Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Full Coverage of 2012 Coke 600

Assessing the Seahawks' Need at Offensive Tackle

+ Round-by-round picks

Offensive Tackle

Strengths: Depth, versatility, run blocking

Weaknesses: Talent, health, pass blocking

In Brief: Kyle Williams proved serviceable in limited action, and serviceable from a third string left tackle is stupendous. I'm not sure if Walter Jones is good for another season or just yet to retire, but for now we'll say he contributes to the overall depth at the position. Jones is a fantastic tackle, and you have to believe if someone can gut out a decent season at well below top form, it's Jones. Sean Locklear looks like an average left tackle that's a bit above average against the pass and has the kind of acumen in space to take to zone blocking. Locklear is the strength of this line. Willis is versatile and could be a good enough pass blocker in a system that de-emphasizes that duty. He showed some flashes of elite run blocking ability.

Targets by round

  1. Eugene Monroe: Monroe is a bit thin in the upper body, and has the look of a tight end that converted to tackle. He's a rare talent in pass protection and that makes him an elite prospect. A team like Seattle that doesn't need point of attack maulers but instead smart, agile blockers that are good on the move could maximize a player with Monroe's skill set. Injury concerns make him an risky pick at four, but should he stay healthy, he certainly would give an otherwise average unit a boost.
  2. William Beatty: Beatty is built a bit like Monroe, but isn't nearly the pass blocker. Effectively, Beatty played right tackle at Connecticut, because though he played left tackle, he played left tackle for a left-handed quarterback. That might confuse people a bit when they're imagining Beatty's profile. He has the frame and the footwork of Monroe, but not nearly the skills. Beatty is a good athlete and a project, but project offensive linemen with questions about their pass protection skills is not my idea of a good pick in the early second round. May be more sizzle than steak.
  3. Troy Kropog: If Seattle targets a tackle in the third, they will probably target Kropog, but if they target Kropog the temptation to trade down or wait to see if he falls to the fourth will be strong. Kropog isn't a typical Tim Ruskell pick, but only because Tulane is not a big school or from a powerhouse conference. That's not enough to disqualify him. Tulane faces its share of top talent and graduates its share of NFL prospects. In a zone blocking system that de-emphasizes raw power, and for a team that needs not just talent at tackle but talent throughout the offensive line, Kropog is a solid fit. Athletic and skilled, knowledgeable of his position and knowledgeable of his offense, Kropog is the kind of good-upside, low-downside value pick that's perfect for an offensive line that needs talent, but has no aspirations of greatness.
  4. Andrew Gardner: Gardner is Sam Baker-East and like Baker is farther down your average mock draft than your average NFL exec's draft board. Gardner has suffered from lack of news. After starting 48 consecutive games at Georgia Tech, Gardner finally succumbed to a torn labrum suffered early in the season. He played through it for much of the 2008 season, but prudently elected to have surgery well in advance of the draft. He didn't participate in the Senior Bowl or the NFL Combine, and did not work out for scouts until Tech's pro day. Despite the labrum tear, Gardner was again elected first team All-ACC. He was a core member of a surprisingly resilient, and very good offense. Tech recently graduated Calvin Johnson and Tashard Choice, but still finished 14th in offensive FEI. Gardner is a good athlete, very skilled, has an NFL-ready mean streak and good upside in a variety of systems.
  5. Jason Watkins: Like Kropog, if Watkins is available in the fifth, Seattle will be tempted to trade down or wait for the sixth. And like Kropog, Watkins makes the most sense to a team that doesn't need a mauling run blocker or a tackle that must start right away. Watkins is quick and gets by on good athleticism. He has a bad mix of below average strength and bad technique, and I could see him cut several times before his first professional snap, but the upside is that of an average to below average left tackle in a zone blocking scheme, and that's excellent value in the sixth. Watkins is a bit old for a developmental prospect.
  6. Phil Trautwein: The other half of Florida' starting offensive tackles, Trautwein is a good example of what happens when a just-good tackle prospect faces lots of top competition on national television. Trautwein is undoubtedly better than some prospects rated above him, and even penciling him in in the sixth feels a bit like succumbing to pre-draft hype, but his potential, upside, whatever you want to call it is probably no greater than Luke Petitgout, and that's a little taste-less.
  7. Cameron Goldberg: Goldberg has everything but size. Effective college offense linemen who seem to lack NFL-size typically top out at Steve Vallos. Goldberg is practice squad fodder and not likely drafted.

Comment 19 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I like Monroe even more now

but I just don’t know if an OT is worth it. I really wish Football had some stats like Baseball does (impossible I know) that showed things like how many wins a position is worth to a team. For example, a top quality QB obviously effects his offense the most, but where does a WR compare to a Center? Or a LB compared to a Safety? Unfortunately, there’s just too much noise in any stats we can look at. Adjusting for offense types, teammate success (a good line allowing a RB to shine for example), and different positions within a position (#1 WR, #2, etc.) are just a few examples I can think of off the top of my head. I wouldn’t know where to start.

by Fear on Apr 20, 2009 2:11 PM PDT reply actions  

Tashard choice

*Choice

"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."

by Fearless Frog on Apr 20, 2009 2:22 PM PDT reply actions  

John - do you feel the Hawks need to draft a tackle in rounds 1-3?

