Seattle Seahawks Sign Aaron Curry to Six-Year, $60 Million Dollar Contract with $34 million guaranteed
Seattle has signed Aaron Curry to a six-Year, $60 Million dollar contract with $34 million guaranteed. The number is huge, but it presents a calculated risk by Seattle. The Seahawks are confident Curry will produce throughout his contract and wanted him in Blue as long as possible. Nevertheless, don't be surprised if Seattle attempts to renegotiate and extend Curry's contract a few year's down the line. That way they will retain Curry longer and delay his more onerous cap years.
Curry will be around for tomorrow's practice and when I attend, he will be prioritized*. Not that you'all care or anything about Swift Justice, Curry will be prioritized for selfish reasons. I wanna see this guy work.
Follow the bump and read my draft grade for Curry or click this and see the entire series. Also, hell yeah.
*And by prioritized, I mean gawked at.
We left off on a bit of a cliffhanger and with good reason(s).
No one player can turn around a team (though the rebounds by Atlanta, Miami, Tennessee and to a lesser extent Baltimore argue that adding a competent quarterback sure helps). Sometimes a marquee talent at a marquee position falls to you at four, but not too often. So you either reach for position and draft B.J. Raji or Eugene Monroe and know the talent isn't that special and you might be drafting the next Johnathan Sullivan, or you take the best guy out there and figure out position later. Seattle did the latter. Seattle did not need Aaron Curry, especially did not need Curry if it had kept Julian Peterson, and shouldn't expect Curry to be the player that makes this defense. No one player can turn around a team.
It's tough to swallow that, because when good teams go bad and they get that first top five pick in whoknowshowlong, everyone wants that pick to be so damn special it makes 12 losses seem worth it. Like that first night with strange isn't going to make the divorce worth it but you better get over it anyhow or else you're going to be forever lonely and bitter. Like Aaron Curry isn't going to be Lawrence Taylor -- who, incidentally, played for some pretty rotten teams but was Lawrence Taylor anyway -- but is seriously badass and more than a little fun to watch.
The next three plays went
- (Right) Hit, swim, does not factor.
- (Right) Short zone, does not factor.
- (Left) Throw away, does not factor.
And those three plays pretty much defined BC's second half offense. So, you can see why I'd cut this game short, start tomorrow with Deon Butler and rejoin Curry against a team with an offense. But there's a grade to be given.
Curry is fast. Curry is rare fast for a linebacker, but the thing that pops for Curry, the thing that makes him special among the special is power. Pure, athletic power. They say you can't teach speed, but truth is you can't teach power either. Yeah, I could bulk up and pound the iron like a pneumatic piston, but on my hulkingest, veiniest, roidingest, most shriveled testicle day, I could not stand with an NFL player. That's because muscle fibers don't increase and you can only max them out so much. That's because the power to slowly lift heavy objects is mostly useful for slowly lifting heavy objects. That's because 6'2"/250 guys that can rattle 6'5"/260 guys that could rattle the fillings from my teeth are unique. Curry is hugely powerful. He will abuse opposing tight ends and force opponents to audible them off the line. He will drive lead blockers into backs and in through the out hole. Curry will add power to a linebacker corps without great power, and size and muscle to a defense built on technique and speed.
Of course, Curry is fast. Curry is rare powerful for a linebacker, but the guys he pops, the players he overpowers looks stuck in quicksand beside him. He gets going fast, has a real nice speed curve, and is effective through the hole, in long pursuit, or running back an interception or fumble. Curry has a way of appearing in places he really shouldn't be like Hasidic Bat Mitzvahs or 25 yards down and across the field four inches into Chris Crane's shoulder socket.
