Dangling Matthew Stafford for Fun and Profit
Matthew Stafford is the undisputed king of private workouts, pro days and conveniently leaked Wonderlic scores. For Stafford, it's another week, another PR victory. He stared down yesterday's media darling and won: getting the better half of an exchange with the increasingly unhinged Mike Singletary. Publicly decry a 21 year old for being glib about his parents divorce? Welcome to the other edge of the media, Samurai Mike. Novelty will shield you only so long.
All the while Detroit dangles Stafford to a quarterback starved NFL. As many as 14 teams are in need of a young quarterback. Tampa Bay is in desperate need. Matt Ryan and Joe Flacco are prominent in the short-term memory of the league. It's not unusual for a team to wait until the week of to announce their selection for the first overall pick, but this year's decision seems especially charged. There's potential energy throughout the league: Young quarterbacks in Arizona, Cleveland and Green Bay misplaced or redundant; Julius Peppers unhappy and awaiting a trade; three teams with two first round picks; teams with cap to burn, and the ambiguities and potential of an uncapped year looming. Detroit isn't just determining the best player or haggling for the best contract, they're pulling strings and working the phones hoping for a deal they can't refuse.
That's why we get another week, another PR victory for Matthew Stafford. There are two layers of media at work. A nascent shadow media of questionable reputability and standards that, ironically enough, actually pursues the truth, and an established media that reports naïve truth as it's fed to them. On March 22, KFFL reported that Detroit had settled on signing Jason Smith. Since then, there's been no substantiation of that story, and instead a handful of mainstream media reports that Stafford may top Detroit's draft board. KFFL cites unnamed sources. The mainstream media cites "experts" that offer such insightful commentary as:
"At the end of the day, it probably comes down to how much they like Matt Stafford or don't because they need a quarterback, that's the most important position," ex-Houston and Washington general manager Charley Casserly said recently in a phone interview. "And if they are sold on him, that's probably where they'll turn first."
Which is to say: If Detroit thinks Stafford is the best player in this draft, they will probably draft him with their first overall pick. It's a fact that people read headlines at a far greater rate than the body of a story, and for an overcooked story like this that's body is as flimsy and hollow as a piñata, the headline is the story. Which is to say: The story is the story. It's as if I asked my wife if she'd like a slice of bread, and she said "If it wouldn't make me deathly ill and was covered in butter and honey, I think that'd be a nice snack." And I wrote: Wife Zeroing in on Toast. It's less of a story even than what KFFL reported.
Detroit is playing a high stakes game of chicken with the NFL. It's barreling towards drafting Stafford, hoping some poor schmo tosses itself in front and Ditkas its fans out of a future. Seattle has joined the charge and publicly set its crosshairs on Mark Sanchez. Detroit General Manager Martin Mayhew and Head Coach Jim Schwartz are economics majors only too aware of "loser's curse" inequities in the rookie pay scale. They are desperate to trade out of the first overall pick. Detroit is not a player-away offense like Atlanta or a ready-made contender like Baltimore. Mayhew and Schwartz understand the instability of their positions, and the potentially ruinous results of a failed first overall pick. I would wager they also know that the best scouting in the world isn't foolproof. So they're making a lot of noise knowing they might hold nothing. They're wining and dining and attending pro days and when the pro days pass, keeping things current with a suggestive murmur and enough information for a rumor. KFFL played their cards right. There's three viable picks at one, the over-reported Stafford, the unlikely because he's a linebacker Aaron Curry and Jason Smith. KFFL could be right by luck of accident. The mainstream media could be right by luck of accident. Detroit is just happy to have people talking. But no one knows anymore than you and I - no one that's sharing - because, right now, no news is really just no news.
18 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Singletary is a moron.
And unless this is some elaborate smokescreen for the 49ers to trade up and get him, he’s surprisingly classless.
"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."
Yeah, complete douche.
Perfect fit for the Niners.
It's great to be a Florida Gator!
by Wayward Llama on Apr 7, 2009 3:26 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Indeed.
I hope he isn’t fired for many seasons so him and Jimmy Raye can run them into the ground even more than Nolan did if that’s humanly possible.
"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."
by Fearless Frog on Apr 7, 2009 12:15 PM PDT up reply actions
And isn't it "Schwartz"?
I could be wrong.