You do a phenomenal job analyzing the situation and the choices, but you (smartly?) left out your opinion. You could say you’re providing the analysis because you feel we need a tackle, but I have a feeling you’re providing the analysis because EVERYONE ELSE IN THE WORLD thinks we need to address tackle, to some extent.

Do you feel the Hawks need to address the position via the draft his year? And if so, at what round? (assuming that “third round talent” would be available in the third round, as an example)

by Nick Andron on Apr 20, 2009 2:34 PM PDT reply actions  

I plan on covering every position

I do not think Seattle needs to draft a tackle in the first three rounds and don’t think the talent is there to justify drafting a tackle in the first three rounds.

by John Morgan on Apr 20, 2009 2:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

So you wouldn't be ok with us drafting Monroe in the 1st?

I thought you were ok with that if not a qb?

"Why is it every time I need to get somewhere, we get waylaid by jackassery?" - Dr. Venture

by Eegah on Apr 20, 2009 3:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think we'll have to wait until Saturday

because what I would do depends quite a bit on who is actually available. But I’ll be sure to say who I want Seattle to draft when the time is right.

by John Morgan on Apr 20, 2009 4:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

This makes sense to me.

We’ve got Jones for this year, and two potential tackles in Locklear and Willis. If those two pan out, a first-to-third round tackle pick is pretty much wasted. So why not wait until next year when you more about how things shake out?

I guess the wildcard here is Willis at guard. But here again we have some depth: Sims will return, Wrotto is showing signs, and you could see Spencer moving there too. There appear to be options to draft guard and center, too.

That all said, it seems like it’s justifiable to draft Monroe if he’s pretty much a guaranteed starter at LT. I just think this #4 pick is a rare opportunity for the Seahawks, and “picking safe” doesn’t really strike me as the right move.

by djafrot on Apr 20, 2009 3:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

What about Andrew Hartline?

Tons of experience even if at C.Mich. , tall and strong but under 300. Do you know anymore about him and if he could put on weight? Also seems that he would be around late in the draft possibly a comp. pick?

by hawkfanjp on Apr 21, 2009 11:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

Excellent round by round analysis

A name that has popped up a bit, especially after a strong pro-day showing is Sebastian Vollmer. He has a back injury concern, but has played without issues for two years since the surgery. He is also older (25 in October), may lack a little experience because he started playing in Germany and is a converted tight end, and came from a spread offense at Houston. He wasn’t invited to the combine. All these concerns may drive him down to the 5th – 7th round.

He is 6-7 5/8 and about 315. At his pro day he ran the 40 between 5.08 and 5.13, and 1.77 on the 10. His shuttle was 4.50 and his 3-Cone was 7.51. He put up 32 reps, had a vertical of 36 1/2 to 37 1/2 depending on the report, and he broad jumped 9’ 3". I know those are just a bunch of dumb measurables, but they do show athleticism for a player over 6’ 7" tall. He was reported to have only given up one sack in 610 pass attempts in 2008 (which I can’t verify). I have watched some video of him and while he may not be the secret love child of Mikhail Baryshnikov and Martha Graham, he does have some agility. Maybe someone else has an opinion of him, is he worth a look at LT if he was available in the late rounds?

Thanks again, John, for providing such excellent insights into potential personnel decisions and the team.

by scratchandsniff on Apr 20, 2009 3:13 PM PDT reply actions  

I think Vollmer would be good value late in the draft.

Though def. not worthy of the first round like his other European counterpart Sebastian Janikowski.

"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."

by Fearless Frog on Apr 20, 2009 10:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SEA!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Avatar_small
The OT Thread---12thrs, Assemble!
Small
Just How Much Do Close Games Matter Anyway?
Small
Help Me Understand How Irvin Will be Used
Turbin_game_uni_small
Hand Size and Quarterbacks
Einstein_www-txt2pic-com_small
On Pete Carroll and Previous QB Competitions

Recent FanPosts

Horsey_small
Results from the 2012 Armchair GM Championship
Tasb_logo_small
Consider it Spun: The 5 Worst Moves of Carroll and Schneider Era in Seattle
Small
Plaxico Burress: viable option, or over the hill?
Small
Portland Seahawks Fans: Where You Be?
Small
Should Seattle Go After Kellen Winslow?
Small
Football where the head is sacred

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editor/Lead Writer

Screen_shot_2012-05-04_at_10 Danny Kelly

Staff Writers/Editors

Screen_shot_2011-01-05_at_9 Scruffy Lefty

Small BrianL

Avatar_small Benne

Olympiabeer_small Tyler Jorgensen

Madhatter_small Thomas Beekers

Profilepic_small DJ C-Raig

897267_o_small Kenneth Arthur

Sbn_pic_small Jacson Bevens

Photo__1__small Charlie Todaro

Staff Writers

Small Joshua Kasparek

Photo_small Matt Erickson

Davis_small Davis Hsu

Profile2_small Rob Staton

208114_505637750968_23709013_30160241_9483_n_small Scott Enyeart

Elephant_pink_clothes_small Chris Sully

Seattle_seahawk_white_1600_reasonably_small_small Derek Stephens

Ace_small Ben Harbaugh

Bu_fb_2_small Daniel Hill

Rob_small Rob Davies