Size, strength, it sounds like athleticism, but it's not. Control is athleticism and Curry is no dancer, but he's nimble. He can move both through and around offensive linemen. He can redirect well and has terrific feet. He moves a little stiff at times, but there's basic inertia at play here, and I don't think it's so much a lack of agility as that it's hard to move a big body at high speeds. So that, if Curry can learn when to burn and learn when to inch in, I think he's physically capable of the kind of sudden redirect and lateral pursuit of the best linebackers. He's a special athlete, but doesn't look consistently so, and unlike almost any great Ruskell prospect before him, there's currently more talent than skill, but a Saint John's Cathedral ceiling.
A lot of skill though and little skill buds that make ya think "this guy's skilled, but there's room for him to be a true technician." He has the pre-rec preternatural awareness. The kind of head-on-a-swivel, everywhere-the-ball's-gonna-be kind of vigilance that looked so promising in Lawrence Jackson before his hand-fighting skills never materialized and he started quitting on plays. Curry has the hand fighting. The push, the rip, the swim that tosses aside lead blockers. He has the buffet of skills of a great pass rusher. He looks a little stiff to terrorize right now, but let's not count him out. There's a little Teddy K in this guy. A little lunatic pass rusher waiting for the right crusade.
You're gonna see this guy and you're gonna love him. He won't fix this defense, but after a game of detailed scouting, there's not many guys I'd rather watch and watch and watch. He could make the Pro Bowl his first year, but the Seahawks themselves might stop that. Should it mean anything, he'll make Sportscenter most Sunday nights. He'll make Seattle's defense better. Better than it was with Julian Peterson, even if it means finding pass rush from other players and better schemes. He will bust through blockers Colin Cole lets through and pretty much stop another Brandon Jacobs debacle from happening. He's going to make his name known around the league awful fast, and in between the flash he's going to be a great teammate and contribute to others' big plays. No, he's not going to make this defense, but everything I've seen says Seattle picked right on Curry. Let's start him with an "A" and see if he can top that.
0 recs |
67 comments
|
Comments
Yes!! Just in time for John's first camp report.
Smart man!
I'm gonna go calm submissive on your ass.
by Dukeshire on Aug 8, 2009 4:58 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Aww crap...
-rest of the NFC West
RLTW!
by Airborne Hawk Guy on Aug 8, 2009 5:04 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
The most badass LB corp in football is complete
Welcome to the Seahawks, Aaron Curry.
"And Joe for Matt Hughes, dislike may not be a strong enough adjective!" - Mike Goldberg
by SSreporters on Aug 8, 2009 5:19 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
That is a ton of money
But I don’t feel bad one bit. Football will be twice as fun this year.
by paul2 on Aug 8, 2009 5:27 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
This put a smile on my face...
I'm gonna go calm submissive on your ass.
by Dukeshire on Aug 8, 2009 5:58 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
"Make him feel welcome Leroy!"
I am officially fired up. Time for beer!
RLTW!
by Airborne Hawk Guy on Aug 8, 2009 6:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That is a ton of scratch.
~please don’t be a bust~
~please don’t be a bust~
~please don’t be a bust~
It's Great to be a Florida Gator!
Looking forward to another year of the Gators embarrassing your football teams.
by Wayward Llama on Aug 8, 2009 6:24 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Aaron Curry isn't gonna nearly be the player we're looking for....
…..(Reverse-jinx!!)
Glenn Beck likes argument, but has a deap-seated hatred for logic.
by Cheddar28 on Aug 8, 2009 6:25 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I saw him take the field today, and he also signed my ball after practice!
Although, holy shit at that money. For a linebacker.
"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."
by Fearless Frog on Aug 8, 2009 7:19 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Or you could have Tyson Jackson
$57 million over 5 years, $31 million guaranteed for a 3-4 DE.
by ninjasocks on Aug 8, 2009 7:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
4-3 OLB seems almost as insignifant in the grand scheme of things as a 3-4 DE.
"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."
by Fearless Frog on Aug 8, 2009 7:47 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It depends
Peterson was pretty effect for us for a couple of years and Leroy was able to grab a few sacks early on. I think we’ve really got a LB-oriented defense (going on gut here) and that Curry may have the flexibility to be able to make some plays (hopefully).
