2008 Season Retrospective: Marcus Trufant
Overview: Marcus Trufant was healthy and started all 16 games. With the pass rush hobbled and the secondary breaking apart at the seams, Trufant was again relied on to match one-on-one against the opponent's best receiver. He caught one interception and defended 13 passes.
What went right: In most ways, Trufant was the exact same cornerback that looked so special in 2007. He tackled well. He held tight coverage and was rarely beat. He showed good ball skills when afforded the opportunity.
What went wrong: He wasn't afforded the opportunity very often. Seattle played from behind and protected its run defense to the ruination of its pass defense. Marshall put Deon Grant in the box and left Trufant on an island. Trufant's talent tends to blind. He's fast and his coverage reliable, but should such a thing exist, he's not a shutdown corner. For too much of his career he's been treated as one, and it's led to some beatdowns and bad stats. Without a man behind him or a lead to protect, Trufant couldn't be bold, couldn't play the ball, instead reverted to atavistic Trufant (a sort of sturdier, stronger Kelly Jennings), was in the right place at the right time, but without the confidence to pick and risk allowing a touchdown.
Outlook: Seattle's been sorta tightlipped about how it will run its defense. Tampa is mentioned a lot, but that could reference the famous Tampa 2, Monte Kiffin's more recent work for the Bucs, an ideal or goal, or be a red herring entirely. Let's use Occam's Razor and assume Tampa -- when Seattle hired a ten-year proponent of the philosophy -- means Tampa 2. Let's say Seattle's bigger line, stronger strongside linebacker and healthy linebacker corps allows Grant to play back in a cover 2 shell. Marcus Trufant will benefit enormously. Trufant is a great corner. Great, great corner. He's very hard to gameplan against because he has no weaknesses, a suite of strengths and a few exceptional skills. He just needs some help. Give him some help over top, some rush to panic the quarterback and a lead to protect and his picks will return. And this Pro Bowler will return.
0 recs |
22 comments
|
Comments
Does a CB like Trufant
ever make a coverage safety look better than he actually is? (further possible indictment of Russell…..)
by jacobstevens on May 27, 2009 3:54 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Didn't he break his hand and wear a cast for part of the season?
Or was it just Tatupu that did?
by cashless on May 27, 2009 3:54 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
And I didn't Kearny as well?
I thought it was the trio that had their hands in casts.
by cashless on May 27, 2009 3:57 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Trufant spent a year (Junior, I believe) with a club for a hand while at Wazzu. He was still amazing.
by abender20 on May 27, 2009 4:03 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Trufant was such a beast at WSU it was ridiculous.
"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."
by Fearless Frog on May 27, 2009 8:48 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Except when Reggie Williams made him his bitch.
Sam Bradford, future Seattle Seahawk.
by Carl Shinyama on May 27, 2009 9:31 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
You know that's right.
Early prospect watch: RB C.J. Spiller, QB Jevon Snead, OT Ciron Black, DT Gerald McCoy, S Eric Berry, DT Ndamukong Suh, CB Ras-I Dowling 6'2, 200
by Misfit74 on May 27, 2009 10:36 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Trufant dominated Randy Moss last season
basically shut him down when the Pats came to town. That game he had good safety help over the top. Usually always someone behind him so he could play Moss tight off the line. I think that game really showed his ability as an elite corner, he shadowed Moss all day, right and left side.
On the flip side, in this example Trufant didnt have that safety help. Green Bay at Seattle last season trying to cover Greg Jennings. Trufant had trouble all game, and got burned several times by Jennings (one for a 45 yd TD). No safety help whatsoever in that game. Tried to play agressive off the line but Jennings was off to the races and Trufant trying to catch back up (ie on an island by himself). Night and day difference.
by Bellevue on May 27, 2009 8:43 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Trufant, I'm not so worried about. Fantastic DB, the jewel of our secondary.
I’m more concerned with Kelly Jennings or Ken Lucas ever returning to form and becoming decent to good #2 corners. As of now I’m more optimistic with Lucas.
"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."
by Fearless Frog on May 27, 2009 8:49 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Same.
No complaints about Trufant and I don’t really care if he gets fanfare or elite corner talk, etc. The dude is a stud and one of the best players on our team. I hope we use him properly this year. I think he’s the type of player that could enjoy a longer career and get more physical (not that he isn’t already) as he ages in the mould of an Al Harris type. I’m not worried about him declining anytime soon, though he will turn 29 this season. He could be a fine corner deep into his 30’s, I think.
Early prospect watch: RB C.J. Spiller, QB Jevon Snead, OT Ciron Black, DT Gerald McCoy, S Eric Berry, DT Ndamukong Suh, CB Ras-I Dowling 6'2, 200
by Misfit74 on May 27, 2009 8:58 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ball skills hurt vs. tall receivers
Is it just me, or is Trufant the all-time career leader in fewest inches of separation per catch? It seems like he is ALWAYS in position to make the play, but rarely does. Actually, in 2007, he seemed to quite a bit more. But last year, slipped a bit.
I’m still a huge fan, and I don’t profess to know if it’s perhaps because he’s making up for lack of safety help. I’m just sayin’.
by PerryCollective on May 27, 2009 9:25 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I think it has more to do with him closing on WRs that were open.
So he’s nearly in position on plays that with another CB would not be close.
by cashless on May 27, 2009 11:20 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nah, I'm with PC
he possessed, perhaps, but never displayed any ball skills at all, with the Hawks, until his contract year in 2007. 2008 I’d say it slightly regressed a bit, but not back to how it was before. But it wasn’t because the wideouts were open, they weren’t. They were simply thrown to anyway, despite the stellar coverage, because he showed time and again that completions could be made no matter was he hip to hip with his man.
by jacobstevens on May 28, 2009 10:25 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
We had safeties over the top of his coverage more in 2007.
At least it seemed that way. When a guy is left on an island…the amount of risks you can take go down.
by cashless on May 28, 2009 12:23 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
More than 2008
because we were using a lot of post safety, for some odd reason. But I’m positive, with high frequency Trufant has been in tremendous position to defend a pass, and it was completed. And not just Fitzgerald and tall receivers on jump balls. Holt always used to own him.
by jacobstevens on May 28, 2009 1:24 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I meant to follow up that 1st sentence
by setting the context to his general career, so before and after 2007, and even occassionally in 2007. That’s the way CB play goes, but it always had been his biggest drawback.
by jacobstevens on May 28, 2009 1:25 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Fitzgerald makes all corners look short
Trufant does play him 2x per season. Which hurts.
by Section 128 on May 28, 2009 8:33 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Good analysis as usual pt2
How many conerbacks do you think could be put out on an island without help with the best receiver and not have trouble?
Tru is defiantly better when allowed to gamble and play for the pick.
by B.B.Finnegan on May 28, 2009 9:50 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
short, sweet, and to the point
Trufant is the one player in the secondary you never have to worry about. He is rarely talked about and is completely unheralded in the national media, although I guess most corners are.
by Hancock.Brett on May 28, 2009 10:17 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 














