NFL Policy on Players and Twittering
The word twitter originates from the 14th century. It wasn't a time known for its labor relations. Twittering used to be the practice of birds and chickens and not something associated with the burly, hypermasculine warrior prototype. But the strong, silent type is fading, and communication, in all its trivial and attenuated modern forms, is vogue. So, with regalia transitioning from a shield bearing one's coat of arms to a personalized last name and a grill that could finance a mortgage, communication is no longer a shrug and a manly nod, but insight like this:
@sparxx_513 haters are good for you to start the day, it's called hatervating, motivation had sex with the hater and made a hatervater!
From Chad Ochocinco.
So what should be the NFL's policy on player's twittering? I've never given it much thought. But the Washington Post contacted SBN's football blogs and asked just that. My answer, in part:
If I were commissioner, my solution would be to have NFL players register their Twitter accounts through the NFL and run their tweets through screeners.
The rest of my response and the responses of my colleagues can be found at the Washington Post's football blog, The League.
17 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I for one would like to see all of Twitter obliterated.
But that’s just me.
Twitter has its value
But the majority of people don’t use it as such.
The demise of the Broncos in '09 is our future. Pray hard.
by Nick Andron on Aug 24, 2009 11:23 AM PDT up reply actions
Not anything that Facebook and RSS feeds don't already cover.
NEEDS MORE FREEDOM!
by Scruffy Lefty on Aug 24, 2009 11:30 AM PDT up reply actions
RSS feeds blow the minds of average internet users.
Child please...
by Airborne Hawk Guy on Aug 24, 2009 12:02 PM PDT up reply actions
Please don't
it’s so easy to win stuff off of there :(
by Trepidation on Aug 24, 2009 12:18 PM PDT up reply actions
So here's a twitter question.
Next to the comment link it has a facebook icon, then a green box saying TWEET or 2 RETWEET. What does that mean?
It allows people to share the article or the article link through those services.
Stupid as either may be, and I have little opinion, both are very effective at connecting people and spreading trends. The buttons are SBN’s way of allowing readers to share articles they like.
by John Morgan on Aug 24, 2009 11:48 AM PDT up reply actions
I made an account sometime last year,
and only started looking at it in the past month. There are a lot of fake people out there trying to get you to go to porn sites. Twitter should try to cut down on that.
Hasselbeck and Sims are funny on Twitter.
Matt is clever and funny and all Sims talks about is food. Lots and lots of food.
Child please...
by Airborne Hawk Guy on Aug 24, 2009 11:56 AM PDT reply actions
I can't stop laughing about
Chad Johnson’s tweet (god I hate that word!). It’s so stupid, but I can’t stop laughing. Hatervater. Hahaha.
I don't much care for twitter
but what right does the NFL have to regulate what their employees do on their free time? (provided they twitter only on their free time)
or would any rules only apply to twittering while on the job?
Chad Johnson
(stfu about OchoCinco) said he would be tweeting on the sidelines/during halftime.
by Trepidation on Aug 24, 2009 12:56 PM PDT up reply actions
I've got a Twitter.
I don’t recommend following me, though. My one and only Twitter post ever says “Twitter is stupid.”

I started reading the graph but then checked my email instead
but couldn’t get through the in box because it was loading slowly so I went to MySpace. No one had commented on my new pics and I’m still banned from Kelly’s page so I came back here to respond to a comment I hadn’t fully read.
You are wrong.
by John Morgan on Aug 24, 2009 2:21 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs

by 