I’m not going to try to serious refute your contention, but I think we can hope for more playmaking from Curry than Jackson. Also, Curry was rated to be a pretty amazing LB while Jackson was thought to be merely a possible contender for the best of a mediocre class of d-linemen.
by ninjasocks on Aug 8, 2009 7:55 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I wouldn't have been any happier to sign an unproven...
QB for 12 million a year.
I’d rather do what we did and take the consensus best player available. Even if Curry doesn’t turn out to be an LB god, we will still be paying for production rather than having a situation like Vince Young or Alex Smith.
We took the best guy available to us. It wasn’t a position of need, so we had that luxury of doing so. Let’s hope our scouts and the general NFL community scouts were right and Aaron Curry is the closest thing to a stud, can’t fail prospect we could get.
by ASeahawkfan on Aug 8, 2009 11:03 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
But would you agree that an above average OT or QB would be worth far more than a very good OLB?
"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."
by Fearless Frog on Aug 9, 2009 1:23 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes.
But is that what we turned down? For example, look at the Matt Leinart, Vince Young, Jay Cutler draft. Cutler turned out to be good, so that’s one out of three. The other two are still struggling, and not even starting. Alex Smith and Russell are not doing so great either. We like to believe that the guys picked at the top of the draft are the best players, but they often are not. Offensive Tackles might not bust quite as often, but plenty of them do as well. As much as I would love to say that the 4th overall pick should be a guarantee, if we picked the 2nd best QB or OT, there is no guarantee that they were going to be an above average QB or OT.
I think that they really weighed those options and decided the question marks about the specific QB(s) and OTs were too much to pass on Curry.
by cashless on Aug 9, 2009 2:05 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sure, in the abstract
However
(1) We’re talking about NFL prospects, not proven NFL talent.
(2) Timmah is doing the picking, which means he’s probably better at picking a good OLB than a good QB or OT. Would you rather spend $60 million on a sure bet with a low payout or a riskier bet with a higher payout?
(3) The OLB in question was heralded as a one-in-a-generation (whatever that means) phenom while the QB in question was Mark “one and done” Sanchez and the OTs included Andre “too fat” Smith, Eugene “meh” Monroe and Michael “there must be a reason he dropped so far” Oher.
I’m not gonna argue that we shouldn’t have gone for Jason Smith or Matt Stafford, had they been there, but I also don’t think that the “safe pick” (QB or OT) is always the safe pick.
by ninjasocks on Aug 9, 2009 2:19 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
"Would you rather spend $60 million on a sure bet with a low payout or a riskier bet with a higher payout?"
Maybe it’s because I’m a gambler at heart, but yes, if largely due to the fact that either position in question was (is) of far greater need than an OLB, and if either panned out, the dividends would be much more important in magnitude. In fact, you could make a very convincing argument we didn’t need an OLB at all.
"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."
by Fearless Frog on Aug 9, 2009 9:20 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why not gamble that a 255 lb linebacker with 4.55 speed and blistering acceleration will turn out to be a great pass rusher?
by cashless on Aug 9, 2009 10:12 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Because in four seasons starting, he has a grand total of 9 sacks.
I’d wager he’s not suddenly going to do a 180 and somehow become a better pass-rusher than he was in college; in most cases, usually the opposite happens.
And in the off chance that Curry becomes a noteworthy pass-rusher, where does that leave Leroy? One of the highest paid OLBs left to attempt coverage, his most obvious weaknesS?
"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."
by Fearless Frog on Aug 9, 2009 10:37 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wait you're saying,
if we use Curry for some pass-rushing that we won’t be utilizing Leroy in the same capacity? I thought part of the reason they let Peterson go was so they COULD use Leroy for pass-rushing.
Glenn Beck likes argument, but has a deap-seated hatred for logic.
by Cheddar28 on Aug 10, 2009 12:15 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Right.