"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."
Everything is aligned for a trade
but the chances are still slim that it happens. Someone would have to be completely sold on Stafford to jump up to 1 and be willing to give up as much or more than what Chicago gave up for Cutler. Tampa’s first round pick this year is only worth 875, the top pick is worth 3,000. All the fabricated hype in the world isn’t going to be able to bridge that gap.
What is Seattle doing with Sanchez? Are they just trying to scare up a little panic that both quarterbacks will be gone by the 4th pick? The Hawks don’t seem to be in much better position to pull off a trade with the teams that really need a QB.
That is...
If teams still are sold on the value of Bill Parcells’s old draft pick chart. It seems to me that the chart is obsolete, and a team willing to trade down from #1 can exploit some inefficiencies in the system. Take a deal that everyone’s going to decry because “The Chart” says otherwise, and take your victories where you can get them.
Incidentally, I believe that's Lupe, Tom's wife, Izzo
Standing there in the photo. She’s either cringing and wondering why this fat, sweaty bastard is sitting next to her or she’s doing her best Egyptian pharaoh dance
::Thought you meant Lupe Fiasco and double checked picture::
"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."
by Fearless Frog on Apr 6, 2009 2:09 PM PDT up reply actions
From the Standpoint of Economics...
I think it’d be great for some top draft pick to be humble and confident enough to be satisfied signing for $20 million in garaunteed money rather the the $30 million price tag that I’ve heard for this year’s class and throw the whole expected value for drafts picks in the toilet.
TMQ (Greg Easterbrook) discussed the Vikings getting lambasted for not drafting on time that one year (or two?) and asked the question that if you didn’t want to pick at your designated spot for financial reasons and no one would trade with you, why not just let yourself be skipped.
Great point.
I think it’s weird that there is so much talent evaluation and so little business strategy. With the 4th overall pick, we shouldn’t HAVE to pay 4th pick money. In Moneyball, Beane would pick guys that were late rounders too early, but pay them way below slot (or so Michael Lewis claims, I know how much he likes to spin tales). If a guy who was probably going to be the 15th pick was selected at 4, we should pay him 13th pick money, or if we really like a guy and ask him if he’d be willing to sign for less, then we should consider him at 4 even if he’s not a 4 talent. I suppose it’s different with football than baseball since there is no trading in baseball, but I don’t see how ‘signability’ is not a big concern.
I love Stafford and Sanchez, but if Sanchez is asking for 80% of what Stafford is asking for, I’m picking Sanchez, because I don’t think that Stafford has 1.25x the chance of succeeding compared to Sanchez.
I don’t know, it’s a good thing I’m not a GM. If I were I’d sign a prospect and DEMAND that he sign for fair market value. Joe Thomas and Jake Long are great tackles, but there was still probably only a 33% chance that they’d be elite, 33% average, and 33% not so great. So giving them the benefit of the doubt, let’s call it 50/50. So I’d only pay them the halfway of elite. So (10+3)/2 = $6.5 million per year, $38 million dollar 6 year contract for you. And of course the prospect would hold out, and I’d hold out even longer since I’m a stubborn ass. In the end I’d hope that this ‘incident’ would solve the rookie contract problem, even though I’d have to use my own team as an example.
Sorry for the rant.
In baseball
the prospects have a lot less leverage though in that they are far more likely to wash out in baseball than they are in Football. Everyone gets sent down to the minors first, no one gets put on the team in the hopes that they will save the franchise. And even then, the wash out rates are phenominally high. Teams in baseball begin negotiations starting from that point, players can’t say “I’m going to be a difference maker for you” because chances are they won’t be.
Ok, well, what about Sanchez?
I mean it’s not great that he would miss out on training camp. But he’s hurting the team just as much as he is hurting himself. It seems to me that the franchise holds a lot more cards than the player, and for whatever reason, every franchise has decided to cave in.
This post about summed up my thoughts on the Stafford - Detroit issue
Or expanded on them. I guess they have to play the game. Seattle does it to, I don’t know how many times I heard Ruskell say one thing then do another. It’s interesting to see who a team talks up and who they completely ignore. Sometimes it’s the ones they ignore that they’re after, so as to not tip their hand. So annoying.

by 
































