morgan on Apr 20, 2009 2:43 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I take it you don't expect Britton to be available with the Hawks second pick then?
The SBN mock draft seemed a little crazy this year.
by Nate Dogg on Apr 20, 2009 2:52 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If he was available though, that would be a fantastic pick along with easy BPA.
"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."
by Fearless Frog on Apr 20, 2009 10:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I meant fantastic value
"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."
by Fearless Frog on Apr 20, 2009 10:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
So you wouldn't be ok with us drafting Monroe in the 1st?
I thought you were ok with that if not a qb?
"Why is it every time I need to get somewhere, we get waylaid by jackassery?" - Dr. Venture
by Eegah on Apr 20, 2009 3:12 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's not what I would do
but I wouldn’t die.
by John Morgan on Apr 20, 2009 3:50 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm assuming we're going to have to wait until Friday night or something...
…to find out what you WOULD do!
by djafrot on Apr 20, 2009 3:53 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think we'll have to wait until Saturday
because what I would do depends quite a bit on who is actually available. But I’ll be sure to say who I want Seattle to draft when the time is right.
by John Morgan on Apr 20, 2009 4:01 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
This makes sense to me.
We’ve got Jones for this year, and two potential tackles in Locklear and Willis. If those two pan out, a first-to-third round tackle pick is pretty much wasted. So why not wait until next year when you more about how things shake out?
I guess the wildcard here is Willis at guard. But here again we have some depth: Sims will return, Wrotto is showing signs, and you could see Spencer moving there too. There appear to be options to draft guard and center, too.
That all said, it seems like it’s justifiable to draft Monroe if he’s pretty much a guaranteed starter at LT. I just think this #4 pick is a rare opportunity for the Seahawks, and “picking safe” doesn’t really strike me as the right move.
by djafrot on Apr 20, 2009 3:22 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
What about Andrew Hartline?
Tons of experience even if at C.Mich. , tall and strong but under 300. Do you know anymore about him and if he could put on weight? Also seems that he would be around late in the draft possibly a comp. pick?
by hawkfanjp on Apr 21, 2009 11:23 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Excellent round by round analysis
A name that has popped up a bit, especially after a strong pro-day showing is Sebastian Vollmer. He has a back injury concern, but has played without issues for two years since the surgery. He is also older (25 in October), may lack a little experience because he started playing in Germany and is a converted tight end, and came from a spread offense at Houston. He wasn’t invited to the combine. All these concerns may drive him down to the 5th – 7th round.
He is 6-7 5/8 and about 315. At his pro day he ran the 40 between 5.08 and 5.13, and 1.77 on the 10. His shuttle was 4.50 and his 3-Cone was 7.51. He put up 32 reps, had a vertical of 36 1/2 to 37 1/2 depending on the report, and he broad jumped 9’ 3". I know those are just a bunch of dumb measurables, but they do show athleticism for a player over 6’ 7" tall. He was reported to have only given up one sack in 610 pass attempts in 2008 (which I can’t verify). I have watched some video of him and while he may not be the secret love child of Mikhail Baryshnikov and Martha Graham, he does have some agility. Maybe someone else has an opinion of him, is he worth a look at LT if he was available in the late rounds?
Thanks again, John, for providing such excellent insights into potential personnel decisions and the team.
by scratchandsniff on Apr 20, 2009 3:13 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I think Vollmer would be good value late in the draft.
Though def. not worthy of the first round like his other European counterpart Sebastian Janikowski.
"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."
by Fearless Frog on Apr 20, 2009 10:10 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 

















