Doug's Mock -- And in the third round...
Never mind the bollocks -- here's the offense!
Certainly interesting that all four picks in our back-and-forth have been defensive players, but I'd imagine that John and I are both under the impression that Ruskell isn't looking to build the 2007 Patriots here -- he'd much rather have the 2002 Bucs he helped create. A dominant defense, and an offense good enough to win. So, let's talk about the aerial component of that offense. Last year's faceplant was led by two unbelievable injury waves -- an offensive line in which all five starters wound up on injured reserve, and a receiver corps that was down to nothing seemingly before the season even started.
Through the era of greatness, Seattle's air attack was defined by Bobby Engram. In the Super Bowl year, he was the team's leading receiver. He was always Matt Hasselbeck's optimal bailout guy, the one he could count on among the surface-talented, ball-dropping blockheads and 12th-round SEC projects. But Mr. Third Down is gone. The cupboard seems to be stacked in Engram's absence, but that's only without the microscope. Nate Burleson is just as capable of inconsistent route-running as he is the highlight touchdown catch. Deion Branch is a 2-to-1 bet to lose a season after blowing a knee tripping over a blade of grass. T.J. Whosyourmama is an outstanding flanker/slot hybrid who can make the tough catch over the middle and is just as good blocking down the seam. That slot position, so crucial to whatever brand of the West Coast Offense Seattle's running these days, remains undefined.
Until now.
Third Round (68) - Juaquin Iglesias, WR, Oklahoma
It's fairly common for offenses (especially college offenses) to be tailored to the skills of one player, but the change seen in Norman, Oklahoma over the last three years has been nothing short of galvanic. In transitioning from Adrian Peterson to Sam Bradford as the face of the offense, the Sooners went from 2,682 passing yards in 2006, to 3,615 in 2007, to 4,891 in 2008 -- from 340 to 401 to 517 attempts. This ain't no Bud Wilkinson three-yards-and-a-cloud offense -- the new Okies are just as prone to go five-wide on your ass and score 60+ points in game after game. And the root of all that dynamism, aside from Bradford and the best offensive line in college football, has been Juaquin Iglesias -- the 6-1, 210-pound Texas native who led the team in receptions and receiving yards in 2007 and 2008.
He's seen as a third-round prospect for a few reasons. There are serious questions about his straight-line speed, and whether he can beat press coverage without the benefit of a system that forced defenses to bail out all the time. But there are two things that caught my eye. First, his ability to get the first move at the snap -- he's very quick off the line, and he's great at using angles to avoid the press altogether. Second, when you watch his YouTubeage, check out how he beats first contact and picks up extra yards. These are the things that separate real slot specialists from guys with good hands who just can't run a 4.3-40. An impressive route-runner with the ability to fill a role sooner than later in the pros, Iglesias would find himself climbing the depth chart in Seattle as the glue over the middle.
Oh -- and in 2008, he converted 19 of the 22 third downs in which he was the target. Sound familiar?
0 recs |
16 comments
Comments
I love this pick
I’m much more excited about a slot reciever than I am one of “elite” WR’s in this years draft. I’ll take Bobby Engram over Peter Warrick any day, and twice on Draft Day.
by MoonHawk on Apr 24, 2009 6:50 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Interesting.
I can get on board with most of your selections thus far.
Do you like Inglesias better than Robiskie as a player, or simply the third round value of what could be a similar player? Are they similar?
by Misfit74 on Apr 24, 2009 8:28 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Robiskie's a late-first/early-second guy
More of a flanker, and faster with better separation that he’s given credit for. Third on my list after Crabtree and Maclin. My sense of Iglesias is that he fills just the one need, but it’s a need that Seattle really could have. Iglesias would allow quite a bit more flexibility with the other receivers, especially Housh, who I think they see as the #1 now.
by Doug Farrar on Apr 24, 2009 8:38 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I'd love to have either Robiskie, Iglesias, or Massoquoi.
