Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dissecting Nick Diaz's Positive Drug Test

Evaluating Trade Value to the Draft Chart

Seahawk Addicts is a web-based Seahawk fans fix, if you will, providing bits and headlines and rumors for us to chew on, but rarely to give us good meat. Today Chris Sullivan crunched some numbers and evaluated our draft trades and actually wrote something that beared repeating.

Trading our #37 pick (530 points) for the #32 pick (590 points) nets us a bare minimum of +60 points. If the Broncos were to pick at the same place they are this year, that would be a net gain of 670 points. The Hawks then traded their #68 (250 points) and #101 (96 points) picks for the #49 pick from the Bears (410 points). That's a net gain of 64 points. Finally, the Hawks traded up for the #91 pick (136), giving up our 5th and 7th pick (40 pts + 13 pts = 53 pts) and our 2010 3rd round pick (remember, we're dead last so that's 265 points). Thats a net loss of 182 points. For the day, in a worst case scenario, the Hawks are down 58 total draft trade value points.

But wait! The Hawks may also have gained a compensatory pick if Leroy Hill does indeed leave in free agency, in addition to the other one we'll likely get from Leonard Weaver (who will almost certainly be a lot "better" statistically than his replacement, as we will be using the fullback in a different manner) and perhaps a few more along the way. On the whole, we likely break at least even -- if Hill is a bottom of the third round compensation pick, that would be about 116 points, doubly accounting for our lost points.

In reality, we should look at the Hawks and Broncos as mid-round finishers. If the Broncos wind up at #16 and #17, assuming no ties, the Broncos #1 would be worth 1,000 points and the Hawks third round (#81) would be worth 190 points. Doing the same math as above we are +470 on the Broncos trade, +64 on the Bears trade, and -102 on the final trade of the day. On the whole, in a relatively realistic look at things, the Seahawks would be +432 points of trade value, equivalent to the #47 draft pick (Connor Barwin). Not bad.

 

Comment 7 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Waiting for the league-wide trade chart evaluation

so we can see at what point (mid first round?) salaries drop off enough to where the old chart is roughly accurate.

“Bore” repeating! :)

by shams on Apr 28, 2009 2:32 AM PDT reply actions  

God forbid Kyle Orton isn't the savior in Denver.

A Broncos team that was already projected to decline BEFORE losing Cutler, should be even worse off now that KO is at the helm.

Complicating matters further for Denver is the Brandon Marshall situation. One of the leagues top young WR’s just had hip surgery, and may be suspended again.

I’ve seen estimates from 3 to 6 wins next year on most sites.

Bring Your Game, Leave Your Name.

by iverson2169 on Apr 28, 2009 10:19 PM PDT reply actions  

Draft didn't help either

Trading away a first and they didn’t fill alot of needs from what everyone has said.

by hawkfanjp on Apr 28, 2009 10:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

Just baffling...

They picked up Rhodes, Buckhalter, AND Arrington…. then go and draft Moreno?

The Culter thing.

These types of moves just make you wonder if McDaniels isn’t going to pile-drive this season into the rocky mountains. I for one hope he does.

Bring Your Game, Leave Your Name.

by iverson2169 on Apr 29, 2009 12:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

AFC WEST

Being from Seattle and going to games since ‘76 I remember my old Bronco Busters T-shirt my dad got me and I can’t help but smile and hope right along with you.

by hawkfanjp on Apr 29, 2009 11:18 AM PDT up reply actions  

Rhodes? Dominic Rhodes?

He was signed by the Bills. I think you are referring to Lamont Jordan.

"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."

by Fearless Frog on Apr 29, 2009 12:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SEA!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Avatar_small
The Official Field Gulls OT Thread - In Which We Gush About Our Favorite TV Shows

Recent FanPosts

Photo_on_2011-10-14_at_23
Jim Harbaugh Vs. Pete Carroll
Small
Nation Wide Mock Draft
Small
Could Dre Kirkpatrick be the key to our 2012 draft?
Einstein_www-txt2pic-com_small
Seahawks QB Situation: Not a Defense for Tarvaris Jackson
Small
Team Needs - The National Perception of Seattle
Small
2012 Mock Draft, Version 1.0
Walshrun_small
Super Bowl XLVI Reaction: New England Patriots
Small
My Friend has a Friend who works for Nike...
208114_505637750968_23709013_30160241_9483_n_small
GM John Schneider On The Ideal QB
Bodypaint_small
Delocated ad

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editor/Lead Writer

284430_601240951600_44900771_32958650_2317286_n_small Danny Kelly

Staff Writers/Editors

Screen_shot_2011-01-05_at_9 Scruffy Lefty

Small BrianL

Avatar_small Benne

Olympiabeer_small Tyler Jorgensen

Hatersgonnahate_small Thomas Beekers

Profilepic_small DJ C-Raig

897267_o_small Kenneth Arthur

Halloween_mobster_small Jacson Bevens

Photo__1__small Charlie Todaro

Staff Writers

Small Joshua Kasparek

Mail Matt Erickson

Davis_small Davis Hsu

Profile2_small Rob Staton

208114_505637750968_23709013_30160241_9483_n_small Scott Enyeart

Elephant_pink_clothes_small Chris Sully

Seattle_seahawk_white_1600_reasonably_small_small Derek Stephens

Osprey1_small Ben Harbaugh

Easleystreet2_small ChadDavis45

Bu_fb_2_small Daniel Hill