2008 Season Retrospective: Olindo Mare
Overview: Seattle signed Olindo Mare on March 27, 2008 to a two year, $3.5 million contract. It was the single best move of Seattle's offseason. It was met with scorn and derision. Ruskell hedged his bets by drafting kicker Brandon Coutu in the seventh round of the 2008 draft. Mare beat out Coutu and went on to be, discounting position, the single best player on the Seahawks roster.
What went right: Everything. Everything went right. Mare was second in total touchbacks and third in touchback percentage. He was the savior of Seattle's kickoff unit, a unit that allowed the fifth most return yards per kick in 2008, and was top ten in return yards per kick in 2007 and 2006. He was ninth in field goal percentage for kickers with twenty or more attempts. Using Football Outsiders advanced numbers, numbers that adjust for distance and weather, Mare was worth 4.6 points above average on field goals and 6.1 points above average kicking off.
What went wrong: Mare never fully displaced Coutu, and Coutu stayed on the active roster, still remains with the team.
Outlook: Retaining Coutu doesn't undo the savvy displayed signing Mare, but it does indicate it wasn't all savvy, it was at least some part luck. Coutu's presumed skill is kicking accuracy, a skill that may not be skill at all. Mare's presumed shortcoming was kicking accuracy, a shortcoming that vanished as the sample expanded. Combining his terrible 2007 with his terrific 2008, Mare's field goal percentage is, well, ordinary. He kicked for 78% over two seasons and is an 80.4% kicker for his career. Coutu was an 80.3% kicker for his college career. There's one major ability that separates the two: kickoff distance, and it's a blowout win for Mare.
So here's where this stands: Seattle is either retaining Coutu hoping they can trade him. As Coutu hasn't shown anything that elevates him from a street free agent, I doubt this. Seattle is retaining Coutu as the kicker and Mare as the kickoff specialist. In this case, the team likely loses Mare after 2009 when Mare signs somewhere he can do both. Or, and I grump that this is the most likely scenario, Seattle is retaining Coutu expecting him to beat out Mare in the preseason and take over kicking duties. Figure it's 50 - 50 that Coutu outperforms Mare in the preseason, and Seattle is suddenly one elite talent less. That's dumb. That's bad process. Coutu is a ticking time-bomb planted in Seattle's special teams, and if he detonates, Seattle will lose 10+ points of field position in 2009.
1 recs |
17 comments
|
Comments
I will be furious if Coutu is the kicker.
Not only is he not a weapon on kickoffs like Mare, he’s bad at them. Even in Minnesota’s dome his kickoffs were horrible and it was frightening seeing kick returners threaten to go the distance before Coutu tackled them.
"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."
by Fearless Frog on May 20, 2009 5:14 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
But... look at him!
How could you say no to that face.

by aerozeppelin on May 20, 2009 6:57 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
I'll bet thousands of drunk college girls
managed to.
2010 Seahawks Mock: 1A: Eric Berry S, 1B: Ndamukong Suh DT, 2: Charles Brown OT, 4:Zac Robinson QB, 5: Stafon Johnson RB 6: Will Tukuafu DE, 7: Kerry Meier WR
Also acceptable, trade for Patrick Chung and draft Ed Wang so everyone can Wang Chung tonight.
by LantermanC on May 20, 2009 7:05 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hehe
I remember that AP picture of our rookies lined up during training camp. Coutu looked so out of place, resembled more like someone’s math tutor rather than a football player. It was so funny.
"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."
by Fearless Frog on May 20, 2009 7:50 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
But what about the potential for the double kick trick play?
by GarethLewin on May 20, 2009 6:40 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I want my two kicker trick play!!!
I won’t let a well-reasoned post on kickers stop my irrational desire to see Coutu throw a 40 yard touchdown pass to Mare.
Seattle Seahawks: We've got Brian Russell and TWO kickers!
by SSreporters on May 20, 2009 7:46 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Who needs two kickers for that?
Efren Herrera gave us plenty of TDs out of the PK position without having another kicker on the roster.
by The Ancient Mariner on May 21, 2009 12:18 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good post
Anyone know a way to make sure Ruskell and Mora see it?
by thebyron on May 20, 2009 7:39 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Injuries hang over Ruskell's head like Damocles' sword.
He knows that the moment he cuts Coutu is the exact same moment Mare pulls a groin muscle.
by KHF on May 20, 2009 9:05 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
k, then he can just put Mare on IR and sign Coutu again.
And even if someone else signs Coutu, what’s the big deal? He’s a dime-a-dozen kicker and most street FAs would probably be similar.
"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."
by Fearless Frog on May 20, 2009 9:39 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not so sure about coutu being dime a dozen.
Teams already know that we spent a pick on him and kept him around despite having mare. I’m pretty sure he’d be snagged up quick.
That said mare is a sure thing, I’d prefer to just drop the kid and use the roster spot on another youngster.
by djafrot on May 20, 2009 9:57 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think it was just injury insurance or something
or that after the season went to the pits it’s not like Coutu was taking up a valuable spot. But it seems like Coutu is just an accurate kicker with inadequate leg strength. Those aren’t hard to find at all. And even if we retain him, it better not be because of some ‘kicker of the future’ jazz, because teams change kickers like underwear, and perhaps rightfully so.
"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."
by Fearless Frog on May 21, 2009 12:04 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I sorta subscribed to the "street FA" theory for a while...
…then we got the Kris Heppner experience in the first four games of 2000.
by KHF on May 21, 2009 7:15 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lots of passion around these parts
for just a couple of scrawny kickers. Guess we are a soccer town now.
by stallz on May 21, 2009 7:45 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
The one area where Ruskell has been undeniably bad in his decision making...
has been on special teams. It’s not just that things haven’t worked out at long-snapper, and at times at punter, the coverage has ranged from ordinary to bad on KOs and PRs, and the coaching has been pedestrian at best.
What worries me is that, as you allude to John, the process sucks. It’s downright sloppy, which is surprising because I think Ruskell is an above average executive. Yet it’s not clear that TR knows how to evaluate ST talent, and he wears his ignorance like so many Confederate flag-waving bozos in my adopted home state—which is to say, proudly. It’s as if special teams is not worthy of his normal level of thoroughness.
Take recently released LS Tyler Schmitt. After an obvious inability to sign a LS worth league minimum two seasons ago, you could practically hear TR saying, “Alright. You want a LS? I’ll get you your damn LS; best LS in college by God! But, since he’s not a real football player we can just skip the physical.” I knew Holmgren and TR couldn’t co-exist for long when Schmitt got hurt and Holmgren said something like, “This kid’s back is worse than mine,” clearly indicating that the condition was chronic (and undiagnosed) rather than an injury. That was Defcon-1 level sarcasm directed at TR’s thoroughness. Petty and vindictive perhaps, but on point.
"Those who fear disorder more than injustice inevitably produce more of both." -- Rev. William Coffin
by dcrockett17 on May 22, 2009 4:41 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 

