And if course Crabtree as well. Great pick Doug. I only hope that the real Seahawks draft goes this well. I have a feeling Timmy is going to throw a surprise pick or two in there. I only hope I react positively to the surprises. If it’s anything like Delmas or Johnson, I will.
by LantermanC on Apr 24, 2009 9:05 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
My exact same pick!
I see me and Doug are of like mind on Iglesias. Sweeeet.
Weez the juice!!
by Carl Shinyama on Apr 24, 2009 10:02 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
A slot WR doesn't make too much sense to me.
TJ will be X for now, I’m assuming, but as he ages we’d move him inside as an Engram-type, right?
So should we draft a receiver to slowly fill in to that X spot, it should be someone like Robiskie, no? I also like the guy from USC that John talked about a few weeks ago, though we could snag him in the fifth or something.
My guess is that if we don’t pull the trigger on Crabtree we won’t spend a mid-round pick on a WR unless it’s someone who slips. We have enough capable starters for a couple of years, if we are going to bring in new blood it’ll either be a pretty-much-guaranteed-starter like Crabs or a late-round-cheap-guess like the USC guy (damn what’s his name).
by djafrot on Apr 24, 2009 10:51 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Patrick Turner.
"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."
by Fearless Frog on Apr 24, 2009 11:07 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Now here's a pick I can get behind.
Although I would still be crying over drafting Curry.
"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."
by Fearless Frog on Apr 24, 2009 11:06 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Me too
Other than Curry, I’d have made the exact same picks as Doug so far.
In fairness, I very much expect Curry to be the pick. Listening to my gut, I’d give it 90% odds right now (barring a trade down).
by kearly on Apr 24, 2009 3:40 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ugh, no Curry please.
Why? Not to get into a massive debate… wait, no, let’s do it… we’re going to draft Curry why exactly? To end up with three humongously expensive linebackers? Is Curry – like John notes – going to put us over the top when Hawk (GB) and Willis (SF) didn’t?
If not, if you’re drafting Curry just because Hill might be gone next season, wow. A bird in the hand, folks. Why not just sign Hill then and be done with it? Why go through the risk?
If we do draft Curry we better damn well do something better than just let Hill leave in free agency or I’ll be pissed.
by djafrot on Apr 24, 2009 4:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
All this in addition to the fact that I'm virtually certian Julian Peterson is a far superior player at this point in time.
"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."
by Fearless Frog on Apr 24, 2009 4:55 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah. I'd take Peterson over Curry for the next two years.
Peterson has experience, and we KNOW he’s good. Curry is still an unknown, even as safe of a pick as he is.
Like I said, all this shell game at LB is boring as shit. LB’s are overrated, paying big bucks for them, especially when they’re unknowns or don’t seem to want to be here, is simply silly.
I’d be all for ditching Hill by trade and passing over Curry in the draft and picking up new blood in the form of one or two picks in the mid- to late- rounds. Improving our DL and DB’s is much more important.
by djafrot on Apr 25, 2009 1:03 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
So fucking true....
"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."
by Fearless Frog on Apr 25, 2009 9:48 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Curry would at least whisper:
‘financial move’
Curry is highly acclaimed. Why do I think Derrick Johnson for some reason? He didn’t transform the Chief’s defense either, did he? He was the first non-pass-rushing LB taken in 2005 (15th overall and after Ware, Merriman).
Johnson in college:
* Dick Butkus Award (2004)
* Bronko Nagurski Trophy (2004)
* Mack Lee Hill Award (2005)
His professional tackle totals: 96, 76, 94. Sacks: 2, 4.5, 4.
by Misfit74 on Apr 24, 2009 6:34 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If ignoring reality or probability....
….Robiskie is my choice at the top of the 2nd round. But I fully understand that someone else of value at a position of greater need may be available. If that be the case, then I would love to see Iglesias in the 3rd.
by KHF on Apr 24, 2009 8:24 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 