Although I suppose cashless is right and we could blitz both, but if Hill is primarily the OLB used for pass-rushing, Curry is likely relegated to his strengths, which are coverage and stopping the run, which don’t really stand out as a to-die-for guy you draft in the top 5.
"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."
by Fearless Frog on Aug 10, 2009 10:27 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yet you would bet on a QB with one year of college starting or OTs that all have something they didn't show in college are worth putting the same money on.
You are willing to bet on the OT or the QB to progress and learn or drastically improve skills (which they would HAVE to do to succeed) but not the OLB? How does that compute?
And you seem to be assuming a Julian Peterson style of pass rush or none. What about the concept of rushing both Leroy Hill(or just threatening and one or none go) with one or two DEs dropping back in zones? Having a 4-3 where pressure from any position is imminent? None of that appeals to you?
by cashless on Aug 10, 2009 12:51 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Okay, fine, I'll assume Curry will be an asset in the team's overall pass-rush.
But if Sanchez doesn’t get the benefit of the doubt for being a one-year wonder, why does Curry? Yes, he’s obviously started more than one season, but he even said himself that if he came out last year he’d be considered a third-round pick at best. If that happened, he would become depth at LB and a special teamer for some team, probably bounce around the NFL, and we’d never hear about him again. It was his senior season that propelled himself into becoming a well-known player.
In addition, I’m struggling to understand which specific OT are you talking about. Because Eugene Monroe was regarded as pretty close to NFL ready and was already a refined pass-protector. Not a fan of Andre Smith or Michael Oher, although the latter has reportedly been stonewalling Terrell Suggs repeatedly in Baltimore’s training camp.
"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."
by Fearless Frog on Aug 10, 2009 10:25 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
You are the one saying you would gamble on one.
Which one was worth it to you? It sounds as thought you like Monroe. Is he also a dominant run blocker in your estimation? That is not something I heard said about him.
I feel like the discussion we just had was somewhat similar to what the scouts went through, except the discussed Crabtree, Orakpo, Raji, and more. If Monroe is a very good pass blocker and nothing else, is he more valuable to the team than a LB that is nearly flawless? And if Monroe is NFL average run blocking and above average pass blocking(still not top 5, just very good) is he so much better than replacement value than if Curry fills out all of his skills with pass rushing on top of it?
I think they discussed this fully and decided that Curry’s abilities they were sure of AND his ceiling were acceptable over the other players they were discussing.
by cashless on Aug 10, 2009 10:31 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Obviously, I'm not 100% certain.
“If Monroe is a very good pass blocker and nothing else, is he more valuable to the team than a LB that is nearly flawless?”
That’s the thing. I don’t Curry is ‘flawless’ in the traditional sense; he’s not especially weak in any area. However, I really don’t see any standout strength that hyped him up to be a top 5 pick. He’s well-rounded and a ‘safe’ pick, but is that what you want? That same tag applied to AJ Hawk. “Shove the fullback into the locker and atomic wedgie the tight end” type run stuffer? I’d apply that tag to Rey Maualuga over Curry. Manny Lawson/Julian Peterson-esque coverage? It’s debatable whether Curry is even better than James Laurinaitis at that.
While I’m wishing Curry is DeMarcus Ware, Julian Peterson, and Lance Briggs all in one, I can’t get over the fact we drafted a non-premium position in the top 5 which also happened to be a position of strength on the team to fill a perceived ‘need’ we never really had.
"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."
by Fearless Frog on Aug 10, 2009 12:14 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wouldn't you argue that an above-average LT is worth much, much more than a very good RB?
A couple of years ago the Cardinals took the “safe pick”and grabbed an OT instead of a flashy, but sometimes injured RB.
by ninjasocks on Aug 9, 2009 2:24 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's not as if Peterson would look nearly as good as he does now behind the Cardinals offensive line.
"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."
by Fearless Frog on Aug 9, 2009 9:19 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Crap!
