2008 Season Retrospective: Brandon Mebane
Overview: Brandon Mebane started 16 games at right defensive tackle. He played mostly over the "1", between the left guard and center, but occasionally slid out to the more disruptive "3" between the left guard and left tackle. He had a career high 5.5 sacks and also four tackles for a loss. Still not yet recognized, Mebane is the best player on Seattle's defensive line.
What went right: Early in the season Mebane was attempting to better time his first step. He was penalized for offsides in week two and week three. I couldn't be more thrilled. He didn't record another offsides all season, though flagged for encroachment in week 15. Those ten yards lost were the growing pains in an emerging pass rusher. Mebane went on to record 13 quarterback hits or passes defensed. He had 5.5 sacks and against some of the better guards in football: Arron Sears, Justin Smiley, Reggie Wells, Logan Mankins and Alan Faneca. The most celebrated, Faneca, tends to allow a lot of sacks.
At the same time, his run stuffing ability held. He held point, backed down or split nearly every double team he faced. In addition to his four tackles for a loss, he had eight tackles for no gain and 11 tackles after a gain of one. That's 23 tackles in which the opposition netted just seven yards.
What went wrong: Despite improving his first step, Mebane still played like a fantastic one and not a true three. His best pass rush move is a bull rush and he backs down the pocket more than actually slicing in and disrupting the backfield. He's very quick, but not very side-to-side agile. He's not bad for a big man, but he's not Tommie Harris.
Outlook: Seattle wants to lock Mebane in at the three. Given Gus Bradley's roots, Mebane will play both right and left defensive tackle, but always playing over the three gap. In such a system, the three is often known as the "under tackle". It's a position he should be good at, but probably not as good as he was playing the one. Mebane is a rare one tech in a single-gap system. The kind of player Chicago and Indianapolis have sought for countless seasons. He's quick and his strangely-low center of gravity makes him a nightmare against taller guards. Mebane is almost impossible to get push on. He has a ferocious club and the kind of three yard quickness that makes him explode through a collapsing pocket and into the ball carrier. As a three, Mebane will have a longer path to the ball carrier and will no longer do what he does best: collapse the pocket. Seattle needs Mebane to be as dominant at the three as he was at the one, and if he is, he will be the engine of this defense and earn his first Pro Bowl. If he's not, Seattle's rush defense could collapse like it did in 2006, post-Marcus Tubbs.
0 recs |
12 comments
|
Comments
Question
Are some of Mebane’s weaknesses at the 3-technique offset by potentially better play at the one-technique by Cole?
"Those who fear disorder more than injustice inevitably produce more of both." -- Rev. William Coffin
by dcrockett17 on May 24, 2009 3:36 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
It would certainly help the run defense
I don’t think Mebane will ever be an elite pass rusher.
by John Morgan on May 24, 2009 4:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Without asking you to do any serious research,
how many DTs off the top of your head would you rather have than Bane?
by SeaTownBlueDevil on May 24, 2009 5:41 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Given age, salary and scheme
Amobi Okoye, maybe Kevin Williams, Vince Wilfork and Haloti Ngata. Ngata could be an excellent one tech. Mebane is a young 24 and costs just $500k.
by John Morgan on May 24, 2009 5:52 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Arron Sears.
"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."
by Fearless Frog on May 24, 2009 4:22 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Makes perfect sense to me
I’ve always seen Mebane as more of a 3 than a 1, but he is just that versatile enough to play either of the DT spots. The 3 is all about disruption though, and disrupting is what Mebane’s done best ever since he got to Seattle. He’s the best DT on the team currently, and I think the coaches understand that, and that is why they want him at the 3 tech because from that spot he stands to make a lot more plays than he otherwise would at the 1. Coach Dan Quinn comes highly regarded. Let’s see what he can do for Mebane in terms of refining him a bit and teaching him some new tricks.
by Catoblepas on May 24, 2009 5:38 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
getting schooled on football
As a non-expert (but dedicated) fan, this is the kind of stuff I like to learn about, such as: “As a three, Mebane will have a longer path to the ball carrier… and will no longer do what he does best: collapse the pocket”. I am not clear on what exactly are the skills needed for each position, so it is nice to hear about, especially applied directly to the Seahawks 2009 year. As to Mebane, I have to think a disruptive 3-tech is a more valuable player (right?) – so if B.M. can pull it off, its a net upgrade for the hawks, if not, we are probably in transitional hell anyway for our defense.
by paul2 on May 24, 2009 5:41 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Mebane was more suited to the three tech coming out of college
There were alot scouting reports on Mebane coming out of college. He was a great pass rushing college DT that bulked up his senior year I believe to play the NT. He may well be able to transition to a three tech with little to no trouble as that was his more natural position early in his college career.
It’s a bit of a concern for us because he has been so solid at the one tech. But he may be just as good at the three tech, only time will tell.
I’m not sold on Cole. I guess we’ll see how he does as the primary run stuffer. I really hope Red Bryant steps up and lives up to his hype. That would help the D-line alot.
It’s going to be interesting to see how the D-line changes affect the team.
by ASeahawkfan on May 25, 2009 6:32 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I thought it was that he bulked up for us
rather than Cal. At any rate, he’s losing weight for 3-tech. John’s assessment feels spot on, so it makes the position change slightly disappointing, but yes 3-tech is more valuable so it may still be a net positive, again as you pointed out if Cole can collapse sufficiently for Mebane to slice in.
One other note that may provide additional hope, here: John, how certain are you that Mebane had single-gap assignment? I had the sense that he was the guy on the line with 2-gap assignment, and why he seemed to me to collapse the pocket while staying in his lanes, rather than collapsing and then pursuing. If he had 2-gap assignment and then is moving to 1, I might still have slight reservations about how Cole can support him, and how well he can perform with less than ideal support there, but otherwise I would be a lot more optimistic about this change, as I had been while assuming he was going from 2-gap to 1-gap.
by jacobstevens on May 26, 2009 3:37 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
He's losing weight?
I didn’t read anything about that, I thought it was Redding who was losing weight.
"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."
by Fearless Frog on May 28, 2009 10:10 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Mebane was on Brock & Salk on 710 AM ESPN
I dunno, last week, or something, and he said he was losing weight for the position change. I think Redding is, too. Slices of beef is just falling off the sides of our defensive line.
by jacobstevens on May 28, 2009 10:29 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 