I’m glad he’s signed, but its about $5 million more guaranteed than I expected. But then I’m not sure that the contract would necessarily be any “worse” than a “$27-28 million guaranteed” contract.
I’m just glad he’s signed and he can start to practice with the team soon.
by ninjasocks on Aug 8, 2009 7:38 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
grrr
10 mil / year for a linebacker is ridiculous. These rookie contracts are absurd. The NBA has the best system by far. MLB sucks because of the slotting / big money bias affecting the actual pick order. Rookies should not be among the highest paid players at their positions- stupid.
by michaelfox99 on Aug 8, 2009 7:42 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I hope curry really is 1.7x as good as Lance Briggs
by michaelfox99 on Aug 8, 2009 7:47 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's why dynasties are built
in the 2nd-5th rounds, although QBs are an exception.
by Fear on Aug 8, 2009 7:51 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
At least the contracts aren't 100% guaranteed
In the NBA you’ve got Eddy Currys and Bobby Simmons’ getting paid $10 million per year when Brandon Roys get paid $3 million and Monta Ellis’ get paid $700000.
by ninjasocks on Aug 8, 2009 7:58 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Feels good to have an elite corp going, whatever corp it is.
I remember having the best line in football. Time for the LBs beeootch!
Emerald City Funk Machine
by blackvanilla on Aug 8, 2009 8:07 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
PFT
said that we released Billy McMullen to make room on the roster. Crap, what are we gonna do now when our top 8 WRs get hurt?
by ninjasocks on Aug 8, 2009 8:17 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Curry will fill in at WR.
He will also snap the ball to himself and then throw it 80 yards downfield…to himself. Barefoot.
RLTW!
by Airborne Hawk Guy on Aug 8, 2009 8:20 PM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
It seems like you might be joking
But my heart tells me you speak the truth.
/thinking that Timmah found Matt’s successor
by ninjasocks on Aug 8, 2009 8:24 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
This just in:
Swift Justice visited the Fred Hutchinson Center after practice. While there he sacked cancer 5 times.
RLTW!
by Airborne Hawk Guy on Aug 8, 2009 9:38 PM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
Win.
"And Joe for Matt Hughes, dislike may not be a strong enough adjective!" - Mike Goldberg
by SSreporters on Aug 9, 2009 12:12 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sign him again from free agency, of course.
"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."
by Fearless Frog on Aug 8, 2009 8:37 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Damn!
That is alot of money, but the team got him for six years (which might or might not be a good thing). The NFL needs to get a rookie cap, these numbers for guys who have done nothing is getting a little hard to swallow. It’s just a little annoying when you have to pay even more money (at the gate and concession) because of these huge contracts (don’t fool yourself the teams pass it on to the consumers).
Whatever, the team got their guy, lets hope he is as good as billed (that’s all I’m hoping for).
by JustinWF on Aug 8, 2009 8:28 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Swift Justice
All this talk of him makes me like him and feel jealous of him. He’s getting a lot of attention tomorrow.
by Alanya Morgan on Aug 8, 2009 9:04 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Hi darling.
Ian Snell walked the world. What an awful game.
by John Morgan on Aug 8, 2009 10:31 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
You'll never believe me
But literally three minutes before he burst through the doors and onto training camp field , I look at my buddy and say “you know what would be awesome? If Curry signed his contract and busted through those doors.” I swear on my mother’s yet-to-be-dug-for-decades-hopefully grave.
A little report on curry’s performance: he was destroyed by three different TE’s in a coverage drill. But later he made up for it with a would-be MONSTER hit on Cameron Morrah after a catch. Honestly, if Curry had hit him, Morrah would have never been the same. Or really even close.
Was a great training camp day! Got five autographs on my jersey :) carlson’s made my day. What an intelligent, articulate, nice guy.
The demise of the Broncos in '09 is our future. Pray hard.
by Nick Andron on Aug 8, 2009 9:20 PM PDT via mobile reply actions 0 recs
Lucky bastard
Sounds like a sweet day.
by ASeahawkfan on Aug 8, 2009 9:32 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Same here, kinda.
I made a comment to my old man about how it would be cool if Curry was here to complete the linebacker trifecta and that it sucks he was still holding out, and about 3 minutes later that dude with the megaphone made the announcement that a new Seahawk was taking the field, Curry started hustling towards the LBs, and everyone gave him a standing ovation.
"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."
by Fearless Frog on Aug 8, 2009 10:00 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Also, Carlson was giving out autographs?
I didn’t see him. Must have missed him.
"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."
by Fearless Frog on Aug 8, 2009 10:01 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I usually hate these huge contracts
but I just don’t care anymore. I whined about Trufant getting paid, and he got paid anyway. I didn’t like Leroy Hill getting paid as he did, but he got paid anyway. I’m not going to bother whining about Curry. He’s overpaid. So are a ton of NFL players.
I’m just going to sit back and enjoy watching this guy. I hope he turns out to be everything he looks like he could be on film.
Go for it Curry. Don’t worry about living up to your contract. Just play the best football you can and you’ll probably end up outplaying your contracts.
Glad to have this guy on my team. Now let’s see what he can do.
by ASeahawkfan on Aug 8, 2009 9:35 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
It's "y'all", not "you'all".
Unless you meant “You All Will”, in which case it should be “y’all’l”.
What? There’s just too much unabated good feeling in this post for the likes of me.
by Groundhog on Aug 8, 2009 10:39 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Money. Well. Spent.
You get pocket aces, you don’t walk ’em. If we get cracked so be it.
by shams on Aug 8, 2009 11:49 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Damn, are they going to have any $$ left for next year's top-5 pick?
Regardless, let the destruction of our enemies begin!
by Jo-Jo on Aug 9, 2009 8:56 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
How is this going to be structured?
I am guessing like Leroy Hill and Nate Burleson, a great portion is going to be over the last two years, and the others will be reasonably priced, but I hope we see the final structure at some point.
Found something interesting while I looked through the articles.
“We were adamant on the length of the deal,” Ruskell said after watching Curry take part in Saturday afternoon’s practice. "That isn’t the way the other deals were going. Once that was accepted, I think that was the turning point.
“These deals are so big that we just felt we’d get as much time as we can, have him be a Seahawk for a long time.”
In exchange for the extra year and a lower annual average than No. 5 pick Mark Sanchez, Curry accepted the most guaranteed money of any rookie first-round pick this season other than No. 1 pick Matt Stafford ($41 million).
Here’s a comparison of all the first-round signings to date.
Ruskell can say what he wants and ask us to believe it, but it is the only other 6 year deal besides Stafford, and a significant step down in money per year from both Tyson Jackson and Sanchez, so I can’t really fault him for his thought process or his results. I’m getting that info from both what he said and the link in the article to all first round contracts.
by cashless on Aug 9, 2009 10:12 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Curry's Contract
Anybody got any further breakdown?
by 008klm on Aug 9, 2009 4:51 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
No financial details released that I could find.
I’m guessing that it might take us some time, besides finding out his current cap hit.
by cashless on Aug 9, 2009 5:19 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
$60 million for the #4 pick
What a douchebag. ;-)
by Brendan Scolari on Aug 9, 2009 5:57 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I know, really.
How’s it feel to not have your rookie in camp? What a greedy bastard that Crabtree. ;-)
by cashless on Aug 9, 2009 5:59 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
What do you mean "your rookie"?
The Niners are gonna lose his rights after he sits out this year (unless they want to draft him in the 6th next year).
by ninjasocks on Aug 9, 2009 6:37 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Relax
Next year, when he gets drafted in the 5th and is fighting for a roster spot behind Chris Henry, you’re not going to be feeling the loss as much.
j/k
by ninjasocks on Aug 9, 2009 10:27 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 



